The Experts below are selected from a list of 321 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Hugo Quiroz-mercado - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics
International Ophthalmology, 2018Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems . Methods A total of 164 consecutive eyes of 164 patients undergoing cataract surgery, 82 in the active-Fluidics group and 82 in the gravity-Fluidics group were enrolled in this study. Cataracts graded NII to NIII using LOCS II were included. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the two platforms with a specific configuration: the active-Fluidics Centurion ^® phacoemulsification system or the gravity-Fluidics Infiniti ^® Vision System. CDE, aspiration time (AT) and the mean estimated aspiration fluid (EAF) were registered and compared. Results A mean age of 68.3 ± 9.8 years was found (range 57–92 years), and no significant difference was evident between both groups. A positive correlation between the CDE values obtained by both platforms was verified ( r = 0.271, R ^2 = 0.073, P = 0.013). Similarly, a significant correlation was evidenced for the EAF ( r = 0.334, R ^2 = 0.112, P = 0.046) and AT values ( r = 0.156, R ^2 = 0.024, P = 0.161). A statistically significantly lower CDE count, aspiration time and estimated fluid were obtained using the active-Fluidics configuration when compared to the gravity-Fluidics configuration by 19.29, 12.10 and 9.29%, respectively ( P = 0.001, P
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics.
International ophthalmology, 2017Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems .
Roberto Gonzalez-salinas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics
International Ophthalmology, 2018Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems . Methods A total of 164 consecutive eyes of 164 patients undergoing cataract surgery, 82 in the active-Fluidics group and 82 in the gravity-Fluidics group were enrolled in this study. Cataracts graded NII to NIII using LOCS II were included. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the two platforms with a specific configuration: the active-Fluidics Centurion ^® phacoemulsification system or the gravity-Fluidics Infiniti ^® Vision System. CDE, aspiration time (AT) and the mean estimated aspiration fluid (EAF) were registered and compared. Results A mean age of 68.3 ± 9.8 years was found (range 57–92 years), and no significant difference was evident between both groups. A positive correlation between the CDE values obtained by both platforms was verified ( r = 0.271, R ^2 = 0.073, P = 0.013). Similarly, a significant correlation was evidenced for the EAF ( r = 0.334, R ^2 = 0.112, P = 0.046) and AT values ( r = 0.156, R ^2 = 0.024, P = 0.161). A statistically significantly lower CDE count, aspiration time and estimated fluid were obtained using the active-Fluidics configuration when compared to the gravity-Fluidics configuration by 19.29, 12.10 and 9.29%, respectively ( P = 0.001, P
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics.
International ophthalmology, 2017Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems .
Rosario Gulias-cañizo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics
International Ophthalmology, 2018Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems . Methods A total of 164 consecutive eyes of 164 patients undergoing cataract surgery, 82 in the active-Fluidics group and 82 in the gravity-Fluidics group were enrolled in this study. Cataracts graded NII to NIII using LOCS II were included. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the two platforms with a specific configuration: the active-Fluidics Centurion ^® phacoemulsification system or the gravity-Fluidics Infiniti ^® Vision System. CDE, aspiration time (AT) and the mean estimated aspiration fluid (EAF) were registered and compared. Results A mean age of 68.3 ± 9.8 years was found (range 57–92 years), and no significant difference was evident between both groups. A positive correlation between the CDE values obtained by both platforms was verified ( r = 0.271, R ^2 = 0.073, P = 0.013). Similarly, a significant correlation was evidenced for the EAF ( r = 0.334, R ^2 = 0.112, P = 0.046) and AT values ( r = 0.156, R ^2 = 0.024, P = 0.161). A statistically significantly lower CDE count, aspiration time and estimated fluid were obtained using the active-Fluidics configuration when compared to the gravity-Fluidics configuration by 19.29, 12.10 and 9.29%, respectively ( P = 0.001, P
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics.
International ophthalmology, 2017Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems .
Manuel Saenz-de-viteri - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics
International Ophthalmology, 2018Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems . Methods A total of 164 consecutive eyes of 164 patients undergoing cataract surgery, 82 in the active-Fluidics group and 82 in the gravity-Fluidics group were enrolled in this study. Cataracts graded NII to NIII using LOCS II were included. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the two platforms with a specific configuration: the active-Fluidics Centurion ^® phacoemulsification system or the gravity-Fluidics Infiniti ^® Vision System. CDE, aspiration time (AT) and the mean estimated aspiration fluid (EAF) were registered and compared. Results A mean age of 68.3 ± 9.8 years was found (range 57–92 years), and no significant difference was evident between both groups. A positive correlation between the CDE values obtained by both platforms was verified ( r = 0.271, R ^2 = 0.073, P = 0.013). Similarly, a significant correlation was evidenced for the EAF ( r = 0.334, R ^2 = 0.112, P = 0.046) and AT values ( r = 0.156, R ^2 = 0.024, P = 0.161). A statistically significantly lower CDE count, aspiration time and estimated fluid were obtained using the active-Fluidics configuration when compared to the gravity-Fluidics configuration by 19.29, 12.10 and 9.29%, respectively ( P = 0.001, P
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics.
International ophthalmology, 2017Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems .
Manuel Garza-león - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics
International Ophthalmology, 2018Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems . Methods A total of 164 consecutive eyes of 164 patients undergoing cataract surgery, 82 in the active-Fluidics group and 82 in the gravity-Fluidics group were enrolled in this study. Cataracts graded NII to NIII using LOCS II were included. Each subject was randomly assigned to one of the two platforms with a specific configuration: the active-Fluidics Centurion ^® phacoemulsification system or the gravity-Fluidics Infiniti ^® Vision System. CDE, aspiration time (AT) and the mean estimated aspiration fluid (EAF) were registered and compared. Results A mean age of 68.3 ± 9.8 years was found (range 57–92 years), and no significant difference was evident between both groups. A positive correlation between the CDE values obtained by both platforms was verified ( r = 0.271, R ^2 = 0.073, P = 0.013). Similarly, a significant correlation was evidenced for the EAF ( r = 0.334, R ^2 = 0.112, P = 0.046) and AT values ( r = 0.156, R ^2 = 0.024, P = 0.161). A statistically significantly lower CDE count, aspiration time and estimated fluid were obtained using the active-Fluidics configuration when compared to the gravity-Fluidics configuration by 19.29, 12.10 and 9.29%, respectively ( P = 0.001, P
-
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-Fluidics.
International ophthalmology, 2017Co-Authors: Roberto Gonzalez-salinas, Manuel Garza-león, Manuel Saenz-de-viteri, Juan Carlos Solís-s, Rosario Gulias-cañizo, Hugo Quiroz-mercadoAbstract:Purpose To compare the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration time and estimated aspiration fluid utilized during phacoemulsification cataract surgery using two phacoemulsification systems .