The Experts below are selected from a list of 20706 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Eric Stock - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The US Supreme Court shows in its recent antitrust decisions a concern about the burdens of US Litigation Process (Stolt-Nielsen / AnimalFeeds)
2010Co-Authors: Eric StockAbstract:U.S. Antitrust Decisions Frequently Driven by Concerns With Burdens of U.S. Litigation Process* Many of the most important U.S. judicial decisions in antitrust have been driven by judicial…
-
The US Supreme Court shows to be driven by concerns with burdens of US Litigation Process according to recent antitrust decisions (Stolt-Nielsen / AnimalFeeds)
2010Co-Authors: Eric StockAbstract:U.S. Antitrust Decisions Frequently Driven by Concerns With Burdens of U.S. Litigation Process* Welcome to our blog! I thought I would start my postings on U.S. developments with a broader point…
-
The US Supreme Court shows to be driven by concerns with burdens of US Litigation Process according to recent antitrust decisions (Bell Atlantic / Twombly)
2007Co-Authors: Eric StockAbstract:U.S. Antitrust Decisions Frequently Driven by Concerns With Burdens of U.S. Litigation Process* Welcome to our blog! I thought I would start my postings on U.S. developments with a broader point…
Carol Henderson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Expert Testimony on Psychological Injury: Procedural and Evidentiary Issues
Psychological Injury and Law, 2008Co-Authors: Michael Finch, Catherine Guthrie, Carol HendersonAbstract:This article introduces psychologists to aspects of the legal Process most pertinent to their role as expert witnesses in civil Litigation. It summarizes the role of psychological evidence in the adjudication of common law tort claims, the structure of the court system, and the stages of the Litigation Process. It also explains the various roles a psychological expert may play during Litigation and the implications of those roles for expert confidentiality and disclosure. The article then provides an overview of legal policy governing the admissibility of psychological expertise, especially as admissibility is affected by the “Daubert” standard applied in most North American courts.
Timothy Craig Allen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
medicolegal issues in pathology
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2008Co-Authors: Timothy Craig AllenAbstract:Abstract The various methods used by risk managers to assist clinicians in handling medicolegal risk, including improving communication with patients and better dealing with medical records issues, are not particularly of benefit to pathologists. An understanding of tort law, the theory of negligence, the principle of standard of care, and the role of the expert witness helps the pathologist generally assess and manage risk and put it into context with daily pathology practice. An understanding of the Litigation Process and techniques to better handle a deposition and high-risk specimens or diagnoses are of practical value in avoiding a lawsuit or increasing the likelihood for good outcome in medical malpractice Litigation.
Chang Jian - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
On the Judging Standard for the Case of Civil Compensation of False Representation of Securities——Centering on the Litigation Process of the Case of Daqing Lianyi Co.Ltd
2006Co-Authors: Chang JianAbstract:The case of Daqing Lianyi Petro-chemical Co.Ltd is the first case of civil compensation of false representation of securities in China that has gone through all the Litigation Process from registering to execution.However,the Litigation Process of the case also reveals the shortcomings of poor judging standard for civil compensation of false representation of securities and the lack of protection of the investors' rights in China.Based on the Litigation Process of the case of Daqing Lianyi Co.Ltd,this paper probes into these shortcomings with the hope of contributing to the civil compensation system for securities and the protection of investor's rights in China.
-
on the judging standard for the case of civil compensation of false representation of securities centering on the Litigation Process of the case of daqing lianyi co ltd
2006Co-Authors: Chang JianAbstract:The case of Daqing Lianyi Petro-chemical Co.Ltd is the first case of civil compensation of false representation of securities in China that has gone through all the Litigation Process from registering to execution.However,the Litigation Process of the case also reveals the shortcomings of poor judging standard for civil compensation of false representation of securities and the lack of protection of the investors' rights in China.Based on the Litigation Process of the case of Daqing Lianyi Co.Ltd,this paper probes into these shortcomings with the hope of contributing to the civil compensation system for securities and the protection of investor's rights in China.
Michael Finch - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Expert Testimony on Psychological Injury: Procedural and Evidentiary Issues
Psychological Injury and Law, 2008Co-Authors: Michael Finch, Catherine Guthrie, Carol HendersonAbstract:This article introduces psychologists to aspects of the legal Process most pertinent to their role as expert witnesses in civil Litigation. It summarizes the role of psychological evidence in the adjudication of common law tort claims, the structure of the court system, and the stages of the Litigation Process. It also explains the various roles a psychological expert may play during Litigation and the implications of those roles for expert confidentiality and disclosure. The article then provides an overview of legal policy governing the admissibility of psychological expertise, especially as admissibility is affected by the “Daubert” standard applied in most North American courts.