The Experts below are selected from a list of 81 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Mateusz Grodecki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Stanley Y W Su - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • On automated e‐business negotiations: Goal, Policy, strategy, and plans of decision and action
    Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2020
    Co-Authors: Haifei Li, Stanley Y W Su
    Abstract:

    In recent years, there has been increasing interest in automated e‐business negotiations. The automation of negotiation requires a decision model to capture the negotiation knowledge of Policymakers and negotiation experts so that the decision‐making process can be carried out automatically. Current research on automated e‐business negotiations has focused on defining low‐level tactics (or negotiation rules) so that automated negotiation systems can carry out automated negotiation processes. These low‐level tactics are usually defined from a technical perspective, not from a business perspective. There is a gap between high‐level business negotiation Goals and low‐level tactics. In this article, we distinguish the concepts of negotiation context, negotiation Goals, negotiation strategy, and negotiation tactics and introduce a formal decision model to show the relations among these concepts. We show how high‐level negotiation Goals can be formally mapped to low‐level tactics that can be used to affect the ...

  • on automated e business negotiations Goal Policy strategy and plans of decision and action
    Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2006
    Co-Authors: Haifei Li, Stanley Y W Su
    Abstract:

    In recent years, there has been increasing interest in automated e‐business negotiations. The automation of negotiation requires a decision model to capture the negotiation knowledge of Policymakers and negotiation experts so that the decision‐making process can be carried out automatically. Current research on automated e‐business negotiations has focused on defining low‐level tactics (or negotiation rules) so that automated negotiation systems can carry out automated negotiation processes. These low‐level tactics are usually defined from a technical perspective, not from a business perspective. There is a gap between high‐level business negotiation Goals and low‐level tactics. In this article, we distinguish the concepts of negotiation context, negotiation Goals, negotiation strategy, and negotiation tactics and introduce a formal decision model to show the relations among these concepts. We show how high‐level negotiation Goals can be formally mapped to low‐level tactics that can be used to affect the ...

Dominik Antonowicz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Haifei Li - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • On automated e‐business negotiations: Goal, Policy, strategy, and plans of decision and action
    Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2020
    Co-Authors: Haifei Li, Stanley Y W Su
    Abstract:

    In recent years, there has been increasing interest in automated e‐business negotiations. The automation of negotiation requires a decision model to capture the negotiation knowledge of Policymakers and negotiation experts so that the decision‐making process can be carried out automatically. Current research on automated e‐business negotiations has focused on defining low‐level tactics (or negotiation rules) so that automated negotiation systems can carry out automated negotiation processes. These low‐level tactics are usually defined from a technical perspective, not from a business perspective. There is a gap between high‐level business negotiation Goals and low‐level tactics. In this article, we distinguish the concepts of negotiation context, negotiation Goals, negotiation strategy, and negotiation tactics and introduce a formal decision model to show the relations among these concepts. We show how high‐level negotiation Goals can be formally mapped to low‐level tactics that can be used to affect the ...

  • on automated e business negotiations Goal Policy strategy and plans of decision and action
    Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2006
    Co-Authors: Haifei Li, Stanley Y W Su
    Abstract:

    In recent years, there has been increasing interest in automated e‐business negotiations. The automation of negotiation requires a decision model to capture the negotiation knowledge of Policymakers and negotiation experts so that the decision‐making process can be carried out automatically. Current research on automated e‐business negotiations has focused on defining low‐level tactics (or negotiation rules) so that automated negotiation systems can carry out automated negotiation processes. These low‐level tactics are usually defined from a technical perspective, not from a business perspective. There is a gap between high‐level business negotiation Goals and low‐level tactics. In this article, we distinguish the concepts of negotiation context, negotiation Goals, negotiation strategy, and negotiation tactics and introduce a formal decision model to show the relations among these concepts. We show how high‐level negotiation Goals can be formally mapped to low‐level tactics that can be used to affect the ...

Piyush Maheshwari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • WS-Policy4MASC - A WS-Policy Extension Used in the MASC Middleware
    IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007), 2007
    Co-Authors: Vladimir Tosic, Abdelkarim Erradi, Piyush Maheshwari
    Abstract:

    WS-Policy4MASC is a new XML language that we developed for specification of monitoring and control (particularly, adaptation) policies in the Manageable and Adaptable Services Compositions (MASC) middleware. It extends the Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy) by defining new types of Policy assertions. Goal Policy assertions specify requirements and guarantees to be met in desired normal operation. Action Policy assertions specify actions to be taken if certain conditions are met or not met. Utility Policy assertions specify monetary values assigned to particular situations. Meta-Policy assertions are used to specify which action Policy assertions are alternatives and which business value-driven conflict resolution strategy should be used. WS- Policy4MASC also enables detailed specification of additional information necessary for run-time Policy-driven management. We evaluated feasibility of the WS- Policy4MASC solutions by implementing a Policy repository and other modules in MASC. We examined their usefulness on a set of realistic scenarios.