Loop Ligator

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 6 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Zheng Ze - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Akira Okada - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: Takashi Sasaki, Toshimichi Hasegawa, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hirofumi Tanano, Masafumi Wasa, Yuichi Fukui, Akira Okada
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background/Purpose: Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a serious and difficult problem in the long-term management of biliary atresia (BA). Recently, endoscopic approaches have been attempted to manage this problem. The authors have attempted endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), a less invasive procedure than endoscopic sclerotherapy. Methods: In the past 5 years, 66 EVL procedures using standard flexible endoscope with a diameter of 9 mm (type p-30, XQ200, or XQ240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were performed in 30 separate sessions on 11 postoperative BA patients. The mean age of the children was 7.8 (range, 3 to 15) years. The EVL device was a small elastic O-ring or a Loop Ligator. Results: EVL was performed for emergency hemostasis in two patients and prophylaxis for impending rupture in nine with large, blue varices, or with red spots on the variceal surface. During the initial procedure, all varices were ligated successfully, and reduction in size was noted. Of eight patients who were examined 7 to 14 days after treatment, seven (87.5%) had improved. Eight of 11 patients (72.7%) were finally cured or at least had improved after one to seven sessions of EVL. However, three patients did not show improvement after four to seven sessions because of the reappearance of the varices, development of distal lesions such as gastric varices, and acute gastric mucosal lesions. A technical complication encountered was a slippage of the O-ring in one patient. A technical difficulty was seen in ligating the giant gastric varix in one patient. There was no deterioration of liver function induced by EVL in this entire series. Conclusions: EVL is an effective and feasible treatment of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative BA patients. However, reappearance or reactivation of the varices or emergence of the more distal lesions is likely to occur even after repeated EVL.

Takashi Sasaki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: Takashi Sasaki, Toshimichi Hasegawa, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hirofumi Tanano, Masafumi Wasa, Yuichi Fukui, Akira Okada
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background/Purpose: Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a serious and difficult problem in the long-term management of biliary atresia (BA). Recently, endoscopic approaches have been attempted to manage this problem. The authors have attempted endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), a less invasive procedure than endoscopic sclerotherapy. Methods: In the past 5 years, 66 EVL procedures using standard flexible endoscope with a diameter of 9 mm (type p-30, XQ200, or XQ240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were performed in 30 separate sessions on 11 postoperative BA patients. The mean age of the children was 7.8 (range, 3 to 15) years. The EVL device was a small elastic O-ring or a Loop Ligator. Results: EVL was performed for emergency hemostasis in two patients and prophylaxis for impending rupture in nine with large, blue varices, or with red spots on the variceal surface. During the initial procedure, all varices were ligated successfully, and reduction in size was noted. Of eight patients who were examined 7 to 14 days after treatment, seven (87.5%) had improved. Eight of 11 patients (72.7%) were finally cured or at least had improved after one to seven sessions of EVL. However, three patients did not show improvement after four to seven sessions because of the reappearance of the varices, development of distal lesions such as gastric varices, and acute gastric mucosal lesions. A technical complication encountered was a slippage of the O-ring in one patient. A technical difficulty was seen in ligating the giant gastric varix in one patient. There was no deterioration of liver function induced by EVL in this entire series. Conclusions: EVL is an effective and feasible treatment of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative BA patients. However, reappearance or reactivation of the varices or emergence of the more distal lesions is likely to occur even after repeated EVL.

Toshimichi Hasegawa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: Takashi Sasaki, Toshimichi Hasegawa, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hirofumi Tanano, Masafumi Wasa, Yuichi Fukui, Akira Okada
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background/Purpose: Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a serious and difficult problem in the long-term management of biliary atresia (BA). Recently, endoscopic approaches have been attempted to manage this problem. The authors have attempted endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), a less invasive procedure than endoscopic sclerotherapy. Methods: In the past 5 years, 66 EVL procedures using standard flexible endoscope with a diameter of 9 mm (type p-30, XQ200, or XQ240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were performed in 30 separate sessions on 11 postoperative BA patients. The mean age of the children was 7.8 (range, 3 to 15) years. The EVL device was a small elastic O-ring or a Loop Ligator. Results: EVL was performed for emergency hemostasis in two patients and prophylaxis for impending rupture in nine with large, blue varices, or with red spots on the variceal surface. During the initial procedure, all varices were ligated successfully, and reduction in size was noted. Of eight patients who were examined 7 to 14 days after treatment, seven (87.5%) had improved. Eight of 11 patients (72.7%) were finally cured or at least had improved after one to seven sessions of EVL. However, three patients did not show improvement after four to seven sessions because of the reappearance of the varices, development of distal lesions such as gastric varices, and acute gastric mucosal lesions. A technical complication encountered was a slippage of the O-ring in one patient. A technical difficulty was seen in ligating the giant gastric varix in one patient. There was no deterioration of liver function induced by EVL in this entire series. Conclusions: EVL is an effective and feasible treatment of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative BA patients. However, reappearance or reactivation of the varices or emergence of the more distal lesions is likely to occur even after repeated EVL.

Kiyokazu Nakajima - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Endoscopic variceal ligation in the management of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative biliary atresia
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1998
    Co-Authors: Takashi Sasaki, Toshimichi Hasegawa, Kiyokazu Nakajima, Hirofumi Tanano, Masafumi Wasa, Yuichi Fukui, Akira Okada
    Abstract:

    Abstract Background/Purpose: Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is a serious and difficult problem in the long-term management of biliary atresia (BA). Recently, endoscopic approaches have been attempted to manage this problem. The authors have attempted endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL), a less invasive procedure than endoscopic sclerotherapy. Methods: In the past 5 years, 66 EVL procedures using standard flexible endoscope with a diameter of 9 mm (type p-30, XQ200, or XQ240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were performed in 30 separate sessions on 11 postoperative BA patients. The mean age of the children was 7.8 (range, 3 to 15) years. The EVL device was a small elastic O-ring or a Loop Ligator. Results: EVL was performed for emergency hemostasis in two patients and prophylaxis for impending rupture in nine with large, blue varices, or with red spots on the variceal surface. During the initial procedure, all varices were ligated successfully, and reduction in size was noted. Of eight patients who were examined 7 to 14 days after treatment, seven (87.5%) had improved. Eight of 11 patients (72.7%) were finally cured or at least had improved after one to seven sessions of EVL. However, three patients did not show improvement after four to seven sessions because of the reappearance of the varices, development of distal lesions such as gastric varices, and acute gastric mucosal lesions. A technical complication encountered was a slippage of the O-ring in one patient. A technical difficulty was seen in ligating the giant gastric varix in one patient. There was no deterioration of liver function induced by EVL in this entire series. Conclusions: EVL is an effective and feasible treatment of gastroesophageal varices in postoperative BA patients. However, reappearance or reactivation of the varices or emergence of the more distal lesions is likely to occur even after repeated EVL.