Faulty Design

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 11262 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Charles H Andrus - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Faulty Design resulting in temporary pacemaker failure
    Chest, 2001
    Co-Authors: Bruce Kleinman, Margaret Baumann, Charles H Andrus
    Abstract:

    A 77-year-old man became asystolic 3 days after aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery. A dual-chamber temporary pacemaker generator was turned on but failed to discharge; instead, an obscure error message appeared on the liquid crystal display of the pacemaker. The intensive-care nurses and physicians were unable to activate the pacemaker. We describe the pacemaker Design that led to this instance of pacemaker failure. This case is important because it illustrates how a medical equipment Design flaw can turn a human error into a potentially catastrophic event.

Bruce Kleinman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Faulty Design resulting in temporary pacemaker failure
    Chest, 2001
    Co-Authors: Bruce Kleinman, Margaret Baumann, Charles H Andrus
    Abstract:

    A 77-year-old man became asystolic 3 days after aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery. A dual-chamber temporary pacemaker generator was turned on but failed to discharge; instead, an obscure error message appeared on the liquid crystal display of the pacemaker. The intensive-care nurses and physicians were unable to activate the pacemaker. We describe the pacemaker Design that led to this instance of pacemaker failure. This case is important because it illustrates how a medical equipment Design flaw can turn a human error into a potentially catastrophic event.

Ohm, Julie Marie - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Consequences of small leaks in wellhead system
    University of Stavanger Norway, 2013
    Co-Authors: Ohm, Julie Marie
    Abstract:

    An increased frequency of minor gas leakages from seals in the wellhead (WH) area have been detected and recently given an increased focus among companies on the Norwegian continental shelf. Among others have Statoil and Shell reported concerns regarding this problem and are working simultaneously to identify and solve the problem. There is however uncertainties in the industry related to how the problem regarding leakages in the WH can be solved, how critical the leakages actually are, the extend of the problem, and whether test of the seals actually can trigger a leakage itself or not. Questions regarding whether the seals should be tested on a general basis and regarding specific maintenance plans for the seals have been raised. It has not been a common practice over the last years to test the seals in the WH after installation. It is therefore difficult to evaluate the extent of this problem as very limited test data exist. In addition, integrity issues in connection to the small cavities in the WH do often show unambiguous test results. Three case studies of three wells at the Oseberg East installation (Statoil) will be presented in this thesis. The case studies have been carried out with the use of the exclusion methods, analysis of pressure and trends, tests results, and simulations of hypothetic scenarios. The main discoveries follow below: It is indicated that the leakages in the seal assemblies in the WH are caused by: • Design capabilities exceeded in operation • Unsuccessful conversion of producers with an inactive A-annulus to producers with gas lift. • Dirt and residual hydraulic oil from installation. • Problems related to vibration • Pressure tests of the DHSV • Faulty Design of WH A review of the barriers on the wells concludes that the wells have in the first place two independent barriers that are possible to test. An additional third barrier gives increased safety against leakages to the atmosphere if seals fail. It is not possible to test the seal in the third barrier without introducing a risk to damage a unidirectional seal in the secondary barrier. It is considered that the frequency of the leakages to the atmosphere is expected to increase with time. It is in particular expected that the total number of leakages will increase through the test ports. The consequences of these leakage rates are considered to be negligible compared with the rates of leakages that are considered to give high risk of explosion and/or fire. The leakages might however be of significant enough size to be detected by the gas-detector and thereby cause the production at the installation to be shut down. The test ports should be monitored and an increased focus on maintenance should be initiated. With these initiatives, leaks to the environment are considered to represent a negligible risk. It is a severe escalation of the leakage to cavities in the wellhead, if the consequence is that the unidirectional seal in the secondary barrier becomes weakened. This danger is reduced by being able to monitor the pressure between the elastomer seal and the unidirectional seal. Examples of recommended compensating measures that will be discussed are: • Pressure monitoring • Use of foam around test plugs • Use of chemical sealant • Evaluate injection of nitrogen to cavities It is recommended to bleed of pressure in the WH cavities before performing test on DHSV or commencement of other well activities. New recommended accept criteria’s in the WH follows: • Operate the well with a 35 bar limit in the cavities • AC. for leakages : o 35 bar/24hr for internal leakages o 0,1 kg/s for leakages to the atmosphere The case studies that have been carried out are related to gas lift wells. There is however indication that minor gas leakages in the WH might exist on other types of wells as well

  • Consequences of small leaks in wellhead system
    University of Stavanger Norway, 2013
    Co-Authors: Ohm, Julie Marie
    Abstract:

    Master's thesis in Petroleum engineeringAn increased frequency of minor gas leakages from seals in the wellhead (WH) area have been detected and recently given an increased focus among companies on the Norwegian continental shelf. Among others have Statoil and Shell reported concerns regarding this problem and are working simultaneously to identify and solve the problem. There is however uncertainties in the industry related to how the problem regarding leakages in the WH can be solved, how critical the leakages actually are, the extend of the problem, and whether test of the seals actually can trigger a leakage itself or not. Questions regarding whether the seals should be tested on a general basis and regarding specific maintenance plans for the seals have been raised. It has not been a common practice over the last years to test the seals in the WH after installation. It is therefore difficult to evaluate the extent of this problem as very limited test data exist. In addition, integrity issues in connection to the small cavities in the WH do often show unambiguous test results. Three case studies of three wells at the Oseberg East installation (Statoil) will be presented in this thesis. The case studies have been carried out with the use of the exclusion methods, analysis of pressure and trends, tests results, and simulations of hypothetic scenarios. The main discoveries follow below: It is indicated that the leakages in the seal assemblies in the WH are caused by: • Design capabilities exceeded in operation • Unsuccessful conversion of producers with an inactive A-annulus to producers with gas lift. • Dirt and residual hydraulic oil from installation. • Problems related to vibration • Pressure tests of the DHSV • Faulty Design of WH A review of the barriers on the wells concludes that the wells have in the first place two independent barriers that are possible to test. An additional third barrier gives increased safety against leakages to the atmosphere if seals fail. It is not possible to test the seal in the third barrier without introducing a risk to damage a unidirectional seal in the secondary barrier. It is considered that the frequency of the leakages to the atmosphere is expected to increase with time. It is in particular expected that the total number of leakages will increase through the test ports. The consequences of these leakage rates are considered to be negligible compared with the rates of leakages that are considered to give high risk of explosion and/or fire. The leakages might however be of significant enough size to be detected by the gas-detector and thereby cause the production at the installation to be shut down. The test ports should be monitored and an increased focus on maintenance should be initiated. With these initiatives, leaks to the environment are considered to represent a negligible risk. It is a severe escalation of the leakage to cavities in the wellhead, if the consequence is that the unidirectional seal in the secondary barrier becomes weakened. This danger is reduced by being able to monitor the pressure between the elastomer seal and the unidirectional seal. Examples of recommended compensating measures that will be discussed are: • Pressure monitoring • Use of foam around test plugs • Use of chemical sealant • Evaluate injection of nitrogen to cavities It is recommended to bleed of pressure in the WH cavities before performing test on DHSV or commencement of other well activities. New recommended accept criteria’s in the WH follows: • Operate the well with a 35 bar limit in the cavities • AC. for leakages : o 35 bar/24hr for internal leakages o 0,1 kg/s for leakages to the atmosphere The case studies that have been carried out are related to gas lift wells. There is however indication that minor gas leakages in the WH might exist on other types of wells as well

Kambiz Ebrahimi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Method for Design and evaluation of ICE exhaust silencers
    2020
    Co-Authors: Ahmed Ahmedov, Nicholas Eavis, Nikolaos Kalantzis, Antonios Pezouvanis, Dave Rogers, Kambiz Ebrahimi
    Abstract:

    The noise levels generated by an unmuffled engine exhaust system can be identified as the loudest vehicle noise source. The muffler or silencer is an essential component of the internal combustion engine exhaust system. Its main function is to reduce the exhaust-generated noise to an acceptably low level. Its Design development is a complex process affecting the engine efficiency and thus fuel consumption, emissions and overall noise generation. This paper focuses on the Design development of a muffler for a single-cylinder engine application. A 1D GT-Power model of a single valve engine was developed. Additionally, an analytical muffler preliminary Design methodology was introduced. The methodology provides guidelines for muffler grade selection, sizing of different components, calculation of backpressure as a function of the exhaust gas flow rate. Two custom mufflers Design concepts were developed for the single-cylinder engine based on the introduced analytical methodology. Two commercial single-cylinder engine muffler Designs available from Yanmar and Loncin were considered for the engine performance evaluation simulation. The presented combination of analytical and numerical modelling procedures can reduce the overall length of the muffler development stage by eliminating Faulty Design concepts and refining the muffler’s performance parameters.

  • Design development and performance evaluation of ICE exhaust silencer
    2018
    Co-Authors: Ahmed Ahmedov, Antonios Pezouvanis, Dave Rogers, Nicholas Beavis, Kambiz Ebrahimi
    Abstract:

    The noise levels generated by an unmuffled engine exhaust system can be identified as the loudest vehicle noise source. The muffler or silencer is an essential component of the internal combustion engine exhaust system, its main function is to reduce the exhaust-generated noise to an acceptably low level. Its Design development is a complex process affecting the engine efficiency and thusfuel consumption, emissions and overall noise generation. This paper focuses on the Design development of a muffler for a single cylinder engine application. A 1D GT-Power model of a single valve engine was developed. Additionally, an analytical muffler preliminary Design methodology was introduced. The methodology provides guidelines for muffler grade selection, sizing of different components, calculation of back pressure as a function of the exhaust gas flow rate. Two custom mufflers Design concepts were developed for the single cylinder engine based on the introduced analytical methodology. Two commercial single cylinder engine muffler Designs available from Yanmar and Loncin were considered for the engine performance evaluation simulation. The presented combination of analytical and numerical modelling procedures can reduce the overall length of the muffler development stage by eliminating Faulty Design concepts and refining the muffler’s performance parameters

Margaret Baumann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Faulty Design resulting in temporary pacemaker failure
    Chest, 2001
    Co-Authors: Bruce Kleinman, Margaret Baumann, Charles H Andrus
    Abstract:

    A 77-year-old man became asystolic 3 days after aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery. A dual-chamber temporary pacemaker generator was turned on but failed to discharge; instead, an obscure error message appeared on the liquid crystal display of the pacemaker. The intensive-care nurses and physicians were unable to activate the pacemaker. We describe the pacemaker Design that led to this instance of pacemaker failure. This case is important because it illustrates how a medical equipment Design flaw can turn a human error into a potentially catastrophic event.