Oculography

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 291 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

P. M. F. Barnes - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • electro Oculography electroretinography visual evoked potentials and multifocal electroretinography in patients with vigabatrin attributed visual field constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

  • Electro‐Oculography, Electroretinography, Visual Evoked Potentials, and Multifocal Electroretinography in Patients with Vigabatrin‐Attributed Visual Field Constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

Graham F.a. Harding - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • electro Oculography electroretinography visual evoked potentials and multifocal electroretinography in patients with vigabatrin attributed visual field constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

  • Electro‐Oculography, Electroretinography, Visual Evoked Potentials, and Multifocal Electroretinography in Patients with Vigabatrin‐Attributed Visual Field Constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

Tim Betts - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • electro Oculography electroretinography visual evoked potentials and multifocal electroretinography in patients with vigabatrin attributed visual field constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

  • Electro‐Oculography, Electroretinography, Visual Evoked Potentials, and Multifocal Electroretinography in Patients with Vigabatrin‐Attributed Visual Field Constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

K. A. Robertson - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • electro Oculography electroretinography visual evoked potentials and multifocal electroretinography in patients with vigabatrin attributed visual field constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

  • Electro‐Oculography, Electroretinography, Visual Evoked Potentials, and Multifocal Electroretinography in Patients with Vigabatrin‐Attributed Visual Field Constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

C. Barber - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • electro Oculography electroretinography visual evoked potentials and multifocal electroretinography in patients with vigabatrin attributed visual field constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.

  • Electro‐Oculography, Electroretinography, Visual Evoked Potentials, and Multifocal Electroretinography in Patients with Vigabatrin‐Attributed Visual Field Constriction
    Epilepsia, 2000
    Co-Authors: Graham F.a. Harding, J. M. Wild, K. A. Robertson, M. C. Lawden, Tim Betts, C. Barber, P. M. F. Barnes
    Abstract:

    Summary: Purpose: Symptomatic visual field constriction thought to be associated with vigabatrin has been reported. The current study investigated the visual fields and visual electrophysiology of eight patients with known vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss, three of whom were reported previously. Six of the patients were no longer receiving vigabatrin. Methods: The central and peripheral fields were examined with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer. Full visual electrophysiology, including flash electroretinography (ERG), pattern electroretinography, multifocal ERG using the VERIS system, electro-Oculography, and flash and pattern visual evoked potentials, was undertaken. Results: Seven patients showed marked visual field constriction with some sparing of the temporal visual field. The eighth exhibited concentric constriction. Most electrophysiological responses were usually just within normal limits; two patients had subnormal Arden electro-Oculography indices; and one patient showed an abnormally delayed photopic b wave. However, five patients showed delayed 30-Hz flicker b waves, and seven patients showed delayed oscillatory potentials. Multifocal ERG showed abnormalities that sometimes correlated with the visual field appearance and confirmed that the deficit occurs at the retinal level. Conclusion: Marked visual field constriction appears to be associated with vigabatrin therapy. The field defects and some electrophysiological abnormalities persist when vigabatrin therapy is withdrawn.