Experimental Trial

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 127788 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Steven R Passmore - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • anatomically remote muscle contraction facilitates patellar tendon reflex reinforcement while mental activity does not a within participants Experimental Trial
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 2012
    Co-Authors: Steven R Passmore, Paul Bruno
    Abstract:

    The Jendrassik maneuver (JM) is a remote facilitation muscular contraction shown to affect amplitude and temporal components of the human stretch reflex. Conflicting theoretical models exist regarding the neurological mechanism related to its ability to reinforce reflex parameters. One mechanism involves the gamma motoneurons of the fusimotor system, which are subject to both physical and mental activity. A second mechanism describes reduced alpha motoneuron presynaptic inhibition, which is not subject to mental activity. In the current study, we determined if mental activity could be used to create a reflex facilitation comparable to a remote muscle contraction. Using a within-participants design, we investigated the relative effect of the JM and a successfully employed mental task (Stroop task) on the amplitude and temporal components of the patellar tendon reflex. We found that the addition of mental activity had no influence on the patellar tendon reflex parameters measured, while the JM provided facilitation (increased reflex amplitude, decreased total reflex time). The findings from this study support the view that the mechanism for the JM is a reduction in presynaptic inhibition of alpha motoneurons as it is influenced by physical and not mental activity.

Paul Bruno - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • anatomically remote muscle contraction facilitates patellar tendon reflex reinforcement while mental activity does not a within participants Experimental Trial
    Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 2012
    Co-Authors: Steven R Passmore, Paul Bruno
    Abstract:

    The Jendrassik maneuver (JM) is a remote facilitation muscular contraction shown to affect amplitude and temporal components of the human stretch reflex. Conflicting theoretical models exist regarding the neurological mechanism related to its ability to reinforce reflex parameters. One mechanism involves the gamma motoneurons of the fusimotor system, which are subject to both physical and mental activity. A second mechanism describes reduced alpha motoneuron presynaptic inhibition, which is not subject to mental activity. In the current study, we determined if mental activity could be used to create a reflex facilitation comparable to a remote muscle contraction. Using a within-participants design, we investigated the relative effect of the JM and a successfully employed mental task (Stroop task) on the amplitude and temporal components of the patellar tendon reflex. We found that the addition of mental activity had no influence on the patellar tendon reflex parameters measured, while the JM provided facilitation (increased reflex amplitude, decreased total reflex time). The findings from this study support the view that the mechanism for the JM is a reduction in presynaptic inhibition of alpha motoneurons as it is influenced by physical and not mental activity.

Ferenc Petak - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • reversing cholinergic bronchoconstriction by common inotropic agents a randomized Experimental Trial on isolated perfused rat lungs
    Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2019
    Co-Authors: Gergely H Fodor, Sam Bayat, Barna Babik, Walid Habre, Ferenc Petak
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND The ability of inotropic agents to alter airway reactivity and lung tissue mechanics has not been compared in a well-controlled Experimental model. Therefore, we compared the potential to alter lung tissue viscoelasticity and bronchodilator effects of commonly used inotropic agents in an isolated perfused rat lung model. METHODS After achieving steady state lung perfusion, sustained bronchoconstriction was induced by acetylcholine (ACh). Isolated rat lungs were then randomly allocated to 6 groups treated with either saline vehicle (n = 8) or incremental concentrations of inotropes (adrenaline, n = 8; dopamine, n = 7; dobutamine, n = 7; milrinone, n = 8; or levosimendan, n = 6) added to the whole-blood perfusate. Airway resistance (Raw), lung tissue damping (G), and elastance were measured under baseline conditions, during steady-state ACh-induced constriction and for each inotrope dose. RESULTS No change in Raw was observed after addition of the saline vehicle. Raw was significantly lower after addition of dopamine (maximum difference [95% CI] of 29 [12-46]% relative to the saline control, P = .004), levosimendan (58 [39-77]%, P < .001), and adrenaline (37 [21-53]%, P < .001), whereas no significant differences were observed at any dose of milrinone (5 [-12 to 22]%) and dobutamine (4 [-13 to 21]%). Lung tissue damping (G) was lower in animals receiving the highest doses of adrenaline (difference: 22 [7-37]%, P = .015), dobutamine (20 [5-35]%, P = .024), milrinone (20 [6-34]%, P = .026), and levosimendan (36 [19-53]%, P < .001) than in controls. CONCLUSIONS Although dobutamine and milrinone did not reduce cholinergic bronchoconstriction, they reversed the ACh-induced elevations in lung tissue resistance. In contrast, adrenaline, dopamine, and levosimendan exhibited both potent bronchodilatory action against ACh and diminished lung tissue damping. Further work is needed to determine whether these effects are clinically relevant in humans.

Carole J Broderick - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs an Experimental Trial of the steps to respect program
    Developmental Psychology, 2005
    Co-Authors: Karin S Frey, Miriam K Hirschstein, Jennie L Snell, Leihua Van Schoiack Edstrom, Elizabeth P Mackenzie, Carole J Broderick
    Abstract:

    Committee for Children Six schools were randomly assigned to a multilevel bullying intervention or a control condition. Children in Grades 3–6 (N 1,023) completed pre- and posttest surveys of behaviors and beliefs and were rated by teachers. Observers coded playground behavior of a random subsample (n 544). Hierarchical analyses of changes in playground behavior revealed declines in bullying and argumentative behavior among intervention-group children relative to control-group children, increases in agreeable interactions, and a trend toward reduced destructive bystander behavior. Those in the intervention group reported enhanced bystander responsibility, greater perceived adult responsiveness, and less acceptance of bullying/aggression than those in the control group. Self-reported aggression did not differ between the groups. Implications for future research on the development and prevention of bullying are discussed.

  • reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs an Experimental Trial of the steps to respect program
    Developmental Psychology, 2005
    Co-Authors: Karin S Frey, Miriam K Hirschstein, Jennie L Snell, Elizabeth P Mackenzie, Leihua Van Schoiack Edstrom, Carole J Broderick
    Abstract:

    Six schools were randomly assigned to a multilevel bullying intervention or a control condition. Children in Grades 3-6 (N=1,023) completed pre- and posttest surveys of behaviors and beliefs and were rated by teachers. Observers coded playground behavior of a random subsample (n=544). Hierarchical analyses of changes in playground behavior revealed declines in bullying and argumentative behavior among intervention-group children relative to control-group children, increases in agreeable interactions, and a trend toward reduced destructive bystander behavior. Those in the intervention group reported enhanced bystander responsibility, greater perceived adult responsiveness, and less acceptance of bullying/aggression than those in the control group. Self-reported aggression did not differ between the groups. Implications for future research on the development and prevention of bullying are discussed.

Gergely H Fodor - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • reversing cholinergic bronchoconstriction by common inotropic agents a randomized Experimental Trial on isolated perfused rat lungs
    Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2019
    Co-Authors: Gergely H Fodor, Sam Bayat, Barna Babik, Walid Habre, Ferenc Petak
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND The ability of inotropic agents to alter airway reactivity and lung tissue mechanics has not been compared in a well-controlled Experimental model. Therefore, we compared the potential to alter lung tissue viscoelasticity and bronchodilator effects of commonly used inotropic agents in an isolated perfused rat lung model. METHODS After achieving steady state lung perfusion, sustained bronchoconstriction was induced by acetylcholine (ACh). Isolated rat lungs were then randomly allocated to 6 groups treated with either saline vehicle (n = 8) or incremental concentrations of inotropes (adrenaline, n = 8; dopamine, n = 7; dobutamine, n = 7; milrinone, n = 8; or levosimendan, n = 6) added to the whole-blood perfusate. Airway resistance (Raw), lung tissue damping (G), and elastance were measured under baseline conditions, during steady-state ACh-induced constriction and for each inotrope dose. RESULTS No change in Raw was observed after addition of the saline vehicle. Raw was significantly lower after addition of dopamine (maximum difference [95% CI] of 29 [12-46]% relative to the saline control, P = .004), levosimendan (58 [39-77]%, P < .001), and adrenaline (37 [21-53]%, P < .001), whereas no significant differences were observed at any dose of milrinone (5 [-12 to 22]%) and dobutamine (4 [-13 to 21]%). Lung tissue damping (G) was lower in animals receiving the highest doses of adrenaline (difference: 22 [7-37]%, P = .015), dobutamine (20 [5-35]%, P = .024), milrinone (20 [6-34]%, P = .026), and levosimendan (36 [19-53]%, P < .001) than in controls. CONCLUSIONS Although dobutamine and milrinone did not reduce cholinergic bronchoconstriction, they reversed the ACh-induced elevations in lung tissue resistance. In contrast, adrenaline, dopamine, and levosimendan exhibited both potent bronchodilatory action against ACh and diminished lung tissue damping. Further work is needed to determine whether these effects are clinically relevant in humans.