The Experts below are selected from a list of 7995 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Juliane Reinecke - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
when Industrial Democracy meets corporate social responsibility a comparison of the bangladesh accord and alliance as responses to the rana plaza disaster
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018Co-Authors: Jimmy Donaghey, Juliane ReineckeAbstract:Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate†led initiatives, with little attention paid to the role of unions. Industrial Democracy centres on labour involvement: those affected by governance need to be part of it. Examining the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as governance responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, this article offers a comparative perspective of how Industrial Democracy†oriented and CSR†oriented initiatives translate into differences in implementation. The article highlights that while CSR can foster effective problem†solving in the short run, Industrial Democracy is necessary to build governance capacities involving workers in the long run.
-
When Industrial Democracy meets corporate social responsibility – a comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza disaster
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2017Co-Authors: Jimmy Donaghey, Juliane ReineckeAbstract:Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate†led initiatives, with little attention paid to the role of unions. Industrial Democracy centres on labour involvement: those affected by governance need to be part of it. Examining the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as governance responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, this article offers a comparative perspective of how Industrial Democracy†oriented and CSR†oriented initiatives translate into differences in implementation. The article highlights that while CSR can foster effective problem†solving in the short run, Industrial Democracy is necessary to build governance capacities involving workers in the long run.
-
When Industrial Democracy meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Responses to Rana Plaza
Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016Co-Authors: Jimmy Donaghey, Juliane ReineckeAbstract:Both the CSR and Industrial relations literatures have analysed labour standards in global supply chains from different perspectives, yet rarely interact with each other. The dominant approach in CSR has been to view workers as passive recipients of corporate-led initiatives and has often failed to examine the role which trade unions can play in such initiatives. In contrast, the Industrial Democracy approach, developed by Industrial relations scholars, centres on labour involvement but its functioning is predicated on institutional infrastructures, which are often lacking in global supply chain contexts. This paper seeks to analyse the interplay between CSR and Industrial Democracy through the examination of the two major responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh: the Accord for Fire and Building Safety and the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety. Our paper highlights that there is potential for Industrial relations and CSR scholars and practitioners to learn lessons from each other’s app...
Jimmy Donaghey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
when Industrial Democracy meets corporate social responsibility a comparison of the bangladesh accord and alliance as responses to the rana plaza disaster
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018Co-Authors: Jimmy Donaghey, Juliane ReineckeAbstract:Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate†led initiatives, with little attention paid to the role of unions. Industrial Democracy centres on labour involvement: those affected by governance need to be part of it. Examining the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as governance responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, this article offers a comparative perspective of how Industrial Democracy†oriented and CSR†oriented initiatives translate into differences in implementation. The article highlights that while CSR can foster effective problem†solving in the short run, Industrial Democracy is necessary to build governance capacities involving workers in the long run.
-
When Industrial Democracy meets corporate social responsibility – a comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza disaster
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2017Co-Authors: Jimmy Donaghey, Juliane ReineckeAbstract:Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate†led initiatives, with little attention paid to the role of unions. Industrial Democracy centres on labour involvement: those affected by governance need to be part of it. Examining the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as governance responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, this article offers a comparative perspective of how Industrial Democracy†oriented and CSR†oriented initiatives translate into differences in implementation. The article highlights that while CSR can foster effective problem†solving in the short run, Industrial Democracy is necessary to build governance capacities involving workers in the long run.
-
When Industrial Democracy meets Corporate Social Responsibility: Responses to Rana Plaza
Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016Co-Authors: Jimmy Donaghey, Juliane ReineckeAbstract:Both the CSR and Industrial relations literatures have analysed labour standards in global supply chains from different perspectives, yet rarely interact with each other. The dominant approach in CSR has been to view workers as passive recipients of corporate-led initiatives and has often failed to examine the role which trade unions can play in such initiatives. In contrast, the Industrial Democracy approach, developed by Industrial relations scholars, centres on labour involvement but its functioning is predicated on institutional infrastructures, which are often lacking in global supply chain contexts. This paper seeks to analyse the interplay between CSR and Industrial Democracy through the examination of the two major responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh: the Accord for Fire and Building Safety and the Alliance for Bangladesh Worker Safety. Our paper highlights that there is potential for Industrial relations and CSR scholars and practitioners to learn lessons from each other’s app...
Nick Wailes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Comparative Analysis of Developments in Industrial Democracy
Industrial Relations, 2001Co-Authors: Michael Poole, Russell D. Lansbury, Nick WailesAbstract:The purpose of this article is to analyze recent developments in Industrial Democracy (worker participation in management) in a comparative perspective. To give the article focus, the period from the mid-1980s onward is selected for analysis, and four countries (United States, Germany, United Kingdom, and Australia) are targeted for systematic examination. Developments in both indirect and direct participation are explained on the basis of elements in the models that we present. Three particularly strong conclusions emerge. First, there are clearly a number of common forces that have affected developments in each country, but the precise forms of participation that have emerged vary in many key respects. Second, organizational changes at the level of the firm appear to be particularly important in the recent period. And finally, the very complex patterns that are observable reinforce our theoretical arguments of the importance of a complex multivariate approach.
Michael Poole - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Comparative Analysis of Developments in Industrial Democracy
Industrial Relations, 2001Co-Authors: Michael Poole, Russell D. Lansbury, Nick WailesAbstract:The purpose of this article is to analyze recent developments in Industrial Democracy (worker participation in management) in a comparative perspective. To give the article focus, the period from the mid-1980s onward is selected for analysis, and four countries (United States, Germany, United Kingdom, and Australia) are targeted for systematic examination. Developments in both indirect and direct participation are explained on the basis of elements in the models that we present. Three particularly strong conclusions emerge. First, there are clearly a number of common forces that have affected developments in each country, but the precise forms of participation that have emerged vary in many key respects. Second, organizational changes at the level of the firm appear to be particularly important in the recent period. And finally, the very complex patterns that are observable reinforce our theoretical arguments of the importance of a complex multivariate approach.
A.v. Shevcov - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ON THE PROBLEMS OF Industrial Democracy IN THE PERIOD OF PERESTROIKA
THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN, 2020Co-Authors: A.v. ShevcovAbstract:Declared in 1985 by the Soviet leadership headed by Mikhail Gorbachev, the policy of «perestroika» was based on a pecu- liarly understood return to the principles of the reign of V. I. Lenin. The reforms included the process of introducing Industrial Democracy along the lines of the Yugoslav economy. The election of the management staff of state-owned enterprises should 1) contribute to improving the efficiency of the national economy; 2) extend electoral procedures to the sphere of economic corporations, thus supporting the reform of the political system in the area of transition to competitive elections. The concept of «Industrial Democracy» is extremely policemen. Western researchers include in its framework very diverse phenomena and processes, from the right of employees to speak out on important management issues, to participate in the management of the enterprise and receive a share of the company's profits. The Soviet reformers of the perestroika period were based on the Yugoslav experience, embodying the philanthropic prin- ciple of «class cooperation» in the process of socialist construction. Moreover, the results of attracting employees to the en- terprise management process were very contradictory. The article considers one of the aspects of this process – sociological research conducted by Soviet researchers at state- owned enterprises. Sociologists studied 1) the attitude of employees to the system of elective leadership; 2) the reaction to the introduction of institutions of Industrial Democracy; 3) the compliance of the results with the stated goals of the party leadership. As a result, the following main positions were identified: the unwillingness of employees to accept innovations «from above» as an urgent need; the incompetence of employees, including candidates for managers of enterprises and institutions; the preservation of relative inviolability of forms of state ownership, which did not allow the introduction of a new system for managing this property.