The Experts below are selected from a list of 30741 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Susan Boland - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Research Guides: Advocacy (24 LITG 501): Federal Law Research: Federal Law Webinars
2014Co-Authors: Susan BolandAbstract:This guide is for first year legal research students taking Advocacy and needing to research Federal Law.
-
Research Guides: Advocacy (24 LITG 501): Federal Law Research: More on Federal Law
2014Co-Authors: Susan BolandAbstract:This guide is for first year legal research students taking Advocacy and needing to research Federal Law.
-
Research Guides: Advocacy (24 LITG 501): Federal Law Research: Codes
2014Co-Authors: Susan BolandAbstract:This guide is for first year legal research students taking Advocacy and needing to research Federal Law.
-
Research Guides: Advocacy (24 LITG 501): Federal Law Research: Home
2014Co-Authors: Susan BolandAbstract:This guide is for first year legal research students taking Advocacy and needing to research Federal Law.
-
Research Guides: Advocacy (24 LITG 501): Federal Law Research: Bluebook Citation
2014Co-Authors: Susan BolandAbstract:This guide is for first year legal research students taking Advocacy and needing to research Federal Law.
David K Suska - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the Federal state standing gap how to enforce Federal Law in Federal court without article iii standing
Social Science Research Network, 2017Co-Authors: Peter N Salib, David K SuskaAbstract:You, too, can sue Donald Trump under the Emoluments Clause! Since Inauguration Day several Lawsuits have been filed against President Trump because of his refusal to divest certain assets. They assert that Trump’s business interests conflict with the Emoluments Clause of Article I. That arcane provision forbids certain Federal officials from accepting any perquisite or gain from a foreign monarch or state. The suits contend, for example, that a foreign dignitary’s booking of a room at the Trump International Hotel in Manhattan would constitute an unLawful emolument. Most commentators have thrown cold water on the prospect of any plaintiff prevailing. The trouble, most argue, is that plaintiffs cannot demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury from any putative violation of the Emoluments Clause. In legalese, they lack Article III standing. What no one has suggested is that plaintiffs do not need Article III standing to enforce the Emoluments Clause against Trump. Everyone assumes that these suits must live or die under Federal standing doctrine. But, as we argue, Article III standing is essentially never a barrier to enforcing Federal Law. Indeed, plaintiffs may even win a merits ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court without ever possessing the elements of Article III standing. If we are right, it is a big deal. Federal standing doctrine is understood to restrain Federal courts’ from performing an advisory function. It also checks congressional power, preserving the Executive’s constitutional prerogative to enforce Federal Law. We challenge this received wisdom and argue that the Supreme Court has — perhaps unwittingly — created a route by which litigants may circumvent Article III’s standing requirements, diminishing the doctrine’s force. This has implications far beyond the Emoluments Clause; many constitutional and statutory provisions have long been thought effectively unenforceable because of the strictures of Article III standing. This Article charts the course that no-standing plaintiffs may follow to enforce Federal Law and land in the U.S. Supreme Court. It also introduces a new term to the legal lexicon: the Federal–State Standing Gap. This term describes the space between Article III standing doctrine and the comparatively lax doctrine of many states. We did not discover this space; everyone who has taken or taught a course on Federal jurisdiction knows about it. But we do think it has gone underappreciated. And that is the gap in the literature that this Article begins to fill.
Vladimir Yuzhakov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
GOVERNANCE FOR RESULTS: ON THE PREPARING OF DRAFT Federal Law ON FUNDAMENTALS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
2016Co-Authors: Vladimir YuzhakovAbstract:The improper quality of public administration is not only connected with the faults of some normative legal acts which regulate its activity, but, on the whole, with the inconsystancy of its legislative regulation. This is suggested to be possible to overcome by designing and passing a fundamental system-forming Federal Law on public administration in Russia. For this aim the Centre for Public Administration Technologies in the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration has prepared the Concept of the Draft Federal Law( the Bill) on the fundamentals of public administration in the RF and proposals for the preparing of this bill. The subject matter of the normative regulation of the bill is social relations in the field of public administration at all stages of its regulation cycle. The Law is to create the legal basis for the successive orientation toward achieving adequately perceived socially important results at all stages, of all forms and levels of public administration processes. In essence, the draft Law is to become the Federal Law on performance management of public authorities, within the frame of strategic planning as well, objectives and results of development.
-
The Concept of the Federal Law on Public Administration in the Russian Federation
2015Co-Authors: Vladimir Yuzhakov, Elvira Talapina, Oleg Alexandrov, Y A Tikhomirov, Elena DobrolyubovaAbstract:The concept of the Federal Law "On the fundamentals of public administration in the Russian Federation" is based on the study of Russian and foreign legislation and legal doctrine, and aimed at improving the systems of legal regulation of the Russian government, the creation of legal conditions for effective and efficient public administration.
Igor Francetic - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
e health in switzerland the laborious adoption of the Federal Law on electronic health records ehr and health information exchange hie networks
Health Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Carlo De Pietro, Igor FranceticAbstract:Within the framework of a broader e-health strategy launched a decade ago, in 2015 Switzerland passed a new Federal Law on patients’ electronic health records (EHR). The reform requires hospitals to adopt interoperable EHRs to facilitate data sharing and cooperation among healthcare providers, ultimately contributing to improvements in quality of care and efficiency in the health system. Adoption is voluntary for ambulatories and private practices, that may however be pushed towards EHRs by patients. The latter have complete discretion in the choice of the health information to share. Moreover, careful attention is given to data security issues. Despite good intentions, the high institutional and organisational fragmentation of the Swiss healthcare system, as well as the lack of full agreement with stakeholders on some critical points of the reform, slowed the process of adoption of the Law. In particular, pilot projects made clear that the participation of ambulatories is doomed to be low unless appropriate incentives are put in place. Moreover, most stakeholders point at the strategy proposed to finance technical implementation and management of EHRs as a major drawback. After two years of intense preparatory work, the Law entered into force in April 2017.
Arie Freiberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Sentencing: State and Federal Law in Victoria
1999Co-Authors: Richard G Fox, Arie FreibergAbstract:Fox and Freiberg have written a comprehensive book on Federal and state Law relating to the sentencing of offenders in the state of Victoria, Australia. In providing such a guide, the authors have meticulously brought together a wealth of statutory and case Law material including the extensive recent amendments to the statutes regulating the sentencing powers of the criminal courts. Sentencing in Victoria: State and Federal Law is a significant advance in the jurisprudence of sentencing in Australia and will be an essential reference for those in the field.