Junior Staff

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 306 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Fang Zhiyuan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Xin Dai - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Senior Executive and Staff: What Effect Do They Exert on Success of Information System?
    2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering, 2013
    Co-Authors: Xin Dai, Jianping Peng, Fang Zhiyuan
    Abstract:

    A large number of studies have shown that the senior executives play a crucial role in the success of enterprise information system. This point of view is highly emphasized by both academics and practitioners especially in China. The present paper proposes that Junior Staff as the direct user of enterprise information system is the primary factor in success of information system too. This proposition is supported by our model as well as industry practices. The paper also conclude that the ability and attitude of Junior Staff to use information system is most important from installation to widely application of the system, and the major role of senior executive is to continuously train and educate the Staffs in information system use, which is the reason why senior executive is important besides first move.

Jianping Peng - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Stefan Herzig - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the influence of tutor qualification on the process and outcome of learning in a problem based course of basic medical pharmacology
    Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology, 2002
    Co-Authors: Jan Matthes, Bent Marxen, Ralphmario Linke, Wolfram Antepohl, Silke Coburger, Hildegard Christ, Walter Lehmacher, Stefan Herzig
    Abstract:

    Limited access to expert tutors is a problem that can be addressed by using tutors from different stages of medical or non-medical (under-, post-) graduate education. To address whether such differences in qualification affect the results of process evaluation by participants or their learning outcome (exam results), we analysed the data of a 4-year prospective study performed with 787 3rd-year medical students (111 groups of 5–10 participants) taking an obligatory problem-based learning (PbL)-course of basic pharmacology. We compared peer tutors (undergraduate medical students, ≥4th year), non-expert (Junior) Staff tutors (physicians, pharmacists, veterinarians, biologists, or chemists during postgraduate education), and expert (senior) Staff tutors (completed postgraduate education). Evaluation scores related to PbL gave the highest values for senior Staff-led groups. The tutor's performance score of peer-led groups did not differ from those of Staff-led groups, but the score obtained from groups tutored by Junior Staff was lower than that obtained with senior Staff tutors. Students' weekly preparation time tended to be lower in peer-led groups, while learning time spent specifically on exam preparation seemed to be increased compared to PbL-groups of Staff tutors. As a putative confounding variable, tutors' experience in coaching PbL-groups was also investigated. Groups led by experienced tutors, defined as tutors with at least one term of previous PbL tutoring, were found to have significantly higher evaluation scores. Interestingly, neither tutors' subject-matter expertise (peer students, Junior Staff, or senior Staff) nor their teaching-method expertise showed any influence on PbL-groups' mean test scores in a written exam. This indicates that the effect of tutor expertise on the learning process is not associated with a difference in learning outcome when just factual knowledge is assessed by traditional methods.

C A Milford - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • out patient management by Junior Staff the value of consultant supervision
    Clinical Otolaryngology, 1993
    Co-Authors: G W R Watters, C A Milford
    Abstract:

    : The effect of consultant supervision on management of patients by Junior Staff was assessed. Supervision was exercised by pre-reading the notes with the consultant at the start of the clinic. The principle finding was that less patients were brought back for another appointment. For new patients, the proportion fell from 40% to 19%, and for follow-up patients it fell from 49.5% to 29%. The overall rate fell from 46% to 23.5%. This has major implications with respect to use of resources and, in the unit studied, this change would make available 38 extra clinic appointments for each registrar per month. The study also raises issues regarding the use of out-patient clinics for post-graduate training and consultant supervision of patient management in general.

  • Out‐patient management by Junior Staff: the value of consultant supervision
    Clinical Otolaryngology, 1993
    Co-Authors: G W R Watters, C A Milford
    Abstract:

    : The effect of consultant supervision on management of patients by Junior Staff was assessed. Supervision was exercised by pre-reading the notes with the consultant at the start of the clinic. The principle finding was that less patients were brought back for another appointment. For new patients, the proportion fell from 40% to 19%, and for follow-up patients it fell from 49.5% to 29%. The overall rate fell from 46% to 23.5%. This has major implications with respect to use of resources and, in the unit studied, this change would make available 38 extra clinic appointments for each registrar per month. The study also raises issues regarding the use of out-patient clinics for post-graduate training and consultant supervision of patient management in general.