Large Animal Surgery

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 93 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Dean Hendrickson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Aimie J Doyle - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2018
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P < .001) and with invasiveness of procedures (OR 7.9, 95% CI 3.2-19.5; P < .001). Primary surgeons were at higher risk for glove perforation than first (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5; P = .008) and second (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2-6.7; P < .001) assistants. Only 25% of glove perforations were detected intraoperatively by the wearer. CONCLUSION: Incidence of glove perforation is similar in Large Animal, human, and small Animal Surgery and is influenced by duration of wear, invasiveness of the Surgery, and role of the wearer. ECT is more sensitive than WLT for detection of glove perforation.

  • Observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2017
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P 

Nora M Biermann - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2018
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P < .001) and with invasiveness of procedures (OR 7.9, 95% CI 3.2-19.5; P < .001). Primary surgeons were at higher risk for glove perforation than first (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5; P = .008) and second (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2-6.7; P < .001) assistants. Only 25% of glove perforations were detected intraoperatively by the wearer. CONCLUSION: Incidence of glove perforation is similar in Large Animal, human, and small Animal Surgery and is influenced by duration of wear, invasiveness of the Surgery, and role of the wearer. ECT is more sensitive than WLT for detection of glove perforation.

  • Observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2017
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P 

Javier Sánchez - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2018
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P < .001) and with invasiveness of procedures (OR 7.9, 95% CI 3.2-19.5; P < .001). Primary surgeons were at higher risk for glove perforation than first (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5; P = .008) and second (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2-6.7; P < .001) assistants. Only 25% of glove perforations were detected intraoperatively by the wearer. CONCLUSION: Incidence of glove perforation is similar in Large Animal, human, and small Animal Surgery and is influenced by duration of wear, invasiveness of the Surgery, and role of the wearer. ECT is more sensitive than WLT for detection of glove perforation.

  • Observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2017
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P 

J T Mcclure - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2018
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P < .001) and with invasiveness of procedures (OR 7.9, 95% CI 3.2-19.5; P < .001). Primary surgeons were at higher risk for glove perforation than first (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5; P = .008) and second (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2-6.7; P < .001) assistants. Only 25% of glove perforations were detected intraoperatively by the wearer. CONCLUSION: Incidence of glove perforation is similar in Large Animal, human, and small Animal Surgery and is influenced by duration of wear, invasiveness of the Surgery, and role of the wearer. ECT is more sensitive than WLT for detection of glove perforation.

  • Observational study on the occurrence of surgical glove perforation and associated risk factors in Large Animal Surgery
    Veterinary Surgery, 2017
    Co-Authors: Nora M Biermann, J T Mcclure, Javier Sánchez, Aimie J Doyle
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of and associated risk factors for glove perforation in Large Animal Surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Surgical gloves (n = 917) worn during 103 Large Animal surgical procedures. METHODS: Gloves worn by personnel involved in sterile preparation and surgical procedures were tested for perforation by 2 previously validated methods, water leak test (WLT) and electroconductivity testing (ECT). The association between surgical and glove-related variables and glove perforation was assessed by using a multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression model. RESULTS: At least 1 glove perforation was detected in 66% of surgical procedures, and 17.9% (164/917) of gloves tested were identified as perforated. All perforations were detected by ECT, whereas only 110/178 (61.8%) were detected by WLT. All perforations detected by WLT were also detected by ECT. The risk of glove perforation increased with duration of wear (>60 minutes odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.7; P 

Large Animal Surgery - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts