The Experts below are selected from a list of 93 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Roland Dauphin - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design of a valuable fuel couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI engine concept: A simulation approach using experimental data
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number - MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel “Octane-On-Demand” concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1.6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model. The results show that the trio [10.5 compression ratio and the fuel couple naphtha based RON71 boosted with ethanol] delivers 4.6% less CO2 emission than the E5 conventional premium gasoline fuel. This is mainly due to the high RON boosting effect of ethanol, and a low carbon content along with a higher LHV (lower heating value) value of naphtha fuel. RON71 fuel consumption represents 86% and 76% of the total volume consumption on NEDC and WLTC, respectively.
-
Design of a valuable Fuel Couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI Engine Concept: a simulation approach using experimental data.
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number-MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel " Octane-On-Demand " concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO 2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1,6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model.
Marie Bedon - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design of a valuable fuel couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI engine concept: A simulation approach using experimental data
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number - MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel “Octane-On-Demand” concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1.6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model. The results show that the trio [10.5 compression ratio and the fuel couple naphtha based RON71 boosted with ethanol] delivers 4.6% less CO2 emission than the E5 conventional premium gasoline fuel. This is mainly due to the high RON boosting effect of ethanol, and a low carbon content along with a higher LHV (lower heating value) value of naphtha fuel. RON71 fuel consumption represents 86% and 76% of the total volume consumption on NEDC and WLTC, respectively.
-
Design of a valuable Fuel Couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI Engine Concept: a simulation approach using experimental data.
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number-MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel " Octane-On-Demand " concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO 2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1,6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model.
Guillaume Bourhis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design of a valuable fuel couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI engine concept: A simulation approach using experimental data
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number - MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel “Octane-On-Demand” concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1.6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model. The results show that the trio [10.5 compression ratio and the fuel couple naphtha based RON71 boosted with ethanol] delivers 4.6% less CO2 emission than the E5 conventional premium gasoline fuel. This is mainly due to the high RON boosting effect of ethanol, and a low carbon content along with a higher LHV (lower heating value) value of naphtha fuel. RON71 fuel consumption represents 86% and 76% of the total volume consumption on NEDC and WLTC, respectively.
-
Design of a valuable Fuel Couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI Engine Concept: a simulation approach using experimental data.
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number-MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel " Octane-On-Demand " concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO 2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1,6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model.
Jean-pascal Solari - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design of a valuable fuel couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI engine concept: A simulation approach using experimental data
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number - MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel “Octane-On-Demand” concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1.6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model. The results show that the trio [10.5 compression ratio and the fuel couple naphtha based RON71 boosted with ethanol] delivers 4.6% less CO2 emission than the E5 conventional premium gasoline fuel. This is mainly due to the high RON boosting effect of ethanol, and a low carbon content along with a higher LHV (lower heating value) value of naphtha fuel. RON71 fuel consumption represents 86% and 76% of the total volume consumption on NEDC and WLTC, respectively.
-
Design of a valuable Fuel Couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI Engine Concept: a simulation approach using experimental data.
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number-MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel " Octane-On-Demand " concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO 2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1,6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model.
Virginie Morel - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
Design of a valuable fuel couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI engine concept: A simulation approach using experimental data
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number - MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel “Octane-On-Demand” concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1.6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model. The results show that the trio [10.5 compression ratio and the fuel couple naphtha based RON71 boosted with ethanol] delivers 4.6% less CO2 emission than the E5 conventional premium gasoline fuel. This is mainly due to the high RON boosting effect of ethanol, and a low carbon content along with a higher LHV (lower heating value) value of naphtha fuel. RON71 fuel consumption represents 86% and 76% of the total volume consumption on NEDC and WLTC, respectively.
-
Design of a valuable Fuel Couple and engine compression ratio for an Octane-On-Demand SI Engine Concept: a simulation approach using experimental data.
Fuel, 2017Co-Authors: Marie Bedon, Misa Milosavljevic, Virginie Morel, Jean-pascal Solari, Guillaume Bourhis, Roland DauphinAbstract:The efficiency of spark ignition engine is usually limited by the appearance of knock, which is linked to fuel Octane number (Research Octane Number – RON and Motor Octane Number-MON). If running the engine at its optimal efficiency requests a high Octane number at high load, a lower Octane number is only needed at low load. Based on this, the application of so-called Octane On demand concept, whereby the fuel anti knock quality is customized to match the real time Requirement of a conventional spark ignition engine has been identified as highly promising. The objective of this study is to define the best fuel couple for the dual fuel " Octane-On-Demand " concept, including a low RON based fuel and an Octane booster for minimizing global CO 2 tailpipe emissions and the Octane booster consumption. The work covers 4 Octane boosters: ethanol, reformate, di-isobutylene, and Superbutol™, and two fuel baseline: non-oxygenated gasoline RON 91 and naphtha based fuel RON 71. The present activity uses 0D vehicle simulations, based on a M-segment vehicle equipped with an up-to-date 1,6L turbocharged GDI engine, to guide the choice of the fuel couple together with the optimal engine compression ratio. Dedicated inputs, such as engine Octane Requirement map and fuel anti-knock properties of various blends, are given to properly run the model.
