The Experts below are selected from a list of 48876 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Marlous Ijntema - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Relationship between Moral Climate of Sports and the Moral Behavior of Young Athletes: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age
-
the relationship between Moral climate of sports and the Moral Behavior of young athletes a multilevel meta analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age < 18 years) was conducted. The results show that there is an overall significant association between these two variables (r= 0.40), indicating that a prosocial Moral climate is related to less antisocial and more prosocial Behavior, while an antisocial Moral climate is associated with more antisocial and less prosocial Behavior of young athletes. Two study characteristics significantly moderated this relationship: specifically, stronger associations were found in cross-sectional and in older studies. In addition, the strength of the association between Moral climate and Moral Behavior was stronger for antisocial Moral climate compared to prosocial Moral climate. Finally, associations for team members were stronger than those of coaches or a broad Moral club climate. Implications for further research and sports practice are discussed.
Maria Kavussanu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Relationship between Moral Climate of Sports and the Moral Behavior of Young Athletes: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age
-
the relationship between Moral climate of sports and the Moral Behavior of young athletes a multilevel meta analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age < 18 years) was conducted. The results show that there is an overall significant association between these two variables (r= 0.40), indicating that a prosocial Moral climate is related to less antisocial and more prosocial Behavior, while an antisocial Moral climate is associated with more antisocial and less prosocial Behavior of young athletes. Two study characteristics significantly moderated this relationship: specifically, stronger associations were found in cross-sectional and in older studies. In addition, the strength of the association between Moral climate and Moral Behavior was stronger for antisocial Moral climate compared to prosocial Moral climate. Finally, associations for team members were stronger than those of coaches or a broad Moral club climate. Implications for further research and sports practice are discussed.
-
Moral Behavior in sport
Current opinion in psychology, 2017Co-Authors: Maria Kavussanu, Nicholas StangerAbstract:In this review paper, we provide an overview of recent research on prosocial and antisocial Behaviors, in the context of sport, focusing mainly on antecedents and consequences of these Behaviors. Motivational variables such as task orientation, mastery climate, autonomous motivation, and autonomy supportive climate are likely to promote prosocial Behavior, whereas ego orientation, performance climate, controlled motivation, and controlling climate may lead to antisocial Behavior. The effects of some motivational variables (i.e., controlled motivation and controlling climate) on antisocial Behavior may be mediated by Moral disengagement, which has been consistently linked to antisocial Behavior across a number of studies. Two Moral variables, Moral identity and empathy have been found to inhibit antisocial Behavior, and their effects are due to anticipated guilt for acting antisocially. With respect to consequences of teammate Behavior, some evidence suggests that prosocial Behavior may enhance the recipient's enjoyment, effort, commitment, and performance, whereas antisocial Behavior could lead to anger. Finally, the frequency of prosocial and antisocial Behaviors varies as a function of context: Student athletes display more antisocial Behavior towards their opponents compared to their fellow students but also more prosocial Behavior towards their teammates than towards their fellow students. In sum, both motivational and Moral variables predict prosocial and antisocial Behaviors in sport, and these Behaviors can have important consequences for the recipient.
-
The effects of goal involvement on Moral Behavior in an experimentally manipulated competitive setting.
Journal of sport & exercise psychology, 2007Co-Authors: Luke D. Sage, Maria KavussanuAbstract:In this experiment we examined the effects of task and ego involvement on three measures of Moral Behavior—prosocial choice, observed prosocial Behavior, and observed antisocial Behavior—in a competitive setting. We also investigated sex differences in Moral Behavior. Male (n = 48) and female (n = 48) college students were randomly assigned to a task-involving, an ego-involving, or a control condition. Participants played two 10-min games of table soccer and completed measures of prosocial choice, goal involvement, goal orientation, and demographics. The two games were recorded, and frequencies of prosocial and antisocial Behavior were coded. Players assigned to the task-involving condition were higher in prosocial choice than those in the ego-involving or control conditions. Individuals in the ego-involving condition displayed more antisocial Behaviors than those in the task-involving or control conditions. Finally, females displayed more prosocial Behaviors than males.
Anouk Spruit - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Relationship between Moral Climate of Sports and the Moral Behavior of Young Athletes: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age
-
the relationship between Moral climate of sports and the Moral Behavior of young athletes a multilevel meta analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age < 18 years) was conducted. The results show that there is an overall significant association between these two variables (r= 0.40), indicating that a prosocial Moral climate is related to less antisocial and more prosocial Behavior, while an antisocial Moral climate is associated with more antisocial and less prosocial Behavior of young athletes. Two study characteristics significantly moderated this relationship: specifically, stronger associations were found in cross-sectional and in older studies. In addition, the strength of the association between Moral climate and Moral Behavior was stronger for antisocial Moral climate compared to prosocial Moral climate. Finally, associations for team members were stronger than those of coaches or a broad Moral club climate. Implications for further research and sports practice are discussed.
Tim Smit - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Relationship between Moral Climate of Sports and the Moral Behavior of Young Athletes: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age
-
the relationship between Moral climate of sports and the Moral Behavior of young athletes a multilevel meta analysis
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2019Co-Authors: Anouk Spruit, Maria Kavussanu, Tim Smit, Marlous IjntemaAbstract:Sports are among the most important leisure activities for youth and adolescents. Both positive (i.e., prosocial) and negative (i.e., antisocial) Moral Behaviors occur on the playing field. To stimulate positive sports experiences, it is important to understand which factors are related to the Moral Behavior of young athletes; one of these is the Moral climate, that is, the socio-Moral environment in which sports take place. Little is known about the overall strength of the relationship between Moral climate and Moral Behavior of young athletes, as well as the potential moderating factors of this relationship. A meta-analysis of 27 studies containing 117 effect sizes and N = 7726 young athletes (age < 18 years) was conducted. The results show that there is an overall significant association between these two variables (r= 0.40), indicating that a prosocial Moral climate is related to less antisocial and more prosocial Behavior, while an antisocial Moral climate is associated with more antisocial and less prosocial Behavior of young athletes. Two study characteristics significantly moderated this relationship: specifically, stronger associations were found in cross-sectional and in older studies. In addition, the strength of the association between Moral climate and Moral Behavior was stronger for antisocial Moral climate compared to prosocial Moral climate. Finally, associations for team members were stronger than those of coaches or a broad Moral club climate. Implications for further research and sports practice are discussed.
Elizabeth Mullen - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
consistency versus licensing effects of past Moral Behavior
Annual Review of Psychology, 2016Co-Authors: Elizabeth Mullen, Benoit MoninAbstract:Why does past Moral Behavior sometimes lead people to do more of the same (consistency), whereas sometimes it liberates them to do the opposite (licensing)? We organize the literature on moderators of Moral consistency versus licensing effects using five conceptual themes: construal level, progress versus commitment, identification, value reflection, and ambiguity. Our review reveals that individuals are more likely to exhibit consistency when they focus abstractly on the connection between their initial Behavior and their values, whereas they are more likely to exhibit licensing when they think concretely about what they have accomplished with their initial Behavior—as long as the second Behavior does not blatantly threaten a cherished identity. Moreover, many studies lacked baseline conditions (“donut” designs), leaving it ambiguous whether licensing was observed. And although many proposed moderators yielded significant interactions, evidence for both significant consistency and balancing simple effect...
-
Striving for the Moral Self: The Effects of Recalling Past Moral Actions on Future Moral Behavior:
Personality & social psychology bulletin, 2011Co-Authors: Jennifer Jordan, Elizabeth Mullen, J. Keith MurnighanAbstract:People's desires to see themselves as Moral actors can contribute to their striving for and achievement of a sense of self-completeness. The authors use self-completion theory to predict (and show) that recalling one's own (im)Moral Behavior leads to compensatory rather than consistent Moral action as a way of completing the Moral self. In three studies, people who recalled their imMoral Behavior reported greater participation in Moral activities (Study 1), reported stronger prosocial intentions (Study 2), and showed less cheating (Study 3) than people who recalled their Moral Behavior. These compensatory effects were related to the Moral magnitude of the recalled event, but they did not emerge when people recalled their own positive or negative nonMoral Behavior (Study 2) or others' (im)Moral Behavior (Study 3). Thus, the authors extend self-completion theory to the Moral domain and use it to integrate the research on Moral cleansing (remunerative Moral strivings) and Moral licensing (relaxed Moral strivings).
