The Experts below are selected from a list of 277602 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Timothy A Judge - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
is the gap more than Gender a longitudinal analysis of Gender Gender Role orientation and earnings
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008Co-Authors: Timothy A Judge, Beth LivingstonAbstract:This study investigated the relationships among Gender, Gender Role orientation (i.e., attitudes toward the Gendered separation of Roles at work and at home), and earnings. A multilevel model was conceptualized in which Gender Role orientation and earnings were within-individual variables that fluctuate over time (although predictors of between-individual differences in Gender Role orientation were also considered). Results indicated that whereas traditional Gender Role orientation was positively related to earnings, Gender significantly predicted the slope of this relationship: Traditional Gender Role orientation was strongly positively associated with earnings for men; it was slightly negatively associated with earnings for women. Occupational segregation partly explained these Gender differences. Overall, the results suggest that although Gender Role attitudes are becoming less traditional for men and for women, traditional Gender Role orientation continues to exacerbate the Gender wage gap.
-
emotional responses to work family conflict an examination of Gender Role orientation among working men and women
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008Co-Authors: Beth Livingston, Timothy A JudgeAbstract:The present study tested the effect of work–family conflict on emotions and the moderating effects of Gender Role orientation. On the basis of a multilevel design, the authors found that family-interferingwith-work was positively related to guilt, and Gender Role orientation interacted with both types of conflict (work-interfering-with-family and family-interfering-with-work) to predict guilt. Specifically, in general, traditional individuals experienced more guilt from family-interfering-with-work, and egalitarian individuals experienced more guilt from work-interfering-with-family. Additionally, a higher level interaction indicated that traditional men tended to experience a stronger relationship between familyinterfering-with-work and guilt than did egalitarian men or women of either Gender Role orientation.
Beth Livingston - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
is the gap more than Gender a longitudinal analysis of Gender Gender Role orientation and earnings
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008Co-Authors: Timothy A Judge, Beth LivingstonAbstract:This study investigated the relationships among Gender, Gender Role orientation (i.e., attitudes toward the Gendered separation of Roles at work and at home), and earnings. A multilevel model was conceptualized in which Gender Role orientation and earnings were within-individual variables that fluctuate over time (although predictors of between-individual differences in Gender Role orientation were also considered). Results indicated that whereas traditional Gender Role orientation was positively related to earnings, Gender significantly predicted the slope of this relationship: Traditional Gender Role orientation was strongly positively associated with earnings for men; it was slightly negatively associated with earnings for women. Occupational segregation partly explained these Gender differences. Overall, the results suggest that although Gender Role attitudes are becoming less traditional for men and for women, traditional Gender Role orientation continues to exacerbate the Gender wage gap.
-
emotional responses to work family conflict an examination of Gender Role orientation among working men and women
Journal of Applied Psychology, 2008Co-Authors: Beth Livingston, Timothy A JudgeAbstract:The present study tested the effect of work–family conflict on emotions and the moderating effects of Gender Role orientation. On the basis of a multilevel design, the authors found that family-interferingwith-work was positively related to guilt, and Gender Role orientation interacted with both types of conflict (work-interfering-with-family and family-interfering-with-work) to predict guilt. Specifically, in general, traditional individuals experienced more guilt from family-interfering-with-work, and egalitarian individuals experienced more guilt from work-interfering-with-family. Additionally, a higher level interaction indicated that traditional men tended to experience a stronger relationship between familyinterfering-with-work and guilt than did egalitarian men or women of either Gender Role orientation.
James M Oneil - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
summarizing 25 years of research on men s Gender Role conflict using the Gender Role conflict scale new research paradigms and clinical implications
The Counseling Psychologist, 2008Co-Authors: James M OneilAbstract:This article reviews 232 empirical studies that used the Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS) over the past 25 years (1982-2007). The article introduces the Gender Role conflict (GRC) construct using past definitions and theoretical models. The research findings for diverse men are summarized and studies related to men's intrapersonal, interpersonal, and therapeutic lives are analyzed. The empirical support, criticism, and challenges to the Gender Role conflict research program are reviewed. A contextual research paradigm with seven domains is presented and 18 research questions and two research models are discussed to foster more moderation and mediation studies on men's GRC. A new diagnostic schema to assess men's GRC in therapy and during psychoeducational interventions is discussed. The research review concludes that GRC is significantly related to men's psychological and interpersonal problems and therefore an important construct for psychologists and other helping professionals.
-
male Gender Role conflict psychometric issues and relations to psychological distress
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1995Co-Authors: Glenn E Good, James M Oneil, John M Robertson, Louise F Fitzgerald, Mark Stevens, Kurt A Debord, Kim M Bartels, David G BravermanAbstract:Two distinct deficits in research on male Gender Role conflict are addressed: (a) lack of psychometric information and (b) lack of research involving clinical samples. First, using 1,043 men across three samples, the psychometric properties of the Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS) were examined through confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency estimation, and construct validation. Next, using 130 male university counseling center clients across two samples, the relation between Gender Role conflict and psychological distress was examined. The GRCS demonstrated good internal consistency and was best modeled as 4 intercorrelated factors, as originally proposed by J. M. O'Neil, B. Helms, R. Gable, L. David, and L. Wrightsman (1986). Construct validity was supported through correlations with attitudes about masculinity, fear of intimacy, and social desirability in expected directions. However, reservations about the Conflicts Between Work and Family Relations subscale are noted. Male Gender Role conflict was significantly related to psychological distress, with the Restrictive Emotionality subscale being the best predictor of distress level. Implications for mental health practice and future research are discussed
David G Braverman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
male Gender Role conflict psychometric issues and relations to psychological distress
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1995Co-Authors: Glenn E Good, James M Oneil, John M Robertson, Louise F Fitzgerald, Mark Stevens, Kurt A Debord, Kim M Bartels, David G BravermanAbstract:Two distinct deficits in research on male Gender Role conflict are addressed: (a) lack of psychometric information and (b) lack of research involving clinical samples. First, using 1,043 men across three samples, the psychometric properties of the Gender Role Conflict Scale (GRCS) were examined through confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency estimation, and construct validation. Next, using 130 male university counseling center clients across two samples, the relation between Gender Role conflict and psychological distress was examined. The GRCS demonstrated good internal consistency and was best modeled as 4 intercorrelated factors, as originally proposed by J. M. O'Neil, B. Helms, R. Gable, L. David, and L. Wrightsman (1986). Construct validity was supported through correlations with attitudes about masculinity, fear of intimacy, and social desirability in expected directions. However, reservations about the Conflicts Between Work and Family Relations subscale are noted. Male Gender Role conflict was significantly related to psychological distress, with the Restrictive Emotionality subscale being the best predictor of distress level. Implications for mental health practice and future research are discussed
Norman B Schmidt - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Gender Role sexual orientation and suicide risk
Journal of Affective Disorders, 2005Co-Authors: Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick, Stephanie J Euton, Jamie N Jones, Norman B SchmidtAbstract:Abstract Background There has been interest in the relationship between homosexuality, Gender Role and suicide risk. Though homosexuals are more likely to identify as cross-Gender, research has not simultaneously examined sexual orientation and Gender Role in assessing suicide risk. In the current study, the unique and interactive effects of sexual orientation and Gender Role were assessed in regard to suicidal ideation, related psychopathology and measures of coping. Methods 77 participants were recruited from an undergraduate psychology subject pool ( n = 47) or from gay, lesbian and transGender student organizations ( n = 30) and assessed on measures of Gender Role, homosexuality, and psychopathology. Results Consistent with expectations, cross-Gender Role (i.e., personality traits associated with the opposite sex) is a unique predictor of suicidal symptoms. Moreover, Gender Role accounted for more of the overall variance in suicidal symptoms, positive problem orientation, peer acceptance and support, than sexual orientation. After accounting for Gender Role, sexual orientation contributed little to the variance in suicidal symptoms, associated pathology and problem-solving deficits. There was no support for Gender Role by sexual orientation interaction effects. Limitations The cross-sectional nature of the data limits statements regarding causality. Conclusions Cross-Gendered individuals, regardless of sexual orientation, appear to have higher risk for suicidal symptoms. Researchers and clinicians should assess Gender Role in evaluations of youth samples.
