The Experts below are selected from a list of 26361 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Brandon A Kemp - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
resolution of the abraham minkowski debate implications for the electromagnetic wave theory of light in matter
Journal of Applied Physics, 2011Co-Authors: Brandon A KempAbstract:A century has now passed since the origins of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy pertaining to the correct form of optical momentum in media. Experiment and theory have been applied at both the classical and quantum levels in attempt to resolve the debate. The result of these efforts is the identification of Abraham’s kinetic momentum as being responsible for the overall center of mass translations of a medium and Minkowski’s canonical or wave momentum as being responsible for translations within or with respect to a medium. In spite of the recent theoretical developments, much confusion still exists regarding the appropriate theory required to predict experimental outcomes and to develop new applications. In this paper, the resolution of the longstanding Abraham-Minkowski controversy is reviewed. The resolution is presented using classical electromagnetic theory and Logical Interpretation of experiments disseminated over the previous century. Emphasis is placed on applied physics applications: modeling op...
-
resolution of the abraham minkowski debate implications for the electromagnetic wave theory of light in matter
Journal of Applied Physics, 2011Co-Authors: Brandon A KempAbstract:A century has now passed since the origins of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy pertaining to the correct form of optical momentum in media. Experiment and theory have been applied at both the classical and quantum levels in attempt to resolve the debate. The result of these efforts is the identification of Abraham’s kinetic momentum as being responsible for the overall center of mass translations of a medium and Minkowski’s canonical or wave momentum as being responsible for translations within or with respect to a medium. In spite of the recent theoretical developments, much confusion still exists regarding the appropriate theory required to predict experimental outcomes and to develop new applications. In this paper, the resolution of the longstanding Abraham-Minkowski controversy is reviewed. The resolution is presented using classical electromagnetic theory and Logical Interpretation of experiments disseminated over the previous century. Emphasis is placed on applied physics applications: modeling optical manipulation of cells and particles. Although the basic Interpretation of optical momentum has been resolved, there is still some uncertainly regarding the complete form of the momentum continuity equation describing electromagnetics. Thus, while a complete picture of electrodynamics has still yet to be fully interpreted, this correspondence should help clarify the state-of-the-art view.
Jacek M łski - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
on support vector regression machines with linguistic Interpretation of the kernel matrix
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2006Co-Authors: Jacek M łskiAbstract:Initially, the idea of approximate reasoning using generalized modus ponens and a fuzzy implication is recalled. Next, a fuzzy system based on Logical Interpretation of if-then rules and with parametric conclusions is presented. Then, it is shown that global and local @e-insensitive learning of the above fuzzy system may be presented as the learning of a support vector regression machine with a special type of a kernel matrix obtained from clustering. The kernel matrix may be interpreted in terms of linguistic values based on the premises of if-then rules. A new method of obtaining a fuzzy system by means of a support vector machine (SVM) with a data-dependent kernel matrix is introduced. This paper contains examples of a SVM used to design fuzzy models of real-life data. Simulation results show an improvement in the generalization ability of a fuzzy system learned by the new method compared with traditional learning methods.
G Lindqvist - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the semantic status of diagnostic criteria for organic mental syndromes and disorders in dsm iii and dsm iii r
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1993Co-Authors: Helge Malmgren, G LindqvistAbstract:After a general introduction referring to the contemporary debate about psychiatric classification, the nature of so-called “diagnostic criteria” in psychiatry is discussed with special reference to DSM-III(-R) and to organic mental syndromes and disorders. A set of diagnostic criteria for a disease category can be intended alternatively (i) as stating Logically necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the diagnostic concept in question, or (ii) as providing contingent (probabilistic) indicators of the disease. In one possible Interpretation, a main aim of DSM-III and DSM-III-R has been to formulate type (i), Logical criteria, which amounts to an attempt to strictly identify syndromes or disorders with complex (polythetic) sets of easily observable symptoms and signs. It is shown that a Logical Interpretation would lead to such unwanted consequences for clinical and scientific practice that it could not possibly have been intended by the authors of DSM-III and DSM-III-R. But neither can the alternative Interpretation in terms of type (ii), contingent or probabilistic indicators be consistently upheld. The conclusion of the essay is that the semantic status of the diagnostic criteria in DSM-III and DSM-III-R is fundamentally blurred. I his unclarity may very well lead to divergent Interpretations of the concepts and to corresponding uncertainties in their clinical and scientific application.
Helge Malmgren - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the semantic status of diagnostic criteria for organic mental syndromes and disorders in dsm iii and dsm iii r
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1993Co-Authors: Helge Malmgren, G LindqvistAbstract:After a general introduction referring to the contemporary debate about psychiatric classification, the nature of so-called “diagnostic criteria” in psychiatry is discussed with special reference to DSM-III(-R) and to organic mental syndromes and disorders. A set of diagnostic criteria for a disease category can be intended alternatively (i) as stating Logically necessary and/or sufficient conditions for the diagnostic concept in question, or (ii) as providing contingent (probabilistic) indicators of the disease. In one possible Interpretation, a main aim of DSM-III and DSM-III-R has been to formulate type (i), Logical criteria, which amounts to an attempt to strictly identify syndromes or disorders with complex (polythetic) sets of easily observable symptoms and signs. It is shown that a Logical Interpretation would lead to such unwanted consequences for clinical and scientific practice that it could not possibly have been intended by the authors of DSM-III and DSM-III-R. But neither can the alternative Interpretation in terms of type (ii), contingent or probabilistic indicators be consistently upheld. The conclusion of the essay is that the semantic status of the diagnostic criteria in DSM-III and DSM-III-R is fundamentally blurred. I his unclarity may very well lead to divergent Interpretations of the concepts and to corresponding uncertainties in their clinical and scientific application.
Drew, Arlyn Sunshine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Hermeneutic for the Aqedah Test: A Way beyond Jon Levenson\u27s and Terence Fretheim\u27s Models
Digital Commons @ Andrews University, 2020Co-Authors: Drew, Arlyn SunshineAbstract:Problem The works of Jon Levenson and Terence Fretheim highlight the problem of determining which Interpretations of the biblical worlds of meaning around the text are congruent with the text of the Aqedah (also known as the Sacrifice of Isaac, Genesis 22: 1-19) and which should be disclaimed. A hermeneutical model is needed for Abraham\u27s test that provides a text-based paradigm for sound Interpretation of the narrative world (in the text), the historical world (behind the text), the theistic world (above the text), the cosmoLogical world (below the text), and the present world (in front of the text). Method Four steps were taken to create and apply a hermeneutical model for understanding the Aqedah test. First, Levenson\u27s and Fretheim\u27s Interpretations of the Aqedah were compared to test the usefulness of a tri-level hermeneutic analysis. Second, a tri-level (micro-meso-macro) spiral hermeneutical model was created that integrated the biblical text as the long central axis of the model and related the five biblical worlds of meaning to the text. Third, this model was tested by the Aqedah narrative of Genesis 22:1-19 and a new interpretive hypothesis was perceived. Fourth, the hermeneutical model and the interpretive hypothesis were evaluated. These four functional tasks were accomplished through six chapters. Chapters one and two introduced the issues and compared the Interpretations of two theologians on the Aqedah. Chapters three to five paired sequential construction of the three levels of the hermeneutical model to their Aqedah application. The final chapter evaluated the two products of this study. Results Two conceptual products have emerged from this dissertation project: the Axial Model of hermeneutics and the Covenant Hypothesis for the Aqedah. The Axial Model embeds the biblical text as the central long axis of a hermeneutical spiral. This text axis emanates the five biblical worlds of meaning (in, behind, in front of, above, and below the text) and norms any and all Interpretations of those worlds. The spiraling ramp of the Axial Model slices through these worlds of meaning, depicting the features that are accessible for the particular interpreter. The interpreter progresses through the micro, meso and macro levels of hermeneutics (micro: exegetical and biblical hermeneutics, meso: theoLogical and dogmatic hermeneutics, macro: philosophical and metaphysical hermeneutics) in a sequential fashion in order to grasp deep understanding of the text. Within the Axial Model, the interpretive principle of Sola Scriptura is represented by the central long axis of the biblical text that emanates the biblical worlds of meaning and norms all Interpretations of those worlds. Tota Scriptura is embodied in the canonical worlds of meaning behind and in front of the text which clarify and test all Interpretations. Prima Scriptura extracts from the worlds of meaning above and below the text the biblical metaphysical framework for Interpretation, and Viva Scriptura recognizes the Holy Spirit\u27s transformative work through the fusion of horizons between the interpreter’s personal and the text\u27s biblical worlds of meaning. The rolling path of the interpreter on the spiral ramp of the Axial Model integrates three hermeneutical circles (parts to a whole, fusion of horizons, projective-integrative) in achieving comprehensive understanding. This Axial Model was then activated by the Aqedah. From the micro-hermeneutical level of exegesis, God\u27s final speech (vv. 15-18) in the Aqedah was recognized as an emphatic divine Interpretation ( By Myself I have sworn, says the Lord ) of Abraham’s test response ( because you have done this thing ). Six of the seven Abrahamic covenant revelations were then evoked by God in retrograde sequence through covenant themes and blessings. Therefore, the Abrahamic covenant appears to be the divine test norm for evaluating Abraham’s test response. On the meso-hermeneutical level, based on the covenant as the test norm, a Logical Interpretation was constructed and tested that saw the Aqedah, not as a test requiring mute compliance to destroy the covenant as embodied in Isaac but as a covenant crisis test to be solved by Abraham embodying the covenant. In other words, God\u27s purpose was to test Abraham\u27s covenant identity by eliciting a compassionate response of integrated covenant revelations (Gen 12:1-3, 12:7, 13:14-17, 15, 17, 18, 21:12-13). Had Abraham actualized all seven covenant lessons in his test response, it could have culminated in covenant-driven intercession for Isaac at the altar site, a mediation appealing to God\u27s character of justice and mercy (the covenant lesson of Gen 18). In that scenario, the discovery of God\u27s provided ram was set up to be the climax of Abraham\u27s test as the grace-filled divine test solution ( God will provide ) given as the anticipated answer to Abraham’s prophetic mediation. This ideal possibility was not perfectly actualized by Abraham. Hence, the divine Interpretation that alluded to only six of the seven covenant lessons was an accurate assessment of Abraham\u27s historic test response. Abraham’s faith-filled ( Now I know you fear God ) but imperfect response still passed the test because he remained open (hinneni) to mid-test divine correction and did not sacrifice Isaac, but accepted and sacrificed the ram as God\u27s provided solution. This theocentric Covenant Hypothesis rests on a linear, non-retracting alignment of God’s actions as the Tester in the Aqedah. Finally, on the macro-hermeneutical level, the Covenant Hypothesis revealed the Aqedah to be a summative (achieving the incorporation of past elements), evaluative (accountable to a standard or norm), diagnostic (revealing any hidden problems or flaw) and formative (assessing for improvement) test of Abraham. Abraham\u27s test obedience is revealed by God\u27s final speech to be an integrative, correctable, healing and dynamic fear of God that exceeds traditional anthropocentric Interpretations of Abraham\u27s obedience as a literalistic, uncomprehending, yet hopeful compliance. Conclusion The tri-level Axial Model reveals the Aqedah test narrative holds higher moral consistency and rational complexity than has been traditionally assumed. Most importantly, the Covenant Hypothesis demonstrates that the enigmatic Aqedah text is fully capable of unbinding itself by making sense of its own parts. In conclusion, the Axial Model appears to be a text-normed hermeneutical model that can unearth deeper understanding of biblical texts
-
A Hermeneutic for the Aqedah Test: A Way beyond Jon Levenson's and Terence Fretheim's Models
Andrews University, 2020Co-Authors: Drew, Arlyn SunshineAbstract:Problem The work of Jon Levenson and Terence Fretheim highlights the problem of determining which Interpretations of the biblical worlds of meaning around the text are congruent with the text of the Aqedah (also known as the Sacrifice of Isaac, Genesis 22: 1-19) and which should be disclaimed. A hermeneutical model is needed for Abraham’s test that provides a text-based paradigm for sound Interpretation of the narrative world (in the text), the historical world (behind the text), the theistic world (above the text), the cosmoLogical world (below the text), and the present world (in front of the text). Method Four steps were taken to create and apply a hermeneutical model for understanding the Aqedah test. First, Levenson's and Fretheim’s Interpretations of the Aqedah were compared to test the usefulness of a tri-level hermeneutic analysis. Second, a tri-level (micro-meso-macro) spiral hermeneutical model was created that integrated the biblical text as the long central axis of the model and related the five biblical worlds of meaning to the text. Third, this model was tested by the Aqedah narrative of Genesis 22:1-19 and a new interpretive hypothesis was perceived. Fourth, the hermeneutical model and the interpretive hypothesis were evaluated. These four functional tasks were accomplished through six chapters. Chapters one and two introduced the issues and compared the Interpretations of the two theologians on the Aqedah. Chapters three to five paired sequential construction of the three levels of the hermeneutical model to their Aqedah application. The final chapter evaluated the two products of this study. Results Two conceptual products have emerged from this dissertation project: the Axial Model of hermeneutics and the Covenant Hypothesis for the Aqedah. The Axial Model embeds the biblical text as the central long axis of a hermeneutical spiral. This text axis emanates the five biblical worlds of meaning (in, behind, in front of, above, and below the text) and norms any and all Interpretations of those worlds. The spiraling ramp of the Axial Model slices through these worlds of meaning, depicting the features that are accessible for the particular interpreter. The interpreter progresses through the micro, meso and macro levels of hermeneutics (micro: exegetical and biblical hermeneutics, meso: theoLogical and dogmatic hermeneutics, macro: philosophical and metaphysical hermeneutics) in a sequential fashion in order to grasp deep understanding of the text. Within the Axial Model, the interpretive principle of Sola Scriptura is represented by the central long axis of the biblical text that emanates the biblical worlds of meaning and norms all Interpretations of those worlds. Tota Scriptura is embodied in the canonical worlds of meaning behind and in front of the text which clarify and test all Interpretations. Prima Scriptura extracts from the worlds of meaning above and below the text the biblical metaphysical framework for Interpretation, and Viva Scriptura recognizes the Holy Spirit’s transformative work through the fusion of horizons between the interpreter’s personal and the text’s biblical worlds of meaning. The rolling path of the interpreter on the spiral ramp of the Axial Model integrates three hermeneutical circles (parts to a whole, fusion of horizons, projective-integrative) in achieving comprehensive understanding. This Axial Model was then activated by the Aqedah. From the micro-hermeneutical level of exegesis, God’s final speech (vv. 15-18) in the Aqedah was recognized as an emphatic divine Interpretation (“By Myself I have sworn, says the Lord”) of Abraham’s test response (“because you have done this thing”). Six of the seven Abrahamic covenant revelations were then evoked by God in retrograde sequence through covenant themes and blessings. Therefore, the Abrahamic covenant appears to be the divine test norm for evaluating Abraham’s test response. On the meso-hermeneutical level, based on the covenant as the test norm, a Logical Interpretation was constructed and tested that saw the Aqedah, not as a test requiring mute compliance to destroy the covenant as embodied in Isaac but as a covenant crisis test to be solved by Abraham embodying the covenant. In other words, God’s purpose was to test Abraham’s covenant identity by eliciting a compassionate response of integrated covenant revelations (Gen 12:1-3, 12:7, 13:14-17, 15, 17, 18, 21:12-13). Had Abraham actualized all seven covenant lessons in his test response, it could have culminated in covenant-driven intercession for Isaac at the altar site, a mediation appealing to God’s character of justice and mercy (the covenant lesson of Gen 18). In that scenario, the discovery of God’s provided ram was set up to be the climax of Abraham’s test as the grace-filled divine test solution ("Lord will provide") given as the anticipated answer to Abraham’s prophetic mediation. This ideal possibility was not perfectly actualized by Abraham. Hence, the divine Interpretation that alluded to only six of the seven covenant lessons was an accurate assessment of Abraham’s historic test response. Abraham’s faith-filled (Now I know you fear God) but imperfect response still passed the test because he remained open (hinneni) to mid-test divine correction and did not sacrifice Isaac, but accepted and sacrificed the ram as God’s provided solution. This theocentric Covenant Hypothesis comes from a linear, non-retracting alignment of God’s actions as the Tester in the Aqedah. Finally, on the macro-hermeneutical level, the Covenant Hypothesis revealed the Aqedah to be a summative (achieving the incorporation of past elements), evaluative (accountable to a standard or norm), diagnostic (revealing any hidden problems or flaw) and formative (assessing for improvement) test of Abraham. Abraham’s test obedience is revealed by God’s final speech to be an integrative, correctable, healing and dynamic fear of God that exceeds traditional anthropocentric Interpretations of Abraham’s obedience as a literalistic, uncomprehending, yet hopeful compliance. Conclusion The tri-level Axial Model reveals the Aqedah test narrative holds higher moral consistency and rational complexity than has been traditionally assumed. Most importantly, the Covenant Hypothesis demonstrates that the enigmatic Aqedah text is fully capable of unbinding itself by making sense of its own parts. In conclusion, the Axial Model appears to be a text-normed hermeneutical model that can unearth deeper understanding of biblical texts
