The Experts below are selected from a list of 5460 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Guérillot Géraldine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • L'espace agile, oasis ou mirage ? Mise en perspective de quelques difficultés et paradoxes pour les travailleurs
    L'Harmattan CREIS, 2020
    Co-Authors: Moriceau Jean-luc, Besson Madeleine, Bia Figueiredo Marie-anne, Guérillot Géraldine
    Abstract:

    National audienceWhat happens to life at work when company premises are designed to promote organizational agility? Indeed, on the one hand, agile management methods tend towards permanent reconfiguration, perpetual movement, valuing deterritorialisation and Nomadism, on the other hand, the turn to spatiality reminds us of the importance of the place where to settle and of the territory. Drawing on the case of a new building of a large French bank designed to arrange the workspace for agility, we contrast the discourses of managers and employees with the affects that arise when observing the place. The affects betray the creation of spacings, the minor uses of the common space regulated and policed by the agile order. Discourses on agility tend to erase the multiple facets of the work environment, underestimating the role of affects, territory, memory and status. Employees find it hard to live in spaces without trace, without history, without emotional investment. In order to be attractive and livable, the spaces of agile management will undoubtedly gain by learning to also make place, to combine with territories and memories.Que se passe-t-il concernant la vie au travail lorsque les locaux de l’entreprise sont conçus pour favoriser l’agilité organisationnelle ? D’un côté, les méthodes de management agiles promeuvent une reconfiguration permanente, un mouvement perpétuel, et valorisent la déterritorialisation et le Nomadisme ; de l’autre, le tournant vers la spatialité rappelle l’importance du lieu où s’installer et du territoire. En prenant le cas d’un nouveau bâtiment d’une grande banque française conçu pour rendre agile l’espace de travail, nous contrastons les discours des managers et employés avec les affects qui naissent lors de l’observation dans les lieux. Les affects trahissent les créations d’espacements (spacings), les usages mineurs de l’espace commun régulé et policé par l’ordre agile. Les discours sur l’agilité ont tendance à effacer les multiples facettes de l’environnement de travail, en sous-estimant le rôle des affects, du territoire, de la mémoire et du statut. Les salariés peinent à vivre dans des espaces sans trace, sans histoire, ni investissement émotionnel. Pour être attractifs et habitables, les espaces du management agile gagneront sans doute à apprendre aussi à faire lieu, à se conjuguer avec des territoires et des mémoires

  • L’espace agile, oasis ou mirage ?
    'OpenEdition', 2020
    Co-Authors: Moriceau Jean-luc, Besson Madeleine, Bia figueiredo Marie, Guérillot Géraldine
    Abstract:

    Que se passe-t-il concernant la vie au travail lorsque les locaux de l’entreprise sont conçus pour favoriser l’agilité organisationnelle ? D’un côté, les méthodes de management agiles promeuvent une reconfiguration permanente, un mouvement perpétuel, et valorisent la déterritorialisation et le Nomadisme ; de l’autre, le tournant vers la spatialité rappelle l’importance du lieu où s’installer et du territoire. En prenant le cas d’un nouveau bâtiment d’une grande banque française conçu pour rendre agile l’espace de travail, nous contrastons les discours des managers et employés avec les affects qui naissent lors de l’observation dans les lieux. Les affects trahissent les créations d’espacements (spacings), les usages mineurs de l’espace commun régulé et policé par l’ordre agile. Les discours sur l’agilité ont tendance à effacer les multiples facettes de l’environnement de travail, en sous-estimant le rôle des affects, du territoire, de la mémoire et du statut. Les salariés peinent à vivre dans des espaces sans trace, sans histoire, ni investissement émotionnel. Pour être attractifs et habitables, les espaces du management agile gagneront sans doute à apprendre aussi à faire lieu, à se conjuguer avec des territoires et des mémoires.What happens to life at work when company premises are designed to promote organizational agility? Indeed, on the one hand, agile management methods tend towards permanent reconfiguration, perpetual movement, valuing deterritorialisation and Nomadism, on the other hand, the turn to spatiality reminds us of the importance of the place where to settle and of the territory. Drawing on the case of a new building of a large French bank designed to arrange the workspace for agility, we contrast the discourses of managers and employees with the affects that arise when observing the place. The affects betray the creation of spacings, the minor uses of the common space regulated and policed by the agile order. Discourses on agility tend to erase the multiple facets of the work environment, underestimating the role of affects, territory, memory and status. Employees find it hard to live in spaces without trace, without history, without emotional investment. In order to be attractive and livable, the spaces of agile management will undoubtedly gain by learning to also make place, to combine with territories and memories

Moriceau Jean-luc - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • L'espace agile, oasis ou mirage ? Mise en perspective de quelques difficultés et paradoxes pour les travailleurs
    L'Harmattan CREIS, 2020
    Co-Authors: Moriceau Jean-luc, Besson Madeleine, Bia Figueiredo Marie-anne, Guérillot Géraldine
    Abstract:

    National audienceWhat happens to life at work when company premises are designed to promote organizational agility? Indeed, on the one hand, agile management methods tend towards permanent reconfiguration, perpetual movement, valuing deterritorialisation and Nomadism, on the other hand, the turn to spatiality reminds us of the importance of the place where to settle and of the territory. Drawing on the case of a new building of a large French bank designed to arrange the workspace for agility, we contrast the discourses of managers and employees with the affects that arise when observing the place. The affects betray the creation of spacings, the minor uses of the common space regulated and policed by the agile order. Discourses on agility tend to erase the multiple facets of the work environment, underestimating the role of affects, territory, memory and status. Employees find it hard to live in spaces without trace, without history, without emotional investment. In order to be attractive and livable, the spaces of agile management will undoubtedly gain by learning to also make place, to combine with territories and memories.Que se passe-t-il concernant la vie au travail lorsque les locaux de l’entreprise sont conçus pour favoriser l’agilité organisationnelle ? D’un côté, les méthodes de management agiles promeuvent une reconfiguration permanente, un mouvement perpétuel, et valorisent la déterritorialisation et le Nomadisme ; de l’autre, le tournant vers la spatialité rappelle l’importance du lieu où s’installer et du territoire. En prenant le cas d’un nouveau bâtiment d’une grande banque française conçu pour rendre agile l’espace de travail, nous contrastons les discours des managers et employés avec les affects qui naissent lors de l’observation dans les lieux. Les affects trahissent les créations d’espacements (spacings), les usages mineurs de l’espace commun régulé et policé par l’ordre agile. Les discours sur l’agilité ont tendance à effacer les multiples facettes de l’environnement de travail, en sous-estimant le rôle des affects, du territoire, de la mémoire et du statut. Les salariés peinent à vivre dans des espaces sans trace, sans histoire, ni investissement émotionnel. Pour être attractifs et habitables, les espaces du management agile gagneront sans doute à apprendre aussi à faire lieu, à se conjuguer avec des territoires et des mémoires

  • L’espace agile, oasis ou mirage ?
    'OpenEdition', 2020
    Co-Authors: Moriceau Jean-luc, Besson Madeleine, Bia figueiredo Marie, Guérillot Géraldine
    Abstract:

    Que se passe-t-il concernant la vie au travail lorsque les locaux de l’entreprise sont conçus pour favoriser l’agilité organisationnelle ? D’un côté, les méthodes de management agiles promeuvent une reconfiguration permanente, un mouvement perpétuel, et valorisent la déterritorialisation et le Nomadisme ; de l’autre, le tournant vers la spatialité rappelle l’importance du lieu où s’installer et du territoire. En prenant le cas d’un nouveau bâtiment d’une grande banque française conçu pour rendre agile l’espace de travail, nous contrastons les discours des managers et employés avec les affects qui naissent lors de l’observation dans les lieux. Les affects trahissent les créations d’espacements (spacings), les usages mineurs de l’espace commun régulé et policé par l’ordre agile. Les discours sur l’agilité ont tendance à effacer les multiples facettes de l’environnement de travail, en sous-estimant le rôle des affects, du territoire, de la mémoire et du statut. Les salariés peinent à vivre dans des espaces sans trace, sans histoire, ni investissement émotionnel. Pour être attractifs et habitables, les espaces du management agile gagneront sans doute à apprendre aussi à faire lieu, à se conjuguer avec des territoires et des mémoires.What happens to life at work when company premises are designed to promote organizational agility? Indeed, on the one hand, agile management methods tend towards permanent reconfiguration, perpetual movement, valuing deterritorialisation and Nomadism, on the other hand, the turn to spatiality reminds us of the importance of the place where to settle and of the territory. Drawing on the case of a new building of a large French bank designed to arrange the workspace for agility, we contrast the discourses of managers and employees with the affects that arise when observing the place. The affects betray the creation of spacings, the minor uses of the common space regulated and policed by the agile order. Discourses on agility tend to erase the multiple facets of the work environment, underestimating the role of affects, territory, memory and status. Employees find it hard to live in spaces without trace, without history, without emotional investment. In order to be attractive and livable, the spaces of agile management will undoubtedly gain by learning to also make place, to combine with territories and memories

Ito, Takehido Y. - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Variability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulates
    'Wiley', 2019
    Co-Authors: Nandintsetseg Dejid, Bracis Chloe, Leimgruber Peter, Kaczensky Petra, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar, Lkhagvasuren Badamjav, Chimeddorj Buyanaa, Enkhtuvshin Shilegdamba, Horning Ned, Ito, Takehido Y.
    Abstract:

    Studying nomadic animal movement across species and ecosystems is essential for better understanding variability in Nomadism. In arid environments, unpredictable changes in water and forage resources are known drivers of nomadic movements. Water resources vary temporally but are often spatially stationary, whereas foraging resources are often both temporally and spatially variable. These differences may lead to different types of nomadic movements: forage- vs. water-driven Nomadism. Our study investigates these two different types of Nomadism in relation to resource gradients from mesic steppe to xeric desert environments in Mongolia’s Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We hypothesized that in the desert, where water is a key resource, animals are more water-dependent and may show water-driven Nomadism with frequent revisits to spatially fixed resources, while in the steppe, animals are less water-dependent and may show forage-driven Nomadism, tracking high-quality foraging patches with infrequent revisits to previously used resources. We utilized GPS movement data from 40 individuals of four ungulate species (Mongolian gazelle, goitered gazelle, saiga antelope, and Asiatic wild ass) in the Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We calculated displacement distances and recursion metrics and subsequently performed a principal component analysis to quantify the variation in movement patterns. The satellite-derived vegetation greenness served as a proxy for the resource gradient and was associated with variation in movement behaviors described by the first principal component, demonstrating that the variability in movements was closely related to the resource gradient from mesic to xeric habitats.We showed that ungulates in the resource-rich steppe tended to move long distances with few revisits (forage-driven Nomadism), while ungulates in the resource-poor desert tended to move shorter distances with more revisits (water-driven Nomadism). Our results suggest that xeric and mesic habitats promote different types of nomadic strategies. These results have important implications for conservation strategies: Forage-driven nomads primarily require a high degree of landscape-level permeability, and water-driven nomads additionally require the protection of ephemeral water bodies and actions to maintain the functional connectivity between them. animal movement; arid; forage; Nomadism; recursion; resource; ungulate; waterVariability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulatespublishedVersio

  • Variability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulates
    2019
    Co-Authors: Nandintsetseg Dejid, Bracis Chloe, Leimgruber Peter, Kaczensky Petra, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar, Lkhagvasuren Badamjav, Chimeddorj Buyanaa, Enkhtuvshin Shilegdamba, Horning Ned, Ito, Takehido Y.
    Abstract:

    Studying nomadic animal movement across species and ecosystems is essential for better understanding variability in Nomadism. In arid environments, unpredictable changes in water and forage resources are known drivers of nomadic movements. Water resources vary temporally but are often spatially stationary, whereas foraging resources are often both temporally and spatially variable. These differences may lead to different types of nomadic movements: forage- vs. water-driven Nomadism. Our study investigates these two different types of Nomadism in relation to resource gradients from mesic steppe to xeric desert environments in Mongolia’s Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We hypothesized that in the desert, where water is a key resource, animals are more water-dependent and may show water-driven Nomadism with frequent revisits to spatially fixed resources, while in the steppe, animals are less water-dependent and may show forage-driven Nomadism, tracking high-quality foraging patches with infrequent revisits to previously used resources. We utilized GPS movement data from 40 individuals of four ungulate species (Mongolian gazelle, goitered gazelle, saiga antelope, and Asiatic wild ass) in the Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We calculated displacement distances and recursion metrics and subsequently performed a principal component analysis to quantify the variation in movement patterns. The satellite-derived vegetation greenness served as a proxy for the resource gradient and was associated with variation in movement behaviors described by the first principal component, demonstrating that the variability in movements was closely related to the resource gradient from mesic to xeric habitats.We showed that ungulates in the resource-rich steppe tended to move long distances with few revisits (forage-driven Nomadism), while ungulates in the resource-poor desert tended to move shorter distances with more revisits (water-driven Nomadism). Our results suggest that xeric and mesic habitats promote different types of nomadic strategies. These results have important implications for conservation strategies: Forage-driven nomads primarily require a high degree of landscape-level permeability, and water-driven nomads additionally require the protection of ephemeral water bodies and actions to maintain the functional connectivity between them. animal movement; arid; forage; Nomadism; recursion; resource; ungulate; wate

Nandintsetseg Dejid - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Variability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulates
    'Wiley', 2019
    Co-Authors: Nandintsetseg Dejid, Bracis Chloe, Leimgruber Peter, Kaczensky Petra, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar, Lkhagvasuren Badamjav, Chimeddorj Buyanaa, Enkhtuvshin Shilegdamba, Horning Ned, Ito, Takehido Y.
    Abstract:

    Studying nomadic animal movement across species and ecosystems is essential for better understanding variability in Nomadism. In arid environments, unpredictable changes in water and forage resources are known drivers of nomadic movements. Water resources vary temporally but are often spatially stationary, whereas foraging resources are often both temporally and spatially variable. These differences may lead to different types of nomadic movements: forage- vs. water-driven Nomadism. Our study investigates these two different types of Nomadism in relation to resource gradients from mesic steppe to xeric desert environments in Mongolia’s Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We hypothesized that in the desert, where water is a key resource, animals are more water-dependent and may show water-driven Nomadism with frequent revisits to spatially fixed resources, while in the steppe, animals are less water-dependent and may show forage-driven Nomadism, tracking high-quality foraging patches with infrequent revisits to previously used resources. We utilized GPS movement data from 40 individuals of four ungulate species (Mongolian gazelle, goitered gazelle, saiga antelope, and Asiatic wild ass) in the Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We calculated displacement distances and recursion metrics and subsequently performed a principal component analysis to quantify the variation in movement patterns. The satellite-derived vegetation greenness served as a proxy for the resource gradient and was associated with variation in movement behaviors described by the first principal component, demonstrating that the variability in movements was closely related to the resource gradient from mesic to xeric habitats.We showed that ungulates in the resource-rich steppe tended to move long distances with few revisits (forage-driven Nomadism), while ungulates in the resource-poor desert tended to move shorter distances with more revisits (water-driven Nomadism). Our results suggest that xeric and mesic habitats promote different types of nomadic strategies. These results have important implications for conservation strategies: Forage-driven nomads primarily require a high degree of landscape-level permeability, and water-driven nomads additionally require the protection of ephemeral water bodies and actions to maintain the functional connectivity between them. animal movement; arid; forage; Nomadism; recursion; resource; ungulate; waterVariability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulatespublishedVersio

  • Variability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulates
    2019
    Co-Authors: Nandintsetseg Dejid, Bracis Chloe, Leimgruber Peter, Kaczensky Petra, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar, Lkhagvasuren Badamjav, Chimeddorj Buyanaa, Enkhtuvshin Shilegdamba, Horning Ned, Ito, Takehido Y.
    Abstract:

    Studying nomadic animal movement across species and ecosystems is essential for better understanding variability in Nomadism. In arid environments, unpredictable changes in water and forage resources are known drivers of nomadic movements. Water resources vary temporally but are often spatially stationary, whereas foraging resources are often both temporally and spatially variable. These differences may lead to different types of nomadic movements: forage- vs. water-driven Nomadism. Our study investigates these two different types of Nomadism in relation to resource gradients from mesic steppe to xeric desert environments in Mongolia’s Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We hypothesized that in the desert, where water is a key resource, animals are more water-dependent and may show water-driven Nomadism with frequent revisits to spatially fixed resources, while in the steppe, animals are less water-dependent and may show forage-driven Nomadism, tracking high-quality foraging patches with infrequent revisits to previously used resources. We utilized GPS movement data from 40 individuals of four ungulate species (Mongolian gazelle, goitered gazelle, saiga antelope, and Asiatic wild ass) in the Gobi-Steppe Ecosystem. We calculated displacement distances and recursion metrics and subsequently performed a principal component analysis to quantify the variation in movement patterns. The satellite-derived vegetation greenness served as a proxy for the resource gradient and was associated with variation in movement behaviors described by the first principal component, demonstrating that the variability in movements was closely related to the resource gradient from mesic to xeric habitats.We showed that ungulates in the resource-rich steppe tended to move long distances with few revisits (forage-driven Nomadism), while ungulates in the resource-poor desert tended to move shorter distances with more revisits (water-driven Nomadism). Our results suggest that xeric and mesic habitats promote different types of nomadic strategies. These results have important implications for conservation strategies: Forage-driven nomads primarily require a high degree of landscape-level permeability, and water-driven nomads additionally require the protection of ephemeral water bodies and actions to maintain the functional connectivity between them. animal movement; arid; forage; Nomadism; recursion; resource; ungulate; wate

  • Variability in Nomadism: environmental gradients modulate the movement behaviors of dryland ungulates
    'Wiley', 2019
    Co-Authors: Nandintsetseg Dejid, Bracis Chloe, Leimgruber Peter, Kaczensky Petra, Buuveibaatar Bayarbaatar, Lkhagvasuren Badamjav, Chimeddorj Buyanaa, Horning Ned, Enkhtuvshin Shiilegdamba, Ito, Takehiko Y.
    Abstract:

    Studying nomadic animal movement across species and ecosystems is essential for better understanding variability in Nomadism. In arid environments, unpredictable changes in water and forage resources are known drivers of nomadic movements. Water resources vary temporally but are often spatially stationary, whereas foraging resources are often both temporally and spatially variable. These differences may lead to different types of nomadic movements: forage‐ vs. water‐driven Nomadism. Our study investigates these two different types of Nomadism in relation to resource gradients from mesic steppe to xeric desert environments in Mongolia's Gobi‐Steppe Ecosystem. We hypothesized that in the desert, where water is a key resource, animals are more water‐dependent and may show water‐driven Nomadism with frequent revisits to spatially fixed resources, while in the steppe, animals are less water‐dependent and may show forage‐driven Nomadism, tracking high‐quality foraging patches with infrequent revisits to previously used resources. We utilized GPS movement data from 40 individuals of four ungulate species (Mongolian gazelle, goitered gazelle, saiga antelope, and Asiatic wild ass) in the Gobi‐Steppe Ecosystem. We calculated displacement distances and recursion metrics and subsequently performed a principal component analysis to quantify the variation in movement patterns. The satellite‐derived vegetation greenness served as a proxy for the resource gradient and was associated with variation in movement behaviors described by the first principal component, demonstrating that the variability in movements was closely related to the resource gradient from mesic to xeric habitats. We showed that ungulates in the resource‐rich steppe tended to move long distances with few revisits (forage‐driven Nomadism), while ungulates in the resource‐poor desert tended to move shorter distances with more revisits (water‐driven Nomadism). Our results suggest that xeric and mesic habitats promote different types of nomadic strategies. These results have important implications for conservation strategies: Forage‐driven nomads primarily require a high degree of landscape‐level permeability, and water‐driven nomads additionally require the protection of ephemeral water bodies and actions to maintain the functional connectivity between them

Besson Madeleine - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • L'espace agile, oasis ou mirage ? Mise en perspective de quelques difficultés et paradoxes pour les travailleurs
    L'Harmattan CREIS, 2020
    Co-Authors: Moriceau Jean-luc, Besson Madeleine, Bia Figueiredo Marie-anne, Guérillot Géraldine
    Abstract:

    National audienceWhat happens to life at work when company premises are designed to promote organizational agility? Indeed, on the one hand, agile management methods tend towards permanent reconfiguration, perpetual movement, valuing deterritorialisation and Nomadism, on the other hand, the turn to spatiality reminds us of the importance of the place where to settle and of the territory. Drawing on the case of a new building of a large French bank designed to arrange the workspace for agility, we contrast the discourses of managers and employees with the affects that arise when observing the place. The affects betray the creation of spacings, the minor uses of the common space regulated and policed by the agile order. Discourses on agility tend to erase the multiple facets of the work environment, underestimating the role of affects, territory, memory and status. Employees find it hard to live in spaces without trace, without history, without emotional investment. In order to be attractive and livable, the spaces of agile management will undoubtedly gain by learning to also make place, to combine with territories and memories.Que se passe-t-il concernant la vie au travail lorsque les locaux de l’entreprise sont conçus pour favoriser l’agilité organisationnelle ? D’un côté, les méthodes de management agiles promeuvent une reconfiguration permanente, un mouvement perpétuel, et valorisent la déterritorialisation et le Nomadisme ; de l’autre, le tournant vers la spatialité rappelle l’importance du lieu où s’installer et du territoire. En prenant le cas d’un nouveau bâtiment d’une grande banque française conçu pour rendre agile l’espace de travail, nous contrastons les discours des managers et employés avec les affects qui naissent lors de l’observation dans les lieux. Les affects trahissent les créations d’espacements (spacings), les usages mineurs de l’espace commun régulé et policé par l’ordre agile. Les discours sur l’agilité ont tendance à effacer les multiples facettes de l’environnement de travail, en sous-estimant le rôle des affects, du territoire, de la mémoire et du statut. Les salariés peinent à vivre dans des espaces sans trace, sans histoire, ni investissement émotionnel. Pour être attractifs et habitables, les espaces du management agile gagneront sans doute à apprendre aussi à faire lieu, à se conjuguer avec des territoires et des mémoires

  • L’espace agile, oasis ou mirage ?
    'OpenEdition', 2020
    Co-Authors: Moriceau Jean-luc, Besson Madeleine, Bia figueiredo Marie, Guérillot Géraldine
    Abstract:

    Que se passe-t-il concernant la vie au travail lorsque les locaux de l’entreprise sont conçus pour favoriser l’agilité organisationnelle ? D’un côté, les méthodes de management agiles promeuvent une reconfiguration permanente, un mouvement perpétuel, et valorisent la déterritorialisation et le Nomadisme ; de l’autre, le tournant vers la spatialité rappelle l’importance du lieu où s’installer et du territoire. En prenant le cas d’un nouveau bâtiment d’une grande banque française conçu pour rendre agile l’espace de travail, nous contrastons les discours des managers et employés avec les affects qui naissent lors de l’observation dans les lieux. Les affects trahissent les créations d’espacements (spacings), les usages mineurs de l’espace commun régulé et policé par l’ordre agile. Les discours sur l’agilité ont tendance à effacer les multiples facettes de l’environnement de travail, en sous-estimant le rôle des affects, du territoire, de la mémoire et du statut. Les salariés peinent à vivre dans des espaces sans trace, sans histoire, ni investissement émotionnel. Pour être attractifs et habitables, les espaces du management agile gagneront sans doute à apprendre aussi à faire lieu, à se conjuguer avec des territoires et des mémoires.What happens to life at work when company premises are designed to promote organizational agility? Indeed, on the one hand, agile management methods tend towards permanent reconfiguration, perpetual movement, valuing deterritorialisation and Nomadism, on the other hand, the turn to spatiality reminds us of the importance of the place where to settle and of the territory. Drawing on the case of a new building of a large French bank designed to arrange the workspace for agility, we contrast the discourses of managers and employees with the affects that arise when observing the place. The affects betray the creation of spacings, the minor uses of the common space regulated and policed by the agile order. Discourses on agility tend to erase the multiple facets of the work environment, underestimating the role of affects, territory, memory and status. Employees find it hard to live in spaces without trace, without history, without emotional investment. In order to be attractive and livable, the spaces of agile management will undoubtedly gain by learning to also make place, to combine with territories and memories