The Experts below are selected from a list of 360 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Mery Lang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using monolithic, microservice, and AWS Lambda architectures
Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2017Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Angee Zambrano, Rubby Casallas, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Mery LangAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be independently developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated, and upgraded. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, how Microservices affect the infrastructure costs is a major evaluation topic for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that Microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison with standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices, such as AWS Lambda, reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more, and unlike Microservices operated by cloud customers, these specialized services help to guarantee the same performance and response times as the number of users increases. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications, and include a discussion on how to replicate the results on other cloud providers.
Mario Villamizar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using monolithic, microservice, and AWS Lambda architectures
Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2017Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Angee Zambrano, Rubby Casallas, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Mery LangAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be independently developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated, and upgraded. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, how Microservices affect the infrastructure costs is a major evaluation topic for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that Microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison with standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices, such as AWS Lambda, reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more, and unlike Microservices operated by cloud customers, these specialized services help to guarantee the same performance and response times as the number of users increases. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications, and include a discussion on how to replicate the results on other cloud providers.
-
Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Running Web Applications in the Cloud Using AWS Lambda and Monolithic and Microservice Architectures
Proceedings - 2016 16th IEEE ACM International Symposium on Cluster Cloud and Grid Computing CCGrid 2016, 2016Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Rubby Casallas, Santiago Gil, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Angee ZambranoAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using\nthe microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in\nthe cloud as a set of small services that can be developed, tested,\ndeployed, scaled, operated and upgraded independently. However, aside\nfrom gaining agility, independent development, and scalability,\ninfrastructure costs are a major concern for companies adopting this\npattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application\ndeveloped and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three\ndifferent approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice\narchitecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice\narchitecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that\nMicroservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison to\nstandard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services\nspecifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices reduces\ninfrastructure costs by 70% or more. Lastly, we also describe the\nchallenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice\napplications.(1)
Angee Zambrano - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using monolithic, microservice, and AWS Lambda architectures
Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2017Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Angee Zambrano, Rubby Casallas, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Mery LangAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be independently developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated, and upgraded. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, how Microservices affect the infrastructure costs is a major evaluation topic for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that Microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison with standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices, such as AWS Lambda, reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more, and unlike Microservices operated by cloud customers, these specialized services help to guarantee the same performance and response times as the number of users increases. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications, and include a discussion on how to replicate the results on other cloud providers.
-
Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Running Web Applications in the Cloud Using AWS Lambda and Monolithic and Microservice Architectures
Proceedings - 2016 16th IEEE ACM International Symposium on Cluster Cloud and Grid Computing CCGrid 2016, 2016Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Rubby Casallas, Santiago Gil, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Angee ZambranoAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using\nthe microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in\nthe cloud as a set of small services that can be developed, tested,\ndeployed, scaled, operated and upgraded independently. However, aside\nfrom gaining agility, independent development, and scalability,\ninfrastructure costs are a major concern for companies adopting this\npattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application\ndeveloped and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three\ndifferent approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice\narchitecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice\narchitecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that\nMicroservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison to\nstandard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services\nspecifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices reduces\ninfrastructure costs by 70% or more. Lastly, we also describe the\nchallenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice\napplications.(1)
Vyas Sekar - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
gremlin systematic resilience testing of Microservices
International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2016Co-Authors: Victor Heorhiadi, Shriram Rajagopalan, Hani Jamjoom, Michael K Reiter, Vyas SekarAbstract:Modern Internet applications are being disaggregated into a microservice-based architecture, with services being updated and deployed hundreds of times a day. The accelerated software life cycle and heterogeneity of language runtimes in a single application necessitates a new approach for testing the resiliency of these applications in production infrastructures. We present Gremlin, a framework for systematically testing the failure-handling capabilities of Microservices. Gremlin is based on the observation that Microservices are loosely coupled and thus rely on standard message-exchange patterns over the network. Gremlin allows the operator to easily design tests and executes them by manipulating inter-service messages at the network layer. We show how to use Gremlin to express common failure scenarios and how developers of an enterprise application were able to discover previously unknown bugs in their failure-handling code without modifying the application.
Lina Ochoa - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Cost comparison of running web applications in the cloud using monolithic, microservice, and AWS Lambda architectures
Service Oriented Computing and Applications, 2017Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Angee Zambrano, Rubby Casallas, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Mery LangAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using the microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in the cloud as a set of small services that can be independently developed, tested, deployed, scaled, operated, and upgraded. However, aside from gaining agility, independent development, and scalability, how Microservices affect the infrastructure costs is a major evaluation topic for companies adopting this pattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application developed and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three different approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice architecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that Microservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison with standard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services specifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices, such as AWS Lambda, reduces infrastructure costs by 70% or more, and unlike Microservices operated by cloud customers, these specialized services help to guarantee the same performance and response times as the number of users increases. Lastly, we also describe the challenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice applications, and include a discussion on how to replicate the results on other cloud providers.
-
Infrastructure Cost Comparison of Running Web Applications in the Cloud Using AWS Lambda and Monolithic and Microservice Architectures
Proceedings - 2016 16th IEEE ACM International Symposium on Cluster Cloud and Grid Computing CCGrid 2016, 2016Co-Authors: Mario Villamizar, Oscar Garces, Mauricio Verano, Lorena Salamanca, Rubby Casallas, Santiago Gil, Lina Ochoa, Harold Castro, Carlos Valencia, Angee ZambranoAbstract:Large Internet companies like Amazon, Netflix, and LinkedIn are using\nthe microservice architecture pattern to deploy large applications in\nthe cloud as a set of small services that can be developed, tested,\ndeployed, scaled, operated and upgraded independently. However, aside\nfrom gaining agility, independent development, and scalability,\ninfrastructure costs are a major concern for companies adopting this\npattern. This paper presents a cost comparison of a web application\ndeveloped and deployed using the same scalable scenarios with three\ndifferent approaches: 1) a monolithic architecture, 2) a microservice\narchitecture operated by the cloud customer, and 3) a microservice\narchitecture operated by the cloud provider. Test results show that\nMicroservices can help reduce infrastructure costs in comparison to\nstandard monolithic architectures. Moreover, the use of services\nspecifically designed to deploy and scale Microservices reduces\ninfrastructure costs by 70% or more. Lastly, we also describe the\nchallenges we faced while implementing and deploying microservice\napplications.(1)
