Good Communication

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 228033 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Ronald C Arkin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • when Good Communication go bad Communications recovery for multi robot teams
    International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004
    Co-Authors: Patrick D Ulam, Ronald C Arkin
    Abstract:

    Ad-hoc networks among groups of autonomous mobile robots are becoming a common occurrence as teams of robots take on increasingly complicated missions over wider areas. Research has often focused on proactive means in which the individual robots of the team may prevent Communication failures between nodes in this network. This is not always possible especially in unknown or hostile environments. This research addresses reactive aspects of Communication recovery. How should the members of the team react in the event of unseen Communication failures between some or all of the nodes in the network? We present a number of behaviors to be utilized in the event of Communications failure as well as a behavioral sequencer to further enhance the effectiveness of these recovery behaviors. The performance of the Communication recovery behavior is analyzed in simulation and their application on hardware platforms is discussed.

  • ICRA - When Good Communication go bad: Communications recovery for multi-robot teams
    IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004, 2004
    Co-Authors: Patrick D Ulam, Ronald C Arkin
    Abstract:

    Ad-hoc networks among groups of autonomous mobile robots are becoming a common occurrence as teams of robots take on increasingly complicated missions over wider areas. Research has often focused on proactive means in which the individual robots of the team may prevent Communication failures between nodes in this network. This is not always possible especially in unknown or hostile environments. This research addresses reactive aspects of Communication recovery. How should the members of the team react in the event of unseen Communication failures between some or all of the nodes in the network? We present a number of behaviors to be utilized in the event of Communications failure as well as a behavioral sequencer to further enhance the effectiveness of these recovery behaviors. The performance of the Communication recovery behavior is analyzed in simulation and their application on hardware platforms is discussed.

Johan P. Woelber - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • working experience is not a predictor of Good Communication results from a controlled trial with simulated patients
    European Journal of Endocrinology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Anne B. Kruse, Götz Fabry, Waltraud Silbernagel, Kirstin Vach, Helge Klauspeter Heil, Norbert Strus, Petra Ratkakruger, Johan P. Woelber
    Abstract:

    INTRODUCTION The importance of Good Communication in dentistry is proven in terms of both medical satisfaction and patient-related recovery and prevention. The present work deals with the comparison of communicative abilities and the communicative self-assessment of licensed dentists as well as students of dentistry with special emphasis on the influence of the treatment experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 34 dentists (experimental group) with an average work experience of 16 years and 36 students (control group) with an average of 1.4 years of treatment experience were included. In addition to a tutor, four types of simulation patients with standardised trained roles (anxious, critical, dissatisfied and difficult to motivate) were used to create reproducible conversations. The self-assessment and evaluation of the conversation took place by completing questionnaires. Here, an introductory questionnaire was distributed to the participants prior to the conversation and another one after intervention. Whilst the tutors completed their survey during the intervention, the simulation patients answered their questions after the conversation. RESULTS The results showed that the dentists rated their own Communication skills significantly higher than the students for anxious (P < 0.001) and unmotivated patients (P = 0.026). However, the evaluation of the simulated patients showed that the students achieved higher overall empathy scores (42.03 vs 38.77, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION Due to the declining empathy values with increasing treatment experience, Communication training is useful for the daily routine of treatment even for experienced dentists.

  • Working experience is not a predictor of Good Communication: Results from a controlled trial with simulated patients.
    European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2019
    Co-Authors: Anne B. Kruse, Helge Klaus‐peter Heil, Norbert Struß, Götz Fabry, Waltraud Silbernagel, Kirstin Vach, Petra Ratka-krüger, Johan P. Woelber
    Abstract:

    INTRODUCTION The importance of Good Communication in dentistry is proven in terms of both medical satisfaction and patient-related recovery and prevention. The present work deals with the comparison of communicative abilities and the communicative self-assessment of licensed dentists as well as students of dentistry with special emphasis on the influence of the treatment experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 34 dentists (experimental group) with an average work experience of 16 years and 36 students (control group) with an average of 1.4 years of treatment experience were included. In addition to a tutor, four types of simulation patients with standardised trained roles (anxious, critical, dissatisfied and difficult to motivate) were used to create reproducible conversations. The self-assessment and evaluation of the conversation took place by completing questionnaires. Here, an introductory questionnaire was distributed to the participants prior to the conversation and another one after intervention. Whilst the tutors completed their survey during the intervention, the simulation patients answered their questions after the conversation. RESULTS The results showed that the dentists rated their own Communication skills significantly higher than the students for anxious (P 

Gianluca Castelnuovo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Patrick D Ulam - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • when Good Communication go bad Communications recovery for multi robot teams
    International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004
    Co-Authors: Patrick D Ulam, Ronald C Arkin
    Abstract:

    Ad-hoc networks among groups of autonomous mobile robots are becoming a common occurrence as teams of robots take on increasingly complicated missions over wider areas. Research has often focused on proactive means in which the individual robots of the team may prevent Communication failures between nodes in this network. This is not always possible especially in unknown or hostile environments. This research addresses reactive aspects of Communication recovery. How should the members of the team react in the event of unseen Communication failures between some or all of the nodes in the network? We present a number of behaviors to be utilized in the event of Communications failure as well as a behavioral sequencer to further enhance the effectiveness of these recovery behaviors. The performance of the Communication recovery behavior is analyzed in simulation and their application on hardware platforms is discussed.

  • ICRA - When Good Communication go bad: Communications recovery for multi-robot teams
    IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004, 2004
    Co-Authors: Patrick D Ulam, Ronald C Arkin
    Abstract:

    Ad-hoc networks among groups of autonomous mobile robots are becoming a common occurrence as teams of robots take on increasingly complicated missions over wider areas. Research has often focused on proactive means in which the individual robots of the team may prevent Communication failures between nodes in this network. This is not always possible especially in unknown or hostile environments. This research addresses reactive aspects of Communication recovery. How should the members of the team react in the event of unseen Communication failures between some or all of the nodes in the network? We present a number of behaviors to be utilized in the event of Communications failure as well as a behavioral sequencer to further enhance the effectiveness of these recovery behaviors. The performance of the Communication recovery behavior is analyzed in simulation and their application on hardware platforms is discussed.

Anne B. Kruse - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • working experience is not a predictor of Good Communication results from a controlled trial with simulated patients
    European Journal of Endocrinology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Anne B. Kruse, Götz Fabry, Waltraud Silbernagel, Kirstin Vach, Helge Klauspeter Heil, Norbert Strus, Petra Ratkakruger, Johan P. Woelber
    Abstract:

    INTRODUCTION The importance of Good Communication in dentistry is proven in terms of both medical satisfaction and patient-related recovery and prevention. The present work deals with the comparison of communicative abilities and the communicative self-assessment of licensed dentists as well as students of dentistry with special emphasis on the influence of the treatment experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 34 dentists (experimental group) with an average work experience of 16 years and 36 students (control group) with an average of 1.4 years of treatment experience were included. In addition to a tutor, four types of simulation patients with standardised trained roles (anxious, critical, dissatisfied and difficult to motivate) were used to create reproducible conversations. The self-assessment and evaluation of the conversation took place by completing questionnaires. Here, an introductory questionnaire was distributed to the participants prior to the conversation and another one after intervention. Whilst the tutors completed their survey during the intervention, the simulation patients answered their questions after the conversation. RESULTS The results showed that the dentists rated their own Communication skills significantly higher than the students for anxious (P < 0.001) and unmotivated patients (P = 0.026). However, the evaluation of the simulated patients showed that the students achieved higher overall empathy scores (42.03 vs 38.77, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION Due to the declining empathy values with increasing treatment experience, Communication training is useful for the daily routine of treatment even for experienced dentists.

  • Working experience is not a predictor of Good Communication: Results from a controlled trial with simulated patients.
    European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2019
    Co-Authors: Anne B. Kruse, Helge Klaus‐peter Heil, Norbert Struß, Götz Fabry, Waltraud Silbernagel, Kirstin Vach, Petra Ratka-krüger, Johan P. Woelber
    Abstract:

    INTRODUCTION The importance of Good Communication in dentistry is proven in terms of both medical satisfaction and patient-related recovery and prevention. The present work deals with the comparison of communicative abilities and the communicative self-assessment of licensed dentists as well as students of dentistry with special emphasis on the influence of the treatment experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 34 dentists (experimental group) with an average work experience of 16 years and 36 students (control group) with an average of 1.4 years of treatment experience were included. In addition to a tutor, four types of simulation patients with standardised trained roles (anxious, critical, dissatisfied and difficult to motivate) were used to create reproducible conversations. The self-assessment and evaluation of the conversation took place by completing questionnaires. Here, an introductory questionnaire was distributed to the participants prior to the conversation and another one after intervention. Whilst the tutors completed their survey during the intervention, the simulation patients answered their questions after the conversation. RESULTS The results showed that the dentists rated their own Communication skills significantly higher than the students for anxious (P 

Good Communication - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts