The Experts below are selected from a list of 55401 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Endre Gr??tnes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Standardization as open innovation: two cases from the Mobile Industry
Information Technology & People, 2009Co-Authors: Endre Grøtnes, Endre Gr??tnesAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to introduce standardization as a neutral arena for open innovation. The aim is to show that different policies towards open membership in standardization initiatives lead to different open innovation processes.Design/methodology/approach – Two cases are used to illustrate the differences in open innovation processes. The cases are the Android Mobile operating system and the service platform developed by the Open Mobile Alliance. The core process types introduced by Gassmann and Enkel are used to show the different open innovation approaches.Findings – Both cases use open innovation to create standards. Open membership leads to a coupled process, while a more restricted membership gives separate inside‐out and outside‐in processes. The case lead by established firms in the Industry has a process where radical innovations are introduced early in the process, while the case lead by newcomers has a process where radical innovations are introduced late in the process. The...
Endre Grøtnes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Standardization as open innovation: two cases from the Mobile Industry
Information Technology & People, 2009Co-Authors: Endre Grøtnes, Endre Gr??tnesAbstract:Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to introduce standardization as a neutral arena for open innovation. The aim is to show that different policies towards open membership in standardization initiatives lead to different open innovation processes.Design/methodology/approach – Two cases are used to illustrate the differences in open innovation processes. The cases are the Android Mobile operating system and the service platform developed by the Open Mobile Alliance. The core process types introduced by Gassmann and Enkel are used to show the different open innovation approaches.Findings – Both cases use open innovation to create standards. Open membership leads to a coupled process, while a more restricted membership gives separate inside‐out and outside‐in processes. The case lead by established firms in the Industry has a process where radical innovations are introduced early in the process, while the case lead by newcomers has a process where radical innovations are introduced late in the process. The...
Tan Bin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Research and application of security domain
Computers & Security, 2012Co-Authors: Tan BinAbstract:in order to better the group norms landing,Guangxi companies need to basis of security domain principle,according to" China Mobile support system safety domain partitioning and boundary integration technical requirements" and" China Mobile data service system centralized safety technical requirements" and other Mobile Industry standards,combined with the actual needs of the production network,from the security domain,boundary integration and security technology protection and other aspects,to develop practical security domain construction standard,for the future of 2-3 year construction principles,strategies and technical guidance,to realize the sustainable development strategy to provide a solid guarantee of information security.
Heikki Hämmäinen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Virtual operators in the Mobile Industry: a techno-economic analysis
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 2007Co-Authors: Timo Smura, Annukka Kiiski, Heikki HämmäinenAbstract:For a company planning to become a Mobile operator, two alternative ways to enter the market exist. In addition to the traditional way of acquiring a spectrum license and building a Mobile network, market entrance is also possible by becoming a virtual operator and utilizing the existing networks of incumbent operators. Potentially, virtual operators will have an important role in shaping the Mobile market structure and competition. In this paper, techno-economic modeling methods are used to analyze the position of virtual operators in the Mobile communications Industry. Four alternative virtual operator scenarios are constructed and analyzed using a linear, deterministic, and quantitative techno-economic model. The results highlight the importance of wholesale contracts with incumbent Mobile network operators in determining the virtual operators’ business profitability. Unbalance in termination prices between fixed and Mobile networks is shown to give incentives for virtual operators to invest in their own network infrastructure.
-
Virtual operators in the Mobile Industry: a techno-economic analysis
NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking, 2007Co-Authors: Timo Smura, Annukka Kiiski, Heikki HämmäinenAbstract:Virtual operator, Mobile, MVNO, Techno-economic modeling,
Anna Sidorova - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Product quality vs service quality in the Mobile Industry: Is there a dominant driver of customer intention to switch providers?
Operations Management Research, 2014Co-Authors: Xianghui Peng, Rebecca Scott, Victor Prybutok, Anna SidorovaAbstract:As service-dominant logic is being proposed and tested in several industries, this study extends the investigation of this theory and provides insights for both researchers and practitioners under the context of the Mobile Industry. This study advances the understanding of customer switching intention by assessing the relative strength of product quality and service quality in terms of Mobile provider switching behavior. This study develops the proposed research model that integrates previous validated constructs contextualized to the Mobile Industry and employs partial least square – structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the corresponding survey data and test the model fit. The results strongly support the hypotheses related to quality and its antecedents. The analysis results also suggest that overall Mobile provider service quality and customer intention to switch Mobile products significantly influence customer intention to switch providers. However, the overall product quality does not significantly influence customer intention to switch Mobile products. This research contributes to the debate of goods-dominant and service-dominant logic by empirically supporting the dominance of service quality within the context of one Industry, the Mobile Industry. In addition, this paper discusses the implications of the findings and presents future research directions.
