The Experts below are selected from a list of 1365 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Daniel B Jones - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mojdeh Kappus, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Di Qi, Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Mojdeh Kappus, Suvranu De, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p
-
or Fire virtual training simulator design and face validity
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2017Co-Authors: Denis Dorozhkin, Jaisa Olasky, Daniel B Jones, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Stephanie B Jones, Caroline G L Cao, Marcos Molina, Steven Henriques, Jinling Wang, Jeff T FlinnAbstract:Background The Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer is a tool for training surgeons the safe operation of electrosurgery tools in both open and minimally invasive surgery. This training includes a dedicated team-training module that focuses on operating room (OR) Fire prevention and response. The module was developed to allow trainees, practicing surgeons, anesthesiologist, and nurses to interact with a virtual OR environment, which includes anesthesia apparatus, electrosurgical equipment, a virtual patient, and a Fire extinguisher. Wearing a head-mounted display, participants must correctly identify the “Fire Triangle” elements and then successfully contain an OR Fire. Within these virtual reality scenarios, trainees learn to react appropriately to the simulated emergency. A study targeted at establishing the face validity of the virtual OR Fire simulator was undertaken at the 2015 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference.
-
OR Fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity
Surgical Endoscopy, 2017Co-Authors: Denis Dorozhkin, Jaisa Olasky, Daniel B Jones, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Stephanie B Jones, Marcos Molina, Steven Henriques, Jinling Wang, Jeff Flinn, Suvranu DeAbstract:Background The Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer is a tool for training surgeons the safe operation of electrosurgery tools in both open and minimally invasive surgery. This training includes a dedicated team-training module that focuses on operating room (OR) Fire prevention and response. The module was developed to allow trainees, practicing surgeons, anesthesiologist, and nurses to interact with a virtual OR environment, which includes anesthesia apparatus, electrosurgical equipment, a virtual patient, and a Fire extinguisher. Wearing a head-mounted display, participants must correctly identify the “Fire Triangle” elements and then successfully contain an OR Fire. Within these virtual reality scenarios, trainees learn to react appropriately to the simulated emergency. A study targeted at establishing the face validity of the virtual OR Fire simulator was undertaken at the 2015 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference. Methods Forty-nine subjects with varying experience participated in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. The subjects were asked to complete the OR Fire training/prevention sequence in the VEST simulator. Subjects were then asked to answer a subjective preference questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions, focused on the usefulness and fidelity of the simulator. Results On a 5-point scale, 12 of 13 questions were rated at a mean of 3 or greater (92%). Five questions were rated above 4 (38%), particularly those focusing on the simulator effectiveness and its usefulness in OR Fire safety training. A total of 33 of the 49 participants (67%) chose the virtual OR Fire trainer over the traditional training methods such as a textbook or an animal model. Conclusions Training for OR Fire emergencies in fully immersive VR environments, such as the VEST trainer, may be the ideal training modality. The face validity of the OR Fire training module of the VEST simulator was successfully established on many aspects of the simulation.
Suvranu De - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Di Qi, Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Mojdeh Kappus, Suvranu De, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p
-
OR Fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity
Surgical Endoscopy, 2017Co-Authors: Denis Dorozhkin, Jaisa Olasky, Daniel B Jones, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Stephanie B Jones, Marcos Molina, Steven Henriques, Jinling Wang, Jeff Flinn, Suvranu DeAbstract:Background The Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer is a tool for training surgeons the safe operation of electrosurgery tools in both open and minimally invasive surgery. This training includes a dedicated team-training module that focuses on operating room (OR) Fire prevention and response. The module was developed to allow trainees, practicing surgeons, anesthesiologist, and nurses to interact with a virtual OR environment, which includes anesthesia apparatus, electrosurgical equipment, a virtual patient, and a Fire extinguisher. Wearing a head-mounted display, participants must correctly identify the “Fire Triangle” elements and then successfully contain an OR Fire. Within these virtual reality scenarios, trainees learn to react appropriately to the simulated emergency. A study targeted at establishing the face validity of the virtual OR Fire simulator was undertaken at the 2015 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference. Methods Forty-nine subjects with varying experience participated in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. The subjects were asked to complete the OR Fire training/prevention sequence in the VEST simulator. Subjects were then asked to answer a subjective preference questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions, focused on the usefulness and fidelity of the simulator. Results On a 5-point scale, 12 of 13 questions were rated at a mean of 3 or greater (92%). Five questions were rated above 4 (38%), particularly those focusing on the simulator effectiveness and its usefulness in OR Fire safety training. A total of 33 of the 49 participants (67%) chose the virtual OR Fire trainer over the traditional training methods such as a textbook or an animal model. Conclusions Training for OR Fire emergencies in fully immersive VR environments, such as the VEST trainer, may be the ideal training modality. The face validity of the OR Fire training module of the VEST simulator was successfully established on many aspects of the simulation.
Adam Ryason - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Di Qi, Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Mojdeh Kappus, Suvranu De, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mojdeh Kappus, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p
Denis Dorozhkin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
or Fire virtual training simulator design and face validity
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 2017Co-Authors: Denis Dorozhkin, Jaisa Olasky, Daniel B Jones, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Stephanie B Jones, Caroline G L Cao, Marcos Molina, Steven Henriques, Jinling Wang, Jeff T FlinnAbstract:Background The Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer is a tool for training surgeons the safe operation of electrosurgery tools in both open and minimally invasive surgery. This training includes a dedicated team-training module that focuses on operating room (OR) Fire prevention and response. The module was developed to allow trainees, practicing surgeons, anesthesiologist, and nurses to interact with a virtual OR environment, which includes anesthesia apparatus, electrosurgical equipment, a virtual patient, and a Fire extinguisher. Wearing a head-mounted display, participants must correctly identify the “Fire Triangle” elements and then successfully contain an OR Fire. Within these virtual reality scenarios, trainees learn to react appropriately to the simulated emergency. A study targeted at establishing the face validity of the virtual OR Fire simulator was undertaken at the 2015 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference.
-
OR Fire virtual training simulator: design and face validity
Surgical Endoscopy, 2017Co-Authors: Denis Dorozhkin, Jaisa Olasky, Daniel B Jones, Steven D Schwaitzberg, Stephanie B Jones, Marcos Molina, Steven Henriques, Jinling Wang, Jeff Flinn, Suvranu DeAbstract:Background The Virtual Electrosurgical Skill Trainer is a tool for training surgeons the safe operation of electrosurgery tools in both open and minimally invasive surgery. This training includes a dedicated team-training module that focuses on operating room (OR) Fire prevention and response. The module was developed to allow trainees, practicing surgeons, anesthesiologist, and nurses to interact with a virtual OR environment, which includes anesthesia apparatus, electrosurgical equipment, a virtual patient, and a Fire extinguisher. Wearing a head-mounted display, participants must correctly identify the “Fire Triangle” elements and then successfully contain an OR Fire. Within these virtual reality scenarios, trainees learn to react appropriately to the simulated emergency. A study targeted at establishing the face validity of the virtual OR Fire simulator was undertaken at the 2015 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons conference. Methods Forty-nine subjects with varying experience participated in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. The subjects were asked to complete the OR Fire training/prevention sequence in the VEST simulator. Subjects were then asked to answer a subjective preference questionnaire consisting of sixteen questions, focused on the usefulness and fidelity of the simulator. Results On a 5-point scale, 12 of 13 questions were rated at a mean of 3 or greater (92%). Five questions were rated above 4 (38%), particularly those focusing on the simulator effectiveness and its usefulness in OR Fire safety training. A total of 33 of the 49 participants (67%) chose the virtual OR Fire trainer over the traditional training methods such as a textbook or an animal model. Conclusions Training for OR Fire emergencies in fully immersive VR environments, such as the VEST trainer, may be the ideal training modality. The face validity of the OR Fire training module of the VEST simulator was successfully established on many aspects of the simulation.
Samuel Alfred - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Di Qi, Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Mojdeh Kappus, Suvranu De, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p
-
Virtual reality operating room with AI guidance: design and validation of a Fire scenario
Surgical Endoscopy, 2020Co-Authors: Adam Ryason, Nicholas Milef, Samuel Alfred, Mojdeh Kappus, Mohamad Rassoul Abu-nuwar, Daniel B JonesAbstract:Background Operating room (OR) Fires are uncommon but disastrous events. Inappropriate handling of OR Fires can result in injuries, even death. Aiming to simulate OR Fire emergencies and effectively train clinicians to react appropriately, we have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based OR Fire virtual trainer based on the principle of the “Fire Triangle” and SAGES FUSE curriculum. The simulator can predict the user’s actions in the virtual OR and provide them with timely feedback to assist with training. We conducted a study investigating the validity of the AI-assisted OR Fire trainer at the 2019 SAGES Learning Center. Methods Fifty-three participants with varying medical experience were voluntarily recruited to participate in our Institutional Review Board approved study. All participants were asked to contain a Fire within the virtual OR. Participants were then asked to fill out a 7-point Likert questionnaire consisting of ten questions regarding the face validation of the AI-assisted OR Fire simulator. Shapiro–Wilk tests were conducted to test normality of the scores for each trial. A Friedman’s ANOVA with post hoc tests was used to evaluate the effect of multiple trials on performance. Results On a 7-point scale, eight of the ten questions were rated a mean of 6 or greater (72.73%), especially those relating to the usefulness of the simulator for OR Fire-containing training. 79.25% of the participants rated the degree of usefulness of AI guidance over 6 out of 7. The performance of individuals improved significantly over the five trials, χ ^2(4) = 119.89, p