Lower Anterior Resection

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 12255 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Lu Yin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of t1 2 rectal cancers
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p<0.01). The TEMS group restarted bowel movement significantly earlier than the LAR group (51.4±5.4h vs. 86.2±8.7h, p<0.01). The postoperative complications were mild and self-limited in the 2 groups. Local recurrences occurred in 2 T2 patients (2/28, 7.1%) at 8 months and 16 months following TEMS, respectively; no patient (0/30, 0.0%) developed local recurrence following LAR. CONCLUSIONS TEMS was associated with more rapid postoperative recovery and minimal surgical morbidity in T1-2 rectal cancer patients as compared to LAR.

  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of T1-2 rectal cancers.
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p

Yue-yu Chen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of t1 2 rectal cancers
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p<0.01). The TEMS group restarted bowel movement significantly earlier than the LAR group (51.4±5.4h vs. 86.2±8.7h, p<0.01). The postoperative complications were mild and self-limited in the 2 groups. Local recurrences occurred in 2 T2 patients (2/28, 7.1%) at 8 months and 16 months following TEMS, respectively; no patient (0/30, 0.0%) developed local recurrence following LAR. CONCLUSIONS TEMS was associated with more rapid postoperative recovery and minimal surgical morbidity in T1-2 rectal cancer patients as compared to LAR.

  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of T1-2 rectal cancers.
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p

Zhao-hui Liu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of t1 2 rectal cancers
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p<0.01). The TEMS group restarted bowel movement significantly earlier than the LAR group (51.4±5.4h vs. 86.2±8.7h, p<0.01). The postoperative complications were mild and self-limited in the 2 groups. Local recurrences occurred in 2 T2 patients (2/28, 7.1%) at 8 months and 16 months following TEMS, respectively; no patient (0/30, 0.0%) developed local recurrence following LAR. CONCLUSIONS TEMS was associated with more rapid postoperative recovery and minimal surgical morbidity in T1-2 rectal cancer patients as compared to LAR.

  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of T1-2 rectal cancers.
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p

Kun Zhu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of t1 2 rectal cancers
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p<0.01). The TEMS group restarted bowel movement significantly earlier than the LAR group (51.4±5.4h vs. 86.2±8.7h, p<0.01). The postoperative complications were mild and self-limited in the 2 groups. Local recurrences occurred in 2 T2 patients (2/28, 7.1%) at 8 months and 16 months following TEMS, respectively; no patient (0/30, 0.0%) developed local recurrence following LAR. CONCLUSIONS TEMS was associated with more rapid postoperative recovery and minimal surgical morbidity in T1-2 rectal cancer patients as compared to LAR.

  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of T1-2 rectal cancers.
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p

Pei-dong Shi - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of t1 2 rectal cancers
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2013
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p<0.01). The TEMS group restarted bowel movement significantly earlier than the LAR group (51.4±5.4h vs. 86.2±8.7h, p<0.01). The postoperative complications were mild and self-limited in the 2 groups. Local recurrences occurred in 2 T2 patients (2/28, 7.1%) at 8 months and 16 months following TEMS, respectively; no patient (0/30, 0.0%) developed local recurrence following LAR. CONCLUSIONS TEMS was associated with more rapid postoperative recovery and minimal surgical morbidity in T1-2 rectal cancer patients as compared to LAR.

  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection for the treatment of T1-2 rectal cancers.
    Hepato-gastroenterology, 2012
    Co-Authors: Yue-yu Chen, Zhao-hui Liu, Kun Zhu, Pei-dong Shi, Lu Yin
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND/AIMS It remains unknown whether transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is superior to laparoscopic Lower Anterior Resection (LAR) for the treatment of rectal cancer. This study aimed to compare the surgical and oncological effectiveness as well as safety of TEMS and LAR in T1-2 rectal cancer patients. METHODOLOGY T1-2N0 rectal cancer patients were prospectively and randomly assigned to local excision using TEMS (n=30) or radical Resection using LAR (n=30). The primary outcome measures were postoperative recovery course. RESULTS The operative duration of TEMS was significantly shorter than that of LAR (130.3±16.7 minutes vs. 198.7±16.8 minutes, p

Related terms

Lower Anterior Resection - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts