The Experts below are selected from a list of 74244 Experts worldwide ranked by ideXlab platform
Herminia De Lencastre - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
detection of an archaic clone of staphylococcus aureus with low level resistance to methicillin in a Pediatric Hospital in portugal and in international samples relics of a formerly widely disseminated strain
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1999Co-Authors: Raquel Saleao, Ilda Santos Sanches, Dora Dias, Isabel Peres, Rosa Barros, Herminia De LencastreAbstract:Close to half of the 878 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains recovered between 1992 and 1997 from the Pediatric Hospital in Lisbon were bacteria in which antibiotic resistance was limited to β-lactam antibiotics. The other half were multidrug resistant. The coexistence of MRSA with such unequal antibiotic resistance profiles prompted us to use molecular typing techniques for the characterization of the MRSA strains. Fifty-three strains chosen randomly were typed by a combination of genotypic methods. Over 90% of the MRSA strains belonged to two clones: the most frequent one, designated the “Pediatric clone,” was reminiscent of historically “early” MRSA: most isolates of this clone were only resistant to β-lactam antimicrobials and remained susceptible to macrolides, quinolones, clindamycin, spectinomycin, and tetracycline. They showed heterogeneous and low-level resistance to methicillin (MIC, 1.5 to 6 μg/ml), carried the ClaI-mecA polymorph II, were free of the transposon Tn554, and showed macrorestriction pattern D (clonal type II::NH::D). The second major clone was the internationally spread and multiresistant “Iberian” MRSA with homogeneous and high-level resistance to methicillin (MIC, >200 μg/ml) and clonal type I::E::A. Surprisingly, the multidrug-resistant and highly epidemic Iberian MRSA did not replace the much less resistant Pediatric clone during the 6 years of surveillance. The Pediatric clone was also identified among contemporary MRSA isolates from Poland, Argentina, The United States, and Colombia, and the overwhelming majority of these were also associated with Pediatric settings. We propose that the Pediatric MRSA strain represents a formerly widely spread archaic clone which survived in some epidemiological settings with relatively limited antimicrobial pressure.
-
detection of an archaic clone of staphylococcus aureus with low level resistance to methicillin in a Pediatric Hospital in portugal and in international samples relics of a formerly widely disseminated strain
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1999Co-Authors: Raquel Saleao, Ilda Santos Sanches, Dora Dias, Isabel Peres, Rosa Barros, Herminia De LencastreAbstract:Close to half of the 878 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains recovered between 1992 and 1997 from the Pediatric Hospital in Lisbon were bacteria in which antibiotic resistance was limited to beta-lactam antibiotics. The other half were multidrug resistant. The coexistence of MRSA with such unequal antibiotic resistance profiles prompted us to use molecular typing techniques for the characterization of the MRSA strains. Fifty-three strains chosen randomly were typed by a combination of genotypic methods. Over 90% of the MRSA strains belonged to two clones: the most frequent one, designated the "Pediatric clone," was reminiscent of historically "early" MRSA: most isolates of this clone were only resistant to beta-lactam antimicrobials and remained susceptible to macrolides, quinolones, clindamycin, spectinomycin, and tetracycline. They showed heterogeneous and low-level resistance to methicillin (MIC, 1.5 to 6 microg/ml), carried the ClaI-mecA polymorph II, were free of the transposon Tn554, and showed macrorestriction pattern D (clonal type II::NH::D). The second major clone was the internationally spread and multiresistant "Iberian" MRSA with homogeneous and high-level resistance to methicillin (MIC, >200 microg/ml) and clonal type I::E::A. Surprisingly, the multidrug-resistant and highly epidemic Iberian MRSA did not replace the much less resistant Pediatric clone during the 6 years of surveillance. The Pediatric clone was also identified among contemporary MRSA isolates from Poland, Argentina, The United States, and Colombia, and the overwhelming majority of these were also associated with Pediatric settings. We propose that the Pediatric MRSA strain represents a formerly widely spread archaic clone which survived in some epidemiological settings with relatively limited antimicrobial pressure.
Larry K Kociolek - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A RevellAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were (i) adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay and (ii) converted to estimated VL (numbers of copies per milliliter) using internal or manufacturer data. Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 asymptomatic versus 197 symptomatic children aged 0 to 4 years, 79 asymptomatic versus 97 symptomatic children aged 5 to 9 years, 69 asymptomatic versus 75 symptomatic children aged 10 to 13 years, 73 asymptomatic versus 109 symptomatic children aged 14 to 17 years) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value for asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001), and VL were 3 to 4 logs lower than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001); differences were consistent (P < 0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; P = 0.01), a recent contact (OR, 2.3; P = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR, 2.7; P = 0.005) had higher estimated risks of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while an immunocompromised status had no effect. Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in their nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but the timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A Revell, Hanna Wardell, Timothy J SavageAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay, and converted to estimated VL (copies/mL) using internal or manufacturer data.Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 vs. 197 ages 0-4; 79 vs 97 ages 5-9; 69 vs 75 ages 10-13; 73 vs 109 ages 14-17) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value in asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (p< 0.0001), and VL 3-4 logs lower (p<0.0001); differences were consistent (p<0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (OR 6.5, p = 0.01), recent contact (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR 2.7, p = 0.005) had higher estimated risk of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while immunocompromise had no effect.Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in the nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
William J Muller - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A RevellAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were (i) adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay and (ii) converted to estimated VL (numbers of copies per milliliter) using internal or manufacturer data. Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 asymptomatic versus 197 symptomatic children aged 0 to 4 years, 79 asymptomatic versus 97 symptomatic children aged 5 to 9 years, 69 asymptomatic versus 75 symptomatic children aged 10 to 13 years, 73 asymptomatic versus 109 symptomatic children aged 14 to 17 years) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value for asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001), and VL were 3 to 4 logs lower than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001); differences were consistent (P < 0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; P = 0.01), a recent contact (OR, 2.3; P = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR, 2.7; P = 0.005) had higher estimated risks of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while an immunocompromised status had no effect. Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in their nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but the timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A Revell, Hanna Wardell, Timothy J SavageAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay, and converted to estimated VL (copies/mL) using internal or manufacturer data.Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 vs. 197 ages 0-4; 79 vs 97 ages 5-9; 69 vs 75 ages 10-13; 73 vs 109 ages 14-17) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value in asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (p< 0.0001), and VL 3-4 logs lower (p<0.0001); differences were consistent (p<0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (OR 6.5, p = 0.01), recent contact (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR 2.7, p = 0.005) had higher estimated risk of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while immunocompromise had no effect.Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in the nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
P A Revell - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A RevellAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were (i) adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay and (ii) converted to estimated VL (numbers of copies per milliliter) using internal or manufacturer data. Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 asymptomatic versus 197 symptomatic children aged 0 to 4 years, 79 asymptomatic versus 97 symptomatic children aged 5 to 9 years, 69 asymptomatic versus 75 symptomatic children aged 10 to 13 years, 73 asymptomatic versus 109 symptomatic children aged 14 to 17 years) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value for asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001), and VL were 3 to 4 logs lower than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001); differences were consistent (P < 0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; P = 0.01), a recent contact (OR, 2.3; P = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR, 2.7; P = 0.005) had higher estimated risks of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while an immunocompromised status had no effect. Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in their nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but the timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A Revell, Hanna Wardell, Timothy J SavageAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay, and converted to estimated VL (copies/mL) using internal or manufacturer data.Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 vs. 197 ages 0-4; 79 vs 97 ages 5-9; 69 vs 75 ages 10-13; 73 vs 109 ages 14-17) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value in asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (p< 0.0001), and VL 3-4 logs lower (p<0.0001); differences were consistent (p<0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (OR 6.5, p = 0.01), recent contact (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR 2.7, p = 0.005) had higher estimated risk of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while immunocompromise had no effect.Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in the nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
Jennifer Dien Bard - One of the best experts on this subject based on the ideXlab platform.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A RevellAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were (i) adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay and (ii) converted to estimated VL (numbers of copies per milliliter) using internal or manufacturer data. Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 asymptomatic versus 197 symptomatic children aged 0 to 4 years, 79 asymptomatic versus 97 symptomatic children aged 5 to 9 years, 69 asymptomatic versus 75 symptomatic children aged 10 to 13 years, 73 asymptomatic versus 109 symptomatic children aged 14 to 17 years) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value for asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001), and VL were 3 to 4 logs lower than for symptomatic children (P < 0.0001); differences were consistent (P < 0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 6.5; P = 0.01), a recent contact (OR, 2.3; P = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR, 2.7; P = 0.005) had higher estimated risks of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while an immunocompromised status had no effect. Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in their nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but the timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
-
comparison of upper respiratory viral load distributions in asymptomatic and symptomatic children diagnosed with sars cov 2 infection in Pediatric Hospital testing programs
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2020Co-Authors: Larry K Kociolek, William J Muller, Rebecca Yee, Jennifer Dien Bard, Cameron Brown, P A Revell, Hanna Wardell, Timothy J SavageAbstract:The distribution of upper respiratory viral loads (VL) in asymptomatic children infected with SARS-CoV-2 is unknown. We assessed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and estimated VL in infected asymptomatic children diagnosed in nine Pediatric Hospital testing programs. Records for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with positive clinical SARS-CoV-2 tests were reviewed. Ct values were adjusted by centering each value around the institutional median Ct value from symptomatic children tested with that assay, and converted to estimated VL (copies/mL) using internal or manufacturer data.Adjusted Ct values and estimated VL for asymptomatic versus symptomatic children (118 vs. 197 ages 0-4; 79 vs 97 ages 5-9; 69 vs 75 ages 10-13; 73 vs 109 ages 14-17) were compared. The median adjusted Ct value in asymptomatic children was 10.3 cycles higher than for symptomatic children (p< 0.0001), and VL 3-4 logs lower (p<0.0001); differences were consistent (p<0.0001) across all four age brackets. These differences were consistent across all institutions and by sex, ethnicity, and race. Asymptomatic children with diabetes (OR 6.5, p = 0.01), recent contact (OR 2.3, p = 0.02), and testing for surveillance (OR 2.7, p = 0.005) had higher estimated risk of having a Ct value in the lowest quartile than children without, while immunocompromise had no effect.Children with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower levels of virus in the nasopharynx/oropharynx than symptomatic children, but timing of infection relative to diagnosis likely impacted levels in asymptomatic children. Caution is recommended when choosing diagnostic tests for screening of asymptomatic children.
