The Experts below are selected from a list of 154743 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Iliane Houle - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions—structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical—the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to de...

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions-structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical-the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to develop concrete areas of future research for the field.

Jonathan M Adler - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions—structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical—the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to de...

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions-structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical-the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to develop concrete areas of future research for the field.

Frederick L Philippe - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions—structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical—the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to de...

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions-structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical-the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to develop concrete areas of future research for the field.

Jennifer Lodismith - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions—structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical—the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to de...

  • the incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well being a review of the field and recommendations for the future
    Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2016
    Co-Authors: Jonathan M Adler, Jennifer Lodismith, Frederick L Philippe, Iliane Houle
    Abstract:

    Grounded in four theoretical positions-structural, cognitive, phenomenological, and ethical-the present review demonstrates the empirical evidence for the incremental validity of narrative identity as a cross-sectional indicator and prospective predictor of well-being, compared with other individual difference and situational variables. In doing so, we develop an Organizational Framework of four categories of narrative variables: (a) motivational themes, (b) affective themes, (c) themes of integrative meaning, and (d) structural elements. Using this Framework, we detail empirical evidence supporting the incremental association between narrative identity and well-being, a case that is strongest for motivational, affective, and integrative meaning themes. These categories of themes serve as vital complimentary correlates and predictors of well-being, alongside commonly assessed variables such as dispositional personality traits. We then use the theoretically grounded review of the empirical literature to develop concrete areas of future research for the field.

Yehuda Baruch - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • career systems in transition a normative model for Organizational career practices
    Personnel Review, 2003
    Co-Authors: Yehuda Baruch
    Abstract:

    This paper offers an integrated formulation for the way organizations may approach planning and managing employees’ careers in a time of transition. A normative career model is developed and compared to an existing descriptive model. This normative model shows how career management practices may be integrated into a comprehensive Organizational Framework, and explores ways in which career systems can be transformed and aligned both internally and externally in terms of philosophy, policy and practice. The suggested formulation provides a Framework from which organizations can develop strategic Organizational career systems appropriate for the new millennium.

  • career systems in transition
    Personnel Review, 2003
    Co-Authors: Yehuda Baruch
    Abstract:

    This paper offers an integrated formulation for the way organizations may approach planning and managing employees’ careers in a time of transition. A normative career model is developed and compared to an existing descriptive model. This normative model shows how career management practices may be integrated into a comprehensive Organizational Framework, and explores ways in which career systems can be transformed and aligned both internally and externally in terms of philosophy, policy and practice. The suggested formulation provides a Framework from which organizations can develop strategic Organizational career systems appropriate for the new millennium.