The Experts below are selected from a list of 127665 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Sonya Dyah Kusumadewi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science and Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science & Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively. (Résumé d'auteur
Monica Di Gregorio - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science and Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science & Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively. (Résumé d'auteur
E Pramova - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science and Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science & Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively. (Résumé d'auteur
Bruno Locatelli - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science and Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science & Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively. (Résumé d'auteur
Intan Maya Sari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science and Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively.
-
Climate Policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages
Environmental Science & Policy, 2017Co-Authors: Monica Di Gregorio, E Pramova, Intan Maya Sari, Leandra Fatorelli, Maria Brockhaus, Jouni Paavola, Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat, Bruno Locatelli, Sonya Dyah KusumadewiAbstract:This article re-conceptualizes Climate Policy Integration (CPI) in the land use sector to highlight the need to assess the level of integration of mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies to minimize trade-offs and to exploit synergies. It suggests that effective CPI in the land use sector requires i) Internal climate Policy coherence between mitigation and adaptation objectives and policies; ii) external climate Policy coherence between climate change and development objectives; iii) vertical Policy integration to mainstream climate change into sectoral policies and; iv) horizontal Policy integration by overarching governance structures for cross-sectoral coordination. This framework is used to examine CPI in the land use sector of Indonesia. The findings indicate that adaptation actors and policies are the main advocates of Internal Policy coherence. External Policy coherence between mitigation and development planning is called for, but remains to be operationalized. Bureaucratic politics has in turn undermined vertical and horizontal Policy integration. Under these circumstances it is unlikely that the Indonesian bureaucracy can deliver strong coordinated action addressing climate change in the land use sector, unless sectoral ministries Internalize a strong mandate on Internal and external climate Policy coherence and find ways to coordinate Policy action effectively. (Résumé d'auteur