The Experts below are selected from a list of 514239 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Srinivasa Rao Idapalapati - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Towards the Fairest Teacher Evaluation Model
World Journal of Educational Research, 2019Co-Authors: Srinivasa Rao IdapalapatiAbstract:This study examines the fairness and reliability of the current teacher Evaluation Models as they are reflected in the existent literature of Evaluation methods. The required data for the study are gathered from online sources. Twenty-five scholarly works on the current Evaluation methods are considered for the study after a careful examination of about hundred relevant works. A qualitative analysis of the data gathered is done in light of cognitive bias theory in order to find out the major strengths and drawbacks in the Models. The strengths and the drawbacks in the existent Models are codified separately in the order of their occurrence in the chosen articles and brought all of them under two criteria of strengths and three criteria of drawbacks. The final set of strengths and drawbacks were analyzed quantitatively to draw inferences that are used in making recommendations for creating fairer, reliable and efficient teacher Evaluation Models.
Richard C. Lamming - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Supply relationship Evaluation:: The relationship assessment process (RAP) and beyond
European Management Journal, 2008Co-Authors: Thomas Johnsen, Rhona Johnsen, Richard C. LammingAbstract:In this article we argue that the common purchasing and supply management practice of evaluating supplier performance may be inappropriate in situations of supply partnerships, as it focuses on evaluating the performance of the supplier rather than the supply relationship. We explore a conceptual framework for supply relationship Evaluation, discussing lessons from past attempts to develop relationship Evaluation Models, focusing particularly on the so-called Relationship Assessment Process (RAP) model (Lamming et al., 1996). The article critically evaluates the RAP model, discussing experiences of implementation from 1995 onwards. Building on the reflections on RAP, we propose a new conceptual framework for supply relationship Evaluation. This is constructed on the basis of a synthesis of literatures grounded predominantly in industrial marketing and purchasing (IMP), and purchasing and supply management (PSM) research, and thus adopts a network rather than a dyadic perspective on relationship Evaluation. We conclude by discussing the implications of the proposed framework.
Li D. Xu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Decision support for fuzzy comprehensive Evaluation of urban development
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1999Co-Authors: Shan Feng, Li D. XuAbstract:Urban development often impacts the economic development pattern and the spacial distribution of resource allocation of a particular area. Urban development can be conceptualized as a multicriteria decision-making problem; therefore, multicriteria Evaluation has been used to trace the trend of urban development. In this paper, a fuzzy multicriteria Evaluation model is developed to study the trend of urban development. First, a multilayer Evaluation index system is presented; it is used to conduct horizontal analysis on urban systems. Second, a fuzzy, multicriteria, multilayer Evaluation model is proposed. Third, the detailed modeling aspects are discussed which include the fuzzy Evaluation Models under different Evaluation rules, the methods used to determine the weights of criteria, and the determination of the membership grades of Evaluation matrix. The model has been implemented and the application results indicate that the proposed model is able to represent those important factors affecting urban development layer-by-layer and stage-by-stage.
Thomas Johnsen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Supply relationship Evaluation:: The relationship assessment process (RAP) and beyond
European Management Journal, 2008Co-Authors: Thomas Johnsen, Rhona Johnsen, Richard C. LammingAbstract:In this article we argue that the common purchasing and supply management practice of evaluating supplier performance may be inappropriate in situations of supply partnerships, as it focuses on evaluating the performance of the supplier rather than the supply relationship. We explore a conceptual framework for supply relationship Evaluation, discussing lessons from past attempts to develop relationship Evaluation Models, focusing particularly on the so-called Relationship Assessment Process (RAP) model (Lamming et al., 1996). The article critically evaluates the RAP model, discussing experiences of implementation from 1995 onwards. Building on the reflections on RAP, we propose a new conceptual framework for supply relationship Evaluation. This is constructed on the basis of a synthesis of literatures grounded predominantly in industrial marketing and purchasing (IMP), and purchasing and supply management (PSM) research, and thus adopts a network rather than a dyadic perspective on relationship Evaluation. We conclude by discussing the implications of the proposed framework.
Daniel L. Stufflebeam - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Evaluation Models viewpoints on educational and human services Evaluation
2000Co-Authors: George F Madaus, Michael Scriven, Daniel L. StufflebeamAbstract:Foreword. Preface. I: Program Evaluation: An Introduction. 1. Program Evaluation: An Historical Overview G.F. Madaus, D.L. Stufflebeam. 2. Models, Metaphors, and Definitions of Evaluation G.F. Madaus, T. Kellaghan. 3. Foundational Models for 21st Century Program Evaluation D.L. Stufflebeam. II: Questions/Methods-Oriented Models. 4. A Rationale for Program Evaluation R.W. Tyler. 5. Outcome Evaluation T. Kellaghan, G.F. Madaus. 6. The Role of Testing in Evaluations G.F. Madaus, et al. 7. The Discrepancy Evaluation Model A. Steinmetz. 8. The Role of Field Trials in Evaluating School Practices: A Rare Design B. Nave, et al. 9. Cost Analysis for Improved Educational Policymaking and Evaluation M.C. Tsang. 10. The Clarification Hearing: A Personal View of the Process G.F. Madaus. 11. Case Study Evaluations: A Decade of Progress R.K. Yin. 12. Educational Criticism as a Form of Qualitative Enquiry D.J. Flinders, E.W. Eisner. 13. Program Theory: Not Whether Programs Work, But How They Work P.J. Rogers. III: Improvement/Accountability-Oriented Evaluation. 14. Course Improvement Through Evaluation L.J. Cronbach. 15. Evaluation Ideologies M. Scriven. 16. The CIPP Model for Evaluation D.L. Stufflebeam. 17. Accountability: Implications for State and Local Policymakers M.W. Kirst. IV: Social Agenda-Directed (Advocacy) Models. 18. Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation R.E. Stake. 19. Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry E.G. Guba, Y.S. Lincoln. 20. Developing Discourses on Evaluation H.S. Bhola. 21. Steps of Empowerment Evaluation: From California to Cape Town D.M. Fetterman. 22. Deliberative Democratic Evaluation in Practice E.R. House, K.R. Howe. V: Overarching Matters. 23. Utilization-Focused Evaluation M.Q. Patton. 24. Professional Standards and Principles for Evaluation D.L. Stufflebeam. 25. The Methodology of MetaEvaluation D.L. Stufflebeam. References.
-
Models for Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation, 1995Co-Authors: Anthony J. Shinkfield, Daniel L. StufflebeamAbstract:The purpose of this Preamble, and of Part 4, is to give an overview of teacher Evaluation Models and to present a range of Models that either are widely used or are likely to be increasingly influential because of their practical and unique characteristics.
