The Experts below are selected from a list of 7647 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Jerry J Sweet - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. Neuropsychologists: The AACN, NAN, SCN 2020 practice and "salary survey".
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2020Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Nathaniel W Nelson, Kristen M. Klipfel, Paul J. MobergAbstract:This portion of the 2020 survey updates practice information, beliefs, and income data of clinical Neuropsychologists who practice within the United States. Methods: Doctoral-level neuropsychology ...
-
the american academy of clinical neuropsychology national academy of neuropsychology and society for clinical neuropsychology apa division 40 2015 tcn professional practice and salary survey professional practices beliefs and incomes of u s neuropsyc
Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2015Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Laura M Benson, Nathaniel W Nelson, Paul J. MobergAbstract:Objective The current survey updated professional practice and income information pertaining to clinical neuropsychology. Methods Doctoral-level members of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association, and the National Academy of Neuropsychology and other Neuropsychologists, as well as postdoctoral trainees in the Association of Postdoctoral Programs in Clinical Neuropsychology and at other training sites were invited to participate in a web-based survey in early 2015. The sample of 1777 respondents, of whom 1579 were doctoral-level practitioners and 198 were postdoctoral trainees, was larger than the prior 2010 income and practice survey. Results The substantial proportional change in gender has continued, with women now a clear majority in the postdoctoral trainee sample as well as in the practitioner sample. Dissimilar from the median age trajectory of American Psychological Association members, the median age of clinical Neuropsychologists remains essentially unchanged since 1989, indicating a substantial annual influx of young Neuropsychologists. The question of whether the Houston Conference training model has become an important influence in the specialty can now be considered settled in the affirmative among postdoctoral trainees and practitioners. Testing assistant usage remains commonplace, and continues to be more common in institutions. The vast majority of clinical Neuropsychologists work full-time and very few are unemployed and seeking employment. The numbers of Neuropsychologists planning to retire in the coming 5-10 years do not suggest a "baby boomer" effect or an unexpected bolus of planned retirements in the next 10 years that would be large enough to be worrisome. Average length of time reported for evaluations appears to be increasing across time. The most common factors affecting evaluation length were identified, with the top three being: (1) goal of evaluation, (2) stamina/health of examinee, and (3) age of examinee. Pediatric specialists remain more likely than others to work part-time, more likely to work in institutions, report lower incomes than respondents with a lifespan professional identity, and are far more likely to be women. Incomes continue to vary considerably by years of clinical practice, work setting, amount of forensic practice, state, and region of country. Neurologists are the number one referral source in institutions and in private practice, as well as for pediatric, adult, and lifespan practitioners. Learning disability is no longer among the top five conditions seen by pediatric Neuropsychologists; traumatic brain injury and seizure disorder are common reasons for clinical evaluations at all age ranges. There is a continued increase in forensic practice and a clear consensus on the use of validity testing. There is a substantial interest in subspecialization board certification, with the greatest interest evident among postdoctoral trainees. Income satisfaction, job satisfaction, and work-life balance satisfaction are higher for men. Job satisfaction varies across general work setting and across age range of practice. Work-life balance satisfaction is moderately correlated with income satisfaction and job satisfaction. Again in this five-year interval survey, a substantial majority of respondents reported increased incomes, despite experiencing substantial negative practice effects related to changes in the US health care system. Numerous breakdowns related to income and professional activities are provided. Conclusions Professional practice survey information continues to provide valuable perspectives regarding consistency and change in the activities, beliefs, and incomes of US clinical Neuropsychologists.
-
The TCN/AACN 2005 "salary survey": professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. Neuropsychologists.
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2006Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Nathaniel W Nelson, Paul J. MobergAbstract:Doctoral-level members of Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association and other Neuropsychologists were invited to participate in a web-based survey in early 2005. Response rate was estimated to be between 28.5 and 31.3%. The range of years postdoctorate was 1–51. Demonstrating the substantial proportional change in gender taking place in the field, 7 of 10 postdoctoral residents were women. Whereas the median age of APA members has been over 50 since the early 1990s, the current median age of clinical Neuropsychologists is 47 and has essentially remained unchanged since 1994, indicating substantial entrance of young psychologists into the field. Use of testing assistants remains commonplace. The “flexible battery” approach has increased in popularity and predominates, whereas endorsement of the “standardized battery” approach continues to decline. More than 90% of respondents are engaged in full-time or full-time plus part-time employment. Incomes from 2004 vary consi...
-
Ten-year follow-up survey of clinical Neuropsychologists: part II. Private practice and economics.
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2000Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Paul J. Moberg, Yana SuchyAbstract:Analyses of a 10-year follow-up survey of clinical Neuropsychologists demonstrated significant changes in employment settings away from institutions, placing a clear majority of the field in private practice settings in 1999 (Sweet, Moberg, & Suchy, 2000). The present paper compares characteristics of practices and beliefs of clinical Neuropsychologists who work in institutions versus private practice, using data from 1989, 1994, and 1999. Previous survey data had not been analyzed along the dimension of work setting. Among the significant findings are differences in age, referral sources, hours per week engaged in specific professional activities (clinical, neuropsychological, forensic, supervisory, research, teaching), ages of patients, type and frequency of data gathered in assessments, hours spent per evaluation, use of an assistant to gather data, and journal subscriptions. Economic changes within the last 5 years have had a differential impact for the two groups in terms of yearly income and hourly reimbursement. However, approximately half of the Neuropsychologists in both groups have increased hours performing clinical work, hours performing administrative duties, and patient load to compensate for economic changes in the last 5 years. Decreases in clinical research and teaching activities are apparent in both groups, but in different amounts.
-
Ten-Year Follow-up Survey of Clinical Neuropsychologists: Part I. Practices and Beliefs
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2000Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Paul J. Moberg, Yana SuchyAbstract:A 21-item questionnaire previously used to survey practices and beliefs of clinical Neuropsychologists (Sweet & Moberg, 1990; Sweet, Moberg, & Westergaard, 1996) was mailed in February 1999 to all ABPP Diplomates in clinical neuropsychology and a larger sample of randomly selected non-ABPP members of Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association. Results were compared with data previously collected in 1989 and 1994. Across 10 years there have been some persistent differences between Neuropsychologists based on board certification status. These differences include degree of involvement in neuropsychological practice and forensic practice, involvement in research and teaching, frequency of subscribing to or regularly reading a variety of relevant journals, employment settings, use of assistants, and use of projective assessment. There are also a number of areas of shared belief and common practice. These important areas of agreement are unrelated to board certification status and are interpreted as signs of cohesiveness and maturity in the continuing evolution of the subspecialty. Shared beliefs and common practices include: appropriate field of training, type of degree, assessment philosophy, most types of information to be gathered in evaluations, and time spent per assessment. In general, the use of assistants is correlated significantly with the number of evaluations performed per month. Although sometimes viewed as exclusively providing assessment, the majority of Neuropsychologists are also involved in treating patients with brain dysfunction. Survey data appear useful in characterizing and monitoring professional status and trends of clinical neuropsychology.
Chriscelyn M. Tussey - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
The Dirty Dozen: 12 Sources of Bias in Forensic Neuropsychology with Ways to Mitigate
Psychological Injury and Law, 2015Co-Authors: Paul M. Richards, Jennifer A. Geiger, Chriscelyn M. TusseyAbstract:The ever expanding role of a forensic Neuropsychologist in civil litigation has rightfully led to a higher level of expectation for this expert, in realms such as clinical and courtroom knowledge, objectivity, and work product utility. The onus is on forensic Neuropsychologists to ensure that these expectations are met. Recognizing that bias is inherent in clinical and forensic work, it is imperative that in high stakes situations such as forensic neuropsychological assessment, the evaluator is proactively conscientious in recognizing, and minimizing, the effects of these biases. This article highlights 12, of many, common biases about which the prudent forensic Neuropsychologist should always be mindful of, during evaluation as well as the provision of deposition or trial testimony. Role, cognitive, and practice biases are defined and illustrated with examples. Specific suggestions are extracted from both empirical literature and forensic experience on how to recognize and mitigate these biases. The information contained in this article is intended to provide sound and practical strategies that can be useful for forensic neuropsychological practitioners. Attorneys will also find the content useful when working with such experts, including during deposition and cross examination preparation.
-
The Neuropsychologist as Expert Witness: Testimony in Civil and Criminal Settings
Psychological Injury and Law, 2013Co-Authors: Paul M. Richards, Chriscelyn M. TusseyAbstract:The niche of forensic neuropsychology and use of Neuropsychologists as expert witnesses has proliferated over the past two decades. Neuropsychologists conduct evaluations or provide consultation to assist triers of fact in both civil and criminal arenas. This article delivers a succinct overview of an array of factors that warrant consideration from the time of referral for a neuropsychological evaluation through the delivery of a verdict or settlement and receipt of payment for services. Readers are offered a primer on relevant legal criteria, distinctions between court settings, and applicable ethical standards and guidelines. Suggestions are made regarding the expert witness retention agreement and strategies for direct and cross examination are reviewed. Logistical and liability considerations are also explored. Real world examples are included to illustrate some of the obstacles that Neuropsychologist expert witnesses may encounter.
Paul J. Moberg - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. Neuropsychologists: The AACN, NAN, SCN 2020 practice and "salary survey".
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2020Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Nathaniel W Nelson, Kristen M. Klipfel, Paul J. MobergAbstract:This portion of the 2020 survey updates practice information, beliefs, and income data of clinical Neuropsychologists who practice within the United States. Methods: Doctoral-level neuropsychology ...
-
the american academy of clinical neuropsychology national academy of neuropsychology and society for clinical neuropsychology apa division 40 2015 tcn professional practice and salary survey professional practices beliefs and incomes of u s neuropsyc
Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2015Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Laura M Benson, Nathaniel W Nelson, Paul J. MobergAbstract:Objective The current survey updated professional practice and income information pertaining to clinical neuropsychology. Methods Doctoral-level members of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association, and the National Academy of Neuropsychology and other Neuropsychologists, as well as postdoctoral trainees in the Association of Postdoctoral Programs in Clinical Neuropsychology and at other training sites were invited to participate in a web-based survey in early 2015. The sample of 1777 respondents, of whom 1579 were doctoral-level practitioners and 198 were postdoctoral trainees, was larger than the prior 2010 income and practice survey. Results The substantial proportional change in gender has continued, with women now a clear majority in the postdoctoral trainee sample as well as in the practitioner sample. Dissimilar from the median age trajectory of American Psychological Association members, the median age of clinical Neuropsychologists remains essentially unchanged since 1989, indicating a substantial annual influx of young Neuropsychologists. The question of whether the Houston Conference training model has become an important influence in the specialty can now be considered settled in the affirmative among postdoctoral trainees and practitioners. Testing assistant usage remains commonplace, and continues to be more common in institutions. The vast majority of clinical Neuropsychologists work full-time and very few are unemployed and seeking employment. The numbers of Neuropsychologists planning to retire in the coming 5-10 years do not suggest a "baby boomer" effect or an unexpected bolus of planned retirements in the next 10 years that would be large enough to be worrisome. Average length of time reported for evaluations appears to be increasing across time. The most common factors affecting evaluation length were identified, with the top three being: (1) goal of evaluation, (2) stamina/health of examinee, and (3) age of examinee. Pediatric specialists remain more likely than others to work part-time, more likely to work in institutions, report lower incomes than respondents with a lifespan professional identity, and are far more likely to be women. Incomes continue to vary considerably by years of clinical practice, work setting, amount of forensic practice, state, and region of country. Neurologists are the number one referral source in institutions and in private practice, as well as for pediatric, adult, and lifespan practitioners. Learning disability is no longer among the top five conditions seen by pediatric Neuropsychologists; traumatic brain injury and seizure disorder are common reasons for clinical evaluations at all age ranges. There is a continued increase in forensic practice and a clear consensus on the use of validity testing. There is a substantial interest in subspecialization board certification, with the greatest interest evident among postdoctoral trainees. Income satisfaction, job satisfaction, and work-life balance satisfaction are higher for men. Job satisfaction varies across general work setting and across age range of practice. Work-life balance satisfaction is moderately correlated with income satisfaction and job satisfaction. Again in this five-year interval survey, a substantial majority of respondents reported increased incomes, despite experiencing substantial negative practice effects related to changes in the US health care system. Numerous breakdowns related to income and professional activities are provided. Conclusions Professional practice survey information continues to provide valuable perspectives regarding consistency and change in the activities, beliefs, and incomes of US clinical Neuropsychologists.
-
The TCN/AACN 2005 "salary survey": professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. Neuropsychologists.
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2006Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Nathaniel W Nelson, Paul J. MobergAbstract:Doctoral-level members of Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association and other Neuropsychologists were invited to participate in a web-based survey in early 2005. Response rate was estimated to be between 28.5 and 31.3%. The range of years postdoctorate was 1–51. Demonstrating the substantial proportional change in gender taking place in the field, 7 of 10 postdoctoral residents were women. Whereas the median age of APA members has been over 50 since the early 1990s, the current median age of clinical Neuropsychologists is 47 and has essentially remained unchanged since 1994, indicating substantial entrance of young psychologists into the field. Use of testing assistants remains commonplace. The “flexible battery” approach has increased in popularity and predominates, whereas endorsement of the “standardized battery” approach continues to decline. More than 90% of respondents are engaged in full-time or full-time plus part-time employment. Incomes from 2004 vary consi...
-
Ten-year follow-up survey of clinical Neuropsychologists: part II. Private practice and economics.
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2000Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Paul J. Moberg, Yana SuchyAbstract:Analyses of a 10-year follow-up survey of clinical Neuropsychologists demonstrated significant changes in employment settings away from institutions, placing a clear majority of the field in private practice settings in 1999 (Sweet, Moberg, & Suchy, 2000). The present paper compares characteristics of practices and beliefs of clinical Neuropsychologists who work in institutions versus private practice, using data from 1989, 1994, and 1999. Previous survey data had not been analyzed along the dimension of work setting. Among the significant findings are differences in age, referral sources, hours per week engaged in specific professional activities (clinical, neuropsychological, forensic, supervisory, research, teaching), ages of patients, type and frequency of data gathered in assessments, hours spent per evaluation, use of an assistant to gather data, and journal subscriptions. Economic changes within the last 5 years have had a differential impact for the two groups in terms of yearly income and hourly reimbursement. However, approximately half of the Neuropsychologists in both groups have increased hours performing clinical work, hours performing administrative duties, and patient load to compensate for economic changes in the last 5 years. Decreases in clinical research and teaching activities are apparent in both groups, but in different amounts.
-
Ten-Year Follow-up Survey of Clinical Neuropsychologists: Part I. Practices and Beliefs
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2000Co-Authors: Jerry J Sweet, Paul J. Moberg, Yana SuchyAbstract:A 21-item questionnaire previously used to survey practices and beliefs of clinical Neuropsychologists (Sweet & Moberg, 1990; Sweet, Moberg, & Westergaard, 1996) was mailed in February 1999 to all ABPP Diplomates in clinical neuropsychology and a larger sample of randomly selected non-ABPP members of Division 40 (Clinical Neuropsychology) of the American Psychological Association. Results were compared with data previously collected in 1989 and 1994. Across 10 years there have been some persistent differences between Neuropsychologists based on board certification status. These differences include degree of involvement in neuropsychological practice and forensic practice, involvement in research and teaching, frequency of subscribing to or regularly reading a variety of relevant journals, employment settings, use of assistants, and use of projective assessment. There are also a number of areas of shared belief and common practice. These important areas of agreement are unrelated to board certification status and are interpreted as signs of cohesiveness and maturity in the continuing evolution of the subspecialty. Shared beliefs and common practices include: appropriate field of training, type of degree, assessment philosophy, most types of information to be gathered in evaluations, and time spent per assessment. In general, the use of assistants is correlated significantly with the number of evaluations performed per month. Although sometimes viewed as exclusively providing assessment, the majority of Neuropsychologists are also involved in treating patients with brain dysfunction. Survey data appear useful in characterizing and monitoring professional status and trends of clinical neuropsychology.
Idlir Licaj - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
How to assess and manage cognitive impairment induced by treatments of non-central nervous system cancer.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2019Co-Authors: Marie Lange, Laure Tron, Didier Maillet, Joy Perrier, Mathieu Boone, Omar Touzani, Myriam Bernaudin, Helene Castel, Idlir LicajAbstract:Abstract A number of neurotoxicity associated with oncological treatments has been reported in non-central nervous system cancers. An expert group presents the state of the art and a guide to help the choice of appropriated tools to assess patient cognition in studies on oncology and neurobehavior in animal models. In addition, current cognitive rehabilitation programs currently under evaluation are also discussed. Cognitive assessments in oncology depend on the research question, study design, cognitive domains, patients’ characteristics, psychometric properties of the tests, and whether the tests are supervised or not by a Neuropsychologist. Batteries of electronic tests can be proposed, but several of them are characterized by weak psychometric developments. In order to improve the comprehension on the impact of cancer treatments on cognition, new animal models are in development, and would in the future include non-human primate models. By bringing together the skills and practices of oncologists, neurologists, Neuropsychologists, neuroscientists, we propose a series of specific tools and tests that accompany the cognitive management of non-CNS cancer patients.
Laura A. Rabin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Assessment trends among Neuropsychologists conducting sport-related concussion evaluations
Developmental neuropsychology, 2017Co-Authors: Brittany C. Lemonda, Danny Tam, William B. Barr, Laura A. RabinAbstract:Neuropsychologists regularly conduct sport-related concussion (SRC) evaluations, although research has not tracked these assessment practices. As part of a survey of neuropsychological test usage, we analyzed data from 215 Neuropsychologists who conduct SRC evaluations. Only 15% reported conducting baseline assessments of athletes as part of a sports program and 92% evaluate athletes' post-concussion without baseline data. The majority of respondents use a full battery, considered the most reliable approach for assessing concussion symptoms in athletes. Only 6% use computerized tests exclusively (>50% ImPACT). We discuss the implications of these results and address challenges faced by Neuropsychologists who perform SRC evaluations.
-
Trends in the neuropsychological assessment of ethnic/racial minorities: a survey of clinical Neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada.
Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology, 2014Co-Authors: Milushka M. Elbulok-charcape, Laura A. Rabin, Amanda T. Spadaccini, William B. BarrAbstract:Despite the importance of diversity variables to the clinical practice of neuropsychology, little is known about Neuropsychologists' multicultural assessment practices and perspectives. The current study was the first to survey issues related to Neuropsychologists' assessment of minority populations, proficiency in languages other than English, approaches to interpreting the cognitive scores of minorities, and perceived challenges associated with assessing ethnic/racial minority patients. We also surveyed respondents with regard to their own demographic backgrounds, as Neuropsychologists who identify as ethnic/racial minorities are reportedly underrepresented in the field. Respondents were 512 (26% usable response rate; 54% female) doctorate-level psychologists affiliated with the International Neuropsychology Society or the National Academy of Neuropsychology who resided in the United States or Canada. Overall, results suggest that lack of appropriate norms, tests, and referral sources are perceived as the greatest challenges associated with assessment of ethnic/racial minorities, that multicultural training is not occurring for some practitioners, and that some are conducting assessments in foreign languages despite limited proficiency. In addition, ethnic/racial minorities appear to be grossly underrepresented in the field of neuropsychology. Findings are discussed in relation to the need for appropriate education and training of Neuropsychologists in multicultural issues and the provision of more valid assessments for ethnic/racial minority individuals.
-
Utilization rates of ecologically oriented instruments among clinical Neuropsychologists.
The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2007Co-Authors: Laura A. Rabin, Leslie A. Burton, William B. BarrAbstract:The ecological validity of neuropsychological instruments has become an important topic in recent decades, as Neuropsychologists are asked to address real-world outcomes with increasing frequency. Although novel instruments that tap skills required for everyday functioning have been developed, it is unclear whether these instruments are migrating from research laboratories into the applied settings of clinical Neuropsychologists. The current study surveyed assessment practices of Neuropsychologists with regard to their utilization of instruments designed with ecological concerns in mind. Respondents included 747 North American, doctorate-level psychologists (40% usable response rate) affiliated with Division 40 of the American Psychological Association, National Academy of Neuropsychology, or the International Neuropsychological Society. Results indicated that approximately one-third of respondents reported use of ecologically oriented instruments (EOIs), and these instruments were generally utilized with...
-
assessment practices of clinical Neuropsychologists in the united states and canada a survey of ins nan and apa division 40 members
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2005Co-Authors: Laura A. Rabin, William B. Barr, Leslie A. BurtonAbstract:The present study surveyed assessment practices and test usage patterns among clinical Neuropsychologists. Respondents were 747 North American, doctorate-level psychologists (40% usable response rate) affiliated with Division 40 of the American Psychological Association (APA), the National Academy of Neuropsychology (NAN), or the International Neuropsychological Society (INS). Respondents first provided basic demographic and practice-related information and reported their most frequently utilized instruments. Overall, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales and Wechsler Memory Scales were most frequently used, followed by the Trail Making Test, California Verbal Learning Test, and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Respondents also reviewed a vignette about a traumatic brain injury patient, and then reported the instruments they would use to assess this patient's specific cognitive symptomatology, general cognitive ability, and capacity to return to work. Particular attention was paid to the areas of memory, attention, and executive functioning. The current study represents the largest and most comprehensive test usage survey conducted to date within the field of clinical neuropsychology. Survey results update and greatly expand knowledge about Neuropsychologists' assessment practices. Following a review of findings, results are compared to those obtained in prior surveys and implications for the field of neuropsychology are discussed.