The Experts below are selected from a list of 38121 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Paola Paganella Laporte - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
disruptive mood dysregulation disorder symptomatic and syndromic thresholds and diagnostic Operationalization
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2020Co-Authors: Paola Paganella Laporte, Alicia Matijasevich, Tiago N Munhoz, Ina S Santos, Aluisio J D Barros, Daniel S Pine, Luis Augusto Rohde, Ellen Leibenluft, Giovanni Abrahao SalumAbstract:Objective To identify the most appropriate threshold for disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) diagnosis and the impact of potential changes in diagnostic rules on prevalence levels in the community. Method Trained psychologists evaluated 3,562 preadolescents/early adolescents from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort with the Development and Well-Being Behavior Assessment (DAWBA). The clinical threshold was assessed in three stages: symptomatic, syndromic, and clinical Operationalization. The symptomatic threshold identified the response category in each DAWBA item, which separates normative misbehavior from a clinical indicator. The syndromic threshold identified the number of irritable mood and outbursts needed to capture preadolescents/early adolescents with high symptom levels. Clinical Operationalization compared the impact of AND/OR rules for combining irritable mood and outbursts on impairment and levels of psychopathology. Results At the symptomatic threshold, most irritable mood items were normative in their lowest response categories and clinically significant in their highest response categories. For outbursts, some indicated a symptom even when present at only a mild level, while others did not indicate symptoms at any level. At the syndromic level, a combination of two out of seven irritable mood and three out of eight outburst indicators accurately captured a cluster of individuals with high level of symptoms. Analysis combining irritable mood and outbursts delineated nonoverlapping aspects of DMDD, providing support for the OR rule in clinical Operationalization. The best DMDD criteria resulted in a prevalence of 3%. Conclusion Results provide information for initiatives aiming to provide data-driven and clinically oriented operationalized criteria for DMDD.
-
disruptive mood dysregulation disorder symptomatic and syndromic thresholds and diagnostic Operationalization
medRxiv, 2019Co-Authors: Paola Paganella Laporte, Alicia Matijasevich, Tiago N Munhoz, Ina S Santos, Aluisio J D Barros, Daniel S Pine, Luis Augusto Rohde, Ellen Leibenluft, Giovanni Abrahao SalumAbstract:Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the most appropriate threshold for Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) diagnosis and the impact of potential changes in diagnostic rules on prevalence levels in the community. Methods: Trained psychologists evaluated 3,562 pre-adolescents/early adolescents from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort with the Development and Well-Being Behavior Assessment (DAWBA). The clinical threshold was assessed in three stages: symptomatic, syndromic and clinical Operationalization. The symptomatic threshold identified the response category in each DAWBA item which separates normative misbehavior from a clinical indicator. The syndromic threshold identified the number of irritable mood and outbursts needed to capture pre-adolescents/early adolescents with high symptom levels. Clinical Operationalization compared the impact of AND/OR rules for combining irritable mood and outbursts on impairment and levels of psychopathology. Results: At the symptomatic threshold, most irritable mood items were normative in their lowest response categories and clinically significant in their highest response categories. For outbursts some indicated a symptom even when present at only a mild level, while others did not indicate symptoms at any level. At the syndromic level, a combination of 2 out of 7 irritable mood and 3 out of 8 outburst indicators accurately captured a cluster of individuals with high level of symptoms. Analysis combining irritable mood and outbursts delineated non-overlapping aspects of DMDD, providing support for the OR rule in clinical Operationalization. The best DMDD criteria resulted in a prevalence of 3%. Conclusions: Results provide information for initiatives aiming to provide data-driven and clinically-oriented operationalized criteria for DMDD.
F Kokkinaki - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
British Journal of Psychology, 2007Co-Authors: K V Petrides, Ria Pita, F KokkinakiAbstract:The construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy) provides a comprehensive Operationalization of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions. In the first part of the present study (N = 274, 92 males), we performed two joint factor analyses to determine the location of trait EI in Eysenckian and Big Five factor space. The results showed that trait EI is a compound personality construct located at the lower levels of the two taxonomies. In the second part of the study, we performed six two-step hierarchical regressions to investigate the incremental validity of trait EI in predicting, over and above the Giant Three and Big Five personality dimensions, six distinct criteria (life satisfaction, rumination, two adaptive and two maladaptive coping styles). Trait EI incrementally predicted four criteria over the Giant Three and five criteria over the Big Five. The discussion addresses common questions about the Operationalization of emotional intelligence as a personality trait.
-
the location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
British Journal of Psychology, 2007Co-Authors: K V Petrides, Ria Pita, F KokkinakiAbstract:The construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy) provides a comprehensive Operationalization of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions. In the first part of the present study (N = 274, 92 males), we performed two joint factor analyses to determine the location of trait EI in Eysenckian and Big Five factor space. The results showed that trait EI is a compound personality construct located at the lower levels of the two taxonomies. In the second part of the study, we performed six two-step hierarchical regressions to investigate the incremental validity of trait EI in predicting, over and above the Giant Three and Big Five personality dimensions, six distinct criteria (life satisfaction, rumination, two adaptive and two maladaptive coping styles). Trait EI incrementally predicted four criteria over the Giant Three and five criteria over the Big Five. The discussion addresses common questions about the Operationalization of emotional intelligence as a personality trait.
Giovanni Abrahao Salum - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
disruptive mood dysregulation disorder symptomatic and syndromic thresholds and diagnostic Operationalization
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2020Co-Authors: Paola Paganella Laporte, Alicia Matijasevich, Tiago N Munhoz, Ina S Santos, Aluisio J D Barros, Daniel S Pine, Luis Augusto Rohde, Ellen Leibenluft, Giovanni Abrahao SalumAbstract:Objective To identify the most appropriate threshold for disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) diagnosis and the impact of potential changes in diagnostic rules on prevalence levels in the community. Method Trained psychologists evaluated 3,562 preadolescents/early adolescents from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort with the Development and Well-Being Behavior Assessment (DAWBA). The clinical threshold was assessed in three stages: symptomatic, syndromic, and clinical Operationalization. The symptomatic threshold identified the response category in each DAWBA item, which separates normative misbehavior from a clinical indicator. The syndromic threshold identified the number of irritable mood and outbursts needed to capture preadolescents/early adolescents with high symptom levels. Clinical Operationalization compared the impact of AND/OR rules for combining irritable mood and outbursts on impairment and levels of psychopathology. Results At the symptomatic threshold, most irritable mood items were normative in their lowest response categories and clinically significant in their highest response categories. For outbursts, some indicated a symptom even when present at only a mild level, while others did not indicate symptoms at any level. At the syndromic level, a combination of two out of seven irritable mood and three out of eight outburst indicators accurately captured a cluster of individuals with high level of symptoms. Analysis combining irritable mood and outbursts delineated nonoverlapping aspects of DMDD, providing support for the OR rule in clinical Operationalization. The best DMDD criteria resulted in a prevalence of 3%. Conclusion Results provide information for initiatives aiming to provide data-driven and clinically oriented operationalized criteria for DMDD.
-
disruptive mood dysregulation disorder symptomatic and syndromic thresholds and diagnostic Operationalization
medRxiv, 2019Co-Authors: Paola Paganella Laporte, Alicia Matijasevich, Tiago N Munhoz, Ina S Santos, Aluisio J D Barros, Daniel S Pine, Luis Augusto Rohde, Ellen Leibenluft, Giovanni Abrahao SalumAbstract:Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the most appropriate threshold for Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD) diagnosis and the impact of potential changes in diagnostic rules on prevalence levels in the community. Methods: Trained psychologists evaluated 3,562 pre-adolescents/early adolescents from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort with the Development and Well-Being Behavior Assessment (DAWBA). The clinical threshold was assessed in three stages: symptomatic, syndromic and clinical Operationalization. The symptomatic threshold identified the response category in each DAWBA item which separates normative misbehavior from a clinical indicator. The syndromic threshold identified the number of irritable mood and outbursts needed to capture pre-adolescents/early adolescents with high symptom levels. Clinical Operationalization compared the impact of AND/OR rules for combining irritable mood and outbursts on impairment and levels of psychopathology. Results: At the symptomatic threshold, most irritable mood items were normative in their lowest response categories and clinically significant in their highest response categories. For outbursts some indicated a symptom even when present at only a mild level, while others did not indicate symptoms at any level. At the syndromic level, a combination of 2 out of 7 irritable mood and 3 out of 8 outburst indicators accurately captured a cluster of individuals with high level of symptoms. Analysis combining irritable mood and outbursts delineated non-overlapping aspects of DMDD, providing support for the OR rule in clinical Operationalization. The best DMDD criteria resulted in a prevalence of 3%. Conclusions: Results provide information for initiatives aiming to provide data-driven and clinically-oriented operationalized criteria for DMDD.
K V Petrides - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
British Journal of Psychology, 2007Co-Authors: K V Petrides, Ria Pita, F KokkinakiAbstract:The construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy) provides a comprehensive Operationalization of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions. In the first part of the present study (N = 274, 92 males), we performed two joint factor analyses to determine the location of trait EI in Eysenckian and Big Five factor space. The results showed that trait EI is a compound personality construct located at the lower levels of the two taxonomies. In the second part of the study, we performed six two-step hierarchical regressions to investigate the incremental validity of trait EI in predicting, over and above the Giant Three and Big Five personality dimensions, six distinct criteria (life satisfaction, rumination, two adaptive and two maladaptive coping styles). Trait EI incrementally predicted four criteria over the Giant Three and five criteria over the Big Five. The discussion addresses common questions about the Operationalization of emotional intelligence as a personality trait.
-
the location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
British Journal of Psychology, 2007Co-Authors: K V Petrides, Ria Pita, F KokkinakiAbstract:The construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy) provides a comprehensive Operationalization of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions. In the first part of the present study (N = 274, 92 males), we performed two joint factor analyses to determine the location of trait EI in Eysenckian and Big Five factor space. The results showed that trait EI is a compound personality construct located at the lower levels of the two taxonomies. In the second part of the study, we performed six two-step hierarchical regressions to investigate the incremental validity of trait EI in predicting, over and above the Giant Three and Big Five personality dimensions, six distinct criteria (life satisfaction, rumination, two adaptive and two maladaptive coping styles). Trait EI incrementally predicted four criteria over the Giant Three and five criteria over the Big Five. The discussion addresses common questions about the Operationalization of emotional intelligence as a personality trait.
Ria Pita - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
the location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
British Journal of Psychology, 2007Co-Authors: K V Petrides, Ria Pita, F KokkinakiAbstract:The construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy) provides a comprehensive Operationalization of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions. In the first part of the present study (N = 274, 92 males), we performed two joint factor analyses to determine the location of trait EI in Eysenckian and Big Five factor space. The results showed that trait EI is a compound personality construct located at the lower levels of the two taxonomies. In the second part of the study, we performed six two-step hierarchical regressions to investigate the incremental validity of trait EI in predicting, over and above the Giant Three and Big Five personality dimensions, six distinct criteria (life satisfaction, rumination, two adaptive and two maladaptive coping styles). Trait EI incrementally predicted four criteria over the Giant Three and five criteria over the Big Five. The discussion addresses common questions about the Operationalization of emotional intelligence as a personality trait.
-
the location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space
British Journal of Psychology, 2007Co-Authors: K V Petrides, Ria Pita, F KokkinakiAbstract:The construct of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or trait emotional self-efficacy) provides a comprehensive Operationalization of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions. In the first part of the present study (N = 274, 92 males), we performed two joint factor analyses to determine the location of trait EI in Eysenckian and Big Five factor space. The results showed that trait EI is a compound personality construct located at the lower levels of the two taxonomies. In the second part of the study, we performed six two-step hierarchical regressions to investigate the incremental validity of trait EI in predicting, over and above the Giant Three and Big Five personality dimensions, six distinct criteria (life satisfaction, rumination, two adaptive and two maladaptive coping styles). Trait EI incrementally predicted four criteria over the Giant Three and five criteria over the Big Five. The discussion addresses common questions about the Operationalization of emotional intelligence as a personality trait.
