Patient Behavior

14,000,000 Leading Edge Experts on the ideXlab platform

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

Scan Science and Technology

Contact Leading Edge Experts & Companies

The Experts below are selected from a list of 291 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform

Yukio Homma - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Conclusions Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make Patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was.

  • Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make Patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

  • Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot

Hiroshi Fukuhara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • Sex Differences in Prevalence and Patient Behavior Regarding Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Among Japanese Medical Checkup Examinees.
    Urology, 2020
    Co-Authors: Manami Kinjo, Yu Nakamura, Satoru Taguchi, Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi, Mitsuhiro Tambo, Takatsugu Okegawa, Hiroshi Fukuhara
    Abstract:

    OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and Patient Behavior regarding LUTS and to reveal sex differences among medical checkup examinees. METHODS This cross-sectional, community-based study included participants age 40 years and above in Japan who presented for a medical checkup. The study parameters included the International Prostate Symptom Score, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, overactive bladder symptom score, and an original questionnaire regarding Patients' distress and Behavior with respect to LUTS. RESULTS Of 1934 residents who presented for a medical checkup, 1582 (81.8%) individuals agreed to participants. Finally, the data of 1256 participants (808 men, 448 women) were analyzed in this study. The overall prevalence of LUTS was similar in both sexes (men 46.8%, women 44.5%; P = .156). Men had a significantly higher prevalence of LUTS than women for voiding and postmicturition symptoms, and a similar prevalence of storage symptoms and overactive bladder. Women had a significantly higher prevalence of urinary incontinence. The rate of distress regarding LUTS and the need to consult a physician were similar in both sexes. However, the consultation rate for LUTS was significantly lower in women than in men (men 38.5%, women 5.3%; P < .001), and women were more likely to restrict their activities owing to LUTS than men (men 13.0%, women 43.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSION Sufficient education regarding LUTS and providing appropriate medical facilities for consultation are warranted to encourage Patients, particularly women, to treat their LUTS.

  • accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Conclusions Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make Patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was.

  • Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make Patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

  • Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot

Peter M Rothwell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • sustained impact of uk fast test public education on response to stroke a population based time series study
    International Journal of Stroke, 2015
    Co-Authors: Frank J Wolters, Nicola L M Paul, Peter M Rothwell
    Abstract:

    BackgroundUrgent assessment is essential after stroke. Several countries have had public education campaigns, based on the FAST (Face-Arm-Speech-Time) test to reduce delays in seeking attention. However, the impact of these campaigns on Patient Behavior is uncertain.MethodsWe prospectively determined Patient Behavior after incident major stroke (NIHSS > 3) in a UK population based study (Oxford Vascular Study) before (2002–2008) and after (2009–2013) introduction of the FAST TV-campaign and assessed any sustained impact of campaign continuation.ResultsAmong 668 consecutive Patients with major stroke, medical attention was sought by a bystander in 553 (89·6%). Patients were more likely to present directly to emergency services (OR = 2·18, 95%CI:1·54–3·09, P < 0·0001) after the campaign and to arrive at hospital within 3 h (OR = 2·18, 1·55–3·06, P < 0·0001). Median [IQR] time to seeking attention fell from 53 [15–265] to 31 [7–120] minutes (P = 0·005) and median time to hospital arrival from 185 [88–885] to...

  • Patient Behavior immediately after transient ischemic attack according to clinical characteristics perception of the event and predicted risk of stroke
    Stroke, 2006
    Co-Authors: Matthew F Giles, Enrico Flossman, Peter M Rothwell
    Abstract:

    Background and Purpose— Little research has been done on Patients’ Behavior after transient ischemic attack (TIA). Recent data on the high early risk of stroke after TIA mean that emergency action after TIA is essential for effective secondary prevention. We therefore studied Patients’ Behavior immediately after TIA according to their perceptions, clinical characteristics, and predicted stroke risk. Methods— Consecutive Patients with TIA participating in the Oxford Vascular Study or attending dedicated hospital clinics in Oxfordshire, UK, were interviewed. Predicted stroke risk was calculated using 2 validated scores. Results— Of 241 Patients, 107 (44.4%) sought medical attention within hours of the event, although only 24 of these attended the emergency department. A total of 107 (44.4%) delayed seeking medical attention for ≥1 day. Correct recognition of symptoms (42.2% of Patients) was not associated with less delay. However, Patients with motor symptoms or duration of symptoms ≥1 hour were more likely...

  • Patient Behavior immediately after transient ischemic attack according to clinical characteristics perception of the event and predicted risk of stroke
    Stroke, 2006
    Co-Authors: Matthew F Giles, Enrico Flossman, Peter M Rothwell
    Abstract:

    Background and Purpose— Little research has been done on Patients’ Behavior after transient ischemic attack (TIA). Recent data on the high early risk of stroke after TIA mean that emergency action ...

Toru Sugihara - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

  • accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Conclusions Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make Patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was.

  • Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot <30 km. When a surgical robot emerged within 30 and 10 km, the prostatectomy caseload in non-robot hospitals reduced by 13 and 18% within 6 months, respectively, while the robot hospitals gained +101% caseload (P < 0.01 for all) Multivariate analyses including 9759 open and 5052 non-robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomies in 483 non-robot hospitals revealed a significant inverse association between distance to nearest surgical robot and % interval days to radical prostatectomy (B = -17.3% for distance to nearest surgical robot ≥30 km and -11.7% for 10-30 km versus distance to nearest surgical robot <10 km), while younger age, high-volume hospital, open-prostatectomy provider and temporal progress were other significant factors related to % interval days to radical prostatectomy widening (P < 0.05 for all). Robotic surgery accessibility within 30 km would make Patients less likely select conventional surgery. The nearer a robot was, the faster the caseload reduction was. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

  • Accessibility to surgical robot technology and prostate-cancer Patient Behavior for prostatectomy.
    Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2017
    Co-Authors: Toru Sugihara, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiroki Matsui, Go Nagao, Akira Ishikawa, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroshi Fukuhara, Kiyohide Fushimi, Makoto Ohori, Yukio Homma
    Abstract:

    Background To examine how surgical robot emergence affects prostate-cancer Patient Behavior in seeking radical prostatectomy focusing on geographical accessibility. Methods In Japan, robotic surgery was approved in April 2012. Based on data in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2012 and March 2014, distance to nearest surgical robot and interval days to radical prostatectomy (divided by mean interval in 2011: % interval days to radical prostatectomy) were calculated for individual radical prostatectomy cases at non-robotic hospitals. Caseload changes regarding distance to nearest surgical robot and robot introduction were investigated. Change in % interval days to radical prostatectomy was evaluated by multivariate analysis including distance to nearest surgical robot, age, comorbidity, hospital volume, operation type, hospital academic status, bed volume and temporal progress. Results % Interval days to radical prostatectomy became wider for distance to nearest surgical robot

Matthew F Giles - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.

Related terms

Patient Behavior - 15 days free trial to Access Experts & Abstracts