The Experts below are selected from a list of 201 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Feealexandra Haase - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the rhetoric of aristotle an introduction into the history of the text with a bilingual edition of the original greek text and the Latin Translation of johann theophilus buhle
Social Science Research Network, 2017Co-Authors: Feealexandra HaaseAbstract:The Rhetoric of Aristotle is a fundamental work for the discipline of rhetoric, which has since antiquity a tradition of editions and Translations until the contemporary time introduced in this study. Among the works of the text tradition of this treatise, the Latin Translation made by the German philologist and philosopher Johan Theophile Buhle is one scholarly work of the age of Enlightenment, which is in this study contrastively edited together with the Greek original text.
-
the rhetoric of aristotle greek and Latin the original greek text and the Latin Translation of johann theophilus buhle
Social Science Research Network, 2016Co-Authors: Feealexandra HaaseAbstract:The Rhetoric of Aristotle was written in Greek and the first language it was translated into was Latin, when Roman rhetoricians discovered the discipline and the importance of the heritage of this writing. The original Greek text is here edited together with a preface and the Latin Translation made by Johann Theophilus Buhle.
M. Rafaiani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Dal manoscritto Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1490. Un nuovo testimone della «Kurzfassung u» della Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis e del pitacium contro il Filioque attestato da Gerhoch di Reichersberg
Edizione del Galluzzo (SISMEL), 2020Co-Authors: P. Chiesa, M. RafaianiAbstract:The manuscript Vienna, ÖNB 1490 (Petrus Lombardus, Collectanea in Epistolas Pauli), includes in the final sheet two short additions by different hands: a version brevior of the Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis, similar to the one transmitted in the codex Munich, BSB, clm 19411; and a Latin Translation of three items on the Filioque, extracted from the Κεφαλαιώδεις by the Greek theologian Nicholas of Methone, already known from a mention by Gerhoch of Reichersberg. For both texts, the fragments of the Viennese manuscipts appear to be relevant witnesses
-
Dal manoscritto Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1490. Un nuovo testimone della «Kurzfassung u» della Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis e del pitacium contro il Filioque attestato da Gerhoch di Reichersberg
Edizione del Galluzzo (SISMEL), 2020Co-Authors: P. Chiesa, M. RafaianiAbstract:The manuscript Vienna, 6NB 1490 (Petrus Lombardus, Collectanea in Epistolas Pauli), includes in the final sheet two short additions by different hands: a version brevior of the Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis, similar to the one transmitted in the codex Munich, BSB, clm 19411; and a Latin Translation of three items on the Filioque, extracted from the \u39a\u3b5\u3c6\u3b1\u3bb\u3b1\u3b9\u3ce\u3b4\u3b5\u3b9\u3c2 by the Greek theologian Nicholas of Methone, already known from a mention by Gerhoch of Reichersberg. For both texts, the fragments of the Viennese manuscipts appear to be relevant witnesses
P. Chiesa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Dal manoscritto Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1490. Un nuovo testimone della «Kurzfassung u» della Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis e del pitacium contro il Filioque attestato da Gerhoch di Reichersberg
Edizione del Galluzzo (SISMEL), 2020Co-Authors: P. Chiesa, M. RafaianiAbstract:The manuscript Vienna, ÖNB 1490 (Petrus Lombardus, Collectanea in Epistolas Pauli), includes in the final sheet two short additions by different hands: a version brevior of the Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis, similar to the one transmitted in the codex Munich, BSB, clm 19411; and a Latin Translation of three items on the Filioque, extracted from the Κεφαλαιώδεις by the Greek theologian Nicholas of Methone, already known from a mention by Gerhoch of Reichersberg. For both texts, the fragments of the Viennese manuscipts appear to be relevant witnesses
-
Dal manoscritto Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, 1490. Un nuovo testimone della «Kurzfassung u» della Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis e del pitacium contro il Filioque attestato da Gerhoch di Reichersberg
Edizione del Galluzzo (SISMEL), 2020Co-Authors: P. Chiesa, M. RafaianiAbstract:The manuscript Vienna, 6NB 1490 (Petrus Lombardus, Collectanea in Epistolas Pauli), includes in the final sheet two short additions by different hands: a version brevior of the Epistola Presbiteri Iohannis, similar to the one transmitted in the codex Munich, BSB, clm 19411; and a Latin Translation of three items on the Filioque, extracted from the \u39a\u3b5\u3c6\u3b1\u3bb\u3b1\u3b9\u3ce\u3b4\u3b5\u3b9\u3c2 by the Greek theologian Nicholas of Methone, already known from a mention by Gerhoch of Reichersberg. For both texts, the fragments of the Viennese manuscipts appear to be relevant witnesses
Campanini Saverio - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Perspicue et fideliter conversus: Johannes Buxtorf the Younger’s Translation of the Guide of the Perplexed
Yod, 2019Co-Authors: Campanini SaverioAbstract:Johannes Buxtorf the Younger’s Latin Translation of the Guide of the Perplexed (1629) is studied in its bibliographical, linguistic and paratextual features. The translator’s preface is analyzed in detail highlighting the peculiar intentions of Buxtorf in editing this medieval philosophical work. Its main function is identified by the translator as a mean towards learning Hebrew, although he was well aware that the original language of the Guide was rather Arabic. A specific ideological bias as to the function of the Guide in designing and promoting a “rational” Judaism, compatible with Protestant ideals is detected among the most interesting motives of this Translation, one which would be destined to a long fortune among Christian Hebraists of the subsequent epochs.La traduction Latine du Guide des égarés par Johannes Buxtorf (1629) est étudiée dans ses aspects bibliographiques, linguistiques et paratextuels. La préface du traducteur est analysée en détail pour illustrer les intentions de Buxtorf en éditant cette œuvre philosophique médiévale. Le traducteur déclare que sa fonction principale sera d’aider les lecteurs à apprendre l’hébreu, même s’il savait parfaitement que le Guide avait été composé en arabe. L’un des motifs les plus intéressants de cette traduction est le parti pris idéologique quant à la fonction du Guide de concevoir et promouvoir un judaïsme « rationnel » compatible avec les idéaux protestants. Cette idée connaîtra une fortune durable auprès des hébraïsants chrétiens des siècles suivants.המאמר דן בתרגומו הלטיני של מורה נבוכים שנעשה על ידי יוהנס בוקסטורף הצעיר בשנת 1629 ובוחן היבטים ביבליוגראפיים, בלשניים ופרה‑טקסטואליים. הוא כולל ניתוח מפורט של הקדמת המתרגם המבהיר את כוונותיו בפרסום חיבור פילוסופי זה. המתרגם מצהיר כי מטרתו העיקרית היא לסייע בידי הקוראים בלימוד העברית למרות שידע כי החיבור במקורו נכתב בערבית. מעניין לציין כי בוקסטורף ראה במורה נבוכים כלי לעידוד היהדות הראציונאלית, נושא שיידון רבות בין הנוצרים ההבראיסטים בדורות הבאים
H L L Busard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a Latin Translation of an arabic commentary on book x of euclid s elements
Mediaeval studies, 1997Co-Authors: H L L BusardAbstract:Les Elements dEuclide ont ete traduits en arabe, puis le texte arabe fut traduit en Latin par Gerard de Cremona qui fut identifie grâce aux lettres utilisees dans les diagrammes geometriques