The Experts below are selected from a list of 40689 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Hongke Zhang - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Mobility Management in SINET
Smart Collaborative Identifier Network, 2016Co-Authors: Hongke Zhang, Wei Su, Wei QuanAbstract:In this chapter, we introduce four Mobility Management schemes available in SINET’s architecture. SINET facilitates mobile nodes’ locator changes at any time without disrupting the ongoing communication sessions. Thus, it can support efficient Mobility, global routing scalability and location privacy.
-
analysis of route optimization mechanism for distributed Mobility Management
Journal of Networks, 2012Co-Authors: Li Yi, Huachun Zhou, Hongke ZhangAbstract:the mobile data traffic has been extremely expanded for years and will remains the high growth rate in a long term. It is believed that distributed Mobility Management has been developed to be a new trend of designing Mobility Management scheme to solve the problem caused by the increasing traffic volume. Based on reviewing the characters of distributed Mobility Management schemes as a model of “access router distributed but location Management centralized”, this paper introduces a distributed Mobility Management scheme called D-PMIPv6 and its route optimization mechanism. A performance analysis will be given, and numerical results show that the route optimization mechanism this paper proposed has a less signaling cost compared with route optimization mechanism for PMIPv6, but reduces the packets delivery cost as the same as route optimization mechanism for PMIPv6.
-
IMIS - Mobility Management Research of Internet Based on the Splitting Mechanism
2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, 2011Co-Authors: Huachun Zhou, Fei Song, Hongke ZhangAbstract:This paper proposes a new Internet architecture based on splitting Mechanism. It separates the Internet access networks from the core network, and makes the IPv6 routing both in access networks and the core network more scalable. Furthermore, this paper gives the Mobility Management protocol of the proposed Internet architecture which supports the host based and the network based Mobility Management methods. Besides, we develop the analytic models for the Mobility Management costs and handover latency, and analyze the impacts of Mobility and system parameters on Mobility Management costs and handover latency, respectively. The analytic results show that the handover latency of the proposed Mobility Management protocol is bigger due to location Management messages across more network process nodes and the network based Mobility Management is better than the host based Mobility Management in term of the handover latency.
-
Mobility Management Research of Internet Based on the Splitting Mechanism
2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, 2011Co-Authors: Huachun Zhou, Fei Song, Hongke ZhangAbstract:This paper proposes a new Internet architecture based on splitting Mechanism. It separates the Internet access networks from the core network, and makes the IPv6 routing both in access networks and the core network more scalable. Furthermore, this paper gives the Mobility Management protocol of the proposed Internet architecture which supports the host based and the network based Mobility Management methods. Besides, we develop the analytic models for the Mobility Management costs and handover latency, and analyze the impacts of Mobility and system parameters on Mobility Management costs and handover latency, respectively. The analytic results show that the handover latency of the proposed Mobility Management protocol is bigger due to location Management messages across more network process nodes and the network based Mobility Management is better than the host based Mobility Management in term of the handover latency.
-
A network-based global Mobility Management architecture
International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 2010Co-Authors: Huachun Zhou, Hongke Zhang, Chi-hsiang Lo, Han-chieh ChaoAbstract:This paper specifies a network-based global Mobility Management architecture, named NetGMM. NetGMM supports network-based Mobility Management and non-Mobile IP mobile environment. There are two design considerations. The first is that a future mobile network requires network-based Mobility Management, shifting the Mobility Management function from Mobile Nodes (MN) to Access Network (AN) nodes. The second is that future mobile networks will support IP multi-services, introducing a separation between network address and identity of a mobile node entity, allowing heterogeneous networks to work together without loss of functionality.
Tai-myoung Chung - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative handover performance analysis of ipv6 Mobility Management protocols
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013Co-Authors: Jean-marie Bonnin, Tai-myoung ChungAbstract:IPv6 Mobility Management is one of the most challenging research topics for enabling Mobility service in the forthcoming mobile wireless ecosystems. The Internet Engineering Task Force has been working for developing efficient IPv6 Mobility Management protocols. As a result, Mobile IPv6 and its extensions such as Fast Mobile IPv6 and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 have been developed as host-based Mobility Management protocols. While the host-based Mobility Management protocols were being enhanced, the network-based Mobility Management protocols such as Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Fast Proxy Mobile IPv6 (FPMIPv6) have been standardized. In this paper, we analyze and compare existing IPv6 Mobility Management protocols including the recently standardized PMIPv6 and FPMIPv6. We identify each IPv6 Mobility Management protocol's characteristics and performance indicators by examining handover operations. Then, we analyze the performance of the IPv6 Mobility Management protocols in terms of handover latency, handover blocking probability, and packet loss. Through the conducted numerical results, we summarize considerations for handover performance.
-
Comparative handover performance analysis of IPv6 Mobility Management protocols
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013Co-Authors: Jong Hyouk Lee, IL SUN YOU, Jean-marie Bonnin, Tai-myoung ChungAbstract:IPv6 Mobility Management is one of the most challenging research topics for enabling Mobility services in the forthcoming mobile wireless ecosystems. The Internet Engineer- ing Task Force (IETF) has been working for developing efficient IPv6 Mobility Management protocols. As a result, Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and its extensions such as Fast Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6) and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) have been developed as host-based Mobility Management protocols. While the host- based Mobility Management protocols were being enhanced, the network-based Mobility Management protocols such as Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Fast Proxy Mobile IPv6 (FPMIPv6) have been standardized. In this paper, we analyze and compare existing IPv6 Mobility Management protocols including the re- cently standardized PMIPv6 and FPMIPv6. We identify each IPv6 Mobility Management protocol’s characteristics and perfor- mance indicators by examining handover operations. Then, we analyze the performance of IPv6 Mobility Management protocols in terms of handover latency, handover blocking probability, and packet loss. Through the conducted numerical results, we summarize considerations for handover performance
Huachun Zhou - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
analysis of route optimization mechanism for distributed Mobility Management
Journal of Networks, 2012Co-Authors: Li Yi, Huachun Zhou, Hongke ZhangAbstract:the mobile data traffic has been extremely expanded for years and will remains the high growth rate in a long term. It is believed that distributed Mobility Management has been developed to be a new trend of designing Mobility Management scheme to solve the problem caused by the increasing traffic volume. Based on reviewing the characters of distributed Mobility Management schemes as a model of “access router distributed but location Management centralized”, this paper introduces a distributed Mobility Management scheme called D-PMIPv6 and its route optimization mechanism. A performance analysis will be given, and numerical results show that the route optimization mechanism this paper proposed has a less signaling cost compared with route optimization mechanism for PMIPv6, but reduces the packets delivery cost as the same as route optimization mechanism for PMIPv6.
-
IMIS - Mobility Management Research of Internet Based on the Splitting Mechanism
2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, 2011Co-Authors: Huachun Zhou, Fei Song, Hongke ZhangAbstract:This paper proposes a new Internet architecture based on splitting Mechanism. It separates the Internet access networks from the core network, and makes the IPv6 routing both in access networks and the core network more scalable. Furthermore, this paper gives the Mobility Management protocol of the proposed Internet architecture which supports the host based and the network based Mobility Management methods. Besides, we develop the analytic models for the Mobility Management costs and handover latency, and analyze the impacts of Mobility and system parameters on Mobility Management costs and handover latency, respectively. The analytic results show that the handover latency of the proposed Mobility Management protocol is bigger due to location Management messages across more network process nodes and the network based Mobility Management is better than the host based Mobility Management in term of the handover latency.
-
Mobility Management Research of Internet Based on the Splitting Mechanism
2011 Fifth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, 2011Co-Authors: Huachun Zhou, Fei Song, Hongke ZhangAbstract:This paper proposes a new Internet architecture based on splitting Mechanism. It separates the Internet access networks from the core network, and makes the IPv6 routing both in access networks and the core network more scalable. Furthermore, this paper gives the Mobility Management protocol of the proposed Internet architecture which supports the host based and the network based Mobility Management methods. Besides, we develop the analytic models for the Mobility Management costs and handover latency, and analyze the impacts of Mobility and system parameters on Mobility Management costs and handover latency, respectively. The analytic results show that the handover latency of the proposed Mobility Management protocol is bigger due to location Management messages across more network process nodes and the network based Mobility Management is better than the host based Mobility Management in term of the handover latency.
-
A network-based global Mobility Management architecture
International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 2010Co-Authors: Huachun Zhou, Hongke Zhang, Chi-hsiang Lo, Han-chieh ChaoAbstract:This paper specifies a network-based global Mobility Management architecture, named NetGMM. NetGMM supports network-based Mobility Management and non-Mobile IP mobile environment. There are two design considerations. The first is that a future mobile network requires network-based Mobility Management, shifting the Mobility Management function from Mobile Nodes (MN) to Access Network (AN) nodes. The second is that future mobile networks will support IP multi-services, introducing a separation between network address and identity of a mobile node entity, allowing heterogeneous networks to work together without loss of functionality.
D. Jones - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
SHIP Mobility Management hybrid SIP-HIP scheme
Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence Networking and Parallel Distributed Computing and First ACIS Internatio, 2005Co-Authors: J.y.h. So, Jidong Wang, D. JonesAbstract:In future wireless communication networks such as 4G, different wireless technologies and architectures will coexist. In these heterogeneous network environments, Mobility Management is a critical issue. Session initiation protocol (SIP) is a widely discussed protocol, which is used for signaling and Mobility Management, especially in Voice over IP (VoIP) environment. However, its Mobility Management is restricted to SIP sessions only. To provide a full Mobility Management for services in future wireless IP networks, SIP can be combined with other protocols. In this paper, a new Mobility Management scheme based on host identity protocol (HIP) and SIP is proposed. The hybrid SIP and HIP (SHIP) scheme is for all services. SHIP has better performance in handoff signaling than SIP. Its signaling overhead is smaller and the signaling delay is much shorter. SHIP has been shown to outperform hybrid SIP and mobile IP, a widely discussed Mobility Management scheme, in a number of areas.
-
SNPD - SHIP Mobility Management hybrid SIP-HIP scheme
Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence Networking and Parallel Distributed Computing and First ACIS Internatio, 2005Co-Authors: J.y.h. So, Jidong Wang, D. JonesAbstract:In future wireless communication networks such as 4G, different wireless technologies and architectures will coexist. In these heterogeneous network environments, Mobility Management is a critical issue. Session initiation protocol (SIP) is a widely discussed protocol, which is used for signaling and Mobility Management, especially in Voice over IP (VoIP) environment. However, its Mobility Management is restricted to SIP sessions only. To provide a full Mobility Management for services in future wireless IP networks, SIP can be combined with other protocols. In this paper, a new Mobility Management scheme based on host identity protocol (HIP) and SIP is proposed. The hybrid SIP and HIP (SHIP) scheme is for all services. SHIP has better performance in handoff signaling than SIP. Its signaling overhead is smaller and the signaling delay is much shorter. SHIP has been shown to outperform hybrid SIP and mobile IP, a widely discussed Mobility Management scheme, in a number of areas.
Jean-marie Bonnin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparative handover performance analysis of ipv6 Mobility Management protocols
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013Co-Authors: Jean-marie Bonnin, Tai-myoung ChungAbstract:IPv6 Mobility Management is one of the most challenging research topics for enabling Mobility service in the forthcoming mobile wireless ecosystems. The Internet Engineering Task Force has been working for developing efficient IPv6 Mobility Management protocols. As a result, Mobile IPv6 and its extensions such as Fast Mobile IPv6 and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 have been developed as host-based Mobility Management protocols. While the host-based Mobility Management protocols were being enhanced, the network-based Mobility Management protocols such as Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Fast Proxy Mobile IPv6 (FPMIPv6) have been standardized. In this paper, we analyze and compare existing IPv6 Mobility Management protocols including the recently standardized PMIPv6 and FPMIPv6. We identify each IPv6 Mobility Management protocol's characteristics and performance indicators by examining handover operations. Then, we analyze the performance of the IPv6 Mobility Management protocols in terms of handover latency, handover blocking probability, and packet loss. Through the conducted numerical results, we summarize considerations for handover performance.
-
Comparative handover performance analysis of IPv6 Mobility Management protocols
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2013Co-Authors: Jong Hyouk Lee, IL SUN YOU, Jean-marie Bonnin, Tai-myoung ChungAbstract:IPv6 Mobility Management is one of the most challenging research topics for enabling Mobility services in the forthcoming mobile wireless ecosystems. The Internet Engineer- ing Task Force (IETF) has been working for developing efficient IPv6 Mobility Management protocols. As a result, Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) and its extensions such as Fast Mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6) and Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) have been developed as host-based Mobility Management protocols. While the host- based Mobility Management protocols were being enhanced, the network-based Mobility Management protocols such as Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) and Fast Proxy Mobile IPv6 (FPMIPv6) have been standardized. In this paper, we analyze and compare existing IPv6 Mobility Management protocols including the re- cently standardized PMIPv6 and FPMIPv6. We identify each IPv6 Mobility Management protocol’s characteristics and perfor- mance indicators by examining handover operations. Then, we analyze the performance of IPv6 Mobility Management protocols in terms of handover latency, handover blocking probability, and packet loss. Through the conducted numerical results, we summarize considerations for handover performance
