Open Wound

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 321 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Brechtje A Grotenhuis - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the use of negative pressure Wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision
    Diseases of The Colon & Rectum, 2014
    Co-Authors: Ulas L Biter, Guyon M N Beck, Guido H H Mannaerts, Myrte M Stok, Brechtje A Grotenhuis
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with significant morbidity after surgical treatment with regard to Wound healing. Recent case studies suggested that negative-pressure Wound therapy as primary treatment following surgical excision may shorten the duration of Wound healing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the role of vacuum therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: negative-pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either negative-pressure Wound therapy for 2 weeks or standard Open Wound healing. The primary end point of the study was the time to complete Wound healing. Secondary end points were visual analog scale score, Wound size ratio at day 14 (ie, Wound healing rate), time to resume daily activities, and recurrence within 6 months after Wound closure. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the study: 24 patients were treated with vacuum therapy, and 25 patients underwent standard Open Wound care. Complete Wound healing was achieved at a median of 84 days in the vacuum therapy group versus 93 days in control patients (p = 0.44). The Wound size ratio was significantly lower in the vacuum therapy group (0.30 versus 0.57, p = 0.02), ie, higher Wound healing rate in the first 2 weeks. There was no difference in visual analog scale scores and disease recurrence between both groups. The time to resume full daily activities after surgery was 27 days in the patients undergoing vacuum therapy and 29 days in the control patients (p = 0.92). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the small number of patients, the lack of blinding to patients and doctors, and the absence of patient quality-of-life evaluation. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply vacuum therapy in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, and it has a positive effect on Wound size reduction in the first 2 weeks. However, there is no difference in time to complete Wound healing and time to resume daily life activities.

Ulas L Biter - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the use of negative pressure Wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision
    Diseases of The Colon & Rectum, 2014
    Co-Authors: Ulas L Biter, Guyon M N Beck, Guido H H Mannaerts, Myrte M Stok, Brechtje A Grotenhuis
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with significant morbidity after surgical treatment with regard to Wound healing. Recent case studies suggested that negative-pressure Wound therapy as primary treatment following surgical excision may shorten the duration of Wound healing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the role of vacuum therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: negative-pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either negative-pressure Wound therapy for 2 weeks or standard Open Wound healing. The primary end point of the study was the time to complete Wound healing. Secondary end points were visual analog scale score, Wound size ratio at day 14 (ie, Wound healing rate), time to resume daily activities, and recurrence within 6 months after Wound closure. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the study: 24 patients were treated with vacuum therapy, and 25 patients underwent standard Open Wound care. Complete Wound healing was achieved at a median of 84 days in the vacuum therapy group versus 93 days in control patients (p = 0.44). The Wound size ratio was significantly lower in the vacuum therapy group (0.30 versus 0.57, p = 0.02), ie, higher Wound healing rate in the first 2 weeks. There was no difference in visual analog scale scores and disease recurrence between both groups. The time to resume full daily activities after surgery was 27 days in the patients undergoing vacuum therapy and 29 days in the control patients (p = 0.92). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the small number of patients, the lack of blinding to patients and doctors, and the absence of patient quality-of-life evaluation. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply vacuum therapy in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, and it has a positive effect on Wound size reduction in the first 2 weeks. However, there is no difference in time to complete Wound healing and time to resume daily life activities.

Harvey N Mayrovitz - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • lymphedema lipedema and the Open Wound the role of compression therapy
    Surgical Clinics of North America, 2003
    Co-Authors: John Macdonald, Nancy Sims, Harvey N Mayrovitz
    Abstract:

    : As the science of Wound healing has evolved over the past two decades, so has awareness of the "hidden epidemic" of lymphedema. Substantial information has been accumulated regarding the pathophysiology and therapy of lymphedema. Until recently, the relationship between Wound healing and the negative effects of associated peri-Wound lymphedema has received little attention. Identifying Wound-related lymph stasis and safe mobilization of the fluid are fundamentals that must be addressed for proper therapy. Experience gained from the successful treatment of primary and secondary lymphedema has proven very useful in the applications to Wound-related lymphedema. The mobilization of lymph fluid from the peri-Wound area with the use of reasoned compression is essential for proper therapy of the Open Wound, as are appropriate bandage selection and safeguards for bandage application.

Guyon M N Beck - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the use of negative pressure Wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision
    Diseases of The Colon & Rectum, 2014
    Co-Authors: Ulas L Biter, Guyon M N Beck, Guido H H Mannaerts, Myrte M Stok, Brechtje A Grotenhuis
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with significant morbidity after surgical treatment with regard to Wound healing. Recent case studies suggested that negative-pressure Wound therapy as primary treatment following surgical excision may shorten the duration of Wound healing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the role of vacuum therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: negative-pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either negative-pressure Wound therapy for 2 weeks or standard Open Wound healing. The primary end point of the study was the time to complete Wound healing. Secondary end points were visual analog scale score, Wound size ratio at day 14 (ie, Wound healing rate), time to resume daily activities, and recurrence within 6 months after Wound closure. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the study: 24 patients were treated with vacuum therapy, and 25 patients underwent standard Open Wound care. Complete Wound healing was achieved at a median of 84 days in the vacuum therapy group versus 93 days in control patients (p = 0.44). The Wound size ratio was significantly lower in the vacuum therapy group (0.30 versus 0.57, p = 0.02), ie, higher Wound healing rate in the first 2 weeks. There was no difference in visual analog scale scores and disease recurrence between both groups. The time to resume full daily activities after surgery was 27 days in the patients undergoing vacuum therapy and 29 days in the control patients (p = 0.92). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the small number of patients, the lack of blinding to patients and doctors, and the absence of patient quality-of-life evaluation. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply vacuum therapy in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, and it has a positive effect on Wound size reduction in the first 2 weeks. However, there is no difference in time to complete Wound healing and time to resume daily life activities.

Guido H H Mannaerts - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the use of negative pressure Wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision
    Diseases of The Colon & Rectum, 2014
    Co-Authors: Ulas L Biter, Guyon M N Beck, Guido H H Mannaerts, Myrte M Stok, Brechtje A Grotenhuis
    Abstract:

    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with significant morbidity after surgical treatment with regard to Wound healing. Recent case studies suggested that negative-pressure Wound therapy as primary treatment following surgical excision may shorten the duration of Wound healing. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the role of vacuum therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: negative-pressure Wound therapy versus standard Open Wound care after surgical excision. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either negative-pressure Wound therapy for 2 weeks or standard Open Wound healing. The primary end point of the study was the time to complete Wound healing. Secondary end points were visual analog scale score, Wound size ratio at day 14 (ie, Wound healing rate), time to resume daily activities, and recurrence within 6 months after Wound closure. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the study: 24 patients were treated with vacuum therapy, and 25 patients underwent standard Open Wound care. Complete Wound healing was achieved at a median of 84 days in the vacuum therapy group versus 93 days in control patients (p = 0.44). The Wound size ratio was significantly lower in the vacuum therapy group (0.30 versus 0.57, p = 0.02), ie, higher Wound healing rate in the first 2 weeks. There was no difference in visual analog scale scores and disease recurrence between both groups. The time to resume full daily activities after surgery was 27 days in the patients undergoing vacuum therapy and 29 days in the control patients (p = 0.92). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by the small number of patients, the lack of blinding to patients and doctors, and the absence of patient quality-of-life evaluation. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply vacuum therapy in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease, and it has a positive effect on Wound size reduction in the first 2 weeks. However, there is no difference in time to complete Wound healing and time to resume daily life activities.