The Experts below are selected from a list of 66 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Paul Benjamin Lowry - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Social Science Research Network, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders’ behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literature — protection motivation theory (PMT) — to include the relationship of insiders’ psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT. PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important workrelated motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap’s relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Computers in Human Behavior, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders' behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literatureprotection motivation theory (PMT)to include the relationship of insiders' psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT.PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important work-related motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap's relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research. Extended PMT model is proposed that includes the relationship of insiders' PsyCap.PsyCap uniquely relates to each Threat and coping appraisal mechanism of PMT.Via the facets of PMT, PsyCap indirectly relates to protection motivation and PMBs.Higher levels of PsyCap are related to more PMBs and higher protection motivation.Opportunities exist to build insiders' PsyCap and improve Information Security.

Alan J Burns - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Social Science Research Network, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders’ behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literature — protection motivation theory (PMT) — to include the relationship of insiders’ psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT. PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important workrelated motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap’s relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Computers in Human Behavior, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders' behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literatureprotection motivation theory (PMT)to include the relationship of insiders' psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT.PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important work-related motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap's relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research. Extended PMT model is proposed that includes the relationship of insiders' PsyCap.PsyCap uniquely relates to each Threat and coping appraisal mechanism of PMT.Via the facets of PMT, PsyCap indirectly relates to protection motivation and PMBs.Higher levels of PsyCap are related to more PMBs and higher protection motivation.Opportunities exist to build insiders' PsyCap and improve Information Security.

Tom L. Roberts - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Social Science Research Network, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders’ behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literature — protection motivation theory (PMT) — to include the relationship of insiders’ psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT. PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important workrelated motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap’s relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Computers in Human Behavior, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders' behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literatureprotection motivation theory (PMT)to include the relationship of insiders' psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT.PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important work-related motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap's relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research. Extended PMT model is proposed that includes the relationship of insiders' PsyCap.PsyCap uniquely relates to each Threat and coping appraisal mechanism of PMT.Via the facets of PMT, PsyCap indirectly relates to protection motivation and PMBs.Higher levels of PsyCap are related to more PMBs and higher protection motivation.Opportunities exist to build insiders' PsyCap and improve Information Security.

Clay Posey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Social Science Research Network, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders’ behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literature — protection motivation theory (PMT) — to include the relationship of insiders’ psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT. PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important workrelated motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap’s relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research.

  • examining the relationship of organizational insiders psychological capital with Information Security Threat and coping appraisals
    Computers in Human Behavior, 2017
    Co-Authors: Alan J Burns, Clay Posey, Tom L. Roberts, Paul Benjamin Lowry
    Abstract:

    Practitioners and researchers alike recognize the positive influence insiders' behavior can have on Information systems (IS) Security. This awareness has resulted in a research stream focused on the performance of protective behaviors. We contribute to this research stream by extending an oft-cited theory in the Information Security literatureprotection motivation theory (PMT)to include the relationship of insiders' psychological capital (PsyCap) with the mechanisms of PMT.PsyCap is a construct of role-breadth psychological capacities and resources embodying important work-related motivational resources. Therefore, given the varied facets central to PMT, determining the relationship of PsyCap with each distinct PMT mechanism is an important contribution. Furthermore, prior research has established that individuals can develop their PsyCap. Consequently, considering the relationship of role-breadth PsyCap with the PMT mechanisms provides an important and malleable, motivational antecedent that complements PMT and is absent from most assessments of the contemporary PMT model. We find support for PsyCap's relationship with the mechanisms of PMT and suggest opportunities to develop PsyCap in conjunction with other organizational Security efforts. We present our findings, discuss their implications for research and practice, and highlight several opportunities for future research. Extended PMT model is proposed that includes the relationship of insiders' PsyCap.PsyCap uniquely relates to each Threat and coping appraisal mechanism of PMT.Via the facets of PMT, PsyCap indirectly relates to protection motivation and PMBs.Higher levels of PsyCap are related to more PMBs and higher protection motivation.Opportunities exist to build insiders' PsyCap and improve Information Security.

Feipei Lai - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Threat Analysis for Wearable Health Devices and Environment Monitoring Internet of Things Integration System
    IEEE Access, 2019
    Co-Authors: Tzu Wei Tseng, Feipei Lai
    Abstract:

    With the rapid development of Internet of Things (IoT) applications, heterogeneous device management issues tend to arise in architecture Security due to hardware computing power, types of software, data transmission interfaces, and networking protocols. Even during data exchange between devices and systems, traditional IoT devices are prone to the disclosure of personal Information, which compromises privacy. Thus, planning an effective Information Security management strategy has become an essential part of application development. This paper presents a strategy to achieve Information Security verification and risk assessment for an IoT-based personal health Information system. Using several interfaces of IoT devices, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, we simulate possible attack hypotheses and define test methods and evaluation methods suitable for each device. In our application systems for Information Security analysis, we also consider and integrate weaknesses of the system architecture to achieve a more complete Information Security Threat analysis.