The Experts below are selected from a list of 2349 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Erazo Franklin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Hermenéutica acerca de la caída de los cuerpos U n modelo filosófico-pedagógico para explicar el vacío tecnológico / Debate about the falling bodies phenomena; philosophical and pedagogical model to explain the technological vacuum
2013Co-Authors: Erazo FranklinAbstract:El presente trabajo constituye una alegoría didáctica en donde los filósofos Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) y Aristóteles (384 a.C–322 a.C), en una simulada confrontación de criterios, debaten ante un tribunal científico Moderno para dilucidar quién tuvo más certeza al juzgar la caída de objetos. Se plantea la pregunta: ¿si se sueltan dos objetos de distintos pesos desde un mismo nivel, cuál de ellos llegará primero al suelo? Para esto, se introduce la definición de “grave” y se realiza un estudio comparativo entre la visión clásica griega y la llamada galileo-newtoniana, arbitrado por la ciencia Moderna para lo cual se crea un modelo físico-pedagógico que explica el vacío tecnológico Desde un punto de vista puramente cualitativo, se muestra la coherencia de la física pragmática de Aristóteles frente a la física ideal de Galileo Galilei. Después de esta contraposición a nivel cualitativo, se hace una extensión cuantitativa de la visión galileana, en donde se muestra la metodología Moderna de la ciencia, para concluir respondiendo la pregunta inicial y establecer en qué medida eran acertadas las posiciones de estos grandes filósofos.The present research is a didactic allegory where the philosophers Aristotle and Galilei in a simulated confrontation argue their ideas in front of a Modern scientific tribunal, in order to indentify who of both was right in the case of falling bodies, and answer the question: ¿when two objects are left, which of them arrives first to the grown?. Firstly, the definition of “grave” is done with a comparative analysis between the classical philosophy and the galilean-newtonian position, under the eyes of the Modern Physic. to explain the vacuum, a pedagogical model is done. Judging the situation only in a qualitative way, the coherence of the Aristotle’s Physics is shown in comparison with the Galilei’s ideal Physics. Finally, a quantitative extension of the Galileo’s point of view is made to show the methodology of Modern sciences and answer the mentioned question
-
Debate about the falling bodies phenomena; philosophical and pedagogical model to explain the technological vacuum
'Salesian Polytechnic University of Ecuador', 2013Co-Authors: Erazo FranklinAbstract:El presente trabajo constituye una alegoría didáctica en donde los filósofos Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) y Aristóteles (384 a.C–322 a.C), en una simulada confrontación de criterios, debaten ante un tribunal científico Moderno para dilucidar quién tuvo más certeza al juzgar la caída de objetos. Se plantea la pregunta: ¿si se sueltan dos objetos de distintos pesos desde un mismo nivel, cuál de ellos llegará primero al suelo? Para esto, se introduce la definición de “grave” y se realiza un estudio comparativo entre la visión clásica griega y la llamada galileo-newtoniana, arbitrado por la ciencia Moderna para lo cual se crea un modelo físico-pedagógico que explica el vacío tecnológico Desde un punto de vista puramente cualitativo, se muestra la coherencia de la física pragmática de Aristóteles frente a la física ideal de Galileo Galilei. Después de esta contraposición a nivel cualitativo, se hace una extensión cuantitativa de la visión galileana, en donde se muestra la metodología Moderna de la ciencia, para concluir respondiendo la pregunta inicial y establecer en qué medida eran acertadas las posiciones de estos grandes filósofos. The present research is a didactic allegory where the philosophers Aristotle and Galilei in a simulated confrontation argue their ideas in front of a Modern scientific tribunal, in order to indentify who of both was right in the case of falling bodies, and answer the question: ¿when two objects are left, which of them arrives first to the grown?. Firstly, the definition of “grave” is done with a comparative analysis between the classical philosophy and the galilean-newtonian position, under the eyes of the Modern Physic. to explain the vacuum, a pedagogical model is done. Judging the situation only in a qualitative way, the coherence of the Aristotle’s Physics is shown in comparison with the Galilei’s ideal Physics. Finally, a quantitative extension of the Galileo’s point of view is made to show the methodology of Modern sciences and answer the mentioned question
-
Hermenéutica acerca de la caída de los cuerpos. Un modelo filosófico - pedagógico para explicar el vacío tecnológico
2013Co-Authors: Erazo FranklinAbstract:The present research is a didactic allegory where the philosophers Aristotle and Galilei in a simulated confrontation argue their ideas in front of a Modern scientific tribunal, in order to indentify who of both was right in the case of falling bodies, and answer the question: ¿when two objects are left, which of them arrives first to the grown?. Firstly, the definition of “grave” is done with a comparative analysis between the classical philosophy and the galilean-newtonian position, under the eyes of the Modern Physic. to explain the vacuum, a pedagogical model is done. Judging the situation only in a qualitative way, the coherence of the Aristotle’s Physics is shown in comparison with the Galilei’s ideal Physics. Finally, a quantitative extension of the Galileo’s point of view is made to show the methodology of Modern sciences and answer the mentioned question.El presente trabajo constituye una alegoría didáctica en donde los filósofos Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) y Aristóteles (384 a.C–322 a.C), en una simulada confrontación de criterios, debaten ante un tribunal científico Moderno para dilucidar quién tuvo más certeza al juzgar la caída de objetos. Se plantea la pregunta: ¿si se sueltan dos objetos de distintos pesos desde un mismo nivel, cuál de ellos llegará primero al suelo? Para esto, se introduce la definición de “grave” y se realiza un estudio comparativo entre la visión clásica griega y la llamada galileo-newtoniana, arbitrado por la ciencia Moderna para lo cual se crea un modelo físico-pedagógico que explica el vacío tecnológico Desde un punto de vista puramente cualitativo, se muestra la coherencia de la física pragmática de Aristóteles frente a la física ideal de Galileo Galilei. Después de esta contraposición a nivel cualitativo, se hace una extensión cuantitativa de la visión galileana, en donde se muestra la metodología Moderna de la ciencia, para concluir respondiendo la pregunta inicial y establecer en qué medida eran acertadas las posiciones de estos grandes filósofos.
Raffelt Georg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components
2020Co-Authors: Vitagliano Edoardo, Tamborra Irene, Raffelt GeorgAbstract:We briefly review the dominant neutrino fluxes at Earth from different sources and present the Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum ranging from meV to PeV energies. For each energy band and source, we discuss both theoretical expectations and experimental data. This compact review should be useful as a brief reference to those interested in neutrino astronomy, fundamental particle Physics, dark-matter detection, high-energy astroPhysics, geoPhysics, and other related topics.Comment: 64 pages, 36 figures. Ancillary files include tables and a Mathematica notebook. Accepted for publication in Reviews of Modern Physic
-
Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components
'American Physical Society (APS)', 2020Co-Authors: Vitagliano Edoardo, Tamborra Irene, Raffelt GeorgAbstract:We briefly review the dominant neutrino fluxes at Earth from different sources and present the Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum ranging from meV to PeV energies. For each energy band and source, we discuss both theoretical expectations and experimental data. This compact review should be useful as a brief reference to those interested in neutrino astronomy, fundamental particle Physics, dark-matter detection, high-energy astroPhysics, geoPhysics, and other related topics.Comment: 64 pages, 36 figures. Ancillary files include tables and a Mathematica notebook. Published in Reviews of Modern Physic
Vitagliano Edoardo - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components
2020Co-Authors: Vitagliano Edoardo, Tamborra Irene, Raffelt GeorgAbstract:We briefly review the dominant neutrino fluxes at Earth from different sources and present the Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum ranging from meV to PeV energies. For each energy band and source, we discuss both theoretical expectations and experimental data. This compact review should be useful as a brief reference to those interested in neutrino astronomy, fundamental particle Physics, dark-matter detection, high-energy astroPhysics, geoPhysics, and other related topics.Comment: 64 pages, 36 figures. Ancillary files include tables and a Mathematica notebook. Accepted for publication in Reviews of Modern Physic
-
Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components
'American Physical Society (APS)', 2020Co-Authors: Vitagliano Edoardo, Tamborra Irene, Raffelt GeorgAbstract:We briefly review the dominant neutrino fluxes at Earth from different sources and present the Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum ranging from meV to PeV energies. For each energy band and source, we discuss both theoretical expectations and experimental data. This compact review should be useful as a brief reference to those interested in neutrino astronomy, fundamental particle Physics, dark-matter detection, high-energy astroPhysics, geoPhysics, and other related topics.Comment: 64 pages, 36 figures. Ancillary files include tables and a Mathematica notebook. Published in Reviews of Modern Physic
Porcel De Peralta, Benjamín - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Analysis of the applicability of the Bohr model in the prediction of the emission lines of the helium atom in the frame of the Modern Physic course of the Faculty of Engineering of La Plata University
2021Co-Authors: Sanjuan, Federico Ezequiel, Muñoz, Emiliano Luis, Creus, Mariano Fabián, Rabal, Héctor Jorge, Chiodini Horacio, Biasetti, Andrés Tobías, Gallego Sagastume, Juana Inés, Porcel De Peralta, BenjamínAbstract:El dictado de la materia Física IIIA de las carreras de Ingeniería Electrónica (IE1), Electricista (IE2) y Química (IQ) dictadas en la Facultad de Ingeniería (FI) de la Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP) abarca dos módulos bimestrales. En el segundo de ellos se abordan temas de Física Moderna y entre las actividades de laboratorio establecidas, los alumnos deben realizar un experimento destinado a determinar las líneas características de emisión de una lámpara de gas de He a baja presión utilizando un espectrómetro portátil. En el presente trabajo se describe el instrumental utilizado, la metodología experimental adoptada, se presentan las mediciones realizadas de las líneas características emitidas por el átomo He (HeI) y se las compara con las líneas publicadas en la literatura. A partir del uso del modelo de Bohr para el caso del átomo de He+1 simplemente ionizado (HeII), se estiman las longitudes de onda emitidas por el ión HeII y se las compara con las líneas características del HeII publicadas. También en el marco del modelo de Bohr, se calculan las longitudes de onda emitidas por el átomo HeI despreciando la repulsión entre los electrones y se las compara con las líneas observadas en el laboratorio. Finalmente, se analiza la aplicabilidad del modelo de Bohr en la descripción de los sistemas HeI y HeII.The Physic IIIA course of the Electronic, Electric and Chemical Engineering degrees of La Plata University includes two modules of two months each. The second teaching module includes Modern Physic topics. In special, in the laboratory activities, students carry out an experiment to determine the characteristic emission lines of an He lamp using a didactic spectrometer. In the present work, we describe the approach used in the laboratory and the experimental methodology. We present the emission lines measured and we compare these measurements with the He emission lines reported in the literature. From the Bohr model, we estimate the emitted wave length for the case of the He+1 ion (The He atom without an electron) and we compare these wave lengths with the lines published. In this sense, we also calculate the emitted lines of the He atom in the frame of the Bohr model and we compare these calculations with the lines measured in the laboratory. Finally, we analyze the potential application of the Bohr model in the description of the He atom and of the He+1 ion.Facultad de IngenieríaCentro de Investigaciones ÓpticasInstituto de Física La Plat
Tamborra Irene - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components
2020Co-Authors: Vitagliano Edoardo, Tamborra Irene, Raffelt GeorgAbstract:We briefly review the dominant neutrino fluxes at Earth from different sources and present the Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum ranging from meV to PeV energies. For each energy band and source, we discuss both theoretical expectations and experimental data. This compact review should be useful as a brief reference to those interested in neutrino astronomy, fundamental particle Physics, dark-matter detection, high-energy astroPhysics, geoPhysics, and other related topics.Comment: 64 pages, 36 figures. Ancillary files include tables and a Mathematica notebook. Accepted for publication in Reviews of Modern Physic
-
Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum at Earth: Sources and Spectral Components
'American Physical Society (APS)', 2020Co-Authors: Vitagliano Edoardo, Tamborra Irene, Raffelt GeorgAbstract:We briefly review the dominant neutrino fluxes at Earth from different sources and present the Grand Unified Neutrino Spectrum ranging from meV to PeV energies. For each energy band and source, we discuss both theoretical expectations and experimental data. This compact review should be useful as a brief reference to those interested in neutrino astronomy, fundamental particle Physics, dark-matter detection, high-energy astroPhysics, geoPhysics, and other related topics.Comment: 64 pages, 36 figures. Ancillary files include tables and a Mathematica notebook. Published in Reviews of Modern Physic
