The Experts below are selected from a list of 21429 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Xiaowei Xu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
a note on Martindale lemma
Algebra Colloquium, 2012Co-Authors: Xiaowei XuAbstract:In 1969, Martindale proved a famous theorem well known as the Martindale lemma. In this paper, we give a generalization of the Martindale lemma by considering the nonlinear case.
Tracy Pritzl - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
reality is a response to Martindale tippins ben porath austin and wittmann
Family Court Review, 2012Co-Authors: Marc J Ackerman, Tracy PritzlAbstract:This article is written as a response to the Martindale et al. critique of the Ackerman and Pritzl (2011) child custody evaluation practices article. The Martindale et al. critique focuses on a small portion of the overall results regarding test usage and suggests that the entire article is “flawed and deficient.” However, their critique engages in confirmatory bias and exaggerated statements and ignores the overall value of the article in general. A more broad-based explanation of the results is provided herein.
-
REALITY IS. . . . A RESPONSE TO Martindale, TIPPINS, BEN‐PORATH, AUSTIN, AND WITTMANN
Family Court Review, 2012Co-Authors: Marc J Ackerman, Tracy PritzlAbstract:This article is written as a response to the Martindale et al. critique of the Ackerman and Pritzl (2011) child custody evaluation practices article. The Martindale et al. critique focuses on a small portion of the overall results regarding test usage and suggests that the entire article is “flawed and deficient.” However, their critique engages in confirmatory bias and exaggerated statements and ignores the overall value of the article in general. A more broad-based explanation of the results is provided herein.
Jovita Dikmonienė - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Charleso Martindale’io recepcijos teorija ir antikinė literatūra
Literatūra, 2007Co-Authors: Jovita DikmonienėAbstract:This article in the descriptive style introduces with adaptation of hermeneutics of reception to Latin poetry in Charles Martindale’s book “Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception”. The following five ideas of Martindale’s reception theory are 1) a contingent and continuously supplemented understanding of the meaning of the text being read, 2) continuously (re)interpreted contexts, 3) history as intersubjective stories about the past, 4) doubting the radical canon criticism, and 5) a dialogue with classical texts. Martindale argues that the text does not have any fixed meaning given by the author. On this stance, he does not agree with Jauss and Gadamer. Martindale compares interpretation of a literary work to performance of a piece of music: each new reading of the same text becomes a new concretization” and differs from any other manner of reading. Martindale notes that when studying ancient literature we cannot approach the pure, non-interpreted facts. Different people interpret one and the same fact differently, depending on their values, experience, and interests. Martindale does not agree with Fish’s theory of interpretative communities, arguing that only the critic himself hides behind the “implied reader” construction. He agrees with theories of dialogue of Bakhtin and Gadamer, with Derridean deconstruction. Martindale suggests understanding reading as an acquaintance and dialogue with the author of the text, which is influenced by the differance. Such a dialogue actualises the ancient literary work and enables passing it on to future generations.
-
Charles Martindale’s reception theory and ancient literature
2007Co-Authors: Jovita DikmonienėAbstract:This article in the descriptive style introduces with adaptation of hermeneutics of reception to Latin poetry in Charles Martindale’s book “Redeeming the text: Latin poetry and the hermeneutics of reception”. The following five ideas of Martindale’s reception theory are 1) a contingent and continuously supplemented understanding of the meaning of the text being read, 2) continuously (re)interpreted contexts, 3) history as intersubjective stories about the past, 4) doubting the radical canon criticism, and 5) a dialogue with classical texts. Martindale argues that the text does not have any fixed meaning given by the author. On this stance, he does not agree with Jauss and Gadamer. Martindale compares interpretation of a literary work to performance of a piece of music: each new reading of the same text becomes a new concretization” and differs from any other manner of reading. Martindale notes that when studying ancient literature we cannot approach the pure, non-interpreted facts. Different people interpret one and the same fact differently, depending on their values, experience, and interests. Martindale does not agree with Fish’s theory of interpretative communities, arguing that only the critic himself hides behind the “implied reader” construction. He agrees with theories of dialogue of Bakhtin and Gadamer, with Derridean deconstruction. Martindale suggests understanding reading as an acquaintance and dialogue with the author of the text, which is influenced by the differance. Such a dialogue actualises the ancient literary work and enables passing it on to future generations.
Marc J Ackerman - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
reality is a response to Martindale tippins ben porath austin and wittmann
Family Court Review, 2012Co-Authors: Marc J Ackerman, Tracy PritzlAbstract:This article is written as a response to the Martindale et al. critique of the Ackerman and Pritzl (2011) child custody evaluation practices article. The Martindale et al. critique focuses on a small portion of the overall results regarding test usage and suggests that the entire article is “flawed and deficient.” However, their critique engages in confirmatory bias and exaggerated statements and ignores the overall value of the article in general. A more broad-based explanation of the results is provided herein.
-
REALITY IS. . . . A RESPONSE TO Martindale, TIPPINS, BEN‐PORATH, AUSTIN, AND WITTMANN
Family Court Review, 2012Co-Authors: Marc J Ackerman, Tracy PritzlAbstract:This article is written as a response to the Martindale et al. critique of the Ackerman and Pritzl (2011) child custody evaluation practices article. The Martindale et al. critique focuses on a small portion of the overall results regarding test usage and suggests that the entire article is “flawed and deficient.” However, their critique engages in confirmatory bias and exaggerated statements and ignores the overall value of the article in general. A more broad-based explanation of the results is provided herein.
Kevin Mccrimmon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Martindale quotients of jordan algebras
Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 2009Co-Authors: Jose A Anquela, Kevin MccrimmonAbstract:In this paper we introduce Martindale quotients of Jordan algebras over arbitrary rings of scalars with respect to denominator filters of ideals. For any denominatored algebra, we show the existence of maximal Martindale quotients naturally containing all Martindale quotients of the algebra with respect to the given denominator filter.