The Experts below are selected from a list of 957 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Marco Fahmi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Ontological Commitments of Mathematical Models
2007Co-Authors: Marco FahmiAbstract:Some philosophers of mathematics argue that the role of mathematical models in science is merely representational: when scientists use mathematical models they only believe that they are adequate representations of the physical phenomenon under investigation. Others disagree with this view and argue that mathematical models also serve as genuine explanations in science. Consequently, the application of mathematical models in science cannot be treated instrumentally and we ought to be realists about mathematics. I advance two reasons to reject realist conclusion: genuine mathematical explanations are indistinguishable from spurious ones. And, for mathematical models to be explanatory, they have to be “bottom-level”; I deny that we can know which explanations (if any) are bottom level in science. I contend that what plays the explanatory role is the Impure Function that links physical structures to mathematical structures.
Fahmi Marco - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN SCIENCE: A DEBATE ABOUT ONTOLOGY
2008Co-Authors: Fahmi MarcoAbstract:Some philosophers of mathematics argue that the role of mathematical models in science is merely representational: when scientists use mathematical models they only believe that they are adequate representations of the physical phenomenon under investigation. Others disagree with this view and argue that mathematical models also serve as genuine explanations in science. Consequently, the application of mathematical models in science cannot be treated instrumentally and we ought to be realists about mathematics. I advance two reasons to reject realist conclusion: genuine mathematical explanations are indistinguishable from spurious ones. And, for mathematical models to be explanatory, they have to be “bottom-level”; I deny that we can know which explanations (if any) are bottom level in science. I contend that what plays the explanatory role is the Impure Function that links physical structures to mathematical structures
