The Experts below are selected from a list of 288 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Maria De Lourdes Santorio Ciocca - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
total insoluble and soluble dietary fiber values measured by enzymatic Gravimetric Method in cereal grains
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2005Co-Authors: Leila Picolli Da Silva, Maria De Lourdes Santorio CioccaAbstract:Cereal grains produced in southern Brazil and collected in production trials carried out in 1996 were evaluated as to total fiber (TF), insoluble fiber (IF) and soluble fiber (SF) contents by the enzymatic–Gravimetric Method of (Prosky et al., J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. Int. 75 (1992) 360). Wheat (BR 23, CEP 24, EMBRAPA 16, EMBRAPA 48 and EMBRAPA 49), triticale (BR 4, EMBRAPA 17 and EMBRAPA 18), barley (BR 2, EMBRAPA 43 and PFC 9205), rye (BR 1), oats (UFRGS 14, UFRGS 15 and UFRGS 17), corn (BR 351 and BR 5202 Pampa) and sorghum (A 9904 and BR 300) cultivars were analyzed. Differences (P<0.05) in TF and IF were found among the species. Wheat, triticale, oats and sorghum cultivars presented significant differences in total and IF levels, and oats cultivars in IF levels. The SF levels (difference between total and IF) of wheat and sorghum cultivars were also different. Although the results may have been affected by Gravimetric corrections, the total and IF values obtained suggest the possible use of different species and different cultivars of cereal grains in specific strategies for animal and human nutrition.
-
Total, insoluble and soluble dietary fiber values measured by enzymatic–Gravimetric Method in cereal grains
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2005Co-Authors: Leila Picolli Da Silva, Maria De Lourdes Santorio CioccaAbstract:Cereal grains produced in southern Brazil and collected in production trials carried out in 1996 were evaluated as to total fiber (TF), insoluble fiber (IF) and soluble fiber (SF) contents by the enzymatic–Gravimetric Method of (Prosky et al., J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. Int. 75 (1992) 360). Wheat (BR 23, CEP 24, EMBRAPA 16, EMBRAPA 48 and EMBRAPA 49), triticale (BR 4, EMBRAPA 17 and EMBRAPA 18), barley (BR 2, EMBRAPA 43 and PFC 9205), rye (BR 1), oats (UFRGS 14, UFRGS 15 and UFRGS 17), corn (BR 351 and BR 5202 Pampa) and sorghum (A 9904 and BR 300) cultivars were analyzed. Differences (P
Siyu Qiu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Solubility of Isomalt in the Water + Ethanol Solvent System at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013Co-Authors: Peng Wang, Jinxia Jiang, Junxia Liu, Xuejiao Liu, Menge Luo, Siyu QiuAbstract:The solubility of isomalt in the water + ethanol solvent system was measured with the mole fraction of water ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K by using the laser Method that is timesaving and the Gravimetric Method that is more reliable. The data were fitted using the simplified Jouyban–Acree model. In this study, the solubility data obtained by these two Methods were compared. The mean relative deviations for isomalt solubility determined by the laser Method and the Gravimetric Method were less than 25 % and 17 %, respectively.
-
solubility of isomalt in the water ethanol solvent system at 288 15 298 15 308 15 and 318 15 k
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013Co-Authors: Peng Wang, Jinxia Jiang, Junxia Liu, Xuejiao Liu, Menge Luo, Siyu Qiu, Yan ZhaoAbstract:The solubility of isomalt in the water + ethanol solvent system was measured with the mole fraction of water ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K by using the laser Method that is timesaving and the Gravimetric Method that is more reliable. The data were fitted using the simplified Jouyban–Acree model. In this study, the solubility data obtained by these two Methods were compared. The mean relative deviations for isomalt solubility determined by the laser Method and the Gravimetric Method were less than 25 % and 17 %, respectively.
Peng Wang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Solubility of Isomalt in the Water + Ethanol Solvent System at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013Co-Authors: Peng Wang, Jinxia Jiang, Junxia Liu, Xuejiao Liu, Menge Luo, Siyu QiuAbstract:The solubility of isomalt in the water + ethanol solvent system was measured with the mole fraction of water ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K by using the laser Method that is timesaving and the Gravimetric Method that is more reliable. The data were fitted using the simplified Jouyban–Acree model. In this study, the solubility data obtained by these two Methods were compared. The mean relative deviations for isomalt solubility determined by the laser Method and the Gravimetric Method were less than 25 % and 17 %, respectively.
-
solubility of isomalt in the water ethanol solvent system at 288 15 298 15 308 15 and 318 15 k
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013Co-Authors: Peng Wang, Jinxia Jiang, Junxia Liu, Xuejiao Liu, Menge Luo, Siyu Qiu, Yan ZhaoAbstract:The solubility of isomalt in the water + ethanol solvent system was measured with the mole fraction of water ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K by using the laser Method that is timesaving and the Gravimetric Method that is more reliable. The data were fitted using the simplified Jouyban–Acree model. In this study, the solubility data obtained by these two Methods were compared. The mean relative deviations for isomalt solubility determined by the laser Method and the Gravimetric Method were less than 25 % and 17 %, respectively.
Leila Picolli Da Silva - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
total insoluble and soluble dietary fiber values measured by enzymatic Gravimetric Method in cereal grains
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2005Co-Authors: Leila Picolli Da Silva, Maria De Lourdes Santorio CioccaAbstract:Cereal grains produced in southern Brazil and collected in production trials carried out in 1996 were evaluated as to total fiber (TF), insoluble fiber (IF) and soluble fiber (SF) contents by the enzymatic–Gravimetric Method of (Prosky et al., J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. Int. 75 (1992) 360). Wheat (BR 23, CEP 24, EMBRAPA 16, EMBRAPA 48 and EMBRAPA 49), triticale (BR 4, EMBRAPA 17 and EMBRAPA 18), barley (BR 2, EMBRAPA 43 and PFC 9205), rye (BR 1), oats (UFRGS 14, UFRGS 15 and UFRGS 17), corn (BR 351 and BR 5202 Pampa) and sorghum (A 9904 and BR 300) cultivars were analyzed. Differences (P<0.05) in TF and IF were found among the species. Wheat, triticale, oats and sorghum cultivars presented significant differences in total and IF levels, and oats cultivars in IF levels. The SF levels (difference between total and IF) of wheat and sorghum cultivars were also different. Although the results may have been affected by Gravimetric corrections, the total and IF values obtained suggest the possible use of different species and different cultivars of cereal grains in specific strategies for animal and human nutrition.
-
Total, insoluble and soluble dietary fiber values measured by enzymatic–Gravimetric Method in cereal grains
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2005Co-Authors: Leila Picolli Da Silva, Maria De Lourdes Santorio CioccaAbstract:Cereal grains produced in southern Brazil and collected in production trials carried out in 1996 were evaluated as to total fiber (TF), insoluble fiber (IF) and soluble fiber (SF) contents by the enzymatic–Gravimetric Method of (Prosky et al., J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. Int. 75 (1992) 360). Wheat (BR 23, CEP 24, EMBRAPA 16, EMBRAPA 48 and EMBRAPA 49), triticale (BR 4, EMBRAPA 17 and EMBRAPA 18), barley (BR 2, EMBRAPA 43 and PFC 9205), rye (BR 1), oats (UFRGS 14, UFRGS 15 and UFRGS 17), corn (BR 351 and BR 5202 Pampa) and sorghum (A 9904 and BR 300) cultivars were analyzed. Differences (P
Menge Luo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Solubility of Isomalt in the Water + Ethanol Solvent System at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013Co-Authors: Peng Wang, Jinxia Jiang, Junxia Liu, Xuejiao Liu, Menge Luo, Siyu QiuAbstract:The solubility of isomalt in the water + ethanol solvent system was measured with the mole fraction of water ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K by using the laser Method that is timesaving and the Gravimetric Method that is more reliable. The data were fitted using the simplified Jouyban–Acree model. In this study, the solubility data obtained by these two Methods were compared. The mean relative deviations for isomalt solubility determined by the laser Method and the Gravimetric Method were less than 25 % and 17 %, respectively.
-
solubility of isomalt in the water ethanol solvent system at 288 15 298 15 308 15 and 318 15 k
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2013Co-Authors: Peng Wang, Jinxia Jiang, Junxia Liu, Xuejiao Liu, Menge Luo, Siyu Qiu, Yan ZhaoAbstract:The solubility of isomalt in the water + ethanol solvent system was measured with the mole fraction of water ranging from 0.00 to 1.00 at (288.15, 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K by using the laser Method that is timesaving and the Gravimetric Method that is more reliable. The data were fitted using the simplified Jouyban–Acree model. In this study, the solubility data obtained by these two Methods were compared. The mean relative deviations for isomalt solubility determined by the laser Method and the Gravimetric Method were less than 25 % and 17 %, respectively.
