The Experts below are selected from a list of 162522 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Emily A Holmes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Multidisciplinary Research priorities for the covid 19 pandemic a call for action for mental health science
The Lancet Psychiatry, 2020Co-Authors: Emily A Holmes, Rory C Oconnor, Hugh V Perry, Irene Tracey, Simon Wessely, Louise Arseneault, Clive Ballard, Helen Christensen, Roxane Cohen SilverAbstract:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science Research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health Research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK Research funding agencies to work with Researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these Research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality Research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for Research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, Research efforts in other countries.
Roxane Cohen Silver - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Multidisciplinary Research priorities for the covid 19 pandemic a call for action for mental health science
The Lancet Psychiatry, 2020Co-Authors: Emily A Holmes, Rory C Oconnor, Hugh V Perry, Irene Tracey, Simon Wessely, Louise Arseneault, Clive Ballard, Helen Christensen, Roxane Cohen SilverAbstract:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is having a profound effect on all aspects of society, including mental health and physical health. We explore the psychological, social, and neuroscientific effects of COVID-19 and set out the immediate priorities and longer-term strategies for mental health science Research. These priorities were informed by surveys of the public and an expert panel convened by the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the mental health Research charity, MQ: Transforming Mental Health, in the first weeks of the pandemic in the UK in March, 2020. We urge UK Research funding agencies to work with Researchers, people with lived experience, and others to establish a high level coordination group to ensure that these Research priorities are addressed, and to allow new ones to be identified over time. The need to maintain high-quality Research standards is imperative. International collaboration and a global perspective will be beneficial. An immediate priority is collecting high-quality data on the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across the whole population and vulnerable groups, and on brain function, cognition, and mental health of patients with COVID-19. There is an urgent need for Research to address how mental health consequences for vulnerable groups can be mitigated under pandemic conditions, and on the impact of repeated media consumption and health messaging around COVID-19. Discovery, evaluation, and refinement of mechanistically driven interventions to address the psychological, social, and neuroscientific aspects of the pandemic are required. Rising to this challenge will require integration across disciplines and sectors, and should be done together with people with lived experience. New funding will be required to meet these priorities, and it can be efficiently leveraged by the UK's world-leading infrastructure. This Position Paper provides a strategy that may be both adapted for, and integrated with, Research efforts in other countries.
Colin P Derdeyn - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
common data elements for radiological imaging of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research group
Neurocritical Care, 2019Co-Authors: Katharina A M Hackenberg, Nima Etminan, Max Wintermark, Philip M Meyers, Giuseppe Lanzino, Daniel A Rufenacht, Timo Krings, John Huston, Gabriel J E Rinkel, Colin P DerdeynAbstract:Lack of homogeneous definitions for imaging data and consensus on their relevance in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage and unruptured intracranial aneurysms lead to a difficulty of data pooling and lack of robust data. The aim of the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Common Data Elements (CDE) Project was to standardize data elements to ultimately facilitate data pooling and establish a more robust data quality in future neurovascular Research on UIA and SAH. For the subcommittee ‘Radiological imaging of SAH,’ international cerebrovascular specialists with imaging expertise in the setting of SAH were selected by the steering committee. CDEs were developed after reviewing the literature on neuroradiology and already existing CDEs for other neurological diseases. For prioritization, the CDEs were classified into ‘Core,’ ‘Supplemental—Highly Recommended,’ ‘Supplemental’ and ‘Exploratory.’ The subcommittee compiled 136 CDEs, 100 out of which were derived from previously established CDEs on ischemic stroke and 36 were newly created. The CDEs were assigned to four main categories (several CDEs were assigned to more than one category): ‘Parenchymal imaging’ with 42 CDEs, ‘Angiography’ with 49 CDEs, ‘Perfusion imaging’ with 20 CDEs, and ‘Transcranial doppler’ with 55 CDEs. The CDEs were classified into core, supplemental highly recommended, supplemental and exploratory elements. The core CDEs were imaging modality, imaging modality type, imaging modality vessel, angiography type, vessel angiography arterial anatomic site and imaging vessel angiography arterial result. The CDEs were established based on the current literature and consensus across cerebrovascular specialists. The use of these CDEs will facilitate standardization and aggregation of imaging data in the setting of SAH. However, the CDEs may require reevaluation and periodic adjustment based on current Research and improved imaging quality and novel modalities.
Nima Etminan - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
common data elements for radiological imaging of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research group
Neurocritical Care, 2019Co-Authors: Katharina A M Hackenberg, Nima Etminan, Max Wintermark, Philip M Meyers, Giuseppe Lanzino, Daniel A Rufenacht, Timo Krings, John Huston, Gabriel J E Rinkel, Colin P DerdeynAbstract:Lack of homogeneous definitions for imaging data and consensus on their relevance in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage and unruptured intracranial aneurysms lead to a difficulty of data pooling and lack of robust data. The aim of the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Common Data Elements (CDE) Project was to standardize data elements to ultimately facilitate data pooling and establish a more robust data quality in future neurovascular Research on UIA and SAH. For the subcommittee ‘Radiological imaging of SAH,’ international cerebrovascular specialists with imaging expertise in the setting of SAH were selected by the steering committee. CDEs were developed after reviewing the literature on neuroradiology and already existing CDEs for other neurological diseases. For prioritization, the CDEs were classified into ‘Core,’ ‘Supplemental—Highly Recommended,’ ‘Supplemental’ and ‘Exploratory.’ The subcommittee compiled 136 CDEs, 100 out of which were derived from previously established CDEs on ischemic stroke and 36 were newly created. The CDEs were assigned to four main categories (several CDEs were assigned to more than one category): ‘Parenchymal imaging’ with 42 CDEs, ‘Angiography’ with 49 CDEs, ‘Perfusion imaging’ with 20 CDEs, and ‘Transcranial doppler’ with 55 CDEs. The CDEs were classified into core, supplemental highly recommended, supplemental and exploratory elements. The core CDEs were imaging modality, imaging modality type, imaging modality vessel, angiography type, vessel angiography arterial anatomic site and imaging vessel angiography arterial result. The CDEs were established based on the current literature and consensus across cerebrovascular specialists. The use of these CDEs will facilitate standardization and aggregation of imaging data in the setting of SAH. However, the CDEs may require reevaluation and periodic adjustment based on current Research and improved imaging quality and novel modalities.
-
abstract 123 the unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score uaits proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research group
Stroke, 2014Co-Authors: Nima Etminan, Kerim Beseoglu, Loch MacdonaldAbstract:Objective: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are being identified with increasing frequency. Their natural history is being defined but their appropriate treatment remains controversial. We convened a panel of experts with the aim being the development of a treatment score (UIATS) that could guide decision making for treatment of UIAs. Method: An international, Multidisciplinary (Neurology, Clinical Epidemiology, Neurosurgery and Neuroradiology) panel of experts on Research and treatment of cerebral aneurysms was formed. Panel members were chosen to be geographically and professionally dispersed, to increase the validity of the score. A 5-round, Delphi consensus process was initiated to identify and rate all features, relevant to assess UIAs and their treatment based on current evidence and practice. Rating scales and risk percentages were repeatedly used to determine statistical weight for each factor and to exclude significant discrepancies between rounds. Medians from all rounds were then transf...
Katharina A M Hackenberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
common data elements for radiological imaging of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research group
Neurocritical Care, 2019Co-Authors: Katharina A M Hackenberg, Nima Etminan, Max Wintermark, Philip M Meyers, Giuseppe Lanzino, Daniel A Rufenacht, Timo Krings, John Huston, Gabriel J E Rinkel, Colin P DerdeynAbstract:Lack of homogeneous definitions for imaging data and consensus on their relevance in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage and unruptured intracranial aneurysms lead to a difficulty of data pooling and lack of robust data. The aim of the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm (UIA) and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Common Data Elements (CDE) Project was to standardize data elements to ultimately facilitate data pooling and establish a more robust data quality in future neurovascular Research on UIA and SAH. For the subcommittee ‘Radiological imaging of SAH,’ international cerebrovascular specialists with imaging expertise in the setting of SAH were selected by the steering committee. CDEs were developed after reviewing the literature on neuroradiology and already existing CDEs for other neurological diseases. For prioritization, the CDEs were classified into ‘Core,’ ‘Supplemental—Highly Recommended,’ ‘Supplemental’ and ‘Exploratory.’ The subcommittee compiled 136 CDEs, 100 out of which were derived from previously established CDEs on ischemic stroke and 36 were newly created. The CDEs were assigned to four main categories (several CDEs were assigned to more than one category): ‘Parenchymal imaging’ with 42 CDEs, ‘Angiography’ with 49 CDEs, ‘Perfusion imaging’ with 20 CDEs, and ‘Transcranial doppler’ with 55 CDEs. The CDEs were classified into core, supplemental highly recommended, supplemental and exploratory elements. The core CDEs were imaging modality, imaging modality type, imaging modality vessel, angiography type, vessel angiography arterial anatomic site and imaging vessel angiography arterial result. The CDEs were established based on the current literature and consensus across cerebrovascular specialists. The use of these CDEs will facilitate standardization and aggregation of imaging data in the setting of SAH. However, the CDEs may require reevaluation and periodic adjustment based on current Research and improved imaging quality and novel modalities.
