The Experts below are selected from a list of 291 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Simon J. T. Pollard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Scientific commentary: Strategic Analysis of environmental policy risks--heat maps, risk futures and the character of environmental harm.
The Science of the total environment, 2013Co-Authors: George Prpich, Jérôme Dagonneau, Sophie A. Rocks, Fiona A. Lickorish, Simon J. T. PollardAbstract:We summarise our recent efforts on the policy-level risk appraisal of environmental risks. These have necessitated working closely with policy teams and a requirement to maintain crisp and accessible messages for policy audiences. Our comparative Analysis uses heat maps, supplemented with risk narratives, and employs the multidimensional character of risks to inform debates on the management of current residual risk and future threats. The policy research and Ensuing Analysis raises core issues about how comparative risk analyses are used by policy audiences, their validation and future developments that are discussed in the commentary below.
Geoffrey Elliott - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Whose Quality Is It, Anyway?
Quality Assurance in Education, 1993Co-Authors: Geoffrey ElliottAbstract:Suggests that, in order to move beyond the rhetoric of quality debates at the levels of educational policy and implementation, it is necessary to ascertain what conceptual frameworks are in use by those who use the term. This task is significant, since the new further education funding council now requires formal quality assurance systems to be in place in each college. Describes quality models in use, and in the Ensuing Analysis concentrates on exploring the focus and range of quality systems. Argues that, since the issue of quality assurance bears on wider debates about institutional autonomy and academic freedom, it is important to be clear about both terminology and theoretical assumptions, since these notions constitute major ideological battlegrounds. A vital distinction to be made is between quality as a system and quality as interpreted and understood by practitioners′ multiple perspectives.
George Prpich - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Scientific commentary: Strategic Analysis of environmental policy risks--heat maps, risk futures and the character of environmental harm.
The Science of the total environment, 2013Co-Authors: George Prpich, Jérôme Dagonneau, Sophie A. Rocks, Fiona A. Lickorish, Simon J. T. PollardAbstract:We summarise our recent efforts on the policy-level risk appraisal of environmental risks. These have necessitated working closely with policy teams and a requirement to maintain crisp and accessible messages for policy audiences. Our comparative Analysis uses heat maps, supplemented with risk narratives, and employs the multidimensional character of risks to inform debates on the management of current residual risk and future threats. The policy research and Ensuing Analysis raises core issues about how comparative risk analyses are used by policy audiences, their validation and future developments that are discussed in the commentary below.
Fiona A. Lickorish - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Scientific commentary: Strategic Analysis of environmental policy risks--heat maps, risk futures and the character of environmental harm.
The Science of the total environment, 2013Co-Authors: George Prpich, Jérôme Dagonneau, Sophie A. Rocks, Fiona A. Lickorish, Simon J. T. PollardAbstract:We summarise our recent efforts on the policy-level risk appraisal of environmental risks. These have necessitated working closely with policy teams and a requirement to maintain crisp and accessible messages for policy audiences. Our comparative Analysis uses heat maps, supplemented with risk narratives, and employs the multidimensional character of risks to inform debates on the management of current residual risk and future threats. The policy research and Ensuing Analysis raises core issues about how comparative risk analyses are used by policy audiences, their validation and future developments that are discussed in the commentary below.
Sophie A. Rocks - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Scientific commentary: Strategic Analysis of environmental policy risks--heat maps, risk futures and the character of environmental harm.
The Science of the total environment, 2013Co-Authors: George Prpich, Jérôme Dagonneau, Sophie A. Rocks, Fiona A. Lickorish, Simon J. T. PollardAbstract:We summarise our recent efforts on the policy-level risk appraisal of environmental risks. These have necessitated working closely with policy teams and a requirement to maintain crisp and accessible messages for policy audiences. Our comparative Analysis uses heat maps, supplemented with risk narratives, and employs the multidimensional character of risks to inform debates on the management of current residual risk and future threats. The policy research and Ensuing Analysis raises core issues about how comparative risk analyses are used by policy audiences, their validation and future developments that are discussed in the commentary below.