The Experts below are selected from a list of 1428 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Arsyana Devi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
STUDI DETAIL PERENCANAAN STRUKTUR GEDUNG FAKULTAS PERIKANAN DAN KELAUTAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA SURABAYA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN OPENFRAME TANPA RIGID Floor DIAFRAGMA DAN OPENFRAME DENGAN RIGID Floor DIAFRAGMA BERDASARKAN SNI 1726:2002 DAN SNI 2847:2013
Rekayasa Teknik Sipil, 2016Co-Authors: Arsyana DeviAbstract:Perencanaan konstruksi bangunan harus mengutamakan struktur yang stabil dan kuat, dimana faktor ini sangat terkait dengan keamanan dan ketahanan bangunan dalam menahan dan menampung beban yang bekerja pada struktur. Dalam peraturan SNI gempa yang masih berlaku saat ini yaitu SNI 1726:2002 memakai konsep wilayah gempa (seismic zone) yaitu 6 zona gempa yang masing-masing memiliki kriteria gempa yaitu ringan, sedang, dan khusus. Peraturan SNI beton dalam merancang struktur gedung sangat diperlukan. Dalam hal ini, peraturan beton yang akan dibahas mengacu pada peraturan SNI 2847:2013. Dalam skripsi ini akan dibahas tentang perbedaan struktur bangunan menggunakan openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma dan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma dengan megunakan zona wilayah gempa 2 diatas tanah lunak di kota Surabaya. Tujuan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah merencanakan struktur gedung secara detail dan membedakan gaya dalam dan respon struktur dari hasil pemodelan dengan menggunakan openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma dan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma berdasarkan SNI 1726:2002 dan SNI 2847:2013. Proses analisis menggunakan gedung 20 lantai untuk analisis gempa dinamis menggunakn sofeware ETABS vol.9.6. Hasil analisis diperoleh respon struktur untuk openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma lebih besar dibandingkan dengan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma. Untuk openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma didapatkan momen yang lebih besar dari dengan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma sehingga jumlah tulangan yang dibutuhkan openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma lebih banyak. Kata Kunci : openframe, rigid Floor diafragma, respon struktur, gaya dalam Building construction plan should give priority to strength and stability, which this factor is related to safety and purpose of building in preserve and supported the loads that work in structure in Indonesia National Standard (SNI) specific for earthquake standard that still valid until today is SNI 1726:2002 using seismic zone concept that divide into six seismic zone with light, medium, and high risk criteria. SNI for concrete is necessary to design building structure. In this case, concrete regulation which will discuss is referred to SNI 2847:2013. This paper shows about the difference between building structure using open frame with and without rigid Floor diapraghm in seismic zone 2 and builds on soft soil in Surabaya. The purpose of this paper is planning to build structure in detail and difference local force and structure response from the modelling result using open frame with and without rigid Floor diapraghm based on SNI 1726:2002 and SNI 2847:2013. Structure calculation using 20 storied building for earthquake dynamic analytics using ETABS. The result obtained for open frame without rigid Floor diapraghm is greater than the structure response for open frame with rigid Floor diapraghm such as displacement, story drift,and element reaction. Shear and moment result obtained are greater than the rigid Floor diapraghm also caused the number of reinforcement bar that needed by open fame without rigid Floor diapraghm is larger. Keywords: open frame, rigid Floor Diaphragm, structur respon, local force
Andriyani Lina - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
STUDI DETAIL PERENCANAAN STRUKTUR GEDUNG FAKULTAS PERIKANAN DAN KELAUTAN UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA SURABAYA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN OPENFRAME TANPA RIGID Floor DIAFRAGMA DAN OPENFRAME DENGAN RIGID Floor DIAFRAGMA BERDASARKAN SNI 1726:2012 DAN SNI 2847:2013
Rekayasa Teknik Sipil, 2016Co-Authors: Andriyani LinaAbstract:Salah satu kriteria dalam merencanakan struktur bangunan bertingkat adalah kekuatan serta perilaku bangunan tinggi. Ketahanan terhadap gempa juga harus diperhatikan dalam merancang struktur bangunan. Dalam peraturan SNI 1726:2012 wilayah gempa Indonesia memakai konsep sesuai dengan gerakan tanah seismik dan koefisien resiko dari gempa maksimum yang di pertimbangkan (Maximum Considered Earhquake, MCE). Peraturan SNI beton dalam merancang struktur gedung sangat diperlukan. Dalam hal ini, peraturan beton yang akan dibahas mengacu pada peraturan SNI 2847:2013. Dalam skripsi ini akan dibahas tentang perbedaan struktur bangunan menggunakan openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma dan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma di kota Surabaya diatas tanah lunak. Tujuan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah merencanakan struktur gedung secara detail dan membedakan gaya dalam dan respon struktur dari hasil kedua pemodelan berdasarkan SNI 1726:2012 dan SNI 2847:2013. Pemodelan struktur gedung 20 lantai dalam 3D dan menggunakn sofeware ETABS vol.9.6. Dari hasil analisis struktur didapatkan rasio simpangan antar lantai pada masing- masing model struktur masih dalam batas izin, dengan perpindahan (displacement) dan gaya dalam openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma lebih besar dibandingkan dengan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model struktur menggunakan openframe dengan rigid Floor diafragma merupakan model struktur yang efektif, karena displacement dan gaya dalam elemen struktur yang lebih kecil dibandingkan model struktur openframe tanpa rigid Floor diafragma. Kata Kunci : gedung, beton bertulang, rigid Floor diafraghm, respon struktur. Criteria in planning and design of multistory buildings are streght and stability. Earthquake resistance building must be considered in designing the structure within the building. According to SNI 1726:2012, seismic zone in Indonesia is using the concept of relevant seismic ground motion and seismic coefficient of maximum risk in considering (Maximum Concidered Earthquake, MCE). SNI for concrete considered indesigning the building structure is needed. In this case, concrete stand are will be examined based on the SNI 2847:2013. This study shows the different response structures using open frame with and without rigid Floor Diaphragm in Surabaya on soft soil condition . The purpose of this paper is to prepare the structure of the high-rise building in detail and differentiate the mode shape, response and reaction. Response of structure is the second product modeling based on SNI 1726:2012 and SNI 2847:2013. Study case of 20-storey building structure modeling in 3D using ETABS ver.9.6. The result obtained deviation ratio between Floors on each model structure is still within the limitsof the regulation with displacement and mode shape in open frame without rigid Floor Diaphragmis greater than the open frame with rigid Floor Diaphragm. The results showed that the model using open frame with rigid Floor Diaphragm is an affective model, because displacement and reaction in the structure element are smaller than the model without rigid Floor Diaphragm. Keywords: high-rise building, rigid Floor diafraghm, structure response, displacemen, story drift
Wael W Eldakhakhni - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
influence of Floor Diaphragm wall coupling on the system level seismic performance of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete block building
Journal of Structural Engineering-asce, 2016Co-Authors: Ahmed Ashou, Wael W EldakhakhniAbstract:AbstractUnderstanding the inelastic seismic response of reinforced masonry shear walls (RMSW) is the first step to develop predictive models of the system-level (i.e., complete building) response under different levels of seismic demand. Such predictive models will not only have to be capable of accurately accounting for the different system-level-specific aspects but will also have to be easy enough to be adopted by design engineers. In this respect, the influence of the Floor Diaphragms on a building’s seismic response is typically recognized only through the role of the former in distributing the shear forces on the building’s seismic force resisting system (SFRS) as a result of the Diaphragms’ in-plane stiffness. Subsequently, the current paper focuses on analyzing experimental data of a series of RMSW tested as individual components and within two asymmetrical building systems. The analyses showed that the out-of-plane stiffness of the Floor Diaphragms played an important role in flexurally coupling ...
Sudhir K Jain - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
seismic analysis of asymmetric buildings with flexible Floor Diaphragms
Journal of Structural Engineering-asce, 2004Co-Authors: Dhiman Basu, Sudhir K JainAbstract:Even though a rigid Floor Diaphragm is a good assumption for seismic analysis of most buildings, several building configurations may exhibit significant flexibility in Floor Diaphragm. However, the issue of static seismic analysis of such buildings for torsional provisions of codes has not been addressed in the literature. Besides, the concept of center of rigidity needs to be formulated for buildings with flexible Floor Diaphragms. In this paper, the definition of center of rigidity for rigid Floor Diaphragm buildings has been extended to unsymmetrical buildings with flexible Floors. A superposition-based analysis procedure is proposed to implement code-specified torsional provisions for buildings with flexible Floor Diaphragms. The procedure suggested considers amplification of static eccentricity as well as accidental eccentricity. The proposed approach is applicable to orthogonal as well as nonorthogonal unsymmetrical buildings and accounts for all possible definitions of center of rigidity.
Ahmed Ashou - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
influence of Floor Diaphragm wall coupling on the system level seismic performance of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete block building
Journal of Structural Engineering-asce, 2016Co-Authors: Ahmed Ashou, Wael W EldakhakhniAbstract:AbstractUnderstanding the inelastic seismic response of reinforced masonry shear walls (RMSW) is the first step to develop predictive models of the system-level (i.e., complete building) response under different levels of seismic demand. Such predictive models will not only have to be capable of accurately accounting for the different system-level-specific aspects but will also have to be easy enough to be adopted by design engineers. In this respect, the influence of the Floor Diaphragms on a building’s seismic response is typically recognized only through the role of the former in distributing the shear forces on the building’s seismic force resisting system (SFRS) as a result of the Diaphragms’ in-plane stiffness. Subsequently, the current paper focuses on analyzing experimental data of a series of RMSW tested as individual components and within two asymmetrical building systems. The analyses showed that the out-of-plane stiffness of the Floor Diaphragms played an important role in flexurally coupling ...