The Experts below are selected from a list of 38817 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Harinder Singh - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
suppression of inflammasome activation by irf8 and IRF4 in cdcs is critical for t cell priming
Cell Reports, 2020Co-Authors: Harinder Singh, Margaret M Mcdaniel, Leah C Kottyan, Chandrashekhar PasareAbstract:Summary Inflammasome activation leads to pyroptotic cell death, thereby eliminating the replicative niche of virulent pathogens. Although inflammasome-associated cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 have an established role in T cell function, whether inflammasome activation in dendritic cells (DCs) is critical for T cell priming is not clear. Here, we find that conventional DCs (cDCs) suppress inflammasome activation to prevent pyroptotic cell death, thus preserving their ability to prime both CD4 and CD8 T cells. Transcription factors IRF8 and IRF4, in cDC1s and cDC2s, respectively, mediate suppression of inflammasome activation by limiting the expression of inflammasome-associated genes. Overexpression of IRF4 or IRF8 inhibits inflammasome activation in macrophages, while reduced expression of IRF8 leads to aberrant inflammasome activation in cDC1s and hampers their ability to prime CD8 T cells. Thus, activation of inflammasome in DCs is detrimental to adaptive immunity, and our results reveal that cDCs use IRF4 and IRF8 to suppress this response.
-
regulation of bifurcating b cell trajectories by mutual antagonism between transcription factors IRF4 and irf8
Nature Immunology, 2015Co-Authors: Heping Xu, Konstantinos Biliouris, Krista Diengerstambaugh, Virendra K Chaudhri, Zhiguo Wu, Yrina Rochman, Harinder SinghAbstract:Antigen-activated B cells differentiate into plasmablasts or germinal center B cells that undergo further affinity maturation. Singh and colleagues identify the antagonistic roles of transcription factors IRF4 and IRF8 that establish these opposing cell fates.
-
regulation of bifurcating b cell trajectories by mutual antagonism between transcription factors IRF4 and irf8
Nature Immunology, 2015Co-Authors: Virendra K Chaudhri, Konstantinos Biliouris, Krista Diengerstambaugh, Yrina Rochman, Harinder SinghAbstract:Upon recognition of antigen, B cells undertake a bifurcated response in which some cells rapidly differentiate into plasmablasts while others undergo affinity maturation in germinal centers (GCs). Here we identified a double-negative feedback loop between the transcription factors IRF4 and IRF8 that regulated the initial developmental bifurcation of activated B cells as well as the GC response. IRF8 dampened signaling via the B cell antigen receptor (BCR), facilitated antigen-specific interaction with helper T cells, and promoted antibody affinity maturation while antagonizing IRF4-driven differentiation of plasmablasts. Genomic analysis revealed concentration-dependent actions of IRF4 and IRF8 in regulating distinct gene-expression programs. Stochastic modeling suggested that the double-negative feedback was sufficient to initiate bifurcation of the B cell developmental trajectories.
Swee Heng Milon Pang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
pu 1 cooperates with IRF4 and irf8 to suppress pre b cell leukemia
Leukemia, 2016Co-Authors: Swee Heng Milon Pang, Martina Minnich, Anja Ebert, Pradnya Gangatirkar, Ross A Dickins, Guangchun Song, Zhen ZhengAbstract:The Ets family transcription factor PU.1 and the interferon regulatory factor (IRF)4 and IRF8 regulate gene expression by binding to composite DNA sequences known as Ets/interferon consensus elements. Although all three factors are expressed from the onset of B-cell development, single deficiency of these factors in B-cell progenitors only mildly impacts on bone marrow B lymphopoiesis. Here we tested whether PU.1 cooperates with IRF factors in regulating early B-cell development. Lack of PU.1 and IRF4 resulted in a partial block in development the pre-B-cell stage. The combined deletion of PU.1 and IRF8 reduced recirculating B-cell numbers. Strikingly, all PU.1/IRF4 and ~50% of PU.1/IRF8 double deficient mice developed pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) associated with reduced expression of the established B-lineage tumor suppressor genes, Ikaros and Spi-B. These genes are directly regulated by PU.1/IRF4/IRF8, and restoration of Ikaros or Spi-B expression inhibited leukemic cell growth. In summary, we demonstrate that PU.1, IRF4 and IRF8 cooperate to regulate early B-cell development and to prevent pre-B-ALL formation.
-
the transcription factors irf8 and pu 1 negatively regulate plasma cell differentiation
Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2014Co-Authors: Swee Heng Milon Pang, Jhagvaral Hasbold, Michael Inouye, Sebastian Carotta, Simon N WillisAbstract:Activated B cells undergo immunoglobulin class-switch recombination (CSR) and differentiate into antibody-secreting plasma cells. The distinct transcriptomes of B cells and plasma cells are maintained by the antagonistic influences of two groups of transcription factors: those that maintain the B cell program, including BCL6 and PAX5, and plasma cell–promoting factors, such as IRF4 and BLIMP-1. We show that the complex of IRF8 and PU.1 controls the propensity of B cells to undergo CSR and plasma cell differentiation by concurrently promoting the expression of BCL6 and PAX5 and repressing AID and BLIMP-1. As the PU.1–IRF8 complex functions in a reciprocal manner to IRF4, we propose that concentration-dependent competition between these factors controls B cell terminal differentiation.
Weihua Gao - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Functional characterization of interferon regulatory factor 5 and its role in the innate antiviral immune response
Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 2018Co-Authors: Kai Luo, Lihai Xia, Weihua GaoAbstract:In mammals, type I interferons (IFNs) are primarily regulated by transcription factors of the IFN regulatory (IRF) family. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF-5) plays pivotal roles in antiviral and inflammatory responses. In the present study, we found that zebrafish (Danio rerio) IRF5 is a key player in the regulation of the expression of type I IFN and its antiviral immune response. IRF5 was upregulated in zebrafish embryonic fibroblast cells (ZF4) when challenged with grass carp reovirus (GCRV). Moreover, the expression profiles of Mx, IFN, Viperin, and IRF7, but not IRF3, were upregulated by overexpression of IRF5 in Epithelioma papulosum cyprinid cells (EPCs). Luciferase assays revealed that the activation of the IFNϕ1 promoter was stimulated by overexpression of IRF5 and IRF5-△IAD (IRF5 lacking the IRF-associated domain), respectively. However, overexpression of IRF5 or IRF5-△IAD inhibited the activity of the IFNϕ3 promoter. IRF5-△DBD (lacking the DNA-binding domain) had no influence in the activation of the IFNϕ1 and IFNϕ3 promoters. Furthermore, the determination of the cytopathic effect (CPE) numbers and viral titers revealed that the viral concentration was reduced by ectopic expression of IRF5 in EPC cells. Ectopic expression of IRF5 in EPC cells could protect cells from GCRV and significantly inhibited GCRV virus replication. These data indicated that IRF5 could limit viral replication through an IFN-dependent pathway.
-
expression pattern analysis of IRF4 and its related genes revealed the functional differentiation of IRF4 paralogues in teleost
Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 2017Co-Authors: Kai Luo, Weihua Gao, Liu Fang, Guangming Tian, Guoliang RuanAbstract:In mammals, interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) plays an important role in the process of development and differentiation of B cells, T cells and dendritic cells. It can regulate immune pathway through IRF5, MyD88, IL21, PGC1α, and NOD2. In the present study, we investigated the expression pattern of IRF4 paralogues and these related genes for the first time in teleosts. The results showed that these genes were all expressed predominantly in known immune tissues while IRF5 was also relatively highly expressed in muscle. IRF4b, IL21, MyD88, IRF5 and NOD2 showed maternal expression in the oocyte and the higher expression of IRF4a, Mx and PGC1α before hatching might be involved in the embryonic innate defense system. Zebrafish embryonic fibroblast (ZF4) cells were infected with GCRV and SVCV. During GCRV infection, the expression of Mx was significantly up-regulated from 3 h to 24 h, reaching the highest level at 12 h (101.5-fold over the controls, P < 0.001). And the expression of IRF4a was significantly up-regulated from 3 h to 48 h, reaching the highest level at 12 h (13.75-fold over the controls, P < 0.001). While the expression of IRF4b was only slightly up-regulated at 12 h and 24 h (3.39-fold, 1.93-fold) above control levels, respectively. Whereas the expression of Mx was significantly up-regulated during SVCV infection from 1 h to 48 h, reaching the highest level at 24 h (11.49-fold over the controls, P < 0.001). IRF4a transcripts were significantly up-regulated from 6 h to 24 h, reaching the highest level at 24 h (41-fold over the controls, P < 0.01). IRF4b only showed a slightly up-regulation by SVCV at 24 h (3.2-fold over the controls, P < 0.01). IRF4a and IRF4b displayed a distinct tissue expression pattern, embryonic stages expression and inducible expression in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that IRF4 paralogues might play different roles in immune system.
Kai Luo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Functional characterization of interferon regulatory factor 5 and its role in the innate antiviral immune response
Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 2018Co-Authors: Kai Luo, Lihai Xia, Weihua GaoAbstract:In mammals, type I interferons (IFNs) are primarily regulated by transcription factors of the IFN regulatory (IRF) family. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF-5) plays pivotal roles in antiviral and inflammatory responses. In the present study, we found that zebrafish (Danio rerio) IRF5 is a key player in the regulation of the expression of type I IFN and its antiviral immune response. IRF5 was upregulated in zebrafish embryonic fibroblast cells (ZF4) when challenged with grass carp reovirus (GCRV). Moreover, the expression profiles of Mx, IFN, Viperin, and IRF7, but not IRF3, were upregulated by overexpression of IRF5 in Epithelioma papulosum cyprinid cells (EPCs). Luciferase assays revealed that the activation of the IFNϕ1 promoter was stimulated by overexpression of IRF5 and IRF5-△IAD (IRF5 lacking the IRF-associated domain), respectively. However, overexpression of IRF5 or IRF5-△IAD inhibited the activity of the IFNϕ3 promoter. IRF5-△DBD (lacking the DNA-binding domain) had no influence in the activation of the IFNϕ1 and IFNϕ3 promoters. Furthermore, the determination of the cytopathic effect (CPE) numbers and viral titers revealed that the viral concentration was reduced by ectopic expression of IRF5 in EPC cells. Ectopic expression of IRF5 in EPC cells could protect cells from GCRV and significantly inhibited GCRV virus replication. These data indicated that IRF5 could limit viral replication through an IFN-dependent pathway.
-
expression pattern analysis of IRF4 and its related genes revealed the functional differentiation of IRF4 paralogues in teleost
Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 2017Co-Authors: Kai Luo, Weihua Gao, Liu Fang, Guangming Tian, Guoliang RuanAbstract:In mammals, interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) plays an important role in the process of development and differentiation of B cells, T cells and dendritic cells. It can regulate immune pathway through IRF5, MyD88, IL21, PGC1α, and NOD2. In the present study, we investigated the expression pattern of IRF4 paralogues and these related genes for the first time in teleosts. The results showed that these genes were all expressed predominantly in known immune tissues while IRF5 was also relatively highly expressed in muscle. IRF4b, IL21, MyD88, IRF5 and NOD2 showed maternal expression in the oocyte and the higher expression of IRF4a, Mx and PGC1α before hatching might be involved in the embryonic innate defense system. Zebrafish embryonic fibroblast (ZF4) cells were infected with GCRV and SVCV. During GCRV infection, the expression of Mx was significantly up-regulated from 3 h to 24 h, reaching the highest level at 12 h (101.5-fold over the controls, P < 0.001). And the expression of IRF4a was significantly up-regulated from 3 h to 48 h, reaching the highest level at 12 h (13.75-fold over the controls, P < 0.001). While the expression of IRF4b was only slightly up-regulated at 12 h and 24 h (3.39-fold, 1.93-fold) above control levels, respectively. Whereas the expression of Mx was significantly up-regulated during SVCV infection from 1 h to 48 h, reaching the highest level at 24 h (11.49-fold over the controls, P < 0.001). IRF4a transcripts were significantly up-regulated from 6 h to 24 h, reaching the highest level at 24 h (41-fold over the controls, P < 0.01). IRF4b only showed a slightly up-regulation by SVCV at 24 h (3.2-fold over the controls, P < 0.01). IRF4a and IRF4b displayed a distinct tissue expression pattern, embryonic stages expression and inducible expression in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that IRF4 paralogues might play different roles in immune system.
Virendra K Chaudhri - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Genomic programming of IRF4-expressing human Langerhans cells.
Nature communications, 2020Co-Authors: Sofia Sirvent, Virendra K Chaudhri, Andres F. Vallejo, James Davies, Kalum Clayton, Jeongmin Woo, Jeremy Riddell, Patrick S. Stumpf, Liliya NazlamovaAbstract:Langerhans cells (LC) can prime tolerogenic as well as immunogenic responses in skin, but the genomic states and transcription factors (TF) regulating these context-specific responses are unclear. Bulk and single-cell transcriptional profiling demonstrates that human migratory LCs are robustly programmed for MHC-I and MHC-II antigen presentation. Chromatin analysis reveals enrichment of ETS-IRF and AP1-IRF composite regulatory elements in antigen-presentation genes, coinciding with expression of the TFs, PU.1, IRF4 and BATF3 but not IRF8. Migration of LCs from the epidermis is accompanied by upregulation of IRF4, antigen processing components and co-stimulatory molecules. TNF stimulation augments LC cross-presentation while attenuating IRF4 expression. CRISPR-mediated editing reveals IRF4 to positively regulate the LC activation programme, but repress NF2EL2 and NF-kB pathway genes that promote responsiveness to oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines. Thus, IRF4-dependent genomic programming of human migratory LCs appears to enable LC maturation while attenuating excessive inflammatory and immunogenic responses in the epidermis.
-
regulation of bifurcating b cell trajectories by mutual antagonism between transcription factors IRF4 and irf8
Nature Immunology, 2015Co-Authors: Heping Xu, Konstantinos Biliouris, Krista Diengerstambaugh, Virendra K Chaudhri, Zhiguo Wu, Yrina Rochman, Harinder SinghAbstract:Antigen-activated B cells differentiate into plasmablasts or germinal center B cells that undergo further affinity maturation. Singh and colleagues identify the antagonistic roles of transcription factors IRF4 and IRF8 that establish these opposing cell fates.
-
regulation of bifurcating b cell trajectories by mutual antagonism between transcription factors IRF4 and irf8
Nature Immunology, 2015Co-Authors: Virendra K Chaudhri, Konstantinos Biliouris, Krista Diengerstambaugh, Yrina Rochman, Harinder SinghAbstract:Upon recognition of antigen, B cells undertake a bifurcated response in which some cells rapidly differentiate into plasmablasts while others undergo affinity maturation in germinal centers (GCs). Here we identified a double-negative feedback loop between the transcription factors IRF4 and IRF8 that regulated the initial developmental bifurcation of activated B cells as well as the GC response. IRF8 dampened signaling via the B cell antigen receptor (BCR), facilitated antigen-specific interaction with helper T cells, and promoted antibody affinity maturation while antagonizing IRF4-driven differentiation of plasmablasts. Genomic analysis revealed concentration-dependent actions of IRF4 and IRF8 in regulating distinct gene-expression programs. Stochastic modeling suggested that the double-negative feedback was sufficient to initiate bifurcation of the B cell developmental trajectories.
