The Experts below are selected from a list of 53943 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
A Torrecillas - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
yield response to regulated deficit irrigation of greenhouse cherry tomatoes
Agricultural Water Management, 2019Co-Authors: Elena Coyagocruz, Antonio J Melendezmartinez, Alfonso Moriana, I F Giron, M J Martinpalomo, A Galindo, D Perezlopez, A TorrecillasAbstract:Around the world, the tomato is considered the most important vegetable because of the extent of the cultivated area. In addition, it requires vast amounts of irrigation but little is known about the management of deficit irrigation. This study aims to evaluate the effect of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on development of crop and fruit quality for cherry tomatoes (ʽLazarinoʼ and ʽSummerbrixʼ). Two different cherry cultivars were used during two crop cycles (autumn and spring). RDI was scheduled with an initial Period of no water stress and with a Period of deficit from the beginning of the flowering, with a threshold of midday leaf water potential of around −1 MPa. It was found that the response to the irrigation treatment was affected by the season and even by the cluster considered. During the autumn cycle, there were no clear differences in yield despite water stress being mild but still significant. In the spring cycle, yield reduction peaked with different responses between cultivars. Water stress reduced fruit weight and fruit number per cluster in cv Summerbrix, producing a continuous decrease throughout the Harvest Period. In cv Lazarino, a yield reduction was detected only at the end of the Harvest Period and was related to the decrease in fruit weight and the number of inflorescence. The application of RDI reduced water by 85% and increased the content of soluble sugar, carotenoids and total phenols in both cultivars and cycles.
-
daily sap flow and maximum daily trunk shrinkage measurements for diagnosing water stress in early maturing peach trees during the post Harvest Period
Tree Physiology, 2007Co-Authors: W Conejero, J J Alarcon, Y Garciaorellana, J M Abrisqueta, A TorrecillasAbstract:We compared the sensitivity of two continuously recorded plant-based water stress indicators (sap flow, SF, and maximum daily trunk shrinkage, MDS) to detect changes in the water status of 4-year-old early maturing peach trees (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch cv. Flordastar grafted on GF-677 peach rootstock) during a cycle of deficit irrigation and recovery. The feasibility of obtaining SF and MDS reference equations for use in irrigation scheduling during the post-Harvest Period was also studied in trees irrigated in excess of crop water requirements. We found that MDS was a more sensitive and reliable detector of changes in plant water status than SF, making it a more precise tool for irrigation scheduling. Baseline relationships between SF or MDS and the climatic variables (air temperature, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and crop reference evapotranspiration (ETo)) were established, despite some scatter in the data. Among the climatic variables, SF correlated more closely with ETo, whereas MDS correlated more closely with mean daily air temperature (T (m)). The fits of the regressions between MDS and ETo, midday air temperature and T (m) for individual Periods were better than those obtained in the overall regressions, confirming that daily stem diameter variations must be considered not only in the context of plant water status but also in the context of plant carbon status.
T M Dejong - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A Weinbaum, I KleinAbstract:Effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees were investigated during a 3-year field experiment. Return bloom and fruit set were measured on 2185 individually tagged spurs. Water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period, which purportedly coincides with the time of flower initiation, had no effect on the percentage of spurs that flowered or set fruit during subsequent years. Although water stress had no apparent effect on spur mortality, 66% of the tagged spurs died within 3 years. In addition, many spurs were vegetative by the third year, indicating the importance of spur renewal for sustained fruit production. Reductions in nut yield were evident after two successive years of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period. Regression analysis indicated a loss in yield of 7.7 kg tree(-1) in response to each 1 MPa decrease in stem water potential below -1.2 MPa during the previous seasons. The number of fruiting positions per tree (estimated indirectly for whole trees based on weight of current-year shoots > 5 cm in length) was negatively associated with water stress. Yield reduction in response to water stress during Harvest appears to be a compound, multiyear effect, associated with reduced annual growth and renewal of fruiting positions.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on nonstructural carbohydrate and nitrogen contents of dormant mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A WeinbaumAbstract:Effect of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on the nonstructural carbohydrate (NC) content of dormant, mature, field-grown almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees was studied. Roots, trunk, branches, spurs and stems of 12 trees were subsampled in February 1997, across a gradient of irrigation treatments (FI = fully irrigated, MS = moderately stressed and SS = severely stressed) to relate NC concentration to the degree of water stress experienced by individual trees during the previous (1996) Harvest Period. To assess the effect of water stress on whole-tree NC content, three dormant FI trees and three dormant SS trees were excavated on December 10, 1997, and dry weights and NC and N concentrations of the tree components were determined. Whole-tree biomass did not differ significantly between FI and SS trees, although SS trees tended to have less total dry weight. Although roots constituted just 13% of tree biomass, they stored 36 and 44% of tree NC and N contents, respectively. There were negative relationships between the seasonal minimum values of both midday (Psi(ms)) and predawn (Psi(pd)) stem water potentials during the Harvest Period and root NC content of dormant trees. Severe water stress during the Harvest Period resulted in a 26% reduction in NC content and a 50% reduction in biomass of current-year stems (> 5 cm in length) per tree. The reduction in NC content is consistent with the previously reported late season reductions in leaf function and persistence. The SS trees exhibited a reduction in NC content but not in N content per tree, indicating that late season accumulation of NC and N were uncoupled in trees subjected to severe Harvest-Period water stress.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on leaf persistence and function in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: I Klein, G Esparza, S A Weinbaum, T M DejongAbstract:In nut tree orchards in California, irrigation is typically withheld during the Harvest Period to reduce the likelihood of bark damage during mechanical shaking of the trees. The ensuing water stress, however, may result in premature defoliation and subsequent yield declines. Our objective was to establish and quantify the water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation and determine its impact on leaf function and persistence in mature almond trees (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) during a 3-year field experiment. The severity of the water stress was characterized by measurements of predawn leaf (Psi(pd)) and midday stem (Psi(ms)) water potentials, stomatal conductance (gs), net CO2 assimilation rate (A) and leaf abscission. During 1995, Psi(ms) of fully irrigated (FI) trees was maintained above -1.0 MPa. In trees in the moderate- (MS) and severe-stress (SS) treatments, Psi(ms) was reduced to -1.4 to -2.0 MPa and -2.0 to -2.6 MPa, respectively. After 18 days of irrigation deprivation, A was reduced by 32 and 58% at midday and early afternoon, respectively, compared with morning values. A significant decrease in morning values of A only occurred after 30 days of irrigation deprivation. Water-use efficiency and A declined as evaporative demand increased from morning to afternoon. Assimilation also declined seasonally as leaves aged. Midday stem water potential was highly correlated with A, but less so with gs. The coefficient of determination between Psi(ms) and gs improved considerably when vapor pressure deficit and wind were multiply regressed with Psi(ms). Although A recovered rapidly when MS trees were irrigated, recovery in SS trees was slower and incomplete. Integrating the MS and SS effects for an extended Period during 1995 resulted in 14 and 30% declines in A, and 6 and 20% declines in gs, respectively. The apparent Psi(ms) threshold for leaf abscission was -1.8 MPa. Daily canopy light interception declined with decreasing Psi(ms) as a result of premature defoliation (and perhaps altered leaf angles) from 67.9% in FI trees to 61.4 and 60.7% in MS and SS trees, respectively.
S A Weinbaum - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A Weinbaum, I KleinAbstract:Effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees were investigated during a 3-year field experiment. Return bloom and fruit set were measured on 2185 individually tagged spurs. Water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period, which purportedly coincides with the time of flower initiation, had no effect on the percentage of spurs that flowered or set fruit during subsequent years. Although water stress had no apparent effect on spur mortality, 66% of the tagged spurs died within 3 years. In addition, many spurs were vegetative by the third year, indicating the importance of spur renewal for sustained fruit production. Reductions in nut yield were evident after two successive years of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period. Regression analysis indicated a loss in yield of 7.7 kg tree(-1) in response to each 1 MPa decrease in stem water potential below -1.2 MPa during the previous seasons. The number of fruiting positions per tree (estimated indirectly for whole trees based on weight of current-year shoots > 5 cm in length) was negatively associated with water stress. Yield reduction in response to water stress during Harvest appears to be a compound, multiyear effect, associated with reduced annual growth and renewal of fruiting positions.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on nonstructural carbohydrate and nitrogen contents of dormant mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A WeinbaumAbstract:Effect of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on the nonstructural carbohydrate (NC) content of dormant, mature, field-grown almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees was studied. Roots, trunk, branches, spurs and stems of 12 trees were subsampled in February 1997, across a gradient of irrigation treatments (FI = fully irrigated, MS = moderately stressed and SS = severely stressed) to relate NC concentration to the degree of water stress experienced by individual trees during the previous (1996) Harvest Period. To assess the effect of water stress on whole-tree NC content, three dormant FI trees and three dormant SS trees were excavated on December 10, 1997, and dry weights and NC and N concentrations of the tree components were determined. Whole-tree biomass did not differ significantly between FI and SS trees, although SS trees tended to have less total dry weight. Although roots constituted just 13% of tree biomass, they stored 36 and 44% of tree NC and N contents, respectively. There were negative relationships between the seasonal minimum values of both midday (Psi(ms)) and predawn (Psi(pd)) stem water potentials during the Harvest Period and root NC content of dormant trees. Severe water stress during the Harvest Period resulted in a 26% reduction in NC content and a 50% reduction in biomass of current-year stems (> 5 cm in length) per tree. The reduction in NC content is consistent with the previously reported late season reductions in leaf function and persistence. The SS trees exhibited a reduction in NC content but not in N content per tree, indicating that late season accumulation of NC and N were uncoupled in trees subjected to severe Harvest-Period water stress.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on leaf persistence and function in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: I Klein, G Esparza, S A Weinbaum, T M DejongAbstract:In nut tree orchards in California, irrigation is typically withheld during the Harvest Period to reduce the likelihood of bark damage during mechanical shaking of the trees. The ensuing water stress, however, may result in premature defoliation and subsequent yield declines. Our objective was to establish and quantify the water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation and determine its impact on leaf function and persistence in mature almond trees (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) during a 3-year field experiment. The severity of the water stress was characterized by measurements of predawn leaf (Psi(pd)) and midday stem (Psi(ms)) water potentials, stomatal conductance (gs), net CO2 assimilation rate (A) and leaf abscission. During 1995, Psi(ms) of fully irrigated (FI) trees was maintained above -1.0 MPa. In trees in the moderate- (MS) and severe-stress (SS) treatments, Psi(ms) was reduced to -1.4 to -2.0 MPa and -2.0 to -2.6 MPa, respectively. After 18 days of irrigation deprivation, A was reduced by 32 and 58% at midday and early afternoon, respectively, compared with morning values. A significant decrease in morning values of A only occurred after 30 days of irrigation deprivation. Water-use efficiency and A declined as evaporative demand increased from morning to afternoon. Assimilation also declined seasonally as leaves aged. Midday stem water potential was highly correlated with A, but less so with gs. The coefficient of determination between Psi(ms) and gs improved considerably when vapor pressure deficit and wind were multiply regressed with Psi(ms). Although A recovered rapidly when MS trees were irrigated, recovery in SS trees was slower and incomplete. Integrating the MS and SS effects for an extended Period during 1995 resulted in 14 and 30% declines in A, and 6 and 20% declines in gs, respectively. The apparent Psi(ms) threshold for leaf abscission was -1.8 MPa. Daily canopy light interception declined with decreasing Psi(ms) as a result of premature defoliation (and perhaps altered leaf angles) from 67.9% in FI trees to 61.4 and 60.7% in MS and SS trees, respectively.
G Esparza - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A Weinbaum, I KleinAbstract:Effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees were investigated during a 3-year field experiment. Return bloom and fruit set were measured on 2185 individually tagged spurs. Water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period, which purportedly coincides with the time of flower initiation, had no effect on the percentage of spurs that flowered or set fruit during subsequent years. Although water stress had no apparent effect on spur mortality, 66% of the tagged spurs died within 3 years. In addition, many spurs were vegetative by the third year, indicating the importance of spur renewal for sustained fruit production. Reductions in nut yield were evident after two successive years of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period. Regression analysis indicated a loss in yield of 7.7 kg tree(-1) in response to each 1 MPa decrease in stem water potential below -1.2 MPa during the previous seasons. The number of fruiting positions per tree (estimated indirectly for whole trees based on weight of current-year shoots > 5 cm in length) was negatively associated with water stress. Yield reduction in response to water stress during Harvest appears to be a compound, multiyear effect, associated with reduced annual growth and renewal of fruiting positions.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on nonstructural carbohydrate and nitrogen contents of dormant mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A WeinbaumAbstract:Effect of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on the nonstructural carbohydrate (NC) content of dormant, mature, field-grown almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees was studied. Roots, trunk, branches, spurs and stems of 12 trees were subsampled in February 1997, across a gradient of irrigation treatments (FI = fully irrigated, MS = moderately stressed and SS = severely stressed) to relate NC concentration to the degree of water stress experienced by individual trees during the previous (1996) Harvest Period. To assess the effect of water stress on whole-tree NC content, three dormant FI trees and three dormant SS trees were excavated on December 10, 1997, and dry weights and NC and N concentrations of the tree components were determined. Whole-tree biomass did not differ significantly between FI and SS trees, although SS trees tended to have less total dry weight. Although roots constituted just 13% of tree biomass, they stored 36 and 44% of tree NC and N contents, respectively. There were negative relationships between the seasonal minimum values of both midday (Psi(ms)) and predawn (Psi(pd)) stem water potentials during the Harvest Period and root NC content of dormant trees. Severe water stress during the Harvest Period resulted in a 26% reduction in NC content and a 50% reduction in biomass of current-year stems (> 5 cm in length) per tree. The reduction in NC content is consistent with the previously reported late season reductions in leaf function and persistence. The SS trees exhibited a reduction in NC content but not in N content per tree, indicating that late season accumulation of NC and N were uncoupled in trees subjected to severe Harvest-Period water stress.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on leaf persistence and function in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: I Klein, G Esparza, S A Weinbaum, T M DejongAbstract:In nut tree orchards in California, irrigation is typically withheld during the Harvest Period to reduce the likelihood of bark damage during mechanical shaking of the trees. The ensuing water stress, however, may result in premature defoliation and subsequent yield declines. Our objective was to establish and quantify the water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation and determine its impact on leaf function and persistence in mature almond trees (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) during a 3-year field experiment. The severity of the water stress was characterized by measurements of predawn leaf (Psi(pd)) and midday stem (Psi(ms)) water potentials, stomatal conductance (gs), net CO2 assimilation rate (A) and leaf abscission. During 1995, Psi(ms) of fully irrigated (FI) trees was maintained above -1.0 MPa. In trees in the moderate- (MS) and severe-stress (SS) treatments, Psi(ms) was reduced to -1.4 to -2.0 MPa and -2.0 to -2.6 MPa, respectively. After 18 days of irrigation deprivation, A was reduced by 32 and 58% at midday and early afternoon, respectively, compared with morning values. A significant decrease in morning values of A only occurred after 30 days of irrigation deprivation. Water-use efficiency and A declined as evaporative demand increased from morning to afternoon. Assimilation also declined seasonally as leaves aged. Midday stem water potential was highly correlated with A, but less so with gs. The coefficient of determination between Psi(ms) and gs improved considerably when vapor pressure deficit and wind were multiply regressed with Psi(ms). Although A recovered rapidly when MS trees were irrigated, recovery in SS trees was slower and incomplete. Integrating the MS and SS effects for an extended Period during 1995 resulted in 14 and 30% declines in A, and 6 and 20% declines in gs, respectively. The apparent Psi(ms) threshold for leaf abscission was -1.8 MPa. Daily canopy light interception declined with decreasing Psi(ms) as a result of premature defoliation (and perhaps altered leaf angles) from 67.9% in FI trees to 61.4 and 60.7% in MS and SS trees, respectively.
I Klein - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: G Esparza, T M Dejong, S A Weinbaum, I KleinAbstract:Effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on yield determinants in mature almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) trees were investigated during a 3-year field experiment. Return bloom and fruit set were measured on 2185 individually tagged spurs. Water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period, which purportedly coincides with the time of flower initiation, had no effect on the percentage of spurs that flowered or set fruit during subsequent years. Although water stress had no apparent effect on spur mortality, 66% of the tagged spurs died within 3 years. In addition, many spurs were vegetative by the third year, indicating the importance of spur renewal for sustained fruit production. Reductions in nut yield were evident after two successive years of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period. Regression analysis indicated a loss in yield of 7.7 kg tree(-1) in response to each 1 MPa decrease in stem water potential below -1.2 MPa during the previous seasons. The number of fruiting positions per tree (estimated indirectly for whole trees based on weight of current-year shoots > 5 cm in length) was negatively associated with water stress. Yield reduction in response to water stress during Harvest appears to be a compound, multiyear effect, associated with reduced annual growth and renewal of fruiting positions.
-
effects of irrigation deprivation during the Harvest Period on leaf persistence and function in mature almond trees
Tree Physiology, 2001Co-Authors: I Klein, G Esparza, S A Weinbaum, T M DejongAbstract:In nut tree orchards in California, irrigation is typically withheld during the Harvest Period to reduce the likelihood of bark damage during mechanical shaking of the trees. The ensuing water stress, however, may result in premature defoliation and subsequent yield declines. Our objective was to establish and quantify the water stress resulting from irrigation deprivation and determine its impact on leaf function and persistence in mature almond trees (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. Nonpareil) during a 3-year field experiment. The severity of the water stress was characterized by measurements of predawn leaf (Psi(pd)) and midday stem (Psi(ms)) water potentials, stomatal conductance (gs), net CO2 assimilation rate (A) and leaf abscission. During 1995, Psi(ms) of fully irrigated (FI) trees was maintained above -1.0 MPa. In trees in the moderate- (MS) and severe-stress (SS) treatments, Psi(ms) was reduced to -1.4 to -2.0 MPa and -2.0 to -2.6 MPa, respectively. After 18 days of irrigation deprivation, A was reduced by 32 and 58% at midday and early afternoon, respectively, compared with morning values. A significant decrease in morning values of A only occurred after 30 days of irrigation deprivation. Water-use efficiency and A declined as evaporative demand increased from morning to afternoon. Assimilation also declined seasonally as leaves aged. Midday stem water potential was highly correlated with A, but less so with gs. The coefficient of determination between Psi(ms) and gs improved considerably when vapor pressure deficit and wind were multiply regressed with Psi(ms). Although A recovered rapidly when MS trees were irrigated, recovery in SS trees was slower and incomplete. Integrating the MS and SS effects for an extended Period during 1995 resulted in 14 and 30% declines in A, and 6 and 20% declines in gs, respectively. The apparent Psi(ms) threshold for leaf abscission was -1.8 MPa. Daily canopy light interception declined with decreasing Psi(ms) as a result of premature defoliation (and perhaps altered leaf angles) from 67.9% in FI trees to 61.4 and 60.7% in MS and SS trees, respectively.
