The Experts below are selected from a list of 4818 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Maria Luisa Azpiroz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
transgenic maize vs organic farming an analysis of Greenpeace mexico s discourse on food security food sovereignty and the right to food 2007 2017 maiz transgenico vs agricultura ecologica un analisis del discurso de Greenpeace mexico en torno a la seguridad alimentaria la soberania alimentaria y el derecho a la alimentacion 2007 2017
Social Science Research Network, 2019Co-Authors: Maria Luisa AzpirozAbstract:English Abstract: Objective: This research analyzes Greenpeace Mexico's discourse on the concepts of food security, food sovereignty and the right to food. Methodology: this article employs a qualitative methodology with the assistance of Atlas.ti software. Methodology: is based on the theory of framing (diagnostic and prognostic functions). A total 151 pieces of Greenpeace Mexico’s website from 2007-2017 are analyzed. Results: the frames found are described and the most important key words and expressions are exposed. Limitations: This research is limited to the analysis of Greenpeace Mexico’s discourse. The study of other Greenpeace units’ discourse would allow assessing whether the NGO maintains a homogenous discourse at a global level or whether there are significant differences according to local circumstances. Conclusions: In summary, Greenpeace Mexico’s discourse around the concepts of "food security", "food sovereignty" and the "right to food" is clearly anti-neoliberal but does not reflect the academic debate regarding these concepts. The complaints (diagnostic frame function) and proposals (prognostic frame function) in Greenpeace Mexico’s discourse are identified, recreating the narrative of five specific frames. The most repeated oppositional terms and expressions are also, identified. Spanish Abstract: Objetivo: la investigacion analiza el discurso de Greenpeace Mexico en torno a los conceptos de seguridad alimentaria, soberania alimentaria y derecho a la alimentacion. Metodologia: se emplea una metodologia cualitativa asistida por el software Atlas.ti, basada en la teoria del framing (funciones diagnostico y pronostico). Se analiza un total de 151 piezas de la web de Greenpeace Mexico del periodo 2007-2017. Resultados: se describe la narrativa de los frames hallados y se exponen las palabras y expresiones clave mas destacadas. Limitaciones: la investigacion se limita al analisis del discurso de Greenpeace Mexico. El estudio del discurso de otras unidades de Greenpeace permitiria valorar si la ONG mantiene un discurso homogeneo a nivel global o si hay diferencias significativas segun las circunstancias locales. Conclusiones: se concluye que el discurso de Greenpeace Mexico en torno a los conceptos “seguridad alimentaria”, “soberania alimentaria” y “derecho a la alimentacion” es claramente antineoliberal pero no refleja el debate academico respecto a dichos conceptos. Se identifican las denuncias (funcion de frame diagnostico) y propuestas (funcion de frame pronostico) presentes en el discurso de Greenpeace Mexico, recreando la narrativa de cinco frames concretos. Tambien se identifican los terminos y expresiones opuestas mas repetidas.
Wawan Budi Darmawan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
strategi jaringan advokasi transnasional Greenpeace indonesia terkait isu deforestasi hutan indonesia oleh wilmar international
Journal of Political Issues, 2020Co-Authors: Muhammad Arief Virgy, Yusa Djuyandi, Wawan Budi DarmawanAbstract:Greenpeace Indonesia looking for Wilmar International as actor for making deforestation.. Greenpeace Indonesia pressured Wilmar International to commit to implementing their No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) policy through the establishment of a transnational advocacy network to make enough power to put pressure on Wilmar International. Through this method, Greenpeace Indonesia succeeded in making Wilmar International pressured and changed its behavior. This research analyzes how Greenpeace Indonesia's strategy in forming transnational advocacy networks so that the network suppresses and monitors the behavior of target actor through the Keck & Sikkink Transnational Advocacy Network theory. Researchers used qualitative methods with a case study approach. Data collection comes from primary and secondary data and data collection through literature studies from books, journals and articles. The results of this study indicate that Greenpeace Indonesia is very optimal in carrying out Information Politics and Leverage Politics strategies. Greenpeace Indonesia has creative and confrontational methods in implementing the Symbolic Politics strategy. But the weakness of this strategy is that Greenpeace Indonesia seems to be exclusive in carrying out its actions by other environmental NGOs, especially domestic-based environmental NGOs. The weaknesses of these four strategies are Accountability Politics where Greenpeace Indonesia does not have the commitment of Wilmar International which has binding legal force.
-
Strategi Jaringan Advokasi Transnasional Greenpeace Indonesia Terkait Isu Deforestasi Hutan Indonesia oleh Wilmar International
'Universitas Bangka Belitung', 2020Co-Authors: Muhammad Arief Virgy, Yusa Djuyandi, Wawan Budi DarmawanAbstract:Greenpeace Indonesia saat ini menyoroti Wilmar Internasional sebagai pelaku deforestasi. Greenpeace Indonesia menekan Wilmar International untuk berkomitmen mengimplementasikan kebijakan No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) mereka lewat pembentukan jaringan advokasi transnasional guna membuat powernya cukup untuk menekan Wilmar International. Lewat metode tersebut, Greenpeace Indonesia berhasil membuat Wilmar International terdesak dan merubah perilakunya. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana strategi Greenpeace Indonesia dalam membentuk jaringan advokasi transnasional hingga jaringan tersebut menekan dan memantau perilaku aktor target melalui teori Transnational Advocacy Network Keck & Sikkink. Peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Pengumpulan data berasal dari data primer dan sekunder serta pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan dari buku, jurnal dan artikel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Greenpeace Indonesia sangat optimal dalam melakukan strategi Information Politics dan Leverage Politics. Greenpeace Indonesia memiliki metode yang kreatif dan konfrontatif dalam mengimplementasikan strategi Symbolic Politics. Tetapi kelemahan dari strategi ini yaitu Greenpeace Indonesia terkesan eksklusif dalam melakukan aksi-aksinya oleh NGO lingkungan lain khususnya NGO lingkungan yang basisnya domestik. Kelemahan dari empat strategi ini yaitu Accountability Politics dimana Greenpeace Indonesia tidak memiliki komitmen dari Wilmar International yang memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat sehingga Greenpeace Indonesia hanya mengandalkan tekanan publik dalam menekan Wilmar International guna berkomitmen menjalankan kebijakan NDPE
Muhammad Arief Virgy - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
strategi jaringan advokasi transnasional Greenpeace indonesia terkait isu deforestasi hutan indonesia oleh wilmar international
Journal of Political Issues, 2020Co-Authors: Muhammad Arief Virgy, Yusa Djuyandi, Wawan Budi DarmawanAbstract:Greenpeace Indonesia looking for Wilmar International as actor for making deforestation.. Greenpeace Indonesia pressured Wilmar International to commit to implementing their No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) policy through the establishment of a transnational advocacy network to make enough power to put pressure on Wilmar International. Through this method, Greenpeace Indonesia succeeded in making Wilmar International pressured and changed its behavior. This research analyzes how Greenpeace Indonesia's strategy in forming transnational advocacy networks so that the network suppresses and monitors the behavior of target actor through the Keck & Sikkink Transnational Advocacy Network theory. Researchers used qualitative methods with a case study approach. Data collection comes from primary and secondary data and data collection through literature studies from books, journals and articles. The results of this study indicate that Greenpeace Indonesia is very optimal in carrying out Information Politics and Leverage Politics strategies. Greenpeace Indonesia has creative and confrontational methods in implementing the Symbolic Politics strategy. But the weakness of this strategy is that Greenpeace Indonesia seems to be exclusive in carrying out its actions by other environmental NGOs, especially domestic-based environmental NGOs. The weaknesses of these four strategies are Accountability Politics where Greenpeace Indonesia does not have the commitment of Wilmar International which has binding legal force.
-
Strategi Jaringan Advokasi Transnasional Greenpeace Indonesia Terkait Isu Deforestasi Hutan Indonesia oleh Wilmar International
'Universitas Bangka Belitung', 2020Co-Authors: Muhammad Arief Virgy, Yusa Djuyandi, Wawan Budi DarmawanAbstract:Greenpeace Indonesia saat ini menyoroti Wilmar Internasional sebagai pelaku deforestasi. Greenpeace Indonesia menekan Wilmar International untuk berkomitmen mengimplementasikan kebijakan No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) mereka lewat pembentukan jaringan advokasi transnasional guna membuat powernya cukup untuk menekan Wilmar International. Lewat metode tersebut, Greenpeace Indonesia berhasil membuat Wilmar International terdesak dan merubah perilakunya. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana strategi Greenpeace Indonesia dalam membentuk jaringan advokasi transnasional hingga jaringan tersebut menekan dan memantau perilaku aktor target melalui teori Transnational Advocacy Network Keck & Sikkink. Peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Pengumpulan data berasal dari data primer dan sekunder serta pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan dari buku, jurnal dan artikel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Greenpeace Indonesia sangat optimal dalam melakukan strategi Information Politics dan Leverage Politics. Greenpeace Indonesia memiliki metode yang kreatif dan konfrontatif dalam mengimplementasikan strategi Symbolic Politics. Tetapi kelemahan dari strategi ini yaitu Greenpeace Indonesia terkesan eksklusif dalam melakukan aksi-aksinya oleh NGO lingkungan lain khususnya NGO lingkungan yang basisnya domestik. Kelemahan dari empat strategi ini yaitu Accountability Politics dimana Greenpeace Indonesia tidak memiliki komitmen dari Wilmar International yang memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat sehingga Greenpeace Indonesia hanya mengandalkan tekanan publik dalam menekan Wilmar International guna berkomitmen menjalankan kebijakan NDPE
Frances Hannah - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
acpns legal case notes series 2020 152 Greenpeace of new zealand inc v charities registration board
2020Co-Authors: Myles Mcgregorlowndes, Frances HannahAbstract:High Court of New Zealand, Mallon J, 12 November 2020 A case to determine the date of registration as a charity for Greenpeace New Zealand Inc
-
acpns legal case notes series 2020 109 Greenpeace of new zealand inc v charities registration board
2020Co-Authors: Myles Mcgregorlowndes, Frances HannahAbstract:High Court of New Zealand, Mallon J, 10 August 2020. Whether Greenpeace New Zealand had charitable purposes and no illegal purposes so could be registered as a charity.
-
acpns legal case notes series 2018 19 Greenpeace of new zealand incorporated
2018Co-Authors: Myles Mcgregorlowndes, Frances HannahAbstract:Registration decision of the Charities Registration Board of New Zealand, 21 March 2018. Greenpeace does not qualify as a charity as it promotes viewpoints that are not for the benefit of the public and they are involved in illegal activities.
Yusa Djuyandi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
strategi jaringan advokasi transnasional Greenpeace indonesia terkait isu deforestasi hutan indonesia oleh wilmar international
Journal of Political Issues, 2020Co-Authors: Muhammad Arief Virgy, Yusa Djuyandi, Wawan Budi DarmawanAbstract:Greenpeace Indonesia looking for Wilmar International as actor for making deforestation.. Greenpeace Indonesia pressured Wilmar International to commit to implementing their No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) policy through the establishment of a transnational advocacy network to make enough power to put pressure on Wilmar International. Through this method, Greenpeace Indonesia succeeded in making Wilmar International pressured and changed its behavior. This research analyzes how Greenpeace Indonesia's strategy in forming transnational advocacy networks so that the network suppresses and monitors the behavior of target actor through the Keck & Sikkink Transnational Advocacy Network theory. Researchers used qualitative methods with a case study approach. Data collection comes from primary and secondary data and data collection through literature studies from books, journals and articles. The results of this study indicate that Greenpeace Indonesia is very optimal in carrying out Information Politics and Leverage Politics strategies. Greenpeace Indonesia has creative and confrontational methods in implementing the Symbolic Politics strategy. But the weakness of this strategy is that Greenpeace Indonesia seems to be exclusive in carrying out its actions by other environmental NGOs, especially domestic-based environmental NGOs. The weaknesses of these four strategies are Accountability Politics where Greenpeace Indonesia does not have the commitment of Wilmar International which has binding legal force.
-
Strategi Jaringan Advokasi Transnasional Greenpeace Indonesia Terkait Isu Deforestasi Hutan Indonesia oleh Wilmar International
'Universitas Bangka Belitung', 2020Co-Authors: Muhammad Arief Virgy, Yusa Djuyandi, Wawan Budi DarmawanAbstract:Greenpeace Indonesia saat ini menyoroti Wilmar Internasional sebagai pelaku deforestasi. Greenpeace Indonesia menekan Wilmar International untuk berkomitmen mengimplementasikan kebijakan No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation (NDPE) mereka lewat pembentukan jaringan advokasi transnasional guna membuat powernya cukup untuk menekan Wilmar International. Lewat metode tersebut, Greenpeace Indonesia berhasil membuat Wilmar International terdesak dan merubah perilakunya. Penelitian ini menganalisis bagaimana strategi Greenpeace Indonesia dalam membentuk jaringan advokasi transnasional hingga jaringan tersebut menekan dan memantau perilaku aktor target melalui teori Transnational Advocacy Network Keck & Sikkink. Peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Pengumpulan data berasal dari data primer dan sekunder serta pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan dari buku, jurnal dan artikel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Greenpeace Indonesia sangat optimal dalam melakukan strategi Information Politics dan Leverage Politics. Greenpeace Indonesia memiliki metode yang kreatif dan konfrontatif dalam mengimplementasikan strategi Symbolic Politics. Tetapi kelemahan dari strategi ini yaitu Greenpeace Indonesia terkesan eksklusif dalam melakukan aksi-aksinya oleh NGO lingkungan lain khususnya NGO lingkungan yang basisnya domestik. Kelemahan dari empat strategi ini yaitu Accountability Politics dimana Greenpeace Indonesia tidak memiliki komitmen dari Wilmar International yang memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat sehingga Greenpeace Indonesia hanya mengandalkan tekanan publik dalam menekan Wilmar International guna berkomitmen menjalankan kebijakan NDPE
