The Experts below are selected from a list of 11982 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Daniel M Bartels - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People's intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In 3 studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual's intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment was partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than in response to past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

  • brief report predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    2012
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People’s intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In 3 studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual’s intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment was partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than in response to past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

  • predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    Social Science Research Network, 2011
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People‟s intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In three studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual‟s intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment were partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

Zachary C Burns - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People's intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In 3 studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual's intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment was partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than in response to past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

  • brief report predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    2012
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People’s intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In 3 studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual’s intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment was partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than in response to past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

  • predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    Social Science Research Network, 2011
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People‟s intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In three studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual‟s intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment were partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

Yingchang Chen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • a study on consumer Intentional Behavior of the promotion of green food mark and green food hotel in taiwan using quantiles regression analysis
    A Study on Consumer Intentional Behavior of the Promotion of Green Food Mark and Green Food Hotel in, 2016
    Co-Authors: Yingchang Chen
    Abstract:

    This study applied Principle Component Analysis to explore the principal components of the questionnaire items and designates the principle components according to the meanings of the question items. Next, this study combined the principle components and basic data to conduct Quantiles Regression Analysis, in order to understand how the basic question items affect the principle components in the case of different quantiles. Finally, this study applied Grey Relational Analysis in discussing the most satisfactory principle components of consumer intentions of green food consumption, such as green food mark and green food hotels. The results showed that, people with environmental protection knowledge are more acceptable to green food mark; while the green food hotel is less profitable; therefore, relevant governmental agencies may improve the intentions of relevant industries through subsidies or incentives.

  • research article a study on consumer Intentional Behavior of the promotion of green food mark and green food hotel in taiwan using quantiles regression analysis
    2016
    Co-Authors: Yingchang Chen
    Abstract:

    This study applied Principle Component Analysis to explore the principal components of the questionnaire items and designates the principle components according to the meanings of the question items. Next, this study combined the principle components and basic data to conduct Quantiles Regression Analysis, in order to understand how the basic question items affect the principle components in the case of different quantiles. Finally, this study applied Grey Relational Analysis in discussing the most satisfactory principle components of consumer intentions of green food consumption, such as green food mark and green food hotels. The results showed that, people with environmental protection knowledge are more acceptable to green food mark; while the green food hotel is less profitable; therefore, relevant governmental agencies may improve the intentions of relevant industries through subsidies or incentives.

Eugene M Caruso - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2012
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People's intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In 3 studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual's intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment was partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than in response to past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

  • brief report predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    2012
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People’s intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In 3 studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual’s intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment was partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than in response to past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

  • predicting premeditation future Behavior is seen as more Intentional than past Behavior
    Social Science Research Network, 2011
    Co-Authors: Zachary C Burns, Eugene M Caruso, Daniel M Bartels
    Abstract:

    People‟s intuitions about the underlying causes of past and future actions might not be the same. In three studies, we demonstrate that people judge the same Behavior as more Intentional when it will be performed in the future than when it has been performed in the past. We found this temporal asymmetry in perceptions of both the strength of an individual‟s intention and the overall prevalence of Intentional Behavior in a population. Because of its heightened Intentionality, people thought the same transgression deserved more severe punishment when it would occur in the future than when it did occur in the past. The difference in judgments of both Intentionality and punishment were partly explained by the stronger emotional reactions that were elicited in response to future actions than past actions. We consider the implications of this temporal asymmetry for legal decision making and theories of attribution more generally.

Jonathan Newton - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • conventional contracts Intentional Behavior and logit choice equality without symmetry
    Research Papers in Economics, 2016
    Co-Authors: Sungha Hwang, Wooyoung Lim, Philip R Neary, Jonathan Newton
    Abstract:

    When coordination games are played under the logit choice rule and there is Intentional bias in agents’ non-best response Behavior, the Egalitarian bargaining solution emerges as the long run social norm. Without Intentional bias, a new solution, the Logit bargaining solution emerges as the long run norm. These results contrast with results under non-payoff dependent deviations from best response Behavior, where it has previously been shown that the Kalai-Smorodinsky and Nash bargaining solutions emerge as long run norms. Experiments on human subjects suggest that non-best response play is payoff dependent and displays Intentional bias. This suggests the Egalitarian solution as the most likely candidate for a long run bargaining norm.

  • conventional contracts Intentional Behavior and logit choice equality without symmetry
    Social Science Research Network, 2016
    Co-Authors: Sungha Hwang, Wooyoung Lim, Philip R Neary, Jonathan Newton
    Abstract:

    Abstract When coordination games are played under the logit choice rule and there is Intentional bias in agents' non-best response Behavior, we show that the Egalitarian bargaining solution emerges as the long run social norm. Without Intentional bias, a new solution, the Logit bargaining solution emerges as the long run norm. These results contrast with results under non-payoff dependent deviations from best response Behavior, where it has previously been shown that the Kalai–Smorodinsky and Nash bargaining solutions emerge as long run norms. We complement the theory with experiments on human subjects, results of which suggest that non-best response play is payoff dependent and displays Intentional bias. This suggests the Egalitarian solution as the most likely candidate for a long run bargaining norm.