The Experts below are selected from a list of 36 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Reshma Amin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parental perceptions of quality of life in children on long term ventilation at home as compared to Enterostomy Tubes
PLOS ONE, 2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni G Narayanan, Theo J Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Objective Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube.
-
Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
-
Parental Perceptions of Quality of Life in Children on Long-Term Ventilation at Home as Compared to Enterostomy Tubes.
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2026Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:OBJECTIVE:Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube. STUDY DESIGN:Participants were divided into three groups: 1) LTHV without an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV cohort); 2) Enterostomy Tube (GT cohort); 3) LTHV with an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT cohort). Caregivers of children ≥ 5 years and followed at SickKids, Toronto, Canada, completed three questionnaires: Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3), Caregiver Priorities Caregiver Health Index (CPCHILD), and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The primary outcome was the difference in utility (HUI2/3) scores between the cohorts. RESULTS:One hundred and nineteen children were enrolled; 47 in the LTHV cohort, 44 in the GT cohort, and 28 in the LTHV+GT cohort. In univariate analysis, HUI2 mean (SE) scores were lowest for the GT cohort, 0.4 (0.04) followed by the LTHV+GT, 0.42 (0.05) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.7 (0.04), p = 0.001. A similar trend was seen for the HUI3 mean (SE) scores: GT cohort, 0.1 (0.06), followed by the LTHV +GT cohort, 0.2 (0.08) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.5 (0.06), p = 0.0001. Technology cohort, nursing hours and the severity of health care needs predicted HRQL as measured by the HUI2/3. CONCLUSION:The HRQL of these children is low. Children on LTHV had higher HRQL than children using Enterostomy Tubes. Further work is needed to identify modifiable factors that can improve HRQL
Brahim Redouane - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parental perceptions of quality of life in children on long term ventilation at home as compared to Enterostomy Tubes
PLOS ONE, 2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni G Narayanan, Theo J Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Objective Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube.
-
Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
-
Parental Perceptions of Quality of Life in Children on Long-Term Ventilation at Home as Compared to Enterostomy Tubes.
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2026Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:OBJECTIVE:Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube. STUDY DESIGN:Participants were divided into three groups: 1) LTHV without an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV cohort); 2) Enterostomy Tube (GT cohort); 3) LTHV with an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT cohort). Caregivers of children ≥ 5 years and followed at SickKids, Toronto, Canada, completed three questionnaires: Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3), Caregiver Priorities Caregiver Health Index (CPCHILD), and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The primary outcome was the difference in utility (HUI2/3) scores between the cohorts. RESULTS:One hundred and nineteen children were enrolled; 47 in the LTHV cohort, 44 in the GT cohort, and 28 in the LTHV+GT cohort. In univariate analysis, HUI2 mean (SE) scores were lowest for the GT cohort, 0.4 (0.04) followed by the LTHV+GT, 0.42 (0.05) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.7 (0.04), p = 0.001. A similar trend was seen for the HUI3 mean (SE) scores: GT cohort, 0.1 (0.06), followed by the LTHV +GT cohort, 0.2 (0.08) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.5 (0.06), p = 0.0001. Technology cohort, nursing hours and the severity of health care needs predicted HRQL as measured by the HUI2/3. CONCLUSION:The HRQL of these children is low. Children on LTHV had higher HRQL than children using Enterostomy Tubes. Further work is needed to identify modifiable factors that can improve HRQL
Derek Stephens - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parental perceptions of quality of life in children on long term ventilation at home as compared to Enterostomy Tubes
PLOS ONE, 2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni G Narayanan, Theo J Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Objective Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube.
-
Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
-
Parental Perceptions of Quality of Life in Children on Long-Term Ventilation at Home as Compared to Enterostomy Tubes.
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2026Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:OBJECTIVE:Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube. STUDY DESIGN:Participants were divided into three groups: 1) LTHV without an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV cohort); 2) Enterostomy Tube (GT cohort); 3) LTHV with an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT cohort). Caregivers of children ≥ 5 years and followed at SickKids, Toronto, Canada, completed three questionnaires: Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3), Caregiver Priorities Caregiver Health Index (CPCHILD), and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The primary outcome was the difference in utility (HUI2/3) scores between the cohorts. RESULTS:One hundred and nineteen children were enrolled; 47 in the LTHV cohort, 44 in the GT cohort, and 28 in the LTHV+GT cohort. In univariate analysis, HUI2 mean (SE) scores were lowest for the GT cohort, 0.4 (0.04) followed by the LTHV+GT, 0.42 (0.05) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.7 (0.04), p = 0.001. A similar trend was seen for the HUI3 mean (SE) scores: GT cohort, 0.1 (0.06), followed by the LTHV +GT cohort, 0.2 (0.08) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.5 (0.06), p = 0.0001. Technology cohort, nursing hours and the severity of health care needs predicted HRQL as measured by the HUI2/3. CONCLUSION:The HRQL of these children is low. Children on LTHV had higher HRQL than children using Enterostomy Tubes. Further work is needed to identify modifiable factors that can improve HRQL
Marialena Mouzaki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parental perceptions of quality of life in children on long term ventilation at home as compared to Enterostomy Tubes
PLOS ONE, 2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni G Narayanan, Theo J Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Objective Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube.
-
Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
-
Parental Perceptions of Quality of Life in Children on Long-Term Ventilation at Home as Compared to Enterostomy Tubes.
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2026Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:OBJECTIVE:Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube. STUDY DESIGN:Participants were divided into three groups: 1) LTHV without an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV cohort); 2) Enterostomy Tube (GT cohort); 3) LTHV with an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT cohort). Caregivers of children ≥ 5 years and followed at SickKids, Toronto, Canada, completed three questionnaires: Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3), Caregiver Priorities Caregiver Health Index (CPCHILD), and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The primary outcome was the difference in utility (HUI2/3) scores between the cohorts. RESULTS:One hundred and nineteen children were enrolled; 47 in the LTHV cohort, 44 in the GT cohort, and 28 in the LTHV+GT cohort. In univariate analysis, HUI2 mean (SE) scores were lowest for the GT cohort, 0.4 (0.04) followed by the LTHV+GT, 0.42 (0.05) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.7 (0.04), p = 0.001. A similar trend was seen for the HUI3 mean (SE) scores: GT cohort, 0.1 (0.06), followed by the LTHV +GT cohort, 0.2 (0.08) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.5 (0.06), p = 0.0001. Technology cohort, nursing hours and the severity of health care needs predicted HRQL as measured by the HUI2/3. CONCLUSION:The HRQL of these children is low. Children on LTHV had higher HRQL than children using Enterostomy Tubes. Further work is needed to identify modifiable factors that can improve HRQL
Krista Keilty - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
parental perceptions of quality of life in children on long term ventilation at home as compared to Enterostomy Tubes
PLOS ONE, 2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni G Narayanan, Theo J Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Objective Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube.
-
Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
2016Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:Baseline Demographics of the Three Study Cohorts: Enterostomy Tube (GT), Long-term home ventilation and Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT) and Long-term home ventilation (LTHV).
-
Parental Perceptions of Quality of Life in Children on Long-Term Ventilation at Home as Compared to Enterostomy Tubes.
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2026Co-Authors: Brahim Redouane, Eyal Cohen, Derek Stephens, Krista Keilty, Marialena Mouzaki, Unni Narayanan, Theo Moraes, Reshma AminAbstract:OBJECTIVE:Health related quality of life (HRQL) of children using medical technology at home is largely unknown. Our aim was to examine the HRQL in children on long-term ventilation at home (LTHV) in comparison to a cohort using an Enterostomy Tube. STUDY DESIGN:Participants were divided into three groups: 1) LTHV without an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV cohort); 2) Enterostomy Tube (GT cohort); 3) LTHV with an Enterostomy Tube (LTHV+GT cohort). Caregivers of children ≥ 5 years and followed at SickKids, Toronto, Canada, completed three questionnaires: Health Utilities Index 2/3 (HUI2/3), Caregiver Priorities Caregiver Health Index (CPCHILD), and the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). The primary outcome was the difference in utility (HUI2/3) scores between the cohorts. RESULTS:One hundred and nineteen children were enrolled; 47 in the LTHV cohort, 44 in the GT cohort, and 28 in the LTHV+GT cohort. In univariate analysis, HUI2 mean (SE) scores were lowest for the GT cohort, 0.4 (0.04) followed by the LTHV+GT, 0.42 (0.05) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.7 (0.04), p = 0.001. A similar trend was seen for the HUI3 mean (SE) scores: GT cohort, 0.1 (0.06), followed by the LTHV +GT cohort, 0.2 (0.08) and then the LTHV cohort, 0.5 (0.06), p = 0.0001. Technology cohort, nursing hours and the severity of health care needs predicted HRQL as measured by the HUI2/3. CONCLUSION:The HRQL of these children is low. Children on LTHV had higher HRQL than children using Enterostomy Tubes. Further work is needed to identify modifiable factors that can improve HRQL