The Experts below are selected from a list of 6 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Günter Krause - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Wolfgang Harich and Friedrich Nietzsche — A Chapter of the East German Nietzsche Debate
    Friedrich Nietzsche (1844–1900), 2020
    Co-Authors: Günter Krause
    Abstract:

    The paper analyzes the reception of Friedrich Nietzsche in the work of Wolfgang Harich who was one of the most famous philosophers and political thinkers of the GDR. It is discussed the approaches of Harich to the philosopher from Rocken and argued that Harich’s main approach to Nietzsche was characterized by an ideological concept of an enemy. Its hard core was to present Friedrich Nietzsche as the most Eminent Creator of the Nazi ideology. The paper shows that Wolfgang Harich’s treatment of Nietzsche was very strongly influenced by the Hungarian Marxist philosopher Georg Lukacs and his concept of the late bourgeois philosophy.

Kevin Simpson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • The Psychology of Creativity and Genius: Reflections on Shakespeare and the Oxfordian Challenge
    Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 2004
    Co-Authors: Kevin Simpson
    Abstract:

    The manifestation of genius evident in the creative endeavors of those in artistic and scientific professions has long-held the imagination of scholars interested in delving into causal origins of such brilliance. Until recently, the specific contribution of the social sciences to resolution of the authorship question has been relatively muted outside of personality analyses and interpretive suppositions. The predictive potential of psychological research to point to the most likely author of the works attributed to William Shakespeare is substantial, though admittedly difficult. The present inquiry will attempt to outline critical elements of the broad, extant empirical literature on the individual aspects of creative eminence and genius. Following these findings will be biographical correlates that appear in the life and works of Edward de Vere, the writer that an increasing number of scholars and observers suggest is the true author of the Shakespeare canon. A natural starting point for such an assessment requires a working definition of what is considered to be exceptional creativity. Genius and the process of genius, often referred to as creativity, are usually attributed to the effortful products of an individual that reflect a domain-specific expertise, originality of thought, substantial social recognition, the acknowledgement of a consensus of expert peers and a superiority of accomplishment that may or may not be recognized in one's lifetime (Csikszentmihalyi, 1999; Gardner, 1993; Simonton, 1999). Contemporary researchers also note that genius appears to be a function of the complex interaction between genetic predisposition, environment, personality factors, and tenacious, hard work that eventually culminates in exceptional achievement (Howe, 1999; Simonton, 1999). Individual Determinants of Creative Genius Contemporary predictors and characteristics of creative genius, while contrasted by notable exceptions in the biographies of many Eminent historical figures, appear to follow a reliable pattern. In a comprehensive review of research, Simonton (1999) notes that the typical creative genius regularly seeks out complexity and novelty across a wide range of interests while remaining independent, autonomous, and non-conforming in personal and professional endeavors. Within this profile, there is also a tendency toward introversion, a strong tolerance for ambiguity, an openness to diverse experiences, and a persistent, uncompromising passion and commitment to work that often results in estrangement from significant others. These individuals also appear to others to be unconventional, rebellious, and boundless in their energy for particular projects and activities. Despite any barriers that may arise in their work, these Eminent persons usually persevere while remaining flexible enough to alter and adapt their methods when dealing with repeated failure. Lastly, a rather unique cognitive ability, defocused attention (Csikszentmihalyi, 1996; Simonton, 1999), has been observed in creative geniuses, a hallmark trait that means that multiple ideas can be held at one time for simultaneous processing, which no doubt proves to be a profound benefit to the individual making groundbreaking intellectual or artistic advances. In recent years, one of the more robust and important investigations of genius was completed by academic psychiatrist Arnold Ludwig (1992; 1995). His research of over 1000 Eminent personalities, whose biographies were reviewed over a 30-year span in the New York Times Book Review, comprehensively answers the question: What distinguishes the exceptional Creator from the average? Ludwig (1995) summarizes his data in the following list of attributes that he believes capture the benefits and liabilities of creative greatness. This "template for greatness" (Ludwig, 1995) predicts that the Eminent individual will possess: * An innate ability or precociousness, tempered by suitable education and/or training * The "right" kind of parents and family resources * A certain irreverence toward authority * Self-sufficiency and independence * Sense of physical vulnerability * Existence of psychological "unease" * Works or creative products that bear a personal seal * Striving for dominance or power Simonton (1994; 1999) adds that the total lifetime productivity of the Eminent Creator is the best behavioral predictor of genius even when there are differences in how this productivity may be shaped by differing domains (e. …