The Experts below are selected from a list of 38295 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Robin Nusslock - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest Moral Decision making
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015Co-Authors: Xiaoqing Hu, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Robin NusslockAbstract:Research has begun to examine the neurocognitive processes underlying voluntary Moral Decision making, which involves engaging in honest or dishonest behavior in a setting in which the individual is free to make his or her own Moral Decisions. Employing event-related potentials, we measured executive control-related and reward-related neural processes during an incentivized coin-guessing task in which participants had the opportunity to voluntarily engage in dishonest behavior, by overreporting their wins to maximize earnings. We report four primary findings: First, the opportunity to deceive recruited executive control processes involving conflict monitoring and conflict resolution, as evidenced by a higher N2 and a smaller P3. Second, processing the outcome of the coin flips engaged reward-related processes, as evidenced by a larger medial feedback negativity (MFN) for incorrect (loss) than for correct (win) guesses, reflecting a reward prediction error signal. Third, elevated executive control-related neural activity reflecting conflict resolution (i.e., an attenuated executive control P3) predicted a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior. Finally, whereas elevated reward-related neural activity (the reward P3) was associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior, an elevated reward prediction error signal (MFN difference score) predicted increased trial-by-trial Moral behavioral adjustment (i.e., a greater likelihood to overreport wins following a previous honest loss than following a previous honest win trial). Collectively, these findings suggest that both executive control- and reward-related neural processes are implicated in Moral Decision making.
-
executive control and reward related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest Moral Decision making
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015Co-Authors: Narun Pornpattananangkul, Robin NusslockAbstract:Research has begun to examine the neurocognitive processes underlying voluntary Moral Decision making, which involves engaging in honest or dishonest behavior in a setting in which the individual is free to make his or her own Moral Decisions. Employing event-related potentials, we measured executive control-related and reward-related neural processes during an incentivized coin-guessing task in which participants had the opportunity to voluntarily engage in dishonest behavior, by overreporting their wins to maximize earnings. We report four primary findings: First, the opportunity to deceive recruited executive control processes involving conflict monitoring and conflict resolution, as evidenced by a higher N2 and a smaller P3. Second, processing the outcome of the coin flips engaged reward-related processes, as evidenced by a larger medial feedback negativity (MFN) for incorrect (loss) than for correct (win) guesses, reflecting a reward prediction error signal. Third, elevated executive control-related neural activity reflecting conflict resolution (i.e., an attenuated executive control P3) predicted a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior. Finally, whereas elevated reward-related neural activity (the reward P3) was associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior, an elevated reward prediction error signal (MFN difference score) predicted increased trial-by-trial Moral behavioral adjustment (i.e., a greater likelihood to overreport wins following a previous honest loss than following a previous honest win trial). Collectively, these findings suggest that both executive control- and reward-related neural processes are implicated in Moral Decision making.
Narun Pornpattananangkul - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest Moral Decision making
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015Co-Authors: Xiaoqing Hu, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Robin NusslockAbstract:Research has begun to examine the neurocognitive processes underlying voluntary Moral Decision making, which involves engaging in honest or dishonest behavior in a setting in which the individual is free to make his or her own Moral Decisions. Employing event-related potentials, we measured executive control-related and reward-related neural processes during an incentivized coin-guessing task in which participants had the opportunity to voluntarily engage in dishonest behavior, by overreporting their wins to maximize earnings. We report four primary findings: First, the opportunity to deceive recruited executive control processes involving conflict monitoring and conflict resolution, as evidenced by a higher N2 and a smaller P3. Second, processing the outcome of the coin flips engaged reward-related processes, as evidenced by a larger medial feedback negativity (MFN) for incorrect (loss) than for correct (win) guesses, reflecting a reward prediction error signal. Third, elevated executive control-related neural activity reflecting conflict resolution (i.e., an attenuated executive control P3) predicted a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior. Finally, whereas elevated reward-related neural activity (the reward P3) was associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior, an elevated reward prediction error signal (MFN difference score) predicted increased trial-by-trial Moral behavioral adjustment (i.e., a greater likelihood to overreport wins following a previous honest loss than following a previous honest win trial). Collectively, these findings suggest that both executive control- and reward-related neural processes are implicated in Moral Decision making.
-
executive control and reward related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest Moral Decision making
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015Co-Authors: Narun Pornpattananangkul, Robin NusslockAbstract:Research has begun to examine the neurocognitive processes underlying voluntary Moral Decision making, which involves engaging in honest or dishonest behavior in a setting in which the individual is free to make his or her own Moral Decisions. Employing event-related potentials, we measured executive control-related and reward-related neural processes during an incentivized coin-guessing task in which participants had the opportunity to voluntarily engage in dishonest behavior, by overreporting their wins to maximize earnings. We report four primary findings: First, the opportunity to deceive recruited executive control processes involving conflict monitoring and conflict resolution, as evidenced by a higher N2 and a smaller P3. Second, processing the outcome of the coin flips engaged reward-related processes, as evidenced by a larger medial feedback negativity (MFN) for incorrect (loss) than for correct (win) guesses, reflecting a reward prediction error signal. Third, elevated executive control-related neural activity reflecting conflict resolution (i.e., an attenuated executive control P3) predicted a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior. Finally, whereas elevated reward-related neural activity (the reward P3) was associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior, an elevated reward prediction error signal (MFN difference score) predicted increased trial-by-trial Moral behavioral adjustment (i.e., a greater likelihood to overreport wins following a previous honest loss than following a previous honest win trial). Collectively, these findings suggest that both executive control- and reward-related neural processes are implicated in Moral Decision making.
Xiaoqing Hu - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest Moral Decision making
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2015Co-Authors: Xiaoqing Hu, Narun Pornpattananangkul, Robin NusslockAbstract:Research has begun to examine the neurocognitive processes underlying voluntary Moral Decision making, which involves engaging in honest or dishonest behavior in a setting in which the individual is free to make his or her own Moral Decisions. Employing event-related potentials, we measured executive control-related and reward-related neural processes during an incentivized coin-guessing task in which participants had the opportunity to voluntarily engage in dishonest behavior, by overreporting their wins to maximize earnings. We report four primary findings: First, the opportunity to deceive recruited executive control processes involving conflict monitoring and conflict resolution, as evidenced by a higher N2 and a smaller P3. Second, processing the outcome of the coin flips engaged reward-related processes, as evidenced by a larger medial feedback negativity (MFN) for incorrect (loss) than for correct (win) guesses, reflecting a reward prediction error signal. Third, elevated executive control-related neural activity reflecting conflict resolution (i.e., an attenuated executive control P3) predicted a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior. Finally, whereas elevated reward-related neural activity (the reward P3) was associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in overall deceptive behavior, an elevated reward prediction error signal (MFN difference score) predicted increased trial-by-trial Moral behavioral adjustment (i.e., a greater likelihood to overreport wins following a previous honest loss than following a previous honest win trial). Collectively, these findings suggest that both executive control- and reward-related neural processes are implicated in Moral Decision making.
Scott T Grafton - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Harm to self outweighs benefit to others in Moral Decision making
'Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences', 2020Co-Authors: Lj Volz, Bl Welborn, Gobel Ms, Gazzaniga Ms, Scott T GraftonAbstract:This is the final version. Available from the national Academy of Sciences via the DOI in this record. How we make Decisions that have direct consequences for ourselves and others forms the Moral foundation of our society. Whereas economic theory contends that humans aim at maximizing their own gains, recent seminal psychological work suggests that our behavior is instead hyperaltruistic: We are more willing to sacrifice gains to spare others from harm than to spare ourselves from harm. To investigate how such egoistic and hyperaltruistic tendencies influence Moral Decision making, we investigated trade-off Decisions combining monetary rewards and painful electric shocks, administered to the participants themselves or an anonymous other. Whereas we replicated the notion of hyperaltruism (i.e., the willingness to forego reward to spare others from harm), we observed strongly egoistic tendencies in participants’ unwillingness to harm themselves for others’ benefit. The Moral principle guiding intersubject trade-off Decision making observed in our study is best described as egoistically biased altruism, with important implications for our understanding of economic and social interactions in our society
-
harm to self outweighs benefit to others in Moral Decision making
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017Co-Authors: Lukas J Volz, Locke B Welborn, Matthias S Gobel, Michael S Gazzaniga, Scott T GraftonAbstract:How we make Decisions that have direct consequences for ourselves and others forms the Moral foundation of our society. Whereas economic theory contends that humans aim at maximizing their own gains, recent seminal psychological work suggests that our behavior is instead hyperaltruistic: We are more willing to sacrifice gains to spare others from harm than to spare ourselves from harm. To investigate how such egoistic and hyperaltruistic tendencies influence Moral Decision making, we investigated trade-off Decisions combining monetary rewards and painful electric shocks, administered to the participants themselves or an anonymous other. Whereas we replicated the notion of hyperaltruism (i.e., the willingness to forego reward to spare others from harm), we observed strongly egoistic tendencies in participants' unwillingness to harm themselves for others' benefit. The Moral principle guiding intersubject trade-off Decision making observed in our study is best described as egoistically biased altruism, with important implications for our understanding of economic and social interactions in our society.
Francesco Sguera - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
understanding the consequences of pride and shame how self evaluations guide Moral Decision making in business
Journal of Business Research, 2018Co-Authors: Richard P. Bagozzi, Leslie E. Sekerka, Francesco SgueraAbstract:Understanding how Morally responsible and irresponsible business actions lead to feelings of pride and shame can help us learn more about what motivates Moral Decision making. This study examines how these particular self-conscious emotions interact with two variables depicting a person's other-orientation, which is made up of other-directed values and perspective-taking. Through an experimental design, we unpack their conjoint influence on Moral Decisions that either promote the organization or repair the damage done to it. By doing so, we contribute to the existing literature by clarifying nuances between self-conscious and Moral emotions, and by testing the specific influence of pride and shame on Moral Decision-making.
-
Understanding the consequences of pride and shame: How self-evaluations guide Moral Decision making in business ☆
Journal of Business Research, 2018Co-Authors: Richard P. Bagozzi, Leslie E. Sekerka, Francesco SgueraAbstract:Understanding how Morally responsible and irresponsible business actions lead to feelings of pride and shame can help us learn more about what motivates Moral Decision making. This study examines how these particular self-conscious emotions interact with two variables depicting a person's other-orientation, which is made up of other-directed values and perspective-taking. Through an experimental design, we unpack their conjoint influence on Moral Decisions that either promote the organization or repair the damage done to it. By doing so, we contribute to the existing literature by clarifying nuances between self-conscious and Moral emotions, and by testing the specific influence of pride and shame on Moral Decision-making.
-
Self-Conscious Emotions and Moral Decision Making in Business
Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017Co-Authors: Francesco Sguera, Leslie E. Sekerka, Richard P. BagozziAbstract:Understanding how Morally responsible and irresponsible management actions lead to feelings of pride and shame can help us learn more about what motivates Moral Decision making. This study examines...
