The Experts below are selected from a list of 58113 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Angela Amaya - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Emmanouil Detsis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • planetary protection classification of samples returned from the martian moons summary of a review by the european science foundation and the national academies of sciences engineering and medicine
    Life sciences in space research, 2019
    Co-Authors: David H Smith, Emmanouil Detsis
    Abstract:

    Abstract This work summarizes the review undertaken by a joint committee of the European Science Foundation and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine into the transfer of viable organisms from the surface of Mars to its moons—Phobos and Deimos—as a consequence of a giant impact on the martian surface. The possibility that viable organisms could survive ejection from Mars and subsequent deposition on Phobos or Deimos is an important consideration in determining whether samples returned from the moons by spacecraft missions be classified as restricted or unrestricted Earth return in the consensus planetary protection guidelines maintained by the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) of the International Council for Science. Having reviewed recent research undertaken in Europe and Japan, the joint committee recommended that samples returned from the martian moons be classified as unrestricted Earth return. This paper is not intended to be a standalone work. Rather it should be regarded as a summary of, and advertisement for, the material presented in the joint committee's Formal Report, Planetary Protection Classification of Samples Return Missions from the Martian Moons (the National Academies Press, 2019).

David E. Avrin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Providing Formal Reports for Outside Imaging and the Rate of Repeat Imaging
    American Journal of Roentgenology, 2014
    Co-Authors: Wyatt M. Tellis, David E. Avrin
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to assess whether providing a Formal Report for outside imaging reduces repeat imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS. From January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2011, patients transferred with an abdominal CT from another (“outside”) institution that was imported to our institution's PACS within 60 days of the original CT were considered. Repeat imaging was defined as when an abdominal CT performed at another institution was followed by the same study at our institution in the 14 days after import to PACS. The rate of repeat imaging was compared between patients whose outside imaging did and did not receive a Formal Report from our radiologists. RESULTS. Consecutive patients (n = 10,330) who imported an outside abdominal CT to our PACS were considered. Thirty-six percent (3719/10,330) received a Formal Report. These patients were 32% less likely than the other patients to undergo repeat imaging (9.4% [350/3719] vs 14% [919/6611]; p < 0.001). The odds of repeat imaging were...

David H Smith - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • planetary protection classification of samples returned from the martian moons summary of a review by the european science foundation and the national academies of sciences engineering and medicine
    Life sciences in space research, 2019
    Co-Authors: David H Smith, Emmanouil Detsis
    Abstract:

    Abstract This work summarizes the review undertaken by a joint committee of the European Science Foundation and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine into the transfer of viable organisms from the surface of Mars to its moons—Phobos and Deimos—as a consequence of a giant impact on the martian surface. The possibility that viable organisms could survive ejection from Mars and subsequent deposition on Phobos or Deimos is an important consideration in determining whether samples returned from the moons by spacecraft missions be classified as restricted or unrestricted Earth return in the consensus planetary protection guidelines maintained by the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) of the International Council for Science. Having reviewed recent research undertaken in Europe and Japan, the joint committee recommended that samples returned from the martian moons be classified as unrestricted Earth return. This paper is not intended to be a standalone work. Rather it should be regarded as a summary of, and advertisement for, the material presented in the joint committee's Formal Report, Planetary Protection Classification of Samples Return Missions from the Martian Moons (the National Academies Press, 2019).

Averil Martin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.