The Experts below are selected from a list of 1161 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Yoshihara Naoki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
A Progress Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploitation Theory since Okishio (1963)
Institute of Economic Research Hitotsubashi University, 2016Co-Authors: Yoshihara NaokiAbstract:This report explores the development of exploitation theory in mathematical Marxian Economics by reviewing the main controversies surrounding the proper definition of exploitation since the contribution of Okishio (1963). The report first examines the debates on the Fundamental Marxian Theorem and Class-Exploitation Correspondence Principle, developed mainly in the 1970s and 1980s, followed by the property relation theory of exploitation by Roemer (1982). Then, the more recent exploitation theory proposed by Vrousalis (2013) and Wright (2000) is introduced. Finally, the report introduces and comments on recent axiomatic studies of exploitation by focusing on the work of Veneziani and Yoshihara (2015).37 p
-
A Progressive Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploitation Theory since Okishio (1963)
ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst, 2014Co-Authors: Yoshihara NaokiAbstract:This report explores the development of exploitation theory in mathematical Marxian Economics by reviewing the main controversies surrounding the definition of exploitation since the contribution of Okishio (1963). The report first examines the robustness and economic implications of the debates on the Fundamental Marxian Theorem, developed mainly in the 1970s and 1980s, followed by the property relation theory of exploitation by Roemer (1982). Then, the more recent exploitation theory proposed by Vrousalis (2013) and Wright (2000) is introduced, before examining its economic implications using a simple economic model. Finally, the report introduces and comments on recent axiomatic studies of exploitation by focusing on the work of Veneziani and Yoshihara (2013a
-
A Progressive Report on Marxian Economic Theory: On the Controversies in Exploitation Theory since Okishio
2014Co-Authors: Yoshihara NaokiAbstract:This report explores the development of exploitation theory in mathe-matical Marxian Economics by reviewing the main controversies surround-ing the definition of exploitation since the contribution of Okishio (1963). The report first examines the robustness and economic implications of the debates on the Fundamental Marxian Theorem, developed mainly in the 1970s and 1980s, followed by the property relation theory of exploitation by Roemer (1982). Then, the more recent exploitation theory proposed by Vrousalis (2013) and Wright (2000) is introduced, before examining its economic implications using a simple economic model. Finally, the report introduces and comments on recent axiomatic studies of exploitation by focusing on the work of Veneziani and Yoshihara (2013a). JEL classification: D63; D51
Rammelt C.f. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The dynamics of financial instability: simplifying Keen's Goodwin–Minsky model
'Wiley', 2019Co-Authors: Rammelt C.f.Abstract:Market capitalism typically goes through cycles of expansion and contraction. Every now and then, these common economic cycles go off the hinges. They become unstable and can lead to recessions, crises and depressions—phenomena that economists typically explain by looking to exogenous forces. Alternative explanations—mostly Marxian and Keynesian—for the instabilities have been sought within the structure of the economic system itself. One such explanation is provided by Steve Keen in his Goodwin–Minsky model. The model effectively mimics the dynamics of key indicators prior to, during and after the 2007/08 crisis. However, the model is also over-specified, highly sensitive to initial conditions and therefore more difficult to convey. In line with George Box's plea for parsimony, this paper presents a more straightforward version of Keen's model that remains consistent with its fundamental behaviour. The model also illustrates the potential for further dialogue between Marxian Economics and system dynamics
-
The dynamics of financial instability: simplifying Keen’s Goodwin–Minsky model
2019Co-Authors: Rammelt C.f.Abstract:Market capitalism typically goes through cycles of expansion and contraction. Every now and then, these common economic cycles go off the hinges. They become unstable and can lead to recessions, crises and depressions—phenomena that economists typically explain by looking to exogenous forces. Alternative explanations—mostly Marxian and Keynesian—for the instabilities have been sought within the structure of the economic system itself. One such explanation is provided by Steve Keen in his Goodwin–Minsky model. The model effectively mimics the dynamics of key indicators prior to, during and after the 2007/08 crisis. However, the model is also over‐specified, highly sensitive to initial conditions and therefore more difficult to convey. In line with George Box's plea for parsimony, this paper presents a more straightforward version of Keen's model that remains consistent with its fundamental behaviour. The model also illustrates the potential for further dialogue between Marxian Economics and system dynamics
Yahya M Madra - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
psychoanalysis and marxism from capitalist all to communist non all
Psychoanalysis Culture and Society, 2005Co-Authors: Ceren Ozselcuk, Yahya M MadraAbstract:Current influential attempts to bring together psychoanalysis and Marxism turn on the question of how to critique and move beyond capitalism without reverting to a utopian notion of communism. Taking this question seriously, the article explores the implications of psychoanalytic categories such as the real, fantasy, jouissance, and the formulae of sexuation, for Marxian Economics and politics. Rethinking Marxism in conjunction with Lacanian psychoanalysis, the article aims to formulate a post-phantasmatic relation to the economy of surplus, and from there, to offer a new ethico-political stance around exploitation and communism.
J E King - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
never intended to be a theory of everything domestic labor in neoclassical and Marxian Economics
Feminist Economics, 2001Co-Authors: Therese Jefferson, J E KingAbstract:This article is a comparative study of the treatment of domestic labor by neoclassical and Marxian economists. Before 1960, mainstream Economics concentrated on production for the market, with serious analysis of housework confined to a handful of economists, whose efforts in this regard were marginalized by Economics departments but supported by departments of home Economics. Later mainstream analyses, first in agricultural Economics and then in human capital theory, culminated in Gary Becker's "new household Economics." Domestic labor was also neglected by Marxist thinkers, who argued that housework was being socialized under capitalism and would disappear altogether under socialism, but it was rediscovered by Marxist-feminists in the late 1960s. Housework continues, however, to pose serious analytical difficulties for both neoclassical and Marxian economists.
Ceren Ozselcuk - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
psychoanalysis and marxism from capitalist all to communist non all
Psychoanalysis Culture and Society, 2005Co-Authors: Ceren Ozselcuk, Yahya M MadraAbstract:Current influential attempts to bring together psychoanalysis and Marxism turn on the question of how to critique and move beyond capitalism without reverting to a utopian notion of communism. Taking this question seriously, the article explores the implications of psychoanalytic categories such as the real, fantasy, jouissance, and the formulae of sexuation, for Marxian Economics and politics. Rethinking Marxism in conjunction with Lacanian psychoanalysis, the article aims to formulate a post-phantasmatic relation to the economy of surplus, and from there, to offer a new ethico-political stance around exploitation and communism.