The Experts below are selected from a list of 78 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Julicher, Manon Margit - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Nederlandse grondrechten: klaar voor de toekomst? : Modernisering van grondrechten in de Grondwet in het licht van het EVRM en het EU-Grondrechtenhandvest
'The Graduate School of the Humanities Utrecht University', 2020Co-Authors: Julicher, Manon MargitAbstract:The fundamental rights in the Dutch Constitution are urgently in need of amendment. At present, they are not in line with developments in technology and society. Some fundamental rights are formulated in such an outdated manner that they are barely comprehensible. Consider, for example, the right to freedom of expression. In the Constitution this right is described as ‘the freedom to publish thoughts and opinions through the press’. Is it possible to invoke this fundamental right in cases that involve spreading fake news or comments that incite hate on the Internet? And what effect does this fundamental right have in relation to legislation that forces social media platforms to apply filters in order to protect copyrighted materials? There is no clear answer. Other fundamental rights also display outdated formulations and a lack of practical manageability. The right to secrecy of Communications, for example, is unable to provide adequate protection from the large-scale Interception of Communication data by government institutions. Moreover, a number of important fundamental rights are not even included in the Constitution. This applies for instance to the right to a fair trial and the right to good administration. The latter right requires that the government acts impartially and with due care towards citizens. This vague and incomplete protection of fundamental rights in the Constitution affects its very raison d’être. The Constitution is a legal remedy to safeguard the freedom of citizens. A powerful and unambiguous protection of fundamental rights is therefore imperative. The fact that the current fundamental rights no longer fulfil this role is unacceptable. Countering abuse of power by the government, after all, fosters citizens’ trust in the administration; trust that is necessary for the acceptance and effectiveness of government action. In a democratic state under the rule of law, like the Netherlands, this is essential. Thus, the catalogue of fundamental rights in the Constitution must be updated. This doctoral thesis sets out arguments for this position, and offers concrete proposals to achieve this modernisation
Manon Margit Julicher - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Nederlandse grondrechten: klaar voor de toekomst? : Modernisering van grondrechten in de Grondwet in het licht van het EVRM en het EU-Grondrechtenhandvest
2020Co-Authors: Manon Margit JulicherAbstract:The fundamental rights in the Dutch Constitution are urgently in need of amendment. At present, they are not in line with developments in technology and society. Some fundamental rights are formulated in such an outdated manner that they are barely comprehensible. Consider, for example, the right to freedom of expression. In the Constitution this right is described as ‘the freedom to publish thoughts and opinions through the press’. Is it possible to invoke this fundamental right in cases that involve spreading fake news or comments that incite hate on the Internet? And what effect does this fundamental right have in relation to legislation that forces social media platforms to apply filters in order to protect copyrighted materials? There is no clear answer. Other fundamental rights also display outdated formulations and a lack of practical manageability. The right to secrecy of Communications, for example, is unable to provide adequate protection from the large-scale Interception of Communication data by government institutions. Moreover, a number of important fundamental rights are not even included in the Constitution. This applies for instance to the right to a fair trial and the right to good administration. The latter right requires that the government acts impartially and with due care towards citizens. This vague and incomplete protection of fundamental rights in the Constitution affects its very raison d’etre. The Constitution is a legal remedy to safeguard the freedom of citizens. A powerful and unambiguous protection of fundamental rights is therefore imperative. The fact that the current fundamental rights no longer fulfil this role is unacceptable. Countering abuse of power by the government, after all, fosters citizens’ trust in the administration; trust that is necessary for the acceptance and effectiveness of government action. In a democratic state under the rule of law, like the Netherlands, this is essential. Thus, the catalogue of fundamental rights in the Constitution must be updated. This doctoral thesis sets out arguments for this position, and offers concrete proposals to achieve this modernisation.
Muharrem Aksu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Özgürlük ve güvenlik dengesinde önleyici amaçlı iletişimin denetlenmesinin temel hak ve özgürlükler açısından değerlendirilmesi = Evaluation of preventive purposed Interception of Communication in terms of fundamental rights and freedoms in the balan
2011Co-Authors: Muharrem AksuAbstract:11 Eylulde ABD'de, sonrasinda da bazi Avrupa ulkelerinde meydana gelen teror saldirilari, adi gecen devletlerde bu tip eylemlerin tekrarlanmamasi icin sert tedbirlerin alinmasina yol acmistir. Bu amacla ABD ve Avrupa devletleri 11 Eylul sonrasinda teror faaliyetlerini ve organize suclulugu onleyebilmek icin var olan duzenlemelerini gelisen teknolojilere ve enformasyon alanindaki yeniliklere uygun olarak yeniden reforme ettiler. Daha onceden var olmayan yeni duzenlemeleri de yururluge koydular. Yapilan duzenlemelerin icerigi, guvenligin ve ozgurlugun algilanmasinda farkliliklar ortaya cikaran ve ozgurlukleri ihlal edici bir mahiyet kazandigini gosteren bir surece donusmustur. Ozgurlukleri ihlal etme riski tasiyan ya da ihlal eden bu tedbirler adi gecen ulkelerde ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesinin yeniden tanimlanmasina ve bu dengenin guvenlik lehine degismesine sebep olmustur. Ote yandan 11 Eylul sonrasinda, diger onleyici tedbirler kadar, terorle ve organize suclulukla mucadelede etkili bir yontem olan onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri de soz konusu devletler tarafindan fazlasiyla ilgi odagi haline gelmistir. Dolayisiyla calismamizda ABD.de, Ingiltere.de ve Almanya.da ozgurlukleri ihlal etme riski tasiyan diger tedbirlerin yani sira onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri, AIHM kararlari isiginda temel hak ve ozgurlukler baglaminda incelenmistir. Ayrica Turkiye.deki uygulama da bu perspektiften degerlendirilmistir. Sonuc olarak, onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri, ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesi duzleminde ele alindiginda, yapilan duzenlemelerde guvenlik kaygisinin one ciktigi ve ozgurluklerin guvenlik amaclarina gore konumlandirildigi ortaya cikmistir. Asiri guvenlik kaygisiyla yururluge konulan onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri ve ozellikle diger onleyici tedbirler, ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesi acisindan guvenlik lehine, ozgurlukler aleyhine yeni bir durum ortaya cikarmistir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ozgurluk, Guvenlik, Insani Guvenlik, Ozgurluk ve Guvenlik Dengesi, Onleyici Amacli Iletisimin Denetlenmesi, Teror. Evaluation of preventive purposed Interception of Communication in terms of fundamental rights and freedoms in the balance of freedom and security...
-
ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesinde onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesinin temel hak ve ozgurlukler acisindan degerlendirilmesi evaluation of preventive purposed Interception of Communication in terms of fundamental rights and freedoms in the balance
2011Co-Authors: Muharrem AksuAbstract:11 Eylulde ABD'de, sonrasinda da bazi Avrupa ulkelerinde meydana gelen teror saldirilari, adi gecen devletlerde bu tip eylemlerin tekrarlanmamasi icin sert tedbirlerin alinmasina yol acmistir. Bu amacla ABD ve Avrupa devletleri 11 Eylul sonrasinda teror faaliyetlerini ve organize suclulugu onleyebilmek icin var olan duzenlemelerini gelisen teknolojilere ve enformasyon alanindaki yeniliklere uygun olarak yeniden reforme ettiler. Daha onceden var olmayan yeni duzenlemeleri de yururluge koydular. Yapilan duzenlemelerin icerigi, guvenligin ve ozgurlugun algilanmasinda farkliliklar ortaya cikaran ve ozgurlukleri ihlal edici bir mahiyet kazandigini gosteren bir surece donusmustur. Ozgurlukleri ihlal etme riski tasiyan ya da ihlal eden bu tedbirler adi gecen ulkelerde ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesinin yeniden tanimlanmasina ve bu dengenin guvenlik lehine degismesine sebep olmustur. Ote yandan 11 Eylul sonrasinda, diger onleyici tedbirler kadar, terorle ve organize suclulukla mucadelede etkili bir yontem olan onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri de soz konusu devletler tarafindan fazlasiyla ilgi odagi haline gelmistir. Dolayisiyla calismamizda ABD.de, Ingiltere.de ve Almanya.da ozgurlukleri ihlal etme riski tasiyan diger tedbirlerin yani sira onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri, AIHM kararlari isiginda temel hak ve ozgurlukler baglaminda incelenmistir. Ayrica Turkiye.deki uygulama da bu perspektiften degerlendirilmistir. Sonuc olarak, onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri, ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesi duzleminde ele alindiginda, yapilan duzenlemelerde guvenlik kaygisinin one ciktigi ve ozgurluklerin guvenlik amaclarina gore konumlandirildigi ortaya cikmistir. Asiri guvenlik kaygisiyla yururluge konulan onleyici amacli iletisimin denetlenmesi tedbiri ve ozellikle diger onleyici tedbirler, ozgurluk ve guvenlik dengesi acisindan guvenlik lehine, ozgurlukler aleyhine yeni bir durum ortaya cikarmistir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ozgurluk, Guvenlik, Insani Guvenlik, Ozgurluk ve Guvenlik Dengesi, Onleyici Amacli Iletisimin Denetlenmesi, Teror. Evaluation of preventive purposed Interception of Communication in terms of fundamental rights and freedoms in the balance of freedom and security...
Oscar Fungai Ngwende - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Interception of Communication in Zimbabwe: A comparative analysis
Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research, 2016Co-Authors: Oscar Fungai NgwendeAbstract:The tenet of institutionalising and operationalising the Interception of Communications as a state statutory practice is not without precedent in modern legal regimes. Therefore, in order to lay bare the legal status of the notion of Interception of Communications in Zimbabwe, a comparative analysis becomes imperative. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis on the same subject with Jamaica, South Africa and United Kingdom.
-
The Interception of Communication Laws in Zimbabwe: Assessing the Impact on the Fundamental Right to Privacy
Imperial journal of interdisciplinary research, 2016Co-Authors: Oscar Fungai NgwendeAbstract:: This paper highlights the theoretical and conceptual framework of the Interception of Communications and the right to privacy as provided under the common law, national legislation, international treaties and charters, and judicial pronouncements on the subject matter in different legal systems. An articulation of the subject matter of Interception of Communications and the justification thereof and the implications on the right to privacy will be done. This will inherently provide the context of the research, justify the research, and demonstrate where it fits into the existing knowledge and the value being added by to the Interception of Communications discourse.
Jean Paul Pierini - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
CyCon - Impact of cyberspace on human rights and democracy
2012Co-Authors: Vittorio Fanchiotti, Jean Paul PieriniAbstract:This paper focuses on the asserted ‘boundlessness’ of cyberspace in order to examine how and to what extent jurisdiction, in its various meaning and forms (jurisdiction to prescribe, to adjudicate and to execute), over activities taking place in the cyberspace may be asserted and even exercised, based on traditional jurisdictional links and also on new trends. The paper also examines conflicts of law in civilian (mainly tort laws and laws on the protection of rights of the personality as well as intellectual property) and criminal matters. Determining what set of rules applies to a certain fact or situation implies a reference to those rules establishing where such a fact or situation has legally taken place and is to be localised (locus commissi delicti), and a reference to main criteria including those focusing on the conduct, the localisation of the hardware, the effect, the access to the informatics system, the accessibility of the information and future trends. The paper further highlights that the enforcement of activities in cyberspace appears to be affected by an assimilation to traditional forms of investigative activities, such as search or inspection or even the Interception of Communication or data flow, which are to a certain degree misleading in respect of the specific means employed. A specific reference to the role of providers in enforcement activities is also included. The second part of the paper deals with the traditional human rights relevant to cyberspace and to the broader concept of ‘right to access’ cyberspace, as well as the uncertainties derived from the fact that a plurality of state and non-state actors may limit and interfere with human rights in cyberspace. The paper specifically deals with the commercial dimension of cyberspace and with eventual corporate liability for human rights violation (multinational corporations violating rights to privacy in connection with or on behalf of states or enforcing censorship) based on US legislation and also taking into consideration European trends. The paper finally highlights the supportive role to the protection of human rights of regulatory bodies enforcing fair-trade and anti-trust regulations, and the multinational dimension of free trade in promoting human rights, by eventually considering restrictions in cyberspace and censorship as restrictions to trade under WTO agreements.