The Experts below are selected from a list of 1458 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Peter G Ryan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
limited long distance transport of plastic pollution by the orange vaal river system south africa
Science of The Total Environment, 2020Co-Authors: Eleanor A Weideman, Vonica Perold, Peter G RyanAbstract:Abstract Much of the plastic waste entering the sea is thought to be transported from land by rivers, yet little is known about the distances over which rivers transport plastic. To address this knowledge gap, we collected surface water samples from the Orange-Vaal River at the end of the wet and dry seasons. The Vaal River drains South Africa's main urban-industrial centre, whereas the upper Orange River is sparsely populated. Below their confluence, the river flows through increasingly arid regions with very low human populations before entering the Atlantic Ocean. We collected bulk water samples from 33 bridges to test for microplastic and microfibre (0.025–1 mm) pollution and conducted observations for macrodebris (>50 mm). Where possible, we sampled for plastic fragments (>1 mm) using a neuston net. Microfibres and microplastics were found at every site (1.7 ± 5.1 L−1, >99% fibres) and accounted for 99% of the number of items recorded. Microfibres and microplastics were particularly abundant in the lower reaches during the period of low flow prior to the wet season flush. Macrodebris and larger microplastics were orders of magnitude less abundant (observations: 0.0002 ± 0.0007 items·m−2; neuston net: 0.34 ± 0.93 items·m−2). However, at sites where larger items were found, they comprised most of the mass of plastic. Larger plastics were found mostly at sites in the upper reaches of the Vaal River. Our results suggest that, while the Orange-Vaal River system may be a source of Microfibres to the Atlantic Ocean, larger plastic items typically only travel short distances. The Orange-Vaal River system therefore does not appear to be a major source of plastics into the Atlantic Ocean, at least under regular flow conditions.
-
sampling Microfibres at the sea surface the effects of mesh size sample volume and water depth
Environmental Pollution, 2020Co-Authors: Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Vonica Perold, Andrea Pierucci, Thomas G Bornman, Stefano AlianiAbstract:Abstract Microfibres are one of the most ubiquitous particulate pollutants, occurring in all environmental compartments. They are often assumed to be microplastics, but include natural as well as synthetic textile fibres and are perhaps best treated as a separate class of pollutants given the challenges they pose in terms of identification and contamination. Microfibres have been largely ignored by traditional methods used to sample floating microplastics at sea, which use 300–500 μm mesh nets that are too coarse to sample most textile fibres. There is thus a need for a consistent set of methods for sampling Microfibres in seawater. We processed bulk water samples through 0.7–63 μm filters to collect Microfibres in three ocean basins. Fibre density increased as mesh size decreased: 20 μm mesh sampled 41% more fibres than 63 μm, and 0.7 μm filters sampled 44% more fibres than 25 μm mesh, but mesh size (20–63 μm) had little effect on the size of fibres retained. Fibre density decreased with sample volume when processed through larger mesh filters, presumably because more fibres were flushed through the filters. Microfibres averaged 2.5 times more abundant at the sea surface than in water sampled 5 m sub-surface. However, the data were noisy; counts of replicate 10-L samples had low repeatability (0.15–0.36; CV = 56%), suggesting that single samples provide only a rough estimate of microfibre abundance. We propose that sampling for Microfibres should use a combination of
-
Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Environment international, 2019Co-Authors: Camille Le Guen, Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Stefano Aliani, Richard B. Sherley, Lars Boehme, Andrew S. BrierleyAbstract:Abstract Marine ecosystems are experiencing substantial disturbances due to climate change and overfishing, and plastic pollution is an additional growing threat. Microfibres are among the most pervasive pollutants in the marine environment, including in the Southern Ocean. However, evidence for microfibre contamination in the diet of top predators in the Southern Ocean is rare. King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) feed on mesopelagic fish, which undergo diel vertical migrations towards the surface at night. Microfibres are concentrated in surface waters and sediments but can also be concentrated in fish, therefore acting as contamination vectors for diving predators feeding at depth. In this study, we investigate microfibre contamination of King Penguin faecal samples collected in February and March 2017 at South Georgia across three groups: incubating, chick-rearing and non-breeding birds. After a KOH digestion to dissolve the organic matter and a density separation step using a NaCl solution, the samples were filtered to collect Microfibres. A total of 77% of the penguin faecal samples (36 of 47) contained Microfibres. Fibres were measured and characterized using Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy to determine their polymeric identity. Most fibres (88%) were made of natural cellulosic materials (e.g. cotton, linen), with only 12% synthetic (e.g. polyester, nylon) or semi-synthetic (e.g. rayon). An average of 21.9 ± 5.8 Microfibres g−1 of faeces (lab dried mass) was found, with concentrations more than twice as high in incubating penguins than in penguins rearing chicks. Incubating birds forage further north at the Antarctic Polar Front and travel longer distances from South Georgia than chick-rearing birds. This suggests that long-distance travelling penguins are probably more exposed to the risk of ingesting Microfibres when feeding north of the Antarctic Polar Front, which might act as a semi-permeable barrier for Microfibres. Microfibres could therefore provide a signature for foraging location in King Penguins.
Andrew S. Brierley - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Environment international, 2019Co-Authors: Camille Le Guen, Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Stefano Aliani, Richard B. Sherley, Lars Boehme, Andrew S. BrierleyAbstract:Abstract Marine ecosystems are experiencing substantial disturbances due to climate change and overfishing, and plastic pollution is an additional growing threat. Microfibres are among the most pervasive pollutants in the marine environment, including in the Southern Ocean. However, evidence for microfibre contamination in the diet of top predators in the Southern Ocean is rare. King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) feed on mesopelagic fish, which undergo diel vertical migrations towards the surface at night. Microfibres are concentrated in surface waters and sediments but can also be concentrated in fish, therefore acting as contamination vectors for diving predators feeding at depth. In this study, we investigate microfibre contamination of King Penguin faecal samples collected in February and March 2017 at South Georgia across three groups: incubating, chick-rearing and non-breeding birds. After a KOH digestion to dissolve the organic matter and a density separation step using a NaCl solution, the samples were filtered to collect Microfibres. A total of 77% of the penguin faecal samples (36 of 47) contained Microfibres. Fibres were measured and characterized using Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy to determine their polymeric identity. Most fibres (88%) were made of natural cellulosic materials (e.g. cotton, linen), with only 12% synthetic (e.g. polyester, nylon) or semi-synthetic (e.g. rayon). An average of 21.9 ± 5.8 Microfibres g−1 of faeces (lab dried mass) was found, with concentrations more than twice as high in incubating penguins than in penguins rearing chicks. Incubating birds forage further north at the Antarctic Polar Front and travel longer distances from South Georgia than chick-rearing birds. This suggests that long-distance travelling penguins are probably more exposed to the risk of ingesting Microfibres when feeding north of the Antarctic Polar Front, which might act as a semi-permeable barrier for Microfibres. Microfibres could therefore provide a signature for foraging location in King Penguins.
Giuseppe Suaria - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
sampling Microfibres at the sea surface the effects of mesh size sample volume and water depth
Environmental Pollution, 2020Co-Authors: Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Vonica Perold, Andrea Pierucci, Thomas G Bornman, Stefano AlianiAbstract:Abstract Microfibres are one of the most ubiquitous particulate pollutants, occurring in all environmental compartments. They are often assumed to be microplastics, but include natural as well as synthetic textile fibres and are perhaps best treated as a separate class of pollutants given the challenges they pose in terms of identification and contamination. Microfibres have been largely ignored by traditional methods used to sample floating microplastics at sea, which use 300–500 μm mesh nets that are too coarse to sample most textile fibres. There is thus a need for a consistent set of methods for sampling Microfibres in seawater. We processed bulk water samples through 0.7–63 μm filters to collect Microfibres in three ocean basins. Fibre density increased as mesh size decreased: 20 μm mesh sampled 41% more fibres than 63 μm, and 0.7 μm filters sampled 44% more fibres than 25 μm mesh, but mesh size (20–63 μm) had little effect on the size of fibres retained. Fibre density decreased with sample volume when processed through larger mesh filters, presumably because more fibres were flushed through the filters. Microfibres averaged 2.5 times more abundant at the sea surface than in water sampled 5 m sub-surface. However, the data were noisy; counts of replicate 10-L samples had low repeatability (0.15–0.36; CV = 56%), suggesting that single samples provide only a rough estimate of microfibre abundance. We propose that sampling for Microfibres should use a combination of
-
Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Environment international, 2019Co-Authors: Camille Le Guen, Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Stefano Aliani, Richard B. Sherley, Lars Boehme, Andrew S. BrierleyAbstract:Abstract Marine ecosystems are experiencing substantial disturbances due to climate change and overfishing, and plastic pollution is an additional growing threat. Microfibres are among the most pervasive pollutants in the marine environment, including in the Southern Ocean. However, evidence for microfibre contamination in the diet of top predators in the Southern Ocean is rare. King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) feed on mesopelagic fish, which undergo diel vertical migrations towards the surface at night. Microfibres are concentrated in surface waters and sediments but can also be concentrated in fish, therefore acting as contamination vectors for diving predators feeding at depth. In this study, we investigate microfibre contamination of King Penguin faecal samples collected in February and March 2017 at South Georgia across three groups: incubating, chick-rearing and non-breeding birds. After a KOH digestion to dissolve the organic matter and a density separation step using a NaCl solution, the samples were filtered to collect Microfibres. A total of 77% of the penguin faecal samples (36 of 47) contained Microfibres. Fibres were measured and characterized using Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy to determine their polymeric identity. Most fibres (88%) were made of natural cellulosic materials (e.g. cotton, linen), with only 12% synthetic (e.g. polyester, nylon) or semi-synthetic (e.g. rayon). An average of 21.9 ± 5.8 Microfibres g−1 of faeces (lab dried mass) was found, with concentrations more than twice as high in incubating penguins than in penguins rearing chicks. Incubating birds forage further north at the Antarctic Polar Front and travel longer distances from South Georgia than chick-rearing birds. This suggests that long-distance travelling penguins are probably more exposed to the risk of ingesting Microfibres when feeding north of the Antarctic Polar Front, which might act as a semi-permeable barrier for Microfibres. Microfibres could therefore provide a signature for foraging location in King Penguins.
Stefano Aliani - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
sampling Microfibres at the sea surface the effects of mesh size sample volume and water depth
Environmental Pollution, 2020Co-Authors: Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Vonica Perold, Andrea Pierucci, Thomas G Bornman, Stefano AlianiAbstract:Abstract Microfibres are one of the most ubiquitous particulate pollutants, occurring in all environmental compartments. They are often assumed to be microplastics, but include natural as well as synthetic textile fibres and are perhaps best treated as a separate class of pollutants given the challenges they pose in terms of identification and contamination. Microfibres have been largely ignored by traditional methods used to sample floating microplastics at sea, which use 300–500 μm mesh nets that are too coarse to sample most textile fibres. There is thus a need for a consistent set of methods for sampling Microfibres in seawater. We processed bulk water samples through 0.7–63 μm filters to collect Microfibres in three ocean basins. Fibre density increased as mesh size decreased: 20 μm mesh sampled 41% more fibres than 63 μm, and 0.7 μm filters sampled 44% more fibres than 25 μm mesh, but mesh size (20–63 μm) had little effect on the size of fibres retained. Fibre density decreased with sample volume when processed through larger mesh filters, presumably because more fibres were flushed through the filters. Microfibres averaged 2.5 times more abundant at the sea surface than in water sampled 5 m sub-surface. However, the data were noisy; counts of replicate 10-L samples had low repeatability (0.15–0.36; CV = 56%), suggesting that single samples provide only a rough estimate of microfibre abundance. We propose that sampling for Microfibres should use a combination of
-
Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Environment international, 2019Co-Authors: Camille Le Guen, Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Stefano Aliani, Richard B. Sherley, Lars Boehme, Andrew S. BrierleyAbstract:Abstract Marine ecosystems are experiencing substantial disturbances due to climate change and overfishing, and plastic pollution is an additional growing threat. Microfibres are among the most pervasive pollutants in the marine environment, including in the Southern Ocean. However, evidence for microfibre contamination in the diet of top predators in the Southern Ocean is rare. King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) feed on mesopelagic fish, which undergo diel vertical migrations towards the surface at night. Microfibres are concentrated in surface waters and sediments but can also be concentrated in fish, therefore acting as contamination vectors for diving predators feeding at depth. In this study, we investigate microfibre contamination of King Penguin faecal samples collected in February and March 2017 at South Georgia across three groups: incubating, chick-rearing and non-breeding birds. After a KOH digestion to dissolve the organic matter and a density separation step using a NaCl solution, the samples were filtered to collect Microfibres. A total of 77% of the penguin faecal samples (36 of 47) contained Microfibres. Fibres were measured and characterized using Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy to determine their polymeric identity. Most fibres (88%) were made of natural cellulosic materials (e.g. cotton, linen), with only 12% synthetic (e.g. polyester, nylon) or semi-synthetic (e.g. rayon). An average of 21.9 ± 5.8 Microfibres g−1 of faeces (lab dried mass) was found, with concentrations more than twice as high in incubating penguins than in penguins rearing chicks. Incubating birds forage further north at the Antarctic Polar Front and travel longer distances from South Georgia than chick-rearing birds. This suggests that long-distance travelling penguins are probably more exposed to the risk of ingesting Microfibres when feeding north of the Antarctic Polar Front, which might act as a semi-permeable barrier for Microfibres. Microfibres could therefore provide a signature for foraging location in King Penguins.
Camille Le Guen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Environment international, 2019Co-Authors: Camille Le Guen, Peter G Ryan, Giuseppe Suaria, Stefano Aliani, Richard B. Sherley, Lars Boehme, Andrew S. BrierleyAbstract:Abstract Marine ecosystems are experiencing substantial disturbances due to climate change and overfishing, and plastic pollution is an additional growing threat. Microfibres are among the most pervasive pollutants in the marine environment, including in the Southern Ocean. However, evidence for microfibre contamination in the diet of top predators in the Southern Ocean is rare. King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) feed on mesopelagic fish, which undergo diel vertical migrations towards the surface at night. Microfibres are concentrated in surface waters and sediments but can also be concentrated in fish, therefore acting as contamination vectors for diving predators feeding at depth. In this study, we investigate microfibre contamination of King Penguin faecal samples collected in February and March 2017 at South Georgia across three groups: incubating, chick-rearing and non-breeding birds. After a KOH digestion to dissolve the organic matter and a density separation step using a NaCl solution, the samples were filtered to collect Microfibres. A total of 77% of the penguin faecal samples (36 of 47) contained Microfibres. Fibres were measured and characterized using Fourier-Transform Infrared spectroscopy to determine their polymeric identity. Most fibres (88%) were made of natural cellulosic materials (e.g. cotton, linen), with only 12% synthetic (e.g. polyester, nylon) or semi-synthetic (e.g. rayon). An average of 21.9 ± 5.8 Microfibres g−1 of faeces (lab dried mass) was found, with concentrations more than twice as high in incubating penguins than in penguins rearing chicks. Incubating birds forage further north at the Antarctic Polar Front and travel longer distances from South Georgia than chick-rearing birds. This suggests that long-distance travelling penguins are probably more exposed to the risk of ingesting Microfibres when feeding north of the Antarctic Polar Front, which might act as a semi-permeable barrier for Microfibres. Microfibres could therefore provide a signature for foraging location in King Penguins.